Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rhodes v MacDonald was litigation originating from claims of ineligibility of US President Barack Obama
for his office, relative to claims pertaining to his place of birth.
In response for an Application for Stay of Execution (of sanctions) in Rhodes v MacDonald, submitted to the
US Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Applicant Orly Taitz was served by the US Supreme
Court with a purported order denying the application, albeit, such order was unsigned by Associate Justice
Thomas, and was not authenticated by a Clerk of the US Supreme Court.
Consequently, Applicant Taitz filed the motion, copied below, requesting the Chief Justice of the US Supreme
Court “for verification of signature of Justice Thomas.”
If Attorney Taitz were served by first class mail with an order of the US Supreme Court that was not
signed by a judge, and was not authenticated by a clerk, then it was a void, not voidable court record.
There simply is no other way to consider such paper.
Her motion should not have been for verification of signature... The notion is an oxymoron; you
cannot verify a non-existing verification. There is no legal foundation for such motion...
Her motion should have been for Due Process of Law - notice and service by the US Supreme Court
of orders and mandates that are verified by a Justice of the US Supreme Court and attested by the
Clerk of the US Supreme Court, such that require "full faith and credit" - pursuant to US Constitution,
Article IV, Section 1, Act of May 26, 1790, and Act of March 27, 1804.
Alternatively, since an unverified, unattested order was in fact failure to dispose of judicial matter, her
motion should have been for Justice Thomas to comply with the Code of Conduct of US Judges, and
expediently dispose of judicial matters brought before him.
See also similar conduct by Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827), where
Court Counsel served, with no authority at all, a notice of denial of the Application by former US
prosecutor Richard Fine for Stay of Execution (ongoing, 17 month solitary confinement with no
warrant and no entry of judgment/conviction in the case).
Complaint was consequently filed alleging public corruption by US Supreme Court Counsel Danny
Bickell. [1]
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
LINKS:
[1] http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/
10-07-01-Complaint-against-US-Supreme-Court-Counsel-Danny-Bickell-Alleged-Public-Corruption-
and-Deprivation-of-Rights-s
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights
violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County,
California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management
systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_____________
APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THE sanctions originally submitted to Justice
Clarence Thomas
cases were held for nearly a month, when it was told to the applicants, that the documents are undergoing Anthrax scan. It is highly
improbable, that someone would be working in the Supreme Court, when it is closed, particularly on inauguration day.
It is also of concern, that Justice Scalia could not remember any of the cases dealing with legitimacy of Barack Obama, particularly
in light of the fact that at the lecture he gave on March 9, 2009 he stated that the Justices pick for oral argument cases not based
on beauty of writing or legal argument, but based on importance to the country. What can be more important than legitimacy of a
person sitting in the position of the president and Commander in Chief?
Of Additional concern is the fact that in both cases unexplained activity happened, when the cases were to the detriment of Mr.
Obama, stating that he was not eligible to the presidency due to the fact that he had foreign allegiance and citizenship and due to
the fact that he refused and still refuses to unseal his original birth certificate, and the short version received does not show the
name of the hospital or doctor or signatures. Taitz also provided information, that the social security number used by Mr. Obama,
042-68-4425, was issued in the state of CT, while he resided in Hi, and it was issued to an elderly individual, born in 1890.
Points and authorities
Taitz cannot provide any points and authorities, as nothing like that ever happened in the Supreme Court and Taitz is requesting
your Honor to review the above Motion as the matter of first impression.
Relief requested
1. Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert (to be identified at a later date) and
view the orders pertaining to her cases and verify and clarify, that there is a valid signature of Justice Thomas and his clerk on the
denial of application 10A56, entered on the Docket on Saturday 17, 2010.
2. Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert and verify that there genuine
signatures of all nine Justices on the denial of her case 08A524 discussed in conference on January 23, 2009.
3. Taitz is requesting your Honor to grant her and her computer security expert (to be identified at a later date) access to the electronic
docket of the cases pertaining to her and her clients, in order to ascertain who made an entry in the docket 10A56 on Saturday, July
17, 2010 and who deleted the Application 08A 524 from the docket of the Supreme Court and whether such person was authorized to
make such changes to the docket.
Respectfully submitted
/s/_____________
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
07.20.10.
Certification
I certify that true and correct copy of the above was served on
Kumar Neal Katyal
Acting Solicitor General of the United States
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania ave, N.W.
Washington DC 20530-0001
US Commission
on Civil Rights
624 Ninth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20425 C
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders
The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya
Palais des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
International Criminal bar Hague
BPI-ICB-CAPI
Head Office
Neuhuyskade 94
2596 XM The Hague
The Netherlands
Tel : 0031 (70) 3268070
0031 (70) 3268070
Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531
Email: info@bpi-icb.org
Website: www.bpi-icb.org
Regional Office – Americas / Bureau régional – Amériques / Oficina regional – Américas
137, rue St-Pierre
Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2Y 3T5
Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757
001 (514) 289-
Fax : 001 (514) 289-8590
Email: admin@bpi-icb.org
Website: www.bpi-icb.org
Signed
/s/ Orly Taitz
Dr Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
z Page 6/6 July 21, 2010