Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Societal norms shape us into what it is or what it means to be a man or a woman. Going
back to my childhood it was sports and Pro-Wrestling. Looking up to iconic, larger than life
figures and idolizing to one day be like them. My family made it very clear what it was like to
be a man, and you never wanted to be called out for being a girl. My experiences are typical
and are pressed on boys and girls at a very early age. Boys given trucks and tool sets, girls given
dolls and easy-bake ovens. This was the society that I grew up in. I am 28 years old and have
only been involved in education for four years. However, things are drastically different from
While students who identify as gay, lesbian or bisexual have been around for a long time
and is nothing new, the buzz in the mainstream media today is the term transgender. A
transgender student is a person whose gender identity differs from the sex they were given at
birth. According to national survey conducted by the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education
Network (GLSEN), roughly 75% of students who identify as transgender feel unsafe at schools
(GLSEN, 2016). As students are going through school and begin to discover their sexuality,
ways in which to accommodate transgender students and make them feel safe is a rising issue
from the local level, all the way to the national level. This paper will look at the national
guidelines from the Obama and Trump Administration, state policies/guidelines, and how
schools and districts in our area have changed to accommodate transgender students. Through
research and review this paper will help to answer the question as to what rights transgender
students should have when choosing a bathroom or changing facilities in school districts.
3
In May of 2016, then President Barack Obama issued a Dear Colleague Letter (DCL)
addressing the hot button topic of transgender students in schools. In this letter the President
discussed how Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits sexual discrimination in
educational programs that receive Federal Financial Assistance (DCL, 2016). President Obama
and his team also clarified that this extends beyond biological characteristics of sex and includes
a persons gender identity. The DCL explained a variety of circumstances in which a school
would be evaluated by The Department of Education to ensure that schools were following the
guidelines in accordance with Federal Regulations and to make sure they were following those
obligations.
The hot button issue of bathrooms and locker room were addressed directly in the DCL
A school may provide separate facilities on the basis of sex, but must allow transgender
students access to such facilities consistent with their gender identity. A school may not require
transgender students to use facilities inconsistent with their gender identity or to use individual-
user facilities when other students are not required to do so. A school may, however, make
individual-user options available to all students who voluntarily seek additional privacy (DCL,
2016).
Fast forward to February of 2017, and Trump administration, passes an order to rescind
the guidelines made by President Obama. To be specific it was the Justice and Education
department under President Trump that rescinded the order on the basis that the previous
guidelines lacked a comprehensive legal analysis of Title IX or explain how the position is
consistent with the expressive language of Title IX (NPR, 2017). States like New Hampshire,
4
Colorado, Texas, and North Carolina have begun to reconstruct their laws to restrict the rights of
transgender students. With a country divided on the issue it is clear a direction is needed and it
States have decided to take a more inclusive approach. An article by The Register Guard
reports that the Oregon Department of Education sent out a 15 page document in 2016, allowing
transgender students to play on sports teams, use locker rooms, changing facilities, and have
preferred names be put on graduation diplomas. Salam Noor, Oregons Deputy Superintendent
of Public Instruction, says even though President Trump is rescinding the Obama
Administrations letter, Oregon schools will not be changing a thing (Roemeling, 2017). Studies
support the motion by the Oregon Department of Education. According to GLSEN, 53% of
individuals who identify as transgender are physically harassed, and nearly half of transgender
students have reported being physically assaulted according to the study. (GLSEN, p.18). With
high numbers is categories as serious as physical harassment and assault, it is clear that
transgender students who are struggling internally are also experiencing outside threats from
their peers. Schools can offer support for this by implementing more trans-inclusive
With no clear direction at the Federal level many states have taken the matter of
transgender bathroom rights into their own hands. I have analyzed three different states laws,
and or bill proposals. There are many similarities and also many differences in what is
suggested. In a study by the National School Climate Survey (2015), reported that they most
commonly avoid school bathrooms and locker rooms because they felt unsafe or uncomfortable
5
in those spaces. With such a national spotlight on bathrooms and locker room use for
transgender students, I felt it necessary to look at some state litigation or pending litigation.
Texas
In the middle of all the controversy, the state with possibly the biggest microscope
underneath it is the State of Texas. Known as Senate Bill 6, the proposal looks to restrict
bathroom use a persons biological sex. The State of Texas defines biological sex as the physical
condition of being male or female, which is stated on a persons birth certificate (Senate Bill
NO.6, 2016). The Senate Bill goes on to discuss the role of the school district and how it shall
handle students whose gender identity differs from what is on their birth certificate.
A school district or open-enrollment charter school shall adopt a policy requiring each
school or school facility to be designated for and used only by persons based on the persons
This makes it clear what school districts would be expected to do if this bill were to pass.
Senate Bill 6 would allow for accommodations to be made such as allowing a student to use a
single-occupancy bathroom or a controlled use of a faculty bathroom. However, this would have
to be at the request of the student. The bill continues this same type of restriction for any state
Texas does underline a few exceptions with Senate Bill 6. A person is allowed to go into
a bathroom that does not align with their biological sex as indicated on their birth certificate if it
is:
facility; or
To receive assistance using the facility (Senate Bill NO.6, 2016).
Senate Bill 6 also outlines a procedure for filing a complaint against a school district or state
This Bill does not come without its opposition. In March of 2017, the Senate State
Affairs Committee voted 8-1 to move the bathroom bill to the full chamber. This was after a
13 hour testimonial largely against the bill and it being possibly introduced as law (Ura, 2017).
Currently, the Texas bill is in the House and it appears to be losing its momentum according to
California
California. Known for its warm weather, sunshine, and A-list clientele. However,
California is also known for being ahead of the curve, and the issue with transgender bathroom
laws is no exception. In 2013 a bill was introduced and in 2014 it became law. Known as
Assembly Bill 1266 (AB 1266), I looked into the Senate Analyses done by the Senate Rules
Committee in California.
activities, and facilities including athletic teams and competitions, consistent with his/her gender
identity, regardless of the gender listed on the pupils records (AB 1266, 2013).
7
In the Bill, existing law is discussed and a stance is taken that no pupil can be
discriminated against on the basis of disability, gender, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion,
sexual orientation or any other classification that can be identified as a hate crime (AB 1266,
2013). This makes it clear that no pupil can be discriminated against based on their gender or
gender identity.
Although California seems to be the leading state for transgender rights in America, that
doesnt mean that this law has not been meant without its opposition. According to the
dailybulletin.com, in March of 2014 Gina Gleason, director of faith and public policy at Calvary
Chapel Chapino Hills, served Secretary of State Debra Brown with a referendum of over 131,000
signatures in an effort to retract the 2014 California law known as AB 1266 (Yarbrough, 2014).
Opponents of the bill claim that it allows the opportunity for members of the opposite sex to
gawk individuals at their most vulnerable, and allow for boys that identify as girls to dominate
high school sports. However, proponents of the bill point to the Los Angeles and San Francisco
Unified School district. These school districts have had transgender bathroom rights intact for
over a decade and they have never reported an issue when it comes to students violating or
Michigan
The mitten state seems to playing policy ping pong when it comes to the rights of
transgender students. When President Obama in 2016 sent his guidelines of his departments
interpretation of Title IX and the schools obligation to follow his interpretations in order to
continue to receive federal funding, it seemed to be very clear. Soon after President Obama sent
those guidelines to schools because of the schools desperately wanting and needing guidance, the
State Board of Education sent out very similar guidelines to Michigan schools. The guidelines
8
outlined what schools can do to help accommodate students who identify as lesbian, gay, bi-
The first of those guidelines where what schools can do to make a more inclusive school
clubs, development of anti-bullying policies, and LGBTQ topics across the curriculum (SBE,
2016). Along with the ways to make staff and policies more inclusive for LGBTQ students. The
State Board of Education also touched on the popular bathroom and locker room
accommodations for transgender students. Below is an excerpt from the State Board of
Education February 2016 discussing the way school should handle accommodations for
transgender students when it comes to bathrooms and locker rooms. The direction that the State
Board of Education resembles that of the California law mentioned above, and mirrors the
guidelines by President Obama. A snapshot or President Obamas guidelines are below as well.
While the State Board of Education and Michigan Department of Education agree with
allowing the rights for transgender students, that doesnt mean that it isnt meant without
opposition. Opponents of transgender bathroom rights are attempting to keep transgender pupils
Republican Senator Tom Casperson has proposed a bill into the Michigan Senate known
as Senate Bill NO.993 (SB 993). This bill would require students and the students parent or
legal guardian to submit a letter in writing for accommodations to be made if a students gender
identity doesnt align with his or her biological sex. This bill discusses what is considered
designated for use by pupils of the opposite biological sex if pupils of the
A single-occupancy restroom;
A unisex restroom; or
A controlled use of a restroom, locker room, or shower room that is
According to the Detroit Free Press, Senate members are not planning to put this Bill as a
top priority. That is not something that deflated the Republican Senator from Escanaba to
introduce the Bill. Republican Tom Casperson believes that his proposal provides reasonable
10
accommodations for students who identify as transgender. However, Amy Hunter who is a
liaison for the ACLU feels that the accommodations are far from reasonable and plans to fight
the proposal Democrats in the Senate feel the Bill is discriminatory and dangerous for students
who are already considered largely at risk and singled out (Gray, 2016).
In evaluating research it appears that a trans-inclusive environment is one that has the
most positive impact for all students and ensuring the safety for all members of a school district
and not just ones that fall into a category we define as normal. In allowing a trans-inclusive
environment you provide students with the opportunity to learn more about the culture and issues
that some transgender students face. Stemming from that understanding you allow meaningful
relationships to be built and the development of critical consciousness to take effect, which
allows for students to develop an in-depth understanding of the world (DePedro, Jackson,
Campbell, Gilley and Ciarelli, 2016). Those who side with allowing gender identity to define
which bathroom you choose is that the possibility of sexual assault. Advocates of the
transgender bathroom rights feel that you are more likely to feel objectified if you are forced to
share a bathroom or changing facility with someone who has identified as being attracted to the
During the cost and benefit analysis of this project I interviewed three individuals in my
school district. My goal is to pilot my school for such a program policy implementation and
interviewing members of my school district was a way for me to begin to have high authority
figures begin thinking about the policy. In each of my interviews the message was very similar.
The school district needs to provide protection for all students (Woodruff, personal interview,
March 17, 2017). One of our school board members discussed the process it may take for unisex
11
bathrooms to be used and things to consider when attempting to accommodate one specific group
of students.
We must take into consideration our rural districts that are trying to maintain a good
education to all students. It is not just a simple task or undergoing to say alright we can
accommodate for gender identity students. Districts cannot just go in and add bathrooms to
school buildings on a whim. It costs money, it takes planning, and it takes plumbing,
engineering & electrical to encompass something like a family use bathroom (Woodruff
These types of concerns are legitimate and need to be taken into account. According to
Alejandro Ortiz, founding architect of the prolific Ortiz Architects of Los Angeles. Considering
that layout changes may be necessary for smaller businesses that dont have the space to simply
rededicate other bathrooms, this cost could range between $20,000 up to $50,000 (Campbell,
2016). These type of costs raise major concerns and should be taken into account when
Of course that is if schools decide to create more unisex bathrooms. If schools simply
allow transgender students to choose the bathroom which they identify then cost of installing
private stalls and curtains could be made very minimal and support all student in the attempts for
students to have that sense of privacy while in the restrooms, or changing facilities.
This issue appears to be split which is why so much attention has surrounded. Both sides
on the policy issue are reacting to the issue and others, like that state of California, and have been
proactive in establishing where it stands on student rights. The issues of equity and diversity are
extremely relevant in this case. Proponents for transgender rights, want students to not be further
12
singled out and want to give those students the freedom to choose what bathroom they identify
with. Others want to protect the rights of students who are not transgender, and feel that anti-
bullying policies and other supports are in place to help transgender students accommodate, but
that doesnt stretch to bathroom rights according to opponents. Title IX is foggy in this area as
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation
in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or
activity receiving Federal financial assistance (Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of
1972).
To some states sex includes sexual orientation, and gender identity. However, other
states look at the literal meaning of the law and see the word sex as it is defined which is the
biological makeup that we are assigned at birth. This makes the debate even more heated and
will likely be settled by the Supreme Court to interpret the Title IX law.
The issue boils down to interpretation. While amendments like the Fourteenth
Amendment guarantees equal protection for all, and laws like Title IX guarantee no
discrimination based on sex, most of those who oppose accommodating gender neutral
bathrooms or allowing a student to choose a bathroom that they identify with only are further
segregating schools. According to Maria Newhouse, schools are sending a clear message to
transgender students about who fits in, who is accepted and who is not and can be incredibly
impactful to identity development (Newhouse, 2013). Newhouse all discusses how many
individuals and institutions do not have full blown aggressions towards the transgender
unconscious forms of prejudice and discrimination. The microaggressions take multiple forms
13
including a school climate, students pointing and starring at a transgender student, and by
ignoring these types of aggression then we only send the message that these transgender rights
are not important and we must look to conform a safe haven for these students and accommodate
policy that invites these students to feel safe and comfortable at school.
Solution
As the country remains grounded in litigation and rural communities are divided on the
issue, the content of such a proposal remains to be a difficult one. School districts such as the
Los Angeles Unified School District have adopted this policy for years and there has never been
an issue where a student or group of students have violated this policy. In our school districts we
teach students to be tolerant and appreciative of other cultures, religions, and all around
differences. We are taught to embrace the differences of others and accept differences whether
we agree with them or not. The world we live in is ever changing and evolving. While our
differences may be noticed more than ever now a days we must send the correct message to our
students that we are accepting of those differences and embrace the qualities that make a student
different.
Not adopting a transgender bathroom policy, and mandating that students must use
bathrooms related to their biological sex, then we are inadvertently supporting out casting people
because they are different. Our subconscious behavior and mandating of such a policy would
only undermine the very philosophy we are trying to teach. It would be my opinion that our
Implementing a policy can be a very trick situation. The research of Frances Fowler have
helped with identifying several instruments to use when implementing policy changes. The
policy instruments I chose for the implementation of policy for allowing transgender students to
14
choose which bathroom they want based on their gender identity was mandates, and hortatory
policy instruments.
Mandates
Mandates as policy instruments encompass two components. The first, is language that
spells out required behavior for all people in a specific social group, and the second is a
prescribed penalty for those who fail to comply (Fowler, 2013). I feel this is one of the best
policy instruments to use because schools needs a written policy in regards to students who
identify as transgender. Without a formal policy it can leave schools open to interpretation and
possible litigation as it has in the case of Gavin Grimm v. The Gloucester County School Board.
Gavin was a high school student in Virginia. He is a transgender boy and as a 10th grader
began to transition. During the transition phase the school allowed Gavin to use the boys
bathroom for a period of two months. After complaints from parents and the community began
to come in, the school decided to adopt a policy that was approved by the school board, to only
allow students to use the bathrooms and locker rooms based on their biological sex. Gavin and
his parents felt that this was unconstitutional and sued the school board for violations of Gavins
Fourteenth amendment and Title IX rights. The district court dismissed Gavins case, and it was
appealed to the U.S Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit court where the lower courts decisions was
overturned in favor of Gavin. The Gloucester County School Board then appealed to the United
States Supreme Court. The U.S Supreme Court has since sent the decision back to the Fourth
Circuit Court and has asked the courts to take into account the Department of Education and
Department of Justice rescinding of the President Obama Guidelines that was the basis of the
This case is a prime example of not having a policy that is concrete. By allowing Gavin
to use the restroom and then allowing the community pressure to influence policy, leaves much
to question in regards to the basis and nature of such a policy and could leave the Gloucester
County School Board in a very big hole when a decision is finally reached.
Allowing for a written policy or language to be in board policy and in the handbook
allows for it to be clear and concise and by default, any violation of that policy is clear and
concise, which would put the school at possible grounds for litigation.
The hortatory policy instrument described in the Fowler text, discusses how a policy
based on hortatory ideology is one that is persuasive in nature and uses a variety of symbolism
and imagery in order to gain support for its cause (Fowler, 2013). I felt that this policy was
appropriate as an implementation method in the beginning stages because it has the potential to
gain support and persuade staff, students, and community members. I feel the hortatory policy
Fowler also discusses in chapter 9 how when political support is weak, a hortatory policy
is one that has the best chance of success if that support is weak (Fowler, 2013). A main
component would be to raise awareness through small curriculum integration in subject areas,
working with the School Improvement Team. Introduction to such topics can lead to a better
Target Audience
My target audience are the students, staff, administration, school board, and community
members of Farwell as well as administrators from our area RESD. Attempting to persuade this
16
very conservative group(s) will be my biggest challenge. That is why I feel that hortatory
method would be the best method to begin my campaign for support and persuade individuals to
understand that we live in an ever changing world and our school is attempting to change with
the times. The plan would be to first open the idea for discussion at the RESD level with other
administrators. This topic was on the agenda at our last meeting and it was something that we
never had gotten to. So, I would request that the topic be on the agenda again and from there I
would walk administrators through the Educational Policy website and discuss my topic via the
portal on the website. Allowing this easy access for administrators to not only view my topic but
other topics of educational policy would be something beneficial to all administrators and
In a report by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), when it comes
to school safety and experiences of harassment and assault, 69% of transgender students felt
unsafe in school because of their sexual orientation (GLSEN, 2009). A staggering 89% of
transgender students were verbally harassed in the past year due to their sexual orientation and
gender expression (GLSEN, 2009). These numbers are staggering and my district as well as
many others across the country have strict policies against harassment and bullying, many of
these cases go unreported because students do not want to be potentially further objectified to
being separated from their peer groups and being made a social outcast further (GLSEN, 2009).
Transgender students are significantly more likely to attempt or complete suicide. In fact,
one out of every two people who identify as transgender have contemplated suicide, and one out
of every four have attempted suicide (Watson, 2016). This concept of transgender is not new but
17
in regards to law it is something that is evolving and has been a challenge for the courts to rule
The Department of Education (DOE) has taken a strong stance under the Obama
administration to define and interpret Title IX and the term sex to include gender identity.
However, federal courts have more so been leaning toward disagreeing with the DOE and many
federal courts have upheld school policies to restrict transgender bathroom use and facility use to
the students sex at birth. A number of states do not allow people who are transgender use
bathrooms based their identity, but there biological sex and law and rulings have supported that
Many schools have laws prohibiting harassment as I stated earlier, my school district is
one of them. However, an argument can be made that by not allowing students to choose a
bathroom that matches their identity then we further segregate them from being able to conform
with the gender group in which they identify with, by not allowing this to happen school districts
further subject that transgender student to feeling like a social outcast and are in fact
subconsciously, for lack of a better term, alienating these students and increasing the likelihood
transgender, feel excluded or deliberately left out by other peers, and 62% report being electronic
extend far beyond the walls at school, and can drastically effect the life of a transgender student
outside of school walls. Many school districts, like in New York, have students and parents fill
out documentation that transitions that student into becoming whatever sex he or she decides
they want to be and according to the DOE report on Example of Policies and Emerging Practices
for Supporting Transgender Students, school districts such as New York have their students fill
18
out the proper paperwork and as long as the parents and students have submitted the proper paper
work to where the student is now being classified by the gender he or she wishes, then that
student now has access to all facilities that the gender would entail, including bathroom or
changing room facilities (NYCRR 466.13). A policy like this is proactive and provides an
avenue where all students can feel comfortable and be successful in school.
According to the Journal of College Admissions (2013), is average age for a student
coming out and being open to their gender identity is age 16. Typical students at that age are
struggling with dating, school, sports, and just finding their place in the world. Now add not
feeling comfortable in your own skin because you struggle with accepting your gender identity
and even more so feeling like no one will accept your identity, including your school district
where everything is supposed to be safe and providing you the best accommodations to learn.
The steps for implementing this type of policy is one that really needs to be handled with
care and delicacy. My school district tends to be more conservative, and because of that
implementing such a policy will take a couple years. As I discussed earlier the first stages would
education aimed toward certain aspects of fitness, dietary guidelines, and sex education. It has
been district policy in the high school for many years to focus on these aspects of health when
teaching such subject matter. Our health curriculum has not discuss sexual orientation or gender
identity issues. This would be my first step in implementation. To raise awareness on the issue
and allow students to understand the struggles of a student who is transgender or struggling with
gender identity.
19
Another step would be to try and include transgender issues across the curriculum. For
example along with the health discussion students would be having students read a book in
English about a boy or girl who struggles with gender identity and are expected to engage in a
paper or some sort of exercise where they have to put their thoughts on paper. Having a
curriculum night would be another step to where we begin to take the steps to introduce these
a staff meeting to prep them on this and prepare to defend the curriculum choices and why
An article by the Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (2016), discusses
The steps of developing critical consciousness involve the opportunity for a person to observe
and reject oppressions in society. An example of this would be our health teacher showing a
video of a transgender student who was killed by a classmate, and or an interview with a
transgender student who speaks out about his or her experience with bullying. This develops
sympathy for the victim and helps students and potentially parents begin to be more open to the
idea of curriculum integration and potentially policy change, down the road (DePedro, Jackson,
Campbell, Gilley, and Ciarelli, 2016). This type of critical consciousness development goes
individuals or groups to change their thinking and begin understand why a policy is needed.
The next step after the integration of curriculum content to focus on transgender or
LGBTQ students is to provide staff the opportunity to learn more about the transgender
movement and how we can help these students be successful in our school. I believe this
20
professional development would need to be focused and interactive in an attempt to really get
staff involved in the process and allow them to voice their opinions on the topic. By allowing
them to voice their opinions we allow for them to feel like they are heard, in future PD we then
could start to look at our policy and in particular how policies are could be tweaked to potentially
The next step would be to have a meeting that allows staff to discuss the possible
implementation of a transgender policy that would allow student to choose a bathroom based on
their gender identity. Again, this would be an open format meeting and we would discuss
positives and potential drawbacks for this. It is crucial that at this stage administration have data
and examples of policies that have worked in the other states and really looking at the data to
show them that implementing this policy is something that has been done and been done very
The next step in the process is having the potentially drafted policy go to the
administration team in my school district and we would engage in conversation to the potential
positives and pitfalls of this policy. Whatever is discussed goes back and is tweaked, taken to the
high school staff team for approval to the changes to have buy in with the policy remain high,
and then back to the administration team for approval. Once it is approved, we would put the
potential policy change on the school board meeting agenda for discussion to allow the
community to voice their opinion in an open forum. Depending on how that meeting goes we
would either move forward and at the next board meeting implement the policy as official
policy and allow for its immediate implementation. If the meeting does not go well we table the
policy and go back to hortatory methods to attempt to educate the community with why this is
Eventually, if all goes according to plan we will gain community support and take the
policy to the board again for discussion and then an action for the board to vote on the issue. If it
passes then we implement immediately and move to phase two of the implementation phase of
mandating. When the policy become mandated we have to support the policy and make sure that
all staff is following the new policy. However, this should be relatively simple given the buy in
process had already involved teachers and allowed for them to become comfortable with the
policy, and the implementation of transgender issues into the curriculum have allowed them to
I anticipate this implementation process taking approximately two year. Given the strong
conservative roots in the district, the fact that no schools have a policy like this in our
surrounding areas, the fact we have no transgender student in our district, and we have leadership
that has actively shut down youth groups promoting LGBTQ clubs is a lot to handle. This
implementation needs to be done with care and precision. Failure to miscue one step could send
the entire plan into a massive collapse. The health classes are my first goal and eventually
spreading to other classrooms for inclusion. In that health class I want to make a curriculum
guide/list of topics covered in health class so student can take it home and parents can see that
we are discussing gender identity and expression in health class. I like health class because it is
required by all students so if we can get a curriculum guide to send home with a brief overview
of what is covered, which includes gender identity, then we begin to get exposure to parents, who
Steps for implementation are crucial and the ideas above are a great start to specific for
incorporating those ideas in the classroom below are a list of steps that I have researched and
have proven to be successful for the University of Massachusetts (2015), and how they have
22
dealt with community, staff and student questions or concerns, as I feel school districts in my
These steps allow for schools to be prepared and mimics a hortatory approach to policy
Conclusion
My solution does not allow for students who identify as transgender to only use stalls that
are unisex or staff bathrooms. This is an approach that only further alienates the students and
doesnt prepare them for the societal changes that he or she will be associated with when they
leave our school. Our main job as educators is to prepare students for life in the 21st century, this
goes beyond what we teach in the classroom but also by what we do outside of the classroom.
Having transgender students understand and learn what it will be like going to the bathroom or
changing facility with someone who is the same gender but the opposite sex. Interacting with
peers of the same gender, and developing relationships with others as a transgender boy or girl.
These are all factors and teachable moments that will influence the student for the rest of their
life. School districts are so much more then educational institutions. They help students figure
out where they are in the world and learn some of those valuable lessons that stretch outside of
the classroom, but it is also unique to where when something does arise or an issue occurs, the
students have the safety of teachers and administrators to help mentor students and discuss what
is appropriate and why it is appropriate. We are secondary family members to these students and
23
teach students what is right or wrong, we teach student tolerance and conformity, we allow
References
Anti-transgender 'bathroom bill' could cost North Carolina nearly $4 billion. (2017, March 27).
bathroom-bill-could-cost-north-carolina-nearly-4-billion-tmwsp/
Examples-of-Policies-and-Emerging-Practices-for.html
Details, scope of Texas' transgender bathroom bill less and less clear | Texas Legislature. (2016,
legislature/2016/12/09/proposed-transgender-bathroom-restrictions-might-apply-texas-
schools-businesses-sporting-venues
Dodds v. United State Department of Education , No. 845 F.3d 217 (United States Court of
Fowler, F. C. (2014). Policy studies for educational leaders: an introduction (4th ed.). Pearson.
24
G.G v. Gloucester County School Board , Westlaw 1-26 (United States Court of Appeals: Fourth
Circuit April 19, 2016) (Westlaw, Central Michigan University, Dist. file).
Gray, K. (2016, May 25). Transgender bathroom bill debuts, but isn't a priority. Retrieved March
bathroom-bill-debuts-but-isnt-priority/84917386/
Greytak, E. A., Kosciw, J. G., & Diaz, E. M. (2009). Harsh Realities: The Experience of
Transgender Youth in Our Nation's Schools (pp. 1-67, Rep.). New York, NY: Gay,
f0e6-43aa-9038-1e357e3163ea.PDF
Hersher, R., & Johnson, C. (2017, February 22). Trump Administration Rescinds Obama Rule
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/22/516664633/trump-administration-
rescinds-obama-rule-on-transgender-students-bathroom-use
Kaiser, M. M., Seitz, K. M., & Walters, E. A. (2014). Transgender Policy. Journal of Cases in
Kosciw, J. G., Greytak, E. A., Palmer, N. A., & Boesen, M. J. (2014). The 2013 National School
https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2013%20National%20School%20Climate
%20Survey%20Full%20Report_0.pdf
Kralik, J. (2017, March 20). "Bathroom Bill" Legislative Tracking . Retrieved March 30, 2017,
from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/-bathroom-bill-legislative-
tracking635951130.aspx
McGowan, C., George, K., & Dempsey, T. (n.d.). Creating A Safe& Affirming School
25
Environment for Transgender and Nonconforming Students. Retrieved April 24, 2017,
from http://206.166.105.35/spec-ed/np_handouts/2014/session20-1.pdf
McKenna, B. (2014). The Transgender Dilema (Rep.). Retrieved March 29, 2017, from Federal
Transgender Students. Journal of College Admission, 23-27. Retrieved April 22, 2017,
Pedro, K. D. (n.d.). Creating Trans-inclusive Schools: Introductory Activities that Enhance the
http://www.academia.edu/12563253/Creating_Trans-
inclusive_Schools_Introductory_Activities_that_Enhance_the_Critical_Consciousness_
of_Future_Educators
Samuels, A. (2017, February 18). Here's how the. Retrieved March 30, 2017, from
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/02/18/heres-how-bathroom-bills-north-carolina-and-
texas-measure/
(2016).
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB1266
The Case Against Fully Shifting To Gender Neutral Bathrooms. (2015, December 02). Retrieved
26
neutral-bathrooms/
The Real Cost of Gender-Neutral Restrooms Diversity. (2016, October 11). Retrieved April 25,
Title IX and Sex Discrimination. (2015, October 15). Retrieved March 30, 2017, from
https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/tix_dis.html
To promote Texas' bathroom bill, Dan Patrick turns to anti-LGBT groups | Texas Legislature.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/texas-legislature/2017/03/29/dan-patrick-taps-groups-
anti-lgbt-past-promote-bathroom-bill
Tunac De Pedro , K., Jackson, C., Campbell, E., Giley, J., & Ciarelli, B. (2016). Creating Trans-
Yarbrough, B. (2014, March 25). California transgender law opponents file suit against Secretary
news/20140325/california-transgender-law-opponents-file-suit-against-secretary-of-state