Constitution Act, 1982

Two interpretations of THE LAW

ONE FOR THE MONEY……TWO FOR THE SHOW

ONLY ONE INTERPRETATION IS LEGAL

DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE WHOLE TRUTH NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH?

DOCUMENT

The Police have the power of God, the People and the evidence
All they need is the Spirit
Fortitude & Conviction

ESTABLISHMENT
DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE WHOLE LIE NOTHING BUT THE LIE?

Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General

Download from Attorney General Web Site (See pages 5-9)

April 12 2007
Please see attached Lawyer Files #s 1-10 which details the Province of Ontario goverment cover up of their
legal system which is not consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982.

See letter to Armand P. LaBarge, Chief YRP dated April 11 2007 which details the criminal acts of Fraud
over $100,000 and filing false and misleading information ($43,000) an offense under s. 206 (1) Tenant
Protection Act, 1997 which unfolded during the ORHT hearing on June 30 2005 before the judicator Nancy
Fahlgen in a public building mandated to serve justice for the people has refused to commence proceedings
against him.

She and others of the ORHT have tampered with the recording of the first day of the hearing and removed
conversation where she told me she is authorized to forward the case on to Investigations and Enforcement
of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing but she never did.

The second day of the hearing she announced there would be no recording for that session..

For twenty months now I have been sending correspondence and the evidence to a gazillion government
departments to have them deal with this matter and I now have a prodigious amount of evidence which
proves beyond any doubt the whole system is corrupt and they do not have a modus operandi capable of
backing the peoples Rights and Freedoms as guaranteed by the Charter. They have set the system up for
lawyers to feast and after all, who writes the laws, and who administers them.

The judges even obstruct justice before the cases get to court.

The evidence also proves that the Ombudsman, the ORHT and the Ontario Civilian Police Commission who
are purportedly independent of the government for public show but they are tight with the conspiracy.
See pages 3-7 for web site download of the many roles of the Attorney general who is responsible to public.
1
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Canadian Society of diverse People $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Painters, Musicians, Artists, Maintenace, Superintendents, Roofers, Psychiatrist, Clergy, Shoe Shiners
Carpenters, Surveyors Engineers, Architects, Doctors, Scientists, Druggists, Accountants, Salesmen
Law Society of Upper Canada
Lawyers

Premier Bill Davis appointed Roy McMurchy as Attorney General 1975- 1985
played a major role in the patriation of the Constitution Act, 1982 and the creation of the
Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Constitution Act, 1982

Charter

Legislature Cabinet Attorney General Executive Crown

Minister Council
Michael Michael Bryant Bryant
Bryant Michael

The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the"guardian of the

public interest

Court of Appeal Crown Attorneys

SOS
Chief Justice Robert McLeary
Newmarket
Roy McMurchy 1996- HELP Paul Culver T.O.
We people are being
scammed
They are ransacking us at their
pleasure, having their way with
us and throwing us to the
wolves
911

York Regional Police

Fraud detectives F. Kerr & G. Rorke state they are well

experienced at taking similar cases as mine to judges for a
warrant and one will grant and another will deny but they didn’t
bother with mine. They use the word threshold ?

The Attorney General or Crown Attorneys can consult with

police but ultimately the police must file the charges.

Wouldn’t want to appear to be influencing anyone

2
 Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General
The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister.

One part of the Attorney General's role is that of a Cabinet Minister. In this capacity the Minister is responsible
for representing the interests and perspectives of the Ministry at Cabinet, while simultaneously representing the
interests and perspectives of Cabinet and consequently the Government to the Ministry and the Ministry's
communities of interest.

The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming from this
role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the
"guardian of the public interest".

Much has been written on the subject of ministerial responsibilities and the unique role of the Attorney General.

There are various components of the Attorney General's role. The Attorney General has unique responsibilities
to the Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government. While there are different
emphases and nuances attached to these there is a general theme throughout all the various aspects of the
Attorney General's responsibilities that the office has a constitutional and traditional responsibility beyond that
of a political minister.

The statutory responsibilities of the office are found in section 5 of the Ministry of the Attorney General Act.
Section 5 states:

The Attorney General,

(a) is the Law Officer of the Executive Council;
(b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law;
(c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario;
(d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General of
England by law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall perform the
duties and powers that, until the Constitution Act, 1867 came into effect, belonged to the offices of the Attorney
General and Solicitor General in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and which, under the provisions of
that Act, are within the scope of the powers of the Legislature;
(e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon all
matters of law referred to him or her by the Government;
(f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government
measures of a legislative nature;
(g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with such
ministries and agency;
(h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of government in
respect of any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature;
(i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices;
(j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant
Governor in Council. "

3
What follows is an overview of the various components of the Attorney General's roles and responsibilities,
primarily as outlined in the Act.

Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a))

The role of chief law officer might be referred to as the Attorney General's overall responsibility as the
independent legal advisor to the Cabinet - and some have even suggested that the role possibly extends to the
Legislature as well. The importance of the independence of the role is fundamental to the position and well
established in common law, statutes and tradition.
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most elusive
concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define. It is the
rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal
liberties.

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained and
that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.

In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General's policy
advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General's legal advice or
constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General's policy advice has the same
weight as that of other ministers.

Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d))

One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility for criminal
prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92 gives the
provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and thereby gives the
provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal Code.

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General and the
Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or not to lay
charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and
in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.

It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out the
Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political pressures.
The Attorney General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken - and seen to be
undertaken - on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations. Whether to initiate or
stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This responsibility has been characterized as a
matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen's Attorney - not as a Minister of the government of the day.

This is not to suggest that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions are made in a complete vacuum. A wide
range of policy considerations may be weighed in executing this responsibility, and the Attorney General may
choose to consult the Cabinet on some of these considerations. However any decisions relating to the conduct of
individual prosecutions must be the Attorney General's alone and independent of the traditional Cabinet decision
making process. In practice, in the vast majority of cases, these decisions are made by the Attorney General's
agents, the Crown Attorneys.

An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal
prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which includes not only the
community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court
to present all the credible evidence available.

4
The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of
criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the
Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in
understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.

Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature, for
decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the prosecution
is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule bars any comment on
a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule strictly prohibits the
Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given the stature of the Attorney
General's position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen as an attempt to influence the
case.

Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual criminal cases,
such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political interference. Accordingly, it is
traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the Attorney General's agents, the Crown
Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the public would expect the Attorney General to be
briefed.

Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f))

The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These responsibilities
have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in accordance with
principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This is obviously an important and broad
area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on the constitutionality and legality of
legislation.

The Attorney General's legislative responsibilities are played out in a variety roles. The Office of Legislative
Counsel reports to the Attorney General. Legislative Counsel plays a key role in ensuring the legal integrity of
Government legislation. Although the Legislative Counsel's reporting relationship to the Attorney General does
allow the Attorney General to provide guidance and set standards, individual pieces of legislation are drafted on
instructions from client ministries and are not within the sole control of Legislative Counsel or the Attorney
General. It should also be noted that Legislative Counsel also has a direct responsibility to the Legislature as the
Office also drafts all private member's bills.

The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed to review
legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical issues related to
legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration.

The Attorney General's role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely, Cabinet
could, in theory, receive the Attorney General's legal opinion on legislation and choose to disregard it. The
Attorney General's role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the area of criminal prosecutions. As
was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions about the legal opinions and policy or
political preferences being offered about legislation.

5
Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d))
In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and its agencies
(s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the historical powers of the
Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based on the Crown's parens patriae
(parental) authority. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only to conduct litigation in cases directly
affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where there is a clear matter of public interest
or public rights at stake.

This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is well and
independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges to legislation,
even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally protected rights.

Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c))

A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in the
province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison with the
judiciary.

Given the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, the responsibility for courts
administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for the principles of judicial
independence must be exercised in this area.

As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most elusive
concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define. It is the
rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal
liberties.

The role has been referred to as "judic

(b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law;

(c) shall superintend all matters conne

(e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon all
matters of law referred to him or her by the Government;

f) shall advise the Government upon a

(g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with such
ministries and agency;

of a legislative nature;
(h) shall conduct and regulate all litiga
(
(i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices;

in respect of any subject within the aut

6
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that
most elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but
hard to easily define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole,
from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties.
The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained and
that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.
In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General's policy
advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General's legal advice or
constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General's policy advice has the same
weight as that of other ministers.

Constitution Act, 1982

Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms
Canada is founded upon principles
that1.recognize
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and
supremacy
freedoms set out in itof God
subject only and
to such the
Consistency in Integrity and Common Sense must prevail
by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free
rule
reasonable
and
of
limits law
prescribed
democratic
society.

The supreme law of Canada, THE CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 (Document) is but a piece of paper without
consistent enforcement so the supremacy of God is the Spirit and the rule of law is the enforcement

The Law Society of Upper Canada

(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe
the rules in the spirit as well as in the letter.
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and
democratic society.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the
right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without
discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic
origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Obviously and most certainly to be consistent with the spirit of

THE LAW there must be consistency in the spirit of enforcement
DO ONTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO ONTO YOU
7
One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility for criminal
prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92 gives the
provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and thereby gives the
provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal Code.
The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General and the
Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or not to lay
charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and
in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.
It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out the
Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political pressures.
The Attorney General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken - and seen to be
undertaken - on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations. Whether to initiate or
stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This responsibility has been characterized as a
matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen's Attorney - not as a Minister of the government of the day.

As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that
most elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but
hard to easily define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole,
from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties.
INCOMPETENCE OR CONSPIRACY?
Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law (See page 7)

The Attorney General is the guardian of the most elusive concept- the rule of law-a well established legal
principle, but hard to define.

It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures
and safeguards personal liberties.
Obviously, only professionals in law would know the rule of law to be the most elusive
concept of the well established legal principle, but hard to define.
Roy McMurchy the present Chief Justice of the province of Ontario was the Attorney General of the province
who played a major role in the patriation of the Constitution Act, 1982 and the Charter.
Given the guarantee and provisions of the Charter (See page 7) the consistency of the Constitution (Document)
is dependent on the consistency of the Constitution (Establishment enforcement) one would have to ask why the
words –the rule of law- were used to back the guarantee?

INCOMPETENCE OR CONSPIRACY?
Given the evidence I have provided to Michael Bryant, Attorney General and all the persons mentioned in the
Lawyer Files #s 1-10 and the fact these Lawyer Files have been provided to Michael Bryant and the Crown
Attorneys defined in Lawyer Files 13 and 13A and they have not responded to me or commenced or caused to
commence proceedings in all matters addressed in these files it is readily apparent that the words-the rule of law-
were used for the most clear and definite purpose to defraud the people of Canada and the evidence shows their
modus operandi never intended to protect the individual as per s.15.(1) (See page 7)
These papers have also been sent to the Prime Minister Stephen Harper & the OPP Commissioner Julian Fantino

8
The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained and that
Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.

Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d))

One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility for criminal
prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92 gives the provinces
authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and thereby gives the provincial
Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal Code.

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General and the
Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or not to lay
charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and in
what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.
It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out the Minister's
criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political pressures. The Attorney
General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken - and seen to be undertaken - on
strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations. Whether to initiate or stay a criminal
proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This responsibility has been characterized as a matter of the
Attorney General acting as the Queen's Attorney - not as a Minister of the government of the day.
I can see why the Attorney General’s role is the most publicly scrutinized. Can’t YOU?
The Attorney General’s responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken-and seen to be
undertaken-on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations.

The Attorney General is a Minister of Cabinet and the Legislature obviously subjected to influential
persuasions (conflict of interest?)

The Attorney General who is over the Crown Attorneys does not direct or cause charges to be laid although they
may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether to lay charges is for the police.
Once the police lay the charges the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney decide if the prosecution should
proceed and in what manner.
What the Hell is that all about?
The police don’t have a clue about the law otherwise things wouldn’t be like they are and
obviously they are like they are because they consult with the professionals in these matters who
are unprofessional in these matters and regardless the Attorney General and Crown Attorneys
make the ultimate decision it makes it rather difficult to charge them with conspiracy.

When you consider the Attorney General is responsible to ensure the administration of justice in
the courts and is responsible for liaison with the judiciary it can be no surprise that the police are
often frustrated by the judges when they deny warrants for investigations when the evidence is
good enough to frustrate the cops. I suppose they revert back to the fact that they are originally
taught that common sense has nothing to do with the law.

It’s absolutely absurd that York Regions finest Fraud investigators can’t figure out what is
happening even when I spell it out for them.
Incompetence or Conspiracy? Perhaps they are frustrated with themselves.
9
An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal
prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which includes not only the
community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to
present all the credible evidence available.
The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of
criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the
Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in
understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.
Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature, for
decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the prosecution is
completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule bars any comment on a
matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule strictly prohibits the Attorney
General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given the stature of the Attorney General's
position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen as an attempt to influence the case.

Would the Crown present all the credible evidence against themselves?

The responsibility is to present the case fairly.

COULD YOU TRUST THEM TO DO SO GIVEN THE EVIDENCE I PROVIDED?
One of the Attorney General’s responsibilities in fostering public respect for the law, is to assist the public in
understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.

There is not a reason in hell for the people to disrespect THE LAW (Document)

It is THE LAW (Establishment) whom I have taken on the responsibility in fostering Establishment respect for the
unadulterated rule of law which is the one which is consistent with the spirit of THE LAW (Document)

Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature

The evidence is overwhelming that he is irresponsible to the people and must be brought before the people.

The police must file the charges outside his realm of authority or
influence. HA HA, oops. Wet my pants.
Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual criminal cases,
such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political interference. Accordingly, it is
traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the Attorney General's agents, the Crown
Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the public would expect the Attorney General to be
briefed.

I have provided the evidence to the Crown Attorney’s of Toronto and Newmarket but I have not heard from them.
I have also provided it to the Premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty and nobody has responded.

There is probable cause that they have all discussed it with each other considering they have all refused to do the
responsible thing since I first provided the Black Book dated September 1 2006 and the fact they haven’t provided
it to the public doesn’t mean they aren’t vulnerable to accusations of unethical influence.
The police will need to seek a warrant from an Incompetent judge to convict another of Conspiracy

10
The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These responsibilities
have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in accordance with
principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This is obviously an important and broad
area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on the constitutionality and legality of
legislation.

The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed to review
legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical issues related to
legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration.

The Attorney General's role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely, Cabinet
could, in theory, receive the Attorney General's legal opinion on legislation and choose to disregard it. The
Attorney General's role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the area of criminal prosecutions. As
was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions about the legal opinions and policy or
political preferences being offered about legislation.

Only those incoherent to the consistency of the Spirit of THE LAW would
write so consistently incoherent
The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These responsibilities
have been described as twofold.

1. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in accordance with principles of natural justice and civil
rights.

2. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on the constitutionality and legality of legislation.

All matters of law must be consistent with the Spirit of the Constitution.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the
right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without
discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic
origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
When the Cabinet decides to go against the Attorney Generals legal opinion on legislation regardless if they
have another professional legal opinion it is not within the Spirit of the Constitution (Document) if there can be
two opinions before they enact their law for the obvious reason that such a law will just provide fodder for
lawyers to argue with the individuals rights to be equal before and under the law to equal benefit of the law
where such arguments benefit only the lawyers and the expense of the taxpayers for certain and the waste of time
arguing it by both parties.

The fact is it tis a tangled web the lawyers have weaved which have made it far too costly and impossible for any
individual to get justice in court where the lawyers always win and one of the parties but justice is never
served for the taxpayer always pays and pays due the incompetence of Establishment to go the moral way
thereby we have the immoral administering the law where moral justice is an impossible acquisition.

My evidence is irrefutable in these matters in every way including the lengthy battle and effort the victim must
endeavor while the criminal still walks the street.

Do you have any idea the insanity of the Establishment inflicts upon the conscience of the populace of society?

11
Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d))
In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and its agencies
(s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the historical powers of the
Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based on the Crown's parens patriae
(parental) authority. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only to conduct litigation in cases directly
affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where there is a clear matter of public interest
or public rights at stake.

This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is well and
independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges to legislation,
even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally protected rights.

Ensure the public interest is well and independently represented .

It may involve interventions in Charter challenges to legislation, even if the
arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally
protected rights

The Constitution Act, 1982

Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms

Canada is founded on principles that recognize the

supremacy of God and the rule of law
consistent in SPIRIT: Consistent in Sanity- Integrity - Morality- Responsibility - Due Diligence - Reason
Proficiency- Purpose

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the
equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in
particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour,
religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

To be consistent with the Spirit of the Constitution you must be consistent with the Constitution

WHO KNEW?

Not the Law Society of Upper Canada

Coherence to Reality is the Realistic

Approach toOTHERS
DO ONTO theASIdeal
YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO ONTO YOU

A little thought goes a long way for goodness sake

12