Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bioseparations
3.1 Introduction
In Section 2 we saw the general principles of a membrane process and now we focus on the
design calculations. The key design calculations are the trans-membrane pressure and the
membrane area.
3.2 Theory
The general case is where we have a porous membrane and the pores are large compared to the
size of the solvent molecules. In this case there is flow in the pores not just diffusion. If we
assume that smaller solute molecules can also pass through the pores, then there is the possibility
that solute molecules will be entrained in the solvent flow. The extent to which this happens will
depend on the size of the solute molecules.
We assume that the flux of solvent (often water) is linearly proportional to the difference
between the applied pressure and the osmotic pressure noting one acts against the other.
(3.1)
The reflection coefficient () is the fraction of the pores that are too small to allow the passage of
solute and from which the solute is reflected and therefore lies in the range (01). For most
UF membranes the pores are quite large compared to the size of the solutes molecules which are
responsible for generating the osmotic pressure and therefore the reflection coefficient is small.
This means that the solvent flux is dominated by the trans-membrane pressure difference which
is large compared to the (osmotic pressure x reflection coefficient) i.e. the second term in the
brackets in equation 3.1 is very small compared to the first.
At low concentration, the osmotic pressure may be related to the concentrations on either side of
the membrane.
(3.2)
Page 1
where M = molarity (concentration)
R = universal gas constant
T = absolute temperature
i = vant Hoff factor
From Physical Chemistry, the van't Hoff factor (i), is the number of moles (ions if the solute
ionizes) of solute actually in solution per mole of solid solute that was added to make the
solution. So, for sodium chloride NaCl which gives one mole of Na+ ion and one mole of Cl- ion
per mole of NaCl dissolved, i = 2, and for calcium chloride CaCl2 (one Ca+ ion and two Cl- ions
per mole of the salt added) i = 3. Notice that the actual charges on the individual ions do not
affect the osmotic pressure directly.
For a solute we normally assume two mechanisms are causing it to cross through the membrane.
The first is the direct diffusion of solute through the membrane and second is the solute being
dragged through the membrane with the solvent flow. The first mechanism is characterised by
a conductivity coefficient (membrane permeability) and a concentration driving force and the
second by a solvent transfer rate (volumetric flux), the fraction of the pore capable of passing
solute (1 - reflection coefficient) and the mean solute concentration on either side of the
membrane.
(3.3)
where Js = flux of solute (kg s-1 m-2) [note the unit difference between JW and JS]
Cs = concentration driving force of solute across the membrane
= mean of the concentrations of solute on either side of the membrane
Ls = membrane permeability for the solute (m s-1).
Note that the units of the solvent and solute fluxes are different with one being mass based
(solute) and the other being volume based (solvent).
Now consider the mass balance on the membrane unit as illustrated in Figure 3.1
Feed
Membrane P
(F, CSF)
Separation
Unit
Overall balance
(3.4)
Solute balance
(3.5)
Finally, if the area of membrane is A, then, assuming that the value of JW (solvent flux) varies
with position over the area A, the Permeate rate is the integral of the solvent flux (JW) across the
area.
(3.6)
(3.7)
(3.8)
this parameter has to be determined experimentally and may, unfortunately, depend on the trans-
membrane pressure and the feed concentration.
In practice, predicting the variation in the solvent and solute fluxes is impossible unless we can
predict the variation in concentrations across the membrane surface. Measuring the local
concentrations and hence the local fluxes is possible but predicting them for design in other than
very simple flow regimes is very difficult. For cross flow devices we can carry out a steady state
differential analysis across the membrane to give a concentration vs. position relationship and
then integrate the resulting differential equations to get a value of the mean transfer fluxes.
We are usually only concerned with the overall operation of the membrane so we can simplify
Page 3
the above expressions greatly if we assume that either there are no gradients in concentration
across the area of the membrane surface or the variation may be characterised by a mean
concentration hence giving a constant value of both the solvent and solute fluxes everywhere
across the area.
(3.9)
and
(3.10)
Now, by dividing Equation (3.10) by (3.9), we get the concentration of solute in the permeate
flow (normally the maximum concentration) which is what we wish to determine.
(3.11)
We are left with one problem namely what concentration to use as being representative of the
upstream surface of the membrane remembering that for diffusion from the bulk to the
membrane there must be a concentration gradient. If the feed compartment is well mixed, then
(3.12)
(3.13)
Here the solute and solvent both dissolve in the membrane and are transported through the
membrane at different rates by molecular diffusion and emerge on the permeate side of the
membrane.
In the absence of any mass transfer resistance in the fluid on either side of the membrane we
postulate that the solute or solvent dissolves in the membrane.
Page 4
Thus we can express the concentration of component i just inside each face of the membrane in
terms of the concentration in the fluid at equilibrium on the exterior of the membrane
Note that the concentration of component i just inside the upstream surface of the membrane is
greater than the concentration in the fluid in contact with surface because the only component i
transfers from the solution to the membrane leaving diluent material behind hence exhibiting a
greater concentration just inside the membrane surface.
(3.14)
where ki = partition coefficient of component i between the membrane and the adjacent
solution
Ci,1 = concentration of component i inside the upstream membrane surface
Ci,2 = concentration of component i inside the downstream membrane surface
Using Ficks Law of diffusion for the diffusion in the membrane we can define the flux of
component i passing through the membrane.
(3.15)
Using the partition coefficient from equation 3.12 we can eliminate the internal membrane
concentrations in equation 3.13 we get
(3.16)
Page 5
The above expression will replace Equations (3.1) and (3.3) when a solution/diffusion membrane
in use.
Because more solvent than solute passes through the membrane, solute is concentrated upstream
of the membrane because the solvent moves more readily than the solute. If the solute is a
macromolecule or a protein this layer can develop into a gelatinous mass on the upstream surface
of the membrane and this is called gel polarisation.
The concentration layer increases the driving force for the solute and reduces the driving force
for the solvent, so it acts to reduce the selectivity and the permeability of the membrane, both of
which are bad news since it encourages the solute to pass through the membrane and reduced the
driving force for solvent to pass through the membrane.
Suppose the concentration on the upstream face of the membrane is low and the concentration on
the downstream face is negligible, then the osmotic pressure is given by
(3.17)
Page 6
where = equilibrium concentration of solute at the upstream surface of the membrane
under to gel layer
If we assume a steady state and Ficks First Law controls the diffusion, we can perform a solute
balance across any plane within the upstream film and the flux of solute to the left and right must
be equal.
(3.18)
where z = the position inside the film measured from the upstream surface of the film
= the concentration of solute in the film at position z
(3.19)
(3.20)
Now we know the following boundary condition for the system namely
Page 7
(3.21)
Hence
If we now apply this across the entire film noting that CS = CS* at z =
(3.23)
This analysis is also applicable if the solute flux is zero and hence the downstream concentration
is zero which is the case when the membrane passes only solvent.
(3.24)
We note that the effective diffusivity divided by the film thickness is an effective mass transfer
coefficient (Year 2 Mass Transfer notes) which must be experimentally determined. The
analysis also ignores the resistance to flow of solvent through the gel layer.
(3.25)
There are major complications if the concentration of the solute at the membrane exceeds the
solubility of the solute because we get precipitation of solute on the membrane surface.
Suppose we are required to treat a known flow rate of feed, F, at a known concentration of the
Page 8
solute of interest CSF and we may have one of two product specifications namely,
The problem is to calculate the flow rates of the two product streams, the area of the membrane
required and the trans-membrane pressure to be used.
Example 1
0.1 m3 s-1 of a protein solution at a feed concentration of 10 mg dm-3 is to be concentrated by
removal of the water through an ultra-filtration membrane, the protein solution is required at a
concentration of 25 mg dm-3. Assume that the membrane is impermeable to protein and the
maximum trans-membrane pressure of 5 bar is to be used. The membrane permeability for
solvent is 1x10-4 m3 s-1 m-2 bar-1 and the reflection coefficient is zero.
Example 2
Suppose we have the same example as above but that the membrane has a finite permeability to
the protein such that Ls = 10-5 m s-1 and the reflection coefficient = 0.999
If we can ignore the resistance to flow for the solvent that the concentration layer represents,
then we can still calculate the solvent flux and hence calculate the concentration at the surface of
the membrane from Equation (3.23) or (3.24). Otherwise the calculation is identical to Example
2 above. We expect that the area of membrane required will increase significantly.
This can then be calculated and direct substitution provides rapid and stable convergence.
We have also ignored the effects of the concentration polarisation on the flux of solvent through
the membrane.
However, an important lesson has been learnt: fouling of membranes leads to loss of
permeability and loss of selectivity and is therefore very important to avoid.
Page 9
We have largely ignored the complications due to osmotic effects.
Page 10