5/22/2017

ASI, JAYSON R.
ALMAREZ, KATHLYN S
BOTARDO, JOSEPH JEREMY B.

ECE 3201

1
 5/22/2017

2
 5/22/2017

3
 5/22/2017

4
 5/22/2017

// //
; = 150.2283

5
 5/22/2017

Now:
//
//1.3K
=23.5061
*fmin was set to 300Hz ( )( . )
.

6
 5/22/2017

Now,

Where ICQ IEQ = 12 1 4.7 + 1.3

7
 5/22/2017

The main difference is that RE was

split into two (RE1 + RE2). This
procedure is called as swamping.

=1.5V
We initially set the Rc of the 2nd
stage to be 1k.

Were now solving for =

For RE = VE/IE
1.5 V/4.5mA = 333.333
330 (standard)

8
 5/22/2017

We set R2= 1k Where 1k < 3.3k

by the
condition (from
rule of thumb)

R2 < 10(Rc)
1k < 3.3K
I2 = 2.2 mA

9
 5/22/2017

2nd STAGE

Principle of
swamping
(splitting RE).

RE2= 320
RE1= set to
8.2

10
 5/22/2017

Since, we desire to bypass RE2 for reduction and

stability of voltage gain.
( )

( ) ( )( . )

( )
( )

11
 5/22/2017

VBB = VTH =

. . RB = RTH =
.
.
.

Now,
= 12 4.2199 1 + 328.2

Where ICQ IEQ

12
 5/22/2017

; rl = Rc//RL
.

= 6.3951 V +

4.2199 mA (500)
=8.505 V
= 17.0101 mA

Vpk = ICQ x rL
= 4.2199 mA x 500
= 2.10995 V

V(pk pk)
= 2.10995 x 2
= 4.2199 V

13
 5/22/2017

Analysis Technique:
We set the desired frequency for
the coupling capacitors to be 10%
of the minimum cut off frequency.
The largest cut off frequencies is
determined by one of the by-pass
capacitors

14
 5/22/2017

=
1
=
2 (30) 3197.2790 + 580.4799
10% 300 = 30 = 1.4043 2.2
2.2 (Standard)

1
=
1 2 (30)
= 1
2 (30) 2662.1298 =
= 1.9928 2.2 2 (30) 689.6552
= 2.2 ( ) = 7.6924 10uF

15
 5/22/2017

IB = Ic/

% Difference from Simulation

/
|

16
 5/22/2017

ro = VA / IC
= 10 V / 1mA

Impedances:

; 10k // 4.7k

17
 5/22/2017

Gain ( )

2nd Stage

IB = Ic/

18
 5/22/2017

% Difference from Simulation

/
|

Small Signal of 2nd Stage

ro = Va/Ic
2222.2222

= 10 / 4.5 mA
= 2222.2222

170.1961(5.7441) + (170.1961 + 1)(5.7441)

19
 5/22/2017

Impedances:

20
 5/22/2017

TWO PORT MODEL

. .

. 580.4799

Gain

21
 5/22/2017

Total Gain:

553.1241

22
 5/22/2017

% Difference from Simulation

|

|
= 3.01%

FREQUENCY RESPONSE

. .

. 580.4799

23
 5/22/2017

= 22.8780 Hz 23 Hz

= 9.4194 Hz
9 Hz
= 19.1497 Hz 19 Hz

Bypass capacitor cut off frequencies (dominant)

=
.
307.7633 Hz (dominant)
308 Hz

=294.0779 Hz
)( . )( )

24
 5/22/2017

HIGH CUT OFF FREQUENCY

= 18.8360
341. 1426

25
 5/22/2017

;
;rL = Rc//RL ; RL = 1K
=
= 2.53 mW

x 100

26
 5/22/2017

Vo(swing)
=
(1.9720+2.3876=
4.3596)

27
 5/22/2017

Designing a simple class A transistor

amplifier requires a lot of considerations. To
effectively bias a single stage, load line analysis
should be implied. In order to stabilize beta
fluctuations, voltage divider biasing technique
should be used. Since a single stage would not
provide much gain, another stage should be
coupled.
To effectively reduce the voltage gain, the
principle of swamping can be used. The splitting
of the emitter resistance has driven the amplifier
linearly.

28
 5/22/2017

. It reduces the variability of voltage

gain from one circuit to another.
Thus, stabilizing the voltage gain.

There are always sacrifices to be able

to reach a desired specification.
Further analysis and careful action
plans should be implied at all costs.

29