You are on page 1of 14

November 3, 2007

Minister of Public Safety


Hon. Stockwell Day
Day.S@parl.gc.ca

Dear Stockwell Day

I very much appreciate the letter signed by you however informative it does
not address the issues.

A Public Inquiry is most definitely required on the public side, point of


view as these puppet Task Forces only address the issues of continuity in
covering up the conspiracy against the people perpetrated by the Attorney
General's Office and ultimately the government of Canada, all at the tax
payers expense

I have watched you on CPAC and have had good vibes about you, but
unfortunately sanity tells me the smoother you are the further you will
climb in the government ranks but I also allow for naïve ignorance too as
the police believing they are quite intelligent as they are told at the
beginning of their careers that the law has nothing to do with common sense
which should be the first clue as they train to be ignorant detectives.

They just fall in line and when controversial topics come up like mine they
consult with the Attorney General or his agents, Crown Attorneys but
ultimately they must lay the charges and in the issues I have addressed the
Ontario Attorney General is the major player in the conspiracy against the
people which the evidence I have accumulated over the passed 2 years
irrefutably proves which I am sure you are well aware of.

This would be a venture into incurable absurdity questioning Michael Bryant


if it is okay to charge him with conspiracy and treason. It is quite
possible he would say sure go ahead and then when the ball is in his court
he can decide whether or not to prosecute himself, for he gets the final
decision.

Anyway what would be the point of consulting with the Attorney General who
would obviously state I was confused and didn’t have a clue about the law
and if the cops had the slightest understanding other than what they are
told and what they see happen in court over and over again as their officers
crawl away with their heads between their toes frustrated as hell knowing
full well the evidence met the criteria of common sense which they still
haven’t got the grasp of the law being nothing to do with common sense.

How the hell can laws be obeyed if they have nothing to do with common sense
and who benefits when that is the case other than lawyers who have infested
the whole legal system with the people trusting that they will keep an eye
on each other when in fact the people should have each others backs watching
the every move of these crooks as they ravish the moral civilization as they
sleep peacefully in trust.

Sure at the moment it seems like I have ventured into a trek of superfluous
futility greater than the challenge Christopher Columbus had getting ships
to prove the world was round but it was an eventuality that had to happen
simply because the world is round, spherical to be more correct.

1
You know as well as I do the evidence I have is irrefutable and if it ever
gets out to the public it will be supported by everything in reality and
obviously due the most serious nature of the issues you people are quite
confident it will never see the light of day and should there be signs of it
nearing the light my lights will be turned off which is no particular
concern to me being an old 65 with my eventuality approaching in any event.

That fact alone must surely tell you I am not addressing the issues for me
or financial gain but for the purpose that is long over due being done and
if not for so many fitting circumstances that perchanced upon me I would be
golfing, fishing and whatever my perceptions would be of the heavenly thing
to partake in.

My Dick and Janeing you people is so obvious to Spot as is your responses


which may appear intelligent alone but when related to the evidence and the
issues you address are abundantly incompetent to the test and yet obviously
would be judged by the system in place as sane in the insane world you
people have created.

The evidence which I have presented you all proves irrefutably it would go
nowhere in the present illegal system but a jury of the people could cause a
most serious ruckus which is definitely not my intention for I am a sane and
moral person who has kept his head when all around have lost theirs.

Do you have any idea what it feels like to be the only sane person in the
world and when the term common sense is used it is in reference to my way of
thinking.

Sure it is a high improbability that I will get the information out and
perchance I do I will probably be certified insane but history will know the
document to mean I was sane as they peruse the insanity of the intelligence
of man induced by the government to ransack us poor ignorant fools.

I will tend to go on hoping to strike a chord perchance there is one amongst


you who would pick up on the necessity of giving sanity a chance before it
is too late which is quite possibly already a wee bit too late.

Well enough of the rambling for now as I bring your attention to the 2
attachments which I have already circulated the Do your part.doc file.

I now make it abundantly clear that I want you to address the issues within
these documents, the aforesaid and the “Boomerang Democracy Resolve” FFF,
Forthright, Forthcoming, Forthwith consistent with The Law, the supreme law
of Canada, the Constitution Act 1982 whereas 25 years ago the individual’s
Charter Rights and Freedoms were guaranteed by the Federal government but
they have not put a modus operandi in place conducive to the guarantee and
in fact have put a system in place conducive to the members of the Law
Society of Upper Canada who hold every position in the legal system who the
Law Society adamantly state or imply their members do not give a damn about
the individuals guaranteed Charter Rights which my evidence irrefutably
attests to.

Our Rights are guaranteed and are attached to the individual as an arm and a
leg yet it’s like pulling teeth to access them.

The lawyers charge us every time we care to access what is already ours and
the system is too costly making justice prohibitive for the moral majority.

2
The people finance the system to protect us as per our Charter Rights and
then charge us individually when we try to access the system which is a
venture into futility trying to find justice from members of the Law Society
who don’t give a damn about our Charter Rights

Now what the hell is that all about?

Yes, I am requesting a response to that question most


definitely
The lawyers have built an empire from our tax money for their benefit and
the evidence is everywhere in reality and irrefutable within the contents of
my writings which the people whose e-mails are listed below have received.

I have also requested on many occasions, an answer to a very simple question


from the prominent people in matters of law whose e-mail addresses you will
also find on page 15 of the Do your part.doc which now includes your
Day.S@parl.gc.ca address.

I ask you all once again what the entity “threshold” means in matters of the
law you people administer and enforce in Canada.

In particular I would like to know what the term “threshold” means in


reference to the evidence I presented to you all in the Toronto Sun document
dated October 8 2006 which the York Regional Police and Randy Craig of the
OPP Anti-Rackets refer to as the invisible delineator which the judge pulls
from his or her hat to determine that my irrefutable evidence did not chin
the line considered to be the “threshold” which determines whether or not
they can commence or cause to commence proceedings in the provincial courts?

The answer is obvious as is the no response to the question as is the


refusal of all the aforesaid people to bring the issues I have addressed to
the public’s attention.

I request each and every individual whose e-mail address is on page 15 of


the attached document, “Do your part.doc(582KB)” to please respond to the
“threshold” question

The playing intelligently ignorant option has worn thin so I suggest


demonstrating another one of your initiatives to appear FFF.

Oh, it would be prudent to mention that the (4) Click on Preamble Federal correspondence
Recap October 9 2007 on page 11 of the Do your part.doc which is to be found on my web
site Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-
freedoms quite convincing that you all were provided the opportunity to prove your
indifference to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights was fiction rather than truly the
Attorney General’s fiction which is in laymen terms conspiracy and treason when the people
willingly refuse to generously suspend their disbelief as per page 2 of the document behind the
black bar which is to be found on page 8 of the aforesaid Do your part.doc

3
I state once again as I have many times before, Do not befuddle the
befuddlement any further insulting the intelligence of our right to be
ignorant of the fiction of the traditionally unscrupulous ways of the
members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are so bloody arrogant in
their belief they are superior to God in their most devilish ways.

Hon Stockwell Day

By all means inform me as to who else agrees with the no need for a Public
Inquiry into the RCMP pension fund scandal which was linked to the upper
command and the DOJ

I noticed you copied your response to the DOJ confirming for me that he is
aware of the issues and the media confirms for me that he has done nothing
to address these issues which are of a most serious nature which Louis
Theoret, Federal Ombudsman of Victims of Crime understands which you will
read in the
Preamble Federal correspondence Recap October 9 2007 document

Clearly the DOJ, Department of Justice

He closed the file leaving predictable victims at the mercy of the


conspiracy.

With reference to your following statement with full respect for Canada’s
democratic traditions I dare say Canada’s democratic traditions are passe’
as of 1982 when the individual’s Rights were guaranteed by the Charter
necessitating a revamp of the legal system so as to be competent to back the
guarantee consistent with and conducive to the provisions of the Charter

You state you are accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must
ensure the Force functions with full respect for the fundamental rights and freedoms of
Canadians and clearly the evidence shows that Sgt. Michael Thomson of the RCMP was
provided copies of Lawyer Files 1-14, 13A of which lawyer File # 14 was addressed to him
dated April 7 2007 which he has refused to respond to.

On October 18 2007 I and my mother went to the RCMP office on Harry Walker Blvd. south
of Davis drive with a prodigious amount of evidence which included copies of the 15 Lawyer
Files, the 73 page letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 and a copy of the Dave
Grech compiled correspondence September 1 2007 and a copy of the recording of the Tribunal
hearing which irrefutably proves that Don Wilson filed a false and misleading information
with the ORHT valued at $43,000 + which is an offense under S.206 (2) of the Tenant
protection Act, 1997 and committed the criminal act of fraud over $100,000 in a public
building financed by the people of Ontario to administer justice to and for the people in
compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the criminal code of the Constitution
Act, 1982.

Sgt Steinebeck met with us for about an hour and declined to take the evidence, which I had
brought because the RCMP web site stated they would not accept evidence by e-mail which I
had provided all the evidence to Sgt Michael Thomson by e-mail but he had declined to
respond to it.

4
Sgt.Steinebech admitted he knew of me when I questioned him about a half hour into our
meeting and he went on to state that he already had copies of all the documents I had brought
because they had received them by e-mail and opened a file for them.

So the big question is why have they not commenced or caused to commence proceedings
against Rick Hennessey, Regional Director of the ORHT as per Lawyer File # 1, of tampering
with the evidence and refusing to file the afore mentioned charges against Don Wilson which
makes Rick Hennessey guilty of Obstruction of a landlord in pursuit of his rights under s. 206
(1) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and obstruction of justice in the matter of the criminal
act of fraud under the Constitution Act 1982.

Dave Grech of the Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs
also declined to file the charges as above and referred to in Lawyer File # 2 addressed to him.

Hon. John Gerretsen Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing also refused to commence or
cause to commence proceedings on these issues as addressed to him in Lawyer File # 3
making him guilty of the same charges as above and more as referred to in the said Lawyer
File # 3 which also includes matters of non consistencies with the Constitution.

The evidence also points to the same charges against the Attorney General Michael Bryant in
Lawyer File # 7 and conspiracy against the people along with other matters regarding non
compliance with the Constitution Act, 1982.

Everyone else referenced in the 15 Lawyer Files are also guilty of conspiracy against the
people and obstruction of justice under the Constitution Act 1982,
They have all received the evidence and have also been informed that should they have
misplaced it they can find it on my web site Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and
Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-
and-freedoms

So you see “As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public
for the RCMP and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s
democratic traditions and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.”

I believe you are accountable to the public for the RCMP failure to function with full respect
for my Charter Rights and Freedoms which are truly fundamental.

I take you at your word that you will ensure that the RCMP functions consistent with the
Constitution and conducive to my guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms and every
other individual of Canada whose guaranteed protection is dependent on punishment due the
crime attentive to deterrence which is the first line of defense in the guaranteed protection of
the people.

If you should require any more evidence than that which has been provided to Sgt. Michael
Thomson of the RCMP please do not hesitate to request by e-mail at franklyone@hotmail.com

5
I trust you understand the serious nature of the issues regarding the conspiracy by the Attorney
General Michael Bryant and the evidence irrefutably proves the Ontario Government does not
have a modus operandi in place capable of backing the individual’s Charter Rights and
Freedoms and in fact the modus operandi in place is conducive to the benefit of the lawyers
and criminal element extremely detrimental to the moral majority.

Once again I state the evidence is all available on my web site Guardians of the Canadians
Charter of Rights and Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-
canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms where you will find links to 9 other web sites
which contain the irrefutable evidence of the Attorney General conspiracy.

A Public Inquiry is in order and I request you do so FFF

Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
Cc

Day.S@parl.gc.ca
victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca;Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca;prevention@ps.gc.ca;randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca;
communications@ps.gc.ca;McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca;bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; brooksn@scc-
csc.gc.ca;bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org;bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca;baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;comail@lsuc.ca;citytvhosts@citytv.com;citydesk@
tor.sunpub.com;city@thestar.ca;
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org;cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca;dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca;dinovoc-
qp@ndp.on.ca;dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca;dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca;editor@rd.ca;editor@tor.sunpub.com;elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;ernie.harde
man@pc.ola.org;fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca;frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca;fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca;grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca;gilla@sen.par
l.gc.ca;gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca;gcarlino@ombudsman.on.ca;hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca;haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca;harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;jaffem@sen.
parl.gc.ca;jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca;julia.munroco@pc.ola.org;kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca;kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;

lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;losier@sen.parl.gc.ca;lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca;communications@ps.gc.ca;mcgee
d@sen.parl.gc.ca;munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca;merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;nejmcust@mms.org;nimhinfo@nih.gov;
mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca;olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;pm@pm.gc.ca;pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca;poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca;phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca;pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca;stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca;stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca;stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithd@sen.parl.gc.
ca;
sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca;szwebmaster@yahoo.com;tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca;tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca;vanlop0
@parl.gc.ca;vanlop1@parl.gc.ca;web@ps.gc.ca;webadmin@justice.gc.ca;wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca;
zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca; info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca

rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org;


jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org;bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org;

6
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org;Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca;
Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;

MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca;


Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;Toews.V@parl.gc.ca;Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca;
OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca;
Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca;
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;dwatch@web.net;info@ocsj.ca;
ocap@tao.ca;info@olderwomensnetwork.org; terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca;
justice@socialjustice.org;info@chfc.ca
sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca;
potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca;phil.jensen@servicecanada.gc.ca;AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca;
elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca;
aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; clgascon@fja.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; francois-giroux@cas-
satj.gc.ca;bob.ward@chrc-ccdp.cadp.ca

Minister of Public Safety


Ministre de a Sécurité publique
Ottawa, Canada K1A 0P8
OCT 2 g 2007

Mr. Frank Gallagher


frank.gaIIaghersympatico.ca

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

Thank you for your correspondence of July 19, 2007, regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police (RCMP) pension fund as well as your concerns that rights under the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms are not being protected. I apologize for the delay in responding.
As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP
and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions
and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.

The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is


taking action to ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner. In order to
deliver on its commitment to make Government more accountable, on April 11, 2006,
Canada’s new Government introduced the Federal Accountability Act, which received Royal
Assent on December 12, 2006. Through this Act, the Government of Canada has introduced
specific measures to help strengthen accountability and increase transparency and oversight in
Government operations. To clarify roles and responsibilities, the Federal Accountability Act
designates Deputy Ministers and Deputy Heads such as the Commissioner of the RCMP as
accounting officers who are accountable before the appropriate committee of Parliament to
answer questions related to their responsibilities.
Canada
-2-
The RCMP is an important national institution that plays a significant role in the safety and
security of Canadians; ensuring public trust and confidence is an important component of
achieving that role. Canada’s new Government has taken a number of recent steps in respect
of this important national institution.

7
On April 13, 2007, Mr. David Brown was appointed to lead an independent investigation into
allegations relating to the RCMP pension and insurance plans. The mandate for this
investigation gave Mr. Brown the flexibility to recommend whether a more formal inquiry was
necessary to address any outstanding questions. In his report, submitted to the Government on
June 15, 2007, Mr. Brown recommended that no formal inquiry was necessary. I have closely
reviewed Mr. Brown’s report and have accepted all of his recommendations.
On July 16, 2007, the Government announced the creation of a five-member Task Force on
Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP, to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In
addition to the appointment of Mr. Brown as Chair, Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman
Inkster, and Larry Murray — each with varied expertise and experience — have been
appointed as members of the Task Force. The Task Force will make recommendations to
improve management and accountability within the RCMP, and will report back to the
Government by the end of 2007.
Furthermore, the appointment of William J.S. Elliott as the new Commissioner of the RCMP,
with a career that has been marked with distinction as well as expertise in the area of national
security, will provide the RCMP with the renewed leadership that it critically needs at this
time.
With respect to the criminal allegations under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 mentioned in
your letter, please note that criminal matters in Ontario fall within the purview of the
Honourable Michael Bryant, Attorney General of Ontario. You may therefore wish to raise
your concerns with his office, using the contact information provided below:
Ministry of the Attorney General
McMurtry-Scott Building
720 Bay Street, 11th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1
Telephone: 416-326-2220

-3-
With respect to your concerns about the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, I have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your correspondence to my
colleague the Honourable Rob Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada,
for his information and consideration. In addition, a copy of your correspondence has been
forwarded to Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
I regret that I cannot help in the way you had perhaps hoped, but wish you well in resolving
your concerns.
Yours sincerely,
c.c.: The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C.
Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner
Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety

I am well aware of the Federal Accountability Act,2006 and in fact have


written the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, providing him with evidence which
his office responded hoping I understand why his office can not get
involved.

8
I do not understand why his office can not get involved unless of course his
office is involved with the conspiracy which clearly the evidence shows must
be by not getting involved.

A copy of his Office’s e-mail can be found in the Government Correspondence


compiled September 1 2007 which is referenced in the afore said Preamble
Federal correspondence Recap October 9 2007 document

The afore mentioned document clearly shows: the Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C.,
M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada has been informed along with
everyone else who I have mentioned and clearly nothing has been done to address these most
serious issues.

You yourself Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety are aware that The
Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
Canada has been informed as you clearly state in your response to me dated November 2 2007
and a copy is hereto copied immediately above with the date incorrectly noted OCT 2 g
2007

Clearly the DOJ is implicated in this conspiracy as well as the RCMP Pension Fund scandal
which the Standing Committee of Public Accounts was ordered to sit on.

You have also Cc Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C. Conflict of Interest and Ethics
Commissioner and the records show I have already been there, done that but her Office had no
authority to deal with the issues.

Your letter of November 2 2007 confirms everything I state that you people do nothing other
than a dog chasing its tail which certainly appears busy and attentive to something but if it
weren’t for the coincidental consistent movement of head and tail its head would be found
stuffed firmly up its ass.

The evidence is clear that the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP,
to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In addition to the appointment of Mr. Brown as Chair,
Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman Inkster, and Larry Murray will accomplish absolutely
nothing other than to appear as if they are benefiting the public as is the Fiction of the
Attorney General which does nothing but provide members of the Law Society with luxurious
benefit to the colossal waste of tax payers money.

The accountability and responsibility has already been defined in the “Roles and
Responsibilities of the Attorney General” on the Ontario Attorney General web site and
common law and common sense demands the guarantor of the guarantee to the individual’s
Charter Rights and Freedoms as provided in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is
the responsible and accountable party to back the guarantee which is the Federal Government
and clearly The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada is mandated with that obligation.

If not he, then who?

9
That seems to be the gazzilion $ question.
“The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and
accountability and is taking action to ensure government business is
conducted in a responsible manner.”

BULLSHIT

To cite a man of wisdom from 2500 years ago ….Confucius says


“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across
every page were the words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY….finally I
began to make out what was written between the lines; the whole volume was
filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”

Mr. Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety

On this 3rd day of November 2007 under the authority of the Constitution Act, 1982
(Document) with due regard to Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms charge you
to uphold your responsibility to which you will be held accountable by the people.
“As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the
RCMP and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic
traditions and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.”

The RCMP have been provided the evidence as have you and all the people whose e-mail
addresses I have provided and I insist on behalf of the people that you commence or cause to
commence proceedings for the restructuring of the antiquated legal system that has been
superseded by the 1982 enactment of the Constitution which demands a modus operandi
consistent with and conducive to the guarantee of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.

Common sense and all that’s sane demands government personnel be irreproachable in this
endeavor FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming, Forthwith and I will tentatively presume you are the
man for this most significant job in this moment of time in history where it is absolutely vital
to the well being and safety of the people of Canada

As Minister of Public Safety Mr. Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. it is incumbent upon you to lead
the way in the interests of each and every person in Canada who is individually guaranteed
Rights as provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom and you must do so with
integrity, fortitude and conviction FFF attentive to, consistent with and conducive to the
guarantee to each and every individual of Canada as per the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.

The present legal system is extraordinarily incompetent to that endeavor to the humongous
waste of tax dollars to the horrific detriment to the people of Canada who finance the system
for their benefit of a moral society under the supremacy of God.

10
It matters not if you believe God exists or ever did for when you have exercised your
responsibilities under the supremacy of God we will all be believers as the spirit of God and
the spirit of The Law is one and the same.

I reiterate a continuity of the befuddlement will not be tolerated giving due cause to
commence proceedings against every individual of the present government personnel who has
been granted authority under the Constitution to administer and enforce it consistent with and
conducive to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom consistent with the aspirations
attributed to God clearly defined in

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set
out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably
justified in a free and democratic society.

2.
Every
one
has
the
follo
wing
funda
ment
al
freed
oms:
(a)
freed
om of
consc
ience
and
religi
on;
(b)
freed
om of
thoug
ht,
belief
,
opini
on
and

11
expre
ssion,
inclu
ding
freed
om of
the
press
and
other
medi
a of
comm
unica
tion;
(c)
freed
om of
peace
ful
asse
mbly;
and
(d)
freed
om of
assoc
iation
.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be
deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental
or physical disability.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the
inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Whatever the cost to the taxpayer to this endeavor will be money most well
spent.

12
I remind you attentiveness to efficiency and effect is demanded as per

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to
be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

The public have been deprived for far too long and it to this endeavor I do not see the
benefit to dwelling on the past which the legal system has a firm grip on which has been
long stretched and an immediate release will propel us far into the future.

I have been FFF and I would expect and respect to be responded to in kind.

Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher

PS
Your immediate attention is required

Are you the man for this most significant challenge?

Answer would be most gratefully appreciated

13
14

You might also like