Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ethanolic Leaf
Extract
(Ungab, Reymar S.)
Preparation of
Dragendorrfs reagent:
Solution A: A mass of
0.85 g of bismuth (III)
nitrate was dissolved in
a mixture of 10.00 mL
Figure 3 TLC Plates acetic acid and 40.00
Spotting the Plates: In mL water.
spotting the plates a
Solution B: A mass of
micropipette was used and
8.00 g potassium
2000ppm of the concentrated
iodide (KI) was
sample was prepared from the
dissolved in 20.00 mL
concentrated plant extract.
of water. Stock
Approximately 5 L prepared
solution: Equal parts of
extract solution was liberally
solutions A & B were
placed in the spot plate. The
mixed.
solvent was then allowed to
evaporate.
Dragendorrfs reagent:
One mL of stock d. Test for Saponins: One
solution, 2.00 mL of TLC plate were placed
acetic acid and 10.00 in the developing
mL of water were chamber. The solvent
mixed. system used for the
determination saponins
b. Test for Flavonoids: was chloroform:
One TLC plate were methanol (30:5). The
placed in the developed
developing chamber. chromatograms were
The solvent system oven-dried and sprayed
used for the with vanillin sulfuric
determination of acid solution. Violet
flavonoids was ethyl spots would indicate
acetate: glacial acetic the presence of
acid: water (90:10:10). saponins.
The developed
chromatograms were e. Test for Tannins: One
air-dried and sprayed TLC plate were placed
with 5% ferric chloride in the developing
solution. Gray spots chamber. The solvent
would indicate the system used for the
presence of flavonoids. determination of
tannins was
c. Test for Phenols: One chloroform: methanol:
TLC plate were placed water (65:35:10). The
in the developing developed
chamber. The solvent chromatograms were
system used for the oven-dried and sprayed
determination of with 0.5% (w/v) vanillin
phenols was ethyl solution prepared in 4%
acetate: formic acid: (w/v) HCl. Blue spots
acetic acid: water would indicate the
(100:11:11:26). The presence of tannins.
developed
Results & Discussion
chromatograms were
air-dried and sprayed Phytochemical screening is of
with 2% ferric chloride great interest and importance
in ethanol. Bright blue especially for the pharmaceuticals
spots would indicate in discovering bio-active
the presence of compounds. Together with this,
phenols. the systematic screening of plant
species with the purpose of preliminary phytochemical
discovering new bioactive screening of the Chromolaena
compounds is a common activity odorata L. ethanolic extract. The
in many laboratories nowadays qualitative phytochemical analysis
with the objective of identifying revealed no positive result as
the phytochemical constituents shown in the figure 4 below in any
present. of the five phytochemical
constituents tested. These results
Preliminary data that should
disagree with the study of
be obtained this activity was the
Vijayaraghavan et al. (2013) in
moisture content of the leaf
which presence of flavonoids,
samples from Hagonoy
phenols, saponins and tannins
(Chromolaena odorata L.) plant.
were confirmed from the
According to the study of Igboh et
Chromolaena odorata L. ethanolic
al. (2009), moisture content of
extracts. Using methanol as
hagonoy leaf is 60% but
extracting solvent on the other
experimentally it was not
hand as with the study of Harini et
determined due to loss of some of
al. (2014), all of the five
the dried samples because of
phytochemical constituents tested
heavy winds. The percent yield
in this activity which are alkaloids,
was not also calculated as
flavonoids, phenols, saponins and
samples was not totally dried.
tannins were present.
Table 1. Preliminary
phytochemical screening of
the ethanolic extract of
Chromolaena
Plant Observation
Constitu
ent
Alkaloids (-) no visible orange
spots
Flavonoi (-) visible gray spots Figure 4 Developed TLC Plate
ds
Phenols (-) no visible bright The discrepancies of the
blue spots result of this activity from the data
Saponins (-) visible violet spots provided by literatures can be
Tannins (-) no visible blue accounted primarily to the
spots different preferences on sampling
Legend: + = positive; - = sites, which consequently would
negative mean variation on environmental
factors such as climate, altitude
The table 1 above shows the and rainfall that would eventually
summary of the results of the produce major variations in the
bioactive compounds present in all the five phytochemicals. But
the plants (GEETHA, 2014). this disagreement could be
Another major factors that could attributed to several factors
be the reason of the negative namely: location, concentration of
results are the concentration of sample solution and choice of
the sample solution, the choice of extracting solvent.
extracting solvent and premature
Considering the results
visualization. Concentration of the
obtained given the certain
sample solution used was 2000
conditions, it is recommended that
ppm, this concentration might be
extraction must be done using
a little bit low to be able observe
different solvents, more
the presence of the tested
concentrated sample solution and
phytochemicals qualitatively. The
using plant sample exposed to
choice of extracting solvent is also
different environmental stresses.
a factor that cannot be ignored.
Type of solvent plays an important Reference
role in the extraction of
phytochemical composition since AKINMOLADUN, A.C., E.O. IBUKUN,
different type of different solvent E. AFOR, E.M. OBUOTOR AND E.O
have different extracting impact FAROMBI, 2007. Pytochemical
(Ngo, 2017). With this reason, the constituents and antioxidant
capacity of ethanol might not be activity of extract from the leaves
enough to extract enough amount of the Ocimum graticcimum. Sci.
of phytochemical constituents Res. Essay, 2:163_166
from the Chromolaena odorata L. GEETHA, T. & GEETHA, N. 2014.
leaf. Lastly, during visualization Phytochemical Screening,
the plate may not be dried enough Quantitative Analysis of Primary
and could therefore causen pre- and Secondary Metabolites of
mature visualization and will
Cymbopogan citratus(DC) stapf.
eventually give a negative result.
leaves from Kodaikanal hills,
Conclusions & Tamilnadu
Recommendations
HARINI, K., JERLIN SHOWMYA J. AND
The result showed negative GEETHA N. (2014). Phytochemical
presence of the five Constituents of Different Extracts
phytochemical constituents. from the Leaves of Chromolaena
Therefore it was concluded that
odorata L. King and Robinson.
Chromolaena odorata L. is not a
International Journal of
good candidate to a source of
useful drugs. Although literatures Pharmaceutical Sciences and
disagree with this result stating Business Management, Vol.2 Issue.
that the plant sample 12, December- 2014, pg. 13-20
Chromolaena odorata L. contains ISSN: 2310-6913
NGO, AND QUAN VAN VUONG.
IGBOH, MN; IKEWUCHI, JC; Impact of Different Extraction
IKEWUCHI, CC, (2009). Chemical Solvents on Bioactive Compounds
Profile of Chromolaena odorata L. and Antioxidant Capacity from the
(King and Robinson) Leaves. Pak J Root of Salacia chinensis L.,
Nutr, 8(5): 521-524. Journal of Food Quality, vol. 2017,
Article ID 9305047, 8 pages, 2017.
KUMAR, M., K. SRIDEVI , N.M.S. doi:10.1155/2017/9305047
NANDURI AND S. RAJAGOPAL, 2004.
VIJAYARAGHAVAN, K., MOHAMAD
Anticancer and immune
ALI, S. AND MARUTHI R. (2013).
stimulatory compounds from
Studies On PhytochemicaL
Andrographis paniculata. J.
Screening And Antioxidant Activity
Ethanopharma., 92: 291_295
Of Chromolaena odorata And
Annona squamosal. International
PAVIA, D. et al., 1988. Introduction
Journal of Innovative Research in
to Organic Laboratory Techniques.
Science, Engineering and
A Contemporary Aprroach. 3rd ed.
Technology. ISSN: 2319-8753
Saunder College Publishing. USA