MEETING STARTS AT 10.

00

SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 1
2
14 CIGRE NCs covering population of 266 million
* Potential of 5 new NCs with population 21 million

3
 COMPOSITION OF SEERC CIGRE RWG -01
MEMBERS of SEERC RWG 01 COUNTRY
Lugschitz, Reich AUSTRIA
Miroevi, Rubini, Mihali, Dundovi, ui, Filipovi-Gri, Pavi CROATIA
Vertanik, Rebolj, Staraini, Baki, Zadnik SLOVENIA
Posati, Berardi, Cauzillo, Emma ITALY
Petrovi, SERBIA
Nemeth, HUNGARY
Bondarenko 1, Bondarenko 2, Kolomiiets, Solohub, Yandulskiy UKRAINE
Shutinoski, Trajkov, Gajdrdzjiski, Atanasoski, Nikoli, Gerasimovski MACEDONIA

SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 4
 Presented at the first meeting (22 Sept 2016 Zagreb)
Present Apologized
H. Lugschitz, G. Miroevi, Z. Rubini, K. Reich, A. Posati, P. Berardi, prof. Cauzillo

D. Mihali, Y. Bondarenko, J. Bondarenko, R. Emma, M. Staraini, B. Zadnik, I. Pavi,

O. Kolomiiets, O. Solohub, N. Petrovi, B. Nemeth, J. Gerasimovski

S. Shutinoski, Z. Trajkov, N. Nikoli, Total: 10 from 6 countries

B. Gajdrdzijski, R. Atanasoski,

Dundovi, ui, B. Filipovi-Gri,

K. Baki, B. Vrtanik, J. Rebolj

Total: 20 from 6 countries

Meeting starts at 10.00 and finished at 14.30.

SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 5
 SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 6
 SEERC REGIONAL WG 01 STANDARDS FOR OHL's
QUESTIONNAIRE DISCUSSION (Sept 2016)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Review of experience and design practices related to
Reliability of Overhead power lines
2. Review of experience and design practices related to
Wind velocities and ice loads
3. Review of experience and design practices related to
Electrical clearances
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 7
 Q1: Reliability of Overhead power lines
Table 1 - Reliability of overhead lines
Clause 3.2.2 - Table 3.1 EN 50341-1

Annex B.2 Annex B.3

Return
Reliability level period Ice load
T [years] Wind velocity per conductor length

3 Nominal wind velocity V3 Nominal ice load I3 = IH

1 50 Extreme wind velocity V50 Extreme ice load I50

2 150
Extreme wind velocity VT Extreme ice load IT = IL
3 500

8
 Q2: Wind velocities and ice loads
Q2 could be useful to improving the reliability of overhead line networks on regional
level. Atmospheric icing is a general term for several types of ice accretions. Most
relevant types for electrical power overhead lines are in-cloud icing (rime icing),
freezing rain (glaze ice) and wet snow. (more detailed description is in CIGRE TB 291
Guidelines for meteorological icing models, statistical methods and topographical
effects (Cigr, 2006), and ISO 12494 Atmospheric icing (ISO, 2001)

This Survey could be broken into following parts:

Part 1: Freezing rain (glaze ice) loadings as treated in design codes, standards and
operational experience
Part 2: Wet snow loadings as treated in design codes, standards and operational
experience
-----------
Part 3: Collection of specific data for glaze ice load assessments
Part 4: Collection of specific data for wet snow load assessments
-----------
Part 5: Restoration measures
Part 6: Electrical failures due to glaze ice and wet snow
Part 7: Methods used for Removal
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9
Extreme and nominal wind velocities and ice loads

Extreme and nominal wind

EN 50341-1:2012
velocities and ice loads
Clause 3.2.2 B.2 B.3

Signification Equation Reliability Wind Ice

Extreme wind velocity VT = CT V50 Def. Eq -

Nominal wind velocity V3 = C3 V50 Def. Eq -

Extreme ice load IT = gI I50 Def. - Eq

Nominal ice load I3 = YI I50 Def. - Eq

10
Combined wind velocities and ice loads

Combined wind EN 50341-1:2012

velocities and ice Clause 4.6.6 B.2 B.3
loads

Signification Equation Comb Wind Ice

.
Low probability wind VIL = VT BI = (V50 W Eq VT -
velocity ) BI
High probability wind VIH = V3 BI or V50 Eq V3 -
velocity W
Extreme ice load IT = I I50 Eq - IT
Nominal ice load I3 = I I50 Eq - I3

11
ICE LOAD - WORLD RECORD

OHL 22 kV with load 305 kg/m in Norway (April 1961)

(CIGRE presentation by M.Fikke, Photo: O.Wist)
631 2015 Coatings for Protecting Overhead Power Network
Equipment in Winter Conditions
645 2016 Meteorological data for assessing climatic
loads on overhead lines

14
EXAMPLE IN GERMANY on 25 November 2005

Normal value
Ice loadings were 15 times higher than
standardized values Values in Alpen
Actual loadings
on 25Nov2016

This extreme loadings caused damages: 25 km of 110/220 kV lines

collapsed and 120 km of MV/LV OHLs

16
Wind and ice loads for minimum air clearances
with new standard
Wind and ice loads EN 50341-1:2012
for minimum air
Clause 5.6 4.3.5 B.3
clearances
Signification Equation Min. Wind Ice
air 10
clear. min

Extreme wind load QW50 = QWx (qh/qp) X Eq -

Nominal wind load QW3 = QWx (qh /qp) X Eq -
(V3/V50)2

Extreme ice load I50 X - Eq

17
 Partial factors and combination factors for
actions in the ultimate limit state
Partial factor for an Combination
Action (Table 4.7)
action factor
Reliability
Clau
Action in the ultimate limit state Symbol Symbol level Symbol Value
se
1 2 3
Climatic loads (Variable actions):
4.3.5 Wind load on any line component QWx W 1,0 1,20 1,4 W 0,4
4.5.2 Ice load on a support from any sub- QI I 1,0 1,25 1,5 I 0,35
conductor
4.2 Permanent loads (Permanent G G 1,0 - -
actions): Self-weight
4.8 Security loads (Accidental actions): A A 1,0 - -
Torsional loads / Longitudinal loads

4.9 Safety loads: QP P 1,5 - -

Construction and maintenance loads*
Loads due to the weight of linesmen
The partial factors on actions mentioned above should be considered in conjunction with the partial factors on material
properties, which are defined in other clauses of this standard.
*The combination value of wind and ice actions may be taken as the actual forces likely to occur during
18
construction and maintenance. Frequently, the effects of wind and ice actions may be neglected.
Third potential survey:
Q3: Electrical clearances collection by countries

Method used, mathematical formula

Internal clearances
External clearances

Collection of the regulations for EMF, corona noise,

19
SUGESTIONS FOR WORKING PROGRAM AND DELIVERY DOCUMENT
WP PUBLICIZE

Questionnaire: current practice

against future plans
To prepare a kind of guidelines for
probabilistic approach
Collection of data in region in
practice as usual
All members prepare case study
using examples published in
EN 50341-1>2012

Next meeting in March 2017 in

Macedonia have to be confired

SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 20
Why, What, How,?
What does it mean standard? story from 1138
In science and technology , English word standard is used with
two different meanings: as a normative document and also as a
measurement standard (etalon in French). Here we continue
with first meaning.

Standards organizations: ISO/IEC Guide 2004

a) International: IEC (1906)
b) Regional: CENELEC (1973)
c) National level: SIST (2000), BS, DIN

SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 21
 The history of the term standard
First time in history term standard was introduced in English
language in 1138 during war between Scots and English people in
famous "Battle of Standard near Northallerton, Yorkshire.

The current Archbishop of York, Thurstan,

gathered local barons and organize militia to
defense against Scotchs king David. Militia
marched under religious banners, or
standards, bearing the symbols of the patron
saints of their cities, St. Peter, St. John, and St.
Wilfred, respectively. It is these standards
that eventually gave their name to the conflict
that followed. But name was example of
Italian medieval chariot carroccio.
Etymology description of term standard : Carroccio (by Wikipedia)
Coined by two Goths words "standan", meaning become in England standard
stand and word "hardus", meaning hard.
 DEFINITION OF STANDARD
Normative documents could be Standards, Technical specifications, Codes
of practice and Regulations.
Standard is document, established by consensus and approved by a
recognized body, that provides, for common and repeated use, rules,
guidelines or characteristics for activities or their results, aimed at
the achievement of the optimum degree of order in a given context.
ISO/IEC 2004, clause 3.2
Technical specification prescribes technical requirements to be fulfilled by a product,
process or service.
NOTE1: a technical specification should indicate the procedure(s) by means of which it may be
determined whether the requirements given are fulfilled.
NOTE2: a technical specification may be a standard, a part of a standard or independent of standard.

Codes of practice recommends practice or procedures for the design, manufacture,

installation, maintenance or utilization of equipment, structures or products.
NOTE1: A Code may be a standard, a part of a standard or independent of standard.

Regulation is a document providing binding legislative rules, that is adopted by an 23

authority.
 History of rules and standards for
OHLs
- 1913 first Normative rules for OHLs
IEC to establish TC for overhead lines
- 1919TC 07 (Bare aluminium conductors)
- 1924TC 11 (Overhead lines),
- 1937TC 28 (Coordination of insulation)
- 1949TC 36 (Insulators) and
- 1951TC 37 (Arresters).
After 1970 starts with standards for OHLs.
Different approaches in different countries
In Slovenia from July 2014 legal act: REGULATIONS of Technical conditions for
construction of overhead power lines over 1kV AC up to 400 kV.
This ACT based on 4 CLC standards: SIST EN 50341-1:2002, SIST EN 50423-1:2005, SIST EN
K. Baki, ELES, Slovenija
50341-3-21:2009, SIST EN 50423-3-21:2009.
 27.04.1913 ELEKTROTECHNIK
UND MACHINENBAU- Heft 17 (371)

1913 - 1988
 New CENELEC standard
EN 50341-1:2012
Upgrades of old standard:
Designing approach (only probabilistic
EU level method)
Impacts of wind to OHL and winter
National level
loads (3 possibilities to define),
Eurocodes with obligation,
Upgrade rules for wooden poles,
Upgrade rules for towers and
foundations,
Considering extreme wind,
Correction of electrical part
(internal/external clearances),
New views to EMF in corona losses,
NEEDS to prepare National Harmonization EN with IEC version 3
Normative Aspects Agreement with CEN/TC 250

K. Baki, ELES, Slovenija

Members of CENELES in SEERC area:

Italy 29
Turkey 29
Romania 14
Hungary 12
Czech R 12
Greece 12
Austria 10
Croatia 7
Slovakia 7
FYROM 4
Slovenia 4
Total 140 weighting points

Non-members: Bosnia & Herz., Serbia, Montenegro and Ukraine.

SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 27
Chapters and annexes ENEN 50341-1
50341-1:2012

of the new standard 1 Scope

EN 50341-1:2012 251 pages

2 Normative references,
Normative annexes: definitions and symbols
ETheoretical method for calculating minimum
air clearances 3 Basis of design
GCalculation methods for earthing systems
J Angels in lattice steel towers
K Steel poles Requirements for overhead lines Requirements for
line components
Informative annexes:
AStrength coordination 7 Supports
BConversion of wind velocities and ice loads Structural 5 Electrical requireme.
requirements
CApplication examples of wind loads special
8 Foundations
forces 4 Actions on lines 6 Earthing systems
D Statistical data for the Gumbel distribution of
extremes 12 Quality
9 Conductors
F Empirical method for calculating mid span assurance, check
clearances and taking-over
10 Insulators
H Installation and measurements of earthing
systems
11 Hardware
L Design requirements for supports and
foundation
M Geotehnical and structural design of Annexes A - D Annexes E - H Annexes J - R

foundation
N Conductors and overhead earth wires SEERC RWG 01
P Tests on insulators and insulators sets Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 28
Q Insulators and R hardware.
 Checklist of the format for National Normative Aspects (NNA)
To be filled up by

Template for
the NC
Item Checklist for the National Committee (NC) Yes No NA

1 First page suitable for publication Checking document

NNA
2 Head of each (even/odd) page: EN-number; page number; country

3 Contents: at least all 12 main clauses

4 Foreword: at least all 6 statements according to Annex B
5 Scope: rules of application
6 Extra definitions and extra symbols indicated
7 Definitions and symbols of the Main Body unchanged
8 List of all National Standards and Regulations
9 Unchanged headings for main clauses and subclauses
10 Clear numbering and heading for all national clauses
11 Reference to all national clauses: A-dev, snc, ncpt
12 Defined font size of letters
13 Prescribed name of Tables and Figures
14 All 12 main clauses, Part 1 applies without change if necessary

15 All national clauses read as amendments to the Main Body (MB),

without any duplication of MB texts and equations into the NNA

16 References to National Regulations: at least an explanatory text; a

complete text if referred to a specific national rule
NA = Not applicable
In order to facilitate the approval and the publication of its NNA, the National Committee declares
to have:

Respected the rules of the NNA format by filling up in Annex A Checklist of the format of NNAs
only one case per item (16).

Country: SLO
Name:
Date: 2016
SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 29
 How many standards is involved in
EN 50341-1:2012 ?
- Eurokods: 14 std
- European standards (EN): 51 std
- Other (ICAO, IEC, CISPR/TR): 22 std
EN 1990:2004 EN ISO 1461:2009 EN 50397-1:2007 EN 60305:1997 EN 60909-0:2002 EN 61952:2008
EN 1991-1-4:2005 EN 61211:2006 EN 62004:2010
IEC 60372:2004
EN 1991-1-6:2005 EN ISO 2063:2005 EN 50522:2011 EN 62219:2002
EN 1992-1-1:2004 EN 1232:1996/A11:2002
EN 55016-1-1:2010 EN 60383-1:1997 HD 474 S1:1998
EN ISO 9001 EN 61284:1999 ICAO Regulations
EN 1993-1-1:2005 EN 60383-2:1997
EN 61325:1997
EN ISO 14713
EN 1993-1-3:2006 EN 60433:2000 Annex 14
ENIEC
61395:1999
60797 IEC 60050-441:1996
EN 10901:2009 EN 60038:2011 ENIEC/TS
61466-1:1997
EN 1993-1-5:2006 EN 60437:1998 60815-1 IEC 60050-466:1996
EN 60071-1:2006
EN 60507:2014 IEC 60050-471:1997
EN 1993-1-8:2005 EN 12385 EN 60071-2:2001 IEC/TS 60815-2
EN 61466-2:2000/A1:2004 IEC 60050-601:1996
EN 1993-1-11:2006 EN 12843:2004 EN 60652:2005 IEC/TS 60815-3 IEC 60050-604:1997
EN 14229:2011 EN 60794-1-1:2012 EN 61467:2009
EN 1993-3-1:2006 IEC 60287-3-1
EN 50182:2002 IEC 60794-1- 2 : 2014 IEC 60826
EN 61472:2013 IEC 60471
EN 1995-1-1:2004 IEC 60794-4:2004 IEC/TR 61597
IEC/TS 60479-1:2005
EN 50183: 2000 IEC 60794-4-10:2000 IEC/TR 61774 IEC/TR 60575
EN 61773:1999
EN 1997-1:2004 EN 60865-1:2012 ISO 12494 IEC 60720
EN 61854:1999
EN 1997-2:2007 EN 60889:2002 CISPR/TR 18-2 IEC 60724
EN 50189: 2001 EN 61897:1999
EN 1998-6:2005
EN 61936-1:2011 CISPR/TR 18-3
EN 50326: 2003
 IEC standards for Overhead lines
IEC standard Publicated Title note
year/edition
IEC 60826 2003 (Ed. 3) Design criteria of overhead New version no. 4 from
transmission lines (OHTL) 2015
IEC 60652 2002 (Ed. 2) Loading tests on overhead line
structures
IEC 61284 1997 (Ed. 2) OHL Requirements and tests + corrected in1998
for fittings
IEC 61773 1996 (Ed. 1) OHL Testing on foundations for + corrected in 1997
structures
IEC TS 61774 1997 (Ed. 1) OHL Meteorological data for
assessing climatic loads
IEC 61854 1998 (Ed. 1) OHL Requirements and tests
for spacers
IEC 61865 2001 (Ed. 1) OHL Calculation of the Calculation method
electrical component of distance
between live parts and obstacles

IEC 61897 1998 (Ed. 1) OHL Requirements and tests

for Stockbridge type aeolian
vibration dampers

Up to 1975 all IEC publications were titled as Recommendation and after 1975 -
Standards. After 2006 all IEC standards are added number 60.000.
I.e. 826 become 60826. So, original IEC standards have number 6xxxx and origin
CENELEC starts with 5xxxx. K. Baki, ELES, Slovenija
 IEC 60826 Ed 4.0
Design Criteria of Overhead transmission Lines

Concept considering reliability approach:

Concept of Reliability based design of OHLs means system of partial risks of

elements. K.Baki, ELES, Slovenija
 3.2.1 Basic requirements
of overhead lines EN 50341-1:2012

3.2.2 Reliability level 3.2.3 Security 3.2.4 Safety BASIS OF DESIGN

Definition of 3.7.1 Partial factor
Reliability level
method
3.6.1 Partial factor
Structure of Clause 3 on the
Basis of Design
3.3 Limit states
RBD (reliability based design)
3.3.2 ULS 3.3.3 SLS
ENABLES BETTER ECONOMIC
OPTIMIZATION.

3.4 Action F 3.6.2 3.6.3 3.5 Material property X

Partial Partial
factor for factor for
actions material
F property
3.5 Characteristic value
FK M
3.5 Characteristic value
XK
Conclusion:
Clause
4.13
Clause
7-11 &
Reliability level of OHL is achieved
3.6.2 Design value of an Table 4.6 EC 3.6.3 Design value of a when structural design resistance
action, Fd = FFK ma- terial property, Xd =
XK/M is higher than considered actions
due to climatic conditions (wind,
3.6.4 Combination value 3.6.4 Combination factor ice).

3.7.2 Total design value 3.7.2 Structural design

of the effect of actions, Ed resistance, Rd

SEERC RWG 01
3.7.2 Basic design
equation
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 33
Ed Rd
 Comparison of reliability levels and return periods
for EN, IEC in ACSE
EN 50341-1:2012 vs. IEC 60826:2003 vs. ASCE
Reliability levels Theoretical return period T considering
3.2.2 climatic impact (in years)
1 (referent value) 50 (0,98-0,99)
2 150
3 500 Annex B 2.1 defines
Return periods
ASCE Manuals on Engineering Practice no. 74: Guidelines for
Electrical Transmission Line Structural Loadings (2010)

Reliability level Return period Probability for Factor for

extreme wind wind

0,5 25 0,87 0,85

1 50 0,64 1,00
2 100 0,39 1,15
4 200 0,22 1,30
8 400 0,12 1,45
 4.1 Three approaches to supply climatic data to determine numerical values for actions

Approach 1: Reference data EN Approach 2: Statistical meteo data: Approach 3: NNA: Vb,0 or
1991-1-4 National Annex Wind velocity VT qp

B.2.1 Conversion factor CT

4.3.1 Basic wind velocity Vb,0 10 minutes mean wind velocity

10 m above ground level

Terrain category II

Return period T = 50 years

4.3.2 Mean wind velocity Vh Reference height above ground h

Wind directional factor cdir EN or NNA

Orography factor co EN or NNA

Roughness length z0 (Terrain

category table 4.1)

4.3.3 Mean wind pressure qh Air density (Altitude H)

SEERC RWG 01
4.3.4 Peak wind pressure qp Turbulence intensity Iv
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 35
NNA
Slovenian maps for ice loads in 2009 and 2017
In discussion. One of the proposals in Slovenian NNA.

SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 37
 Ice loads considering
ISO 12494 & EN 50341-1
 Comparison of ice loads between
some of NNAs
SLOVENIJA
ro = 900 NEMIJA FINSKA
Al/Fe Al/Fe ro = 750 ro = 500
cona f 240/40 490/65 Al/Fe Al/Fe Al/Fe Al/Fe
21.9 30.6 cona k 240/40 490/65 cona 240/40 490/65
21.9 30.6 21.9 30.6
1 1 8.3 9.8
2 1.6 13.2 15.6 1 1 7.2 8.1 1 10.0 10.0
3 2.5 20.7 24.4 2 2 14.4 16.1 2 25.0 25.0
4 5 41.3 48.8 3 3 21.6 24.2 3 50.0 50.0
4 4 28.8 32.2
1 1 40.9 48.4 1 55.5 59.4
2 1.6 48.8 56.5 1 1 41.5 48.3 2 83.5 86.2
3 2.5 58.8 66.8 2 2 54.5 61.0 3 116.0 118.0
4 5 80.2 89.3 3 3 64.9 71.6
4 4 73.9 80.7 1 16.8 14.4
1 1 9.5 8.9 2 30.8 27.8
2 1.6 13.5 12.9 1 1 9.8 8.8 3 47.1 43.7
3 2.5 18.5 18.1 2 2 16.3 15.2
4 5 29.2 29.4 3 3 21.5 20.5 Different use of ice density.
4 4 26.0 25.1
 Ice loads in Poland and Estonia
for selected conductors
POLJSKA
ro = 700
ESTONIJA
Al/Fe Al/Fe
cona 240/40 490/65 ro = 900
21.9 30.6 Al/Fe Al/Fe
cona 240/40 490/65
S1 17.5 22.3 21.9 30.6
S2 26.2 33.3
S3 34.4 41.5 1 8.8 11.3

S1 61.1 71.3
1 41.9 50.6
S2 73.0 84.3
S3 82.8 92.9
1 10.0 10.0
S1 19.6 20.3
S2 25.6 26.9
S3 30.4 31.1
EKA/SLOVAKA ITALIJA
ro = 500 ro1 = 900
Al/Fe Al/Fe ro2 = ro3
= 500
cona 240/40 490/65
21.9 30.6 cona Al/Fe 240/40 Al/Fe 490/65
21.9 30.6
I-0 3.9 4.9
1 do 600 0.0 0.0
I-1 8.0 9.8 600 19.9 24.3
I-2 16.7 19.7 1500 48.8 56.6
I-3 25.5 29.5 2 do 600 17.0 20.2
I-5 43.6 49.2 600 17.0 20.2
I-8 71.3 78.6 1500 41.4 47.0
I-12 108.5 117.9 3 do 600 0.0 0.0
600 12.9 15.6
I-18 165.0 176.6 1500 28.6 33.1

I-0 38.5 47.1 1 do 600 21.9 30.6

I-1 50.6 59.1 600 57.9 66.6
I-2 69.3 77.7 1500 86.7 95.4
I-3 84.3 92.7 2 do 600 69.9 78.6
600 69.9 78.6
I-5 108.7 117.0 1500 105.9 114.6
I-8 137.8 146.1 3 do 600 21.9 30.6
I-12 169.3 177.6 600 61.9 70.6
I-18 208.1 216.3 1500 88.9 97.6

I-0 0 8.3 8.2 1 do 600 0.0 0.0

600 18.0 18.0
I-1 1 14.4 14.2 1500 32.4 32.4
I-2 2 23.7 23.6 2 do 600 24.0 24.0
I-3 3 31.2 31.1 600 24.0 24.0
I-5 5 43.4 43.2 1500 42.0 42.0
I-8 8 57.9 57.7 3 do 600 0.0 0.0
I-12 12 73.7 73.5 600 20.0 20.0
What is situation with NNA available in
English on CENELEC TC11 web site
Country
Germany EN 50341-2-4
Finland EN 50341-2-7
UK EN 50341-2-9
Italy EN 50341-2-13
Norway EN 50341-2-16
Sweden EN 50341-2-18
Czech Republic EN 50341-2-19
Estonia EN 50341-2-20
Slovenia EN 50341-2-21
Poland EN 50341-2-22
Slovak Republic EN 50341-2-23
SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 42
Chapter 5 on the Electrical Requirements
5.2 Insulation coordination Annex E

5.3 Highest system voltage Nominal system voltage (Table

Transient overvoltages 5.1)

5.4 Minimum air clearances Definitions (Table 5.2)

Theoretical Empirical
method method
( 5.4.2) ( 5.4.3)
5.5 Load cases
Table 5.3 to Table 5.6
5.5

5.6 Combination wind load cases / electrical stresses

(Table 5.7)

5.7 Internal clearances (at tower 5.8 External clearances (safety

top and at mid span) - Tables 5.8 distances) - Tables 5.10 to 5.15
and 5.9

SEERC RWG 01
Zagreb, 23. 09. 2016. 43
Comments on chapter 5
Completely new text for subclause 5.1
Purpose and content of clause 5 included
Difference internal/external clearances
Standard reference conditions (for Tables 5.3 to 5.5)
regarding gap configurations and altitude
adjustment for differing conditions possible (by using Table E.5)
Minimum air clearances determined either by:
Theoretical method detailed in annex E or
Empirical method (European experience)
Limitations of clause 5
Flowchart of the structure of clause 5
44
 Tab. 5.1 in Standard EN 50341-1
In accordance with Nazivne napetosti Najvije napetosti Najvija napetost
sistema Un (kV) sistema Us (kV) opreme (min. value)
IEC 60038 & Um (kV)
EN 60038 3 3,6 3,6
6 7,2 7,2
10 12 12
(kV)
15 17,5 17,5
20 24 24
22 24 24
30 36 36
35 40,5 40,5
45 52 52
66 72,5 72,5
69 72,5 72,5
90 100 100
110 123 123
115 123 123
132 145 145
Each NNA have to 138 145 145
define nominal system 150 170 170
154 170 170
Voltage above 230 kV. 220 245 245
230 245 245
300 or 362 or 420 300 or 362 or 420
420 or 525 or 550 420 or 525 or 550
765 or 800 765 or 800
1100 or 1200 1100 or 1200
NOTE Nazivne napetosti nad 230 kV se definirajo v nacionalnih standardih.

K. Baki, ELES, Slovenija

New structure of chapter 5
5.2 Currents

5.3 Insulation coordination Annex E

5.4 Highest system voltage Nominal system voltage (Table 5.1)

Transient overvoltages

5.5 Minimum air clearances Definitions (Table 5.2)

Theoretical Empirical
method method (
( 5.5.2) 5.5.3)

Table 5.3 to 5.5 Table 5.6 5.6 Load cases

5.7 Combination wind load cases / electrical stresses (Table 5.7)

5.8 Internal clearances (at support top 5.9 External clearances (safety
and at mid span) - Tables 5.8 and 5.9 distances) - Tables 5.10 to 5.15

46