Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P H Y S I C A L AT T R A C T I O N
Mo nda y, Jan uary 16 , 2 01 7
RECAP
Q: What key components make up a close relationship?
o Strong, frequent, diverse interdependence that lasts over a considerable period of time
Q: What theory predicts that fear or uncertainty drive humans to seek out relationships with others?
o Need for affiliation
Q: What theory proposes that humans seek out relationships to share positive/happy experiences?
o Need for intimacy
Q: What theory proposes that humans seek out relationships with others to share positive experiences as well
as during times of fear/uncertainty?
o Need for belongingness
Q: What are the steps in scientific research?
o Observable behaviour/phenomenon
o Hypothesis and generate a testable prediction
o Evaluate the prediction
o Revise/communicate results
PHYSICAL AT TRACTION
This is how most romantic relationships start
Experimental examples
Experiment with strippers: effects of ovulatory cycle on tip earnings
by lap dancers
o Women who are on the pill (dotted line) compared to normally cycling non-pill users (solid line)
o Being off the pill produces more dollars earned per shift: affected by pheromones (exuding different
quality/quantity of chemicals possibly pheromones)
Oral contraceptive use in women changes preferences for male facial masculinity
o Women on the pill prefer a different type of man compared to women not on the pill
o Pill users prefer men with effeminate features
o Non-pill users prefer more masculine men
How satisfied are women with their partners? (See graphs
below)
o On pill (grey) and not on pill (white)
o Women on the pill
Sexual satisfaction is lower
General satisfaction with relationship was
higher
Partner attractiveness (opinion) was lower
o Human nature: look for partner genetically
different from you
o Being on the pill tends to promote the opposite
controls the cycle and do not seek a partner who is
genetically very different from them (relatives are more likely to give support; less likely to leave you)
o Less masculine looking men: looked like better providers and fathers
o Relationships lasted 2 years longer on average (for pill users)
Buss, 1989
Multi-cultural study: from Belgium to Zambia (considered universal)
found that men prefer younger mates (2.66 years younger, on average)
men rated good looks as important
women rated earning potential as important
So me crit iq ue s o f p ap e r- pe nci l st ud ie s
Argument is that participants respond with what they think a good romantic partner ought to have
E arly st ud ies o n at t ra ct io n
Physical attractiveness is important: Walster et al., 1966
700 students participated in a dating game on a university campus
Subjects rated by experimenters on attractiveness; subjects rated their randomly assigned partners
Physical attractiveness of partner was the only predictor of how comfortable subjects felt on their date and
whether they would date again (participants looked at physical attractiveness as the primary factor for the
initiation of dating)
FACIAL AT TRACTIVENESS
Cunningham et al, 1995 tested men and women from many Latin, Asian and white cultures
Most subjects favoured: larger eyes, small noses, and a small chin
Womens features of attractiveness (favoured by men):
o narrow cheeks, high eyebrows, and smiles
Mens features of attractiveness (favoured by women):
o large eyes, prominent cheekbones, and chin
o high-status clothing and good grooming habits
Even if you have an attractive face, your body type may decrease your attractiveness in the opinion of
others (and vice versa)
Re ce nt fi nd ing s
Evolutionary Psychologists argue that facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism are valued
as attractive features between both genders (e.g., Rhodes, 2006)
o Sexual dimorphism: as soon as you look at a face, you are able to tell whether it is male/female
Argue that attractive features signal good health
o Studies try to figure out whether attractiveness does correlate with health or not
Do es be a ut y p red ict he a lt h?
Kalick et al (1998) tested Americans perception of health and beauty of late adolescents
Found that participants were blinded by attractive faces when making health judgments
i.e., there was no correlation between attractiveness and health
For some late adolescents, beauty masked their poor health
Pro t o t yp e s
Prototypes: mathematically averaged faces
o Participants preferred prototypes (Langlois et al, 1994)
o faces included symmetry as well (since faces were averaged)
o we have an idea of prototypes (an average face) in our brains
G ay p ref e re nce s
Bailey et al (1997)
Gay men preferred men who look and act masculine, and were straight acting
Lesbian women preferred partners who were female looking (i.e., did not have masculine features, such as
short hair, muscular build and high WHR)
Faci al symme t ry
Recreating faces using a single photograph
PERSONALITY
Attractiveness paints a rosy glow around potential mates
Leads to perception that attractive people have better personality
o i.e., we judge books by their covers
Study: What is beautiful is good (Dion et al, 1972)
o Subjects evaluated personalities and quality of life of men and women in photos
o If an individual is attractive, we tend to associate other positive aspects with that individual
o People rated as more attractive were associated with higher IQ, higher paying job
AT TRACTIVENESS OF CHILDREN
Evidence suggests that adults give more attractive children
preferential treatment as well
Dion (1972)
o children made to look more or less attractive; subjects
administered penalties for incorrect responses (removing pennies)
o men: did not discriminate based on looks
o women: penalized unattractive children more severely
they penalized unattractive males and attractive females more
C anad i an s t ud y
Harrell (news report)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/03/health/ugly-children-may-get-parental-short-shrift.html?_r=0
found that mothers and fathers were less likely to buckle less attractive children
CONTRAST EFFECT
Face perception research indicates that adapting to attractive faces leads to negative perception of an
average face (reverse for unattractive adaptation)
o E.g. if you spend a lot of time with models and get used to attractive faces, then the average face
will seem less attractive
Makeup is used to create more contrast in the face e.g. red lips, dark eyes, dark eyebrows
Our visual system is conducting a comparison between the 2 stimuli
Context effect demo
o Adaptation to a stimulus: animated spiral
o Picture of Brad Pitt looks like its being warped
PERSONAL DISPOSITIONS
Mood influences our ratings of others attractiveness
in bad mood lower attractiveness ratings
May and Hamilton (1980)
o induced positive, negative, or neutral mood using music and asked women to rate photos of men
o Congruency effect:
positive mood produced more attractive ratings;
negative mood produced more negative ratings
BEING IN A RELATIONSHIP
results in people rating others as less attractive
Evolutionary explanation: mechanism for relationship maintenance to ensure its longevity via reduction of
temptation
Being in a relationship makes the individuals in the relationship seem more attractive
BEING SINGLE
People become less discriminating the longer they are not in a relationship
Desperation shows an effect even on a short time frame
o Mickey Gilleys 1975 song Dont all the girls get prettier at closing time
o Pennebaker et al (1979) confirmed this finding in both genders (in a bar)
Peoples objective attractiveness (as perceived by others): creates a lower limit on the kinds of people they
may pair up with
Subjective attractiveness (self-perception): creates an upper limit on the kinds of partners people seek out
This creates a balance where people tend to date within their range of objective and subjective attractiveness
levels