Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brynne Adamson
Mr. Gunther
English 2010
Everest Essay
Climbing Mount Everest is an amazing feat, although it can be very dangerous. The
higher one climbs, especially on the tallest mountain in the world, the harder it is for the body to
draw oxygen out of the air. This increases the possibility of making mistakes and getting high
altitude sickness, which could be the end of someones life. Thus, until 1978, climbers only
ascended Mount Everest with supplemental oxygen; no one was sure if climbing without it was
possible. However, after Reinhold Messner and Peter Habeler proved to all mankind that the
summit could be reached without bottled oxygen, many became skeptical. They soon took the
stand that climbing with supplemental air was unsportsmanlike and unnecessary, while others
still saw bottled air as a necessity to reach the summit unharmed. Thus, the debate on using
Climbing with oxygen has its benefits. The most obvious advantage of supplemental
oxygen is the fact that it helps in the prevention of acquiring deadly illnesses. ...[W]ithout
supplemental oxygen the body is vastly more vulnerable to HAPE and HACE, hypothermia,
frostbite, and a host of other mortal perils (Krakauer, 158). Climbing with oxygen particularly
helps with the prevention of high altitude sickness, such as HAPE or HACE, which are mostly
caused by the brain not receiving enough oxygen due to the high elevation. These illnesses can
cause headaches, nausea, fatigue, and an inability to function correctly. In fact, if one doesnt
descend down the mountain quick enough if such a disease is contracted, they will most likely
Adamson 2
die. When climbing, one needs to be at the top of their game in order to make it to the summit of
Everest, which will not be possible if they are experiencing the symptoms of high altitude
sickness. Yet, through the use of bottled oxygen, practically anyone can reach the summit with a
little bit of training and acclimatization. Oxygen provides safety in the dangers of climbing
Everest.
There are also many negatives to ascending with oxygen. One of its biggest problems is
that it doesnt last forever. There is a time limit when climbing Everest on supplemental oxygen,
which can cause complications if delays arise. On the other hand, if one climbed on just their
own power, there would be no need for supplemental oxygen. There would be no time limit, no
added weight due to the bottles of air, and no feeling of claustrophobia, which some climbers
experience when using oxygen masks. Also the trip to the top of Mount Everest would be less
expensive without the need for bottled oxygen. When Mountain Madness, a team led by Scott
Fischer, climbed Mount Everest in 1996, their oxygen supply cost clients $325 a bottle
(Boukreev, Anatoli, and G. Weston. DeWalt, 91). In modern times, it probably costs more than
Overall, the debate of climbing with oxygen is a complicated one. One side, there are
those that believe in the use of bottled air. Oxygen provides safety and protection regarding
dangerous diseases caused by high elevation. It also allows climbers to make better decisions on
the tallest summit in the world. Those on the other side of the debate believe that oxygen is
unsportsmanlike. They think that ascenders should be able to rely on their own bodies if they
acclimatize right, considering oxygen only lasts for hours at a time. They also wish to save
money and backpack space for their trip to the summit. There are many other different views to
the the way oxygen should or should not be used, all of which further complicate the issue. The
Adamson 3
answer to the oxygen debate seems to depend on the person and ones own individual beliefs;
this is why the debate is still going on today and will continue to be brought up as the years go
on.
Adamson 4
Works Cited
Boukreev, Anatoli, and G. Weston. DeWalt. The Climb. New York: St. Martin's, 1999.
Print.
Krakauer, Jon. Into Thin Air. New York: Anchor , 1999. Print.