Professional Documents
Culture Documents
597
D. Boundary Conditions
Three different boundary conditions are employed in
present study, as shown in Fig.3: velocity inlet boundary
condition is adopted to fix the both the flow speed and flow
direction, and it is placed 0.5m (about 15 times of cylinder
diameter) away from the circle center to eliminate boundary
condition effects on flow fields; adiabatic non-slip smooth wall
is used to model cylinder surface; moreover, pressure outlet
boundary condition is implemented to model the backpressure
of atmosphere for fluid zone, and it is placed 1.0m(about 30
times of cylinder diameter) to obtain fully developed flow.
Fig.4(a) Global view of transient lift force Fig.6(a) PSD results of transient lift forces
598
of cylinder, promising that the flow first separates from
surface, then reattaches, and next re-separates again. Finally, a
separation bubble strong enough is engendered, and the
separated vortex blob oscillates downstream in the vortex
wake. These eight curves indicate identical separation positions
on cylinder surfaces, promising that the differences among the
grid points on cylinder surface can be neglected.
599
kinetic energy PSD results will converge. Hence, besides the
above three methods, the convergence of far field turbulent
kinetic energy PSD results should also be included in the grid
validations for bundle conductors.
REFERENCES
[1] Sjoerd W. Rienstra, Nonlinear Free Vibration of Coupled Spans of
OverheadTransmission Lines[C], Proceedings of the 3rd European
Conference on Mathematics in Industry 27-31 (1988), 133144.
[2] Muhammad Bilal Waris, Takashi Ishihara, Muhammad Waheed Sarwar,
Galloping response prediction of ice-accreted transmission lines[C], The
4th International Conference on Advances in Wind and
Structures(AWAS'08), Jeju, Korea, May 29-31, 2008
[3] Xin Wang, Wen-Juan Lou, NUMERICAL APPROACH TO
Fig.9(b) PSD results of turbulent kinetic energy GALLOPING OF CONDUCTOR[C], The Seventh Asia-Pacific
Conference on Wind Engineering, November 8-12, 2009, Taipei,
Taiwan
[4] M.A.Baenziger, W.D.James, B.Wouters, L.Li, Dynamics Load on
Transmission line Strutcures Due to Galloping Conditions[C], IEEE
Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol.9,No.1, January 1994
[5] C.B.Rawlins,Analysis of Conductor Galloping Field Observations-
Single Conductors, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and
Systems, Vol.PAS-100, No.8, August 1981
[6] Xiao-hui LIU, BoYAN,Hong-yan ZHANG,SongZHOU, Nonlinear
numerical simulation method for galloping of iced conductor[J], Appl.
Math. Mech. -Engl. Ed. 30(4), 489501 (2009)
[7] JIANG Zhenglong, LU ]iazheng. LEI Hongcai. Analysis of the causes of
tower collapses in Hunan during the 2008 ice storm [J]. High Voltage
Engineering, 2008 ,34(11) : 7(In Chinese)
[8] Shinichi Oka, Takeshi Ishihara, Numerical study on steady aerodynamic
characteristics of ice accreted transmission lines[C], The Fifth
International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering
(CWE2010),Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA May 23-27, 2010
Fig.9(c) Peak values of PSD results of
[9] C.B. Gurung, H. Yamaguchi, T. Yukino, Journal of Wind Engineering
turbulent kinetic energy and Industrial Aerodynamics, 91(7), pp.903-924, 2003
[10] Den Hartog, J. P. Transmission line vibration due to sleet. Transaction
AIEE 51, Part 4, 10741086 (1932)
IV. CONCLUDING REMARKS [11] Nigol, O., Clarke, G. J. Conductor galloping and control based on
torsional mechanism. IEEE Power Engineering Society, Meeting, Paper
To account for the grid sensitivities in the accurate No. C74016-2, New York (1974)
simulation of transient wind load induced by separated flows [12] O. Nigol, P.G. Buchan, Conductor galloping part I- Den Hartog
around cylinders, eight high-quality multi-block structured mechanism, IEEE Transaction on PAS 100(2) (1981) 699-707.
grids are generated and then Navier-Stokes equations are [13] O. Nigol, P.G. Buchan, Conductor galloping-part II Torsional
solved based on them. Four different grid validation methods, mechanism, IEEETransaction on PAS 100(2) (1981) 708-20.
including the normally used grid validation method of lift/drag [14] J. Wang, J.L. Lilien, Overhead electric transmission line galloping - A
full multi-span 3DOF model, some application and design
forces, PSD results of lift/drag forces, as well as the proposed recommendations, IEEE Transaction on PD 113(3) (1998) 909-16.
methods of both wall shear stress on cylinder surface and
[15] Dumitru DELEANU, The Non-Linear Galloping Response of a One-
turbulent kinetic energy in the far field, are employed are dimensional Structure[J], Ovidius University Annals of Constructions,
compared. The results indicate that, the lift/drag force and PSD Vol.1, No. 3, April 2002
results of lift/drag force can by adopted in grid validations [16] McComber P., Paradis A., A cable galloping model for thin ice
conducted for single conductor since they are integrated from accretions[J]. Atmospheric Research, 1998 ,46 (12) : 13.
wall surface and are the compromise results of flow separations [17] J. Chabart O. , Lilien J. L. Galloping of electrical lines in wind tunnel
on cylinder surface; For a more through study of flow facilities[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
separation characteristics, wall shear stress on cylinder surface Aerodynamics.1998. 74(6) :967.
should be included since it can well predict the flow separation [18] Macdonald J. H. G, Larose G. L. A unified approach to aerodynamic
damping and drag/lift instabilities, and its application to dry inclined
characteristics on wall surface. These three methods are all cable galloping[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2006, 22 (2) : 229.
applicable for single conductor. For bundle conductors, flow [19] W. Dettmer, D. Peric, A computational framework for fluidrigid body
interference should be accounted for and turbulent kinetic interaction: Finite element formulation and applications, Comput.
energy is proposed as the grid validation parameter. The results Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg[J]. 195 (2006) 16331666
show that, large amplitude oscillation of peak values as the grid [20] L. Li, S. J. Sherwin, P. W. Bearman, A moving frame of reference
is refined, indicating flow dissipation characteristics are algorithm for _uid=structure interaction of rotating and translating
evidently influenced by grid density variations; and as the grid bodies[J], INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL
METHODS IN FLUIDS, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2002; 38:187206
is condensed to be fine enough, the peak values of turbulent (DOI: 10.1002/_d.216)
600
[21] I. Robertson, L. Li1, S.J. Sherwin, P.W. Bearman, A numerical study of [25] Yolanda Mack, Raphael Haftka, Corin Segal, Nestor Queipo, Wei Shyy,
rotational and transverse galloping rectangular bodies[J], Journal of Computational Modeling and Sensitivity Evaluation of Liquid Rocket
Fluids and Structures 17 (2003) , 681699 Injector Flow[C], AIAA 2007-5592
[22] Tetsuro Tamura, Reliability on CFD estimation for wind-structure [26] Adam Neale, Dominique Derome, Bert Blocken, Jan Carmeliet,
interaction problems[J], Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial etermination of surface convective heat transfer coefficients by CFD[C],
Aerodynamics 81 (1999) 117~143 11th Canadian Conference on Building Science and Technology Banff,
[23] B. Blocken, T. van Hooff, L. Aanen , B. BronsemaComputational Alberta, 2007
analysis of the performance of a venturishaped roof for natural [27] Alexander M. Levchenya, Evgueni M. Smirnov, CFD-ANALYSIS OF
ventilation: venturi-effect versus wind-blocking effect[J]Accepted for 3D FLOW STRUCTURE AND ENDWALL HEAT TRANSFER IN A
publication in Computers & Fluids, 26 April, 2011 TRANSONIC TURBINE BLADE CASCADE: EFFECTS OF GRID
[24] John C. Vassberg,Edward N. Tinoco,Mori Mani, David Levy, Tom REFINEMENT[C], WEST-EAST HIGH SPEED FLOW FIELD
Zickuhr, Dimitri J. Mavriplis, Richard A. Wahls, Joseph H. Morrison, CONFERENCE 19-22, November 2007, Moscow, Russia
Olaf P. Brodersen, Bernhard Eisfeld, Mitsuhiro Murayama, Comparison [28] Yutong Liu, Kerem Pekkan, S. Casey Jones, Ajit P. Yoganathan, The
of NTF Experimental Datawith CFD Predictions from the Third AIAA Effects of Different Mesh Generation Methods on Computational Fluid
CFD Drag Prediction Workshop[C], AIAA 2008-6918, Honolulu, Dynamic Analysis and Power Loss Assessment in Total Cavopulmonary
Hawaii, August 2008 Connection[C], Transactions of the ASME, 2004, Vol.126. 594:603
601