Menu

The Self Realisation Community

True Freedon arises from Self-Determination under Natural Law.

Denial of Consent to Register Children

This is a sanitised process used by my wife and I to deny our consent to register the
birth of our daughter.

NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF DENIAL OF CONSENT TO REGISTER CHILDREN

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED,

Following todays receipt of your letter dated 07 May 2010, the contents of which
are hereby refused for cause without dishonour; please nd enclosed a
DECLARATION OF DENIAL OF CONSENT TO REGISTER CHILDREN.

We trust this presentment brings this matter to a swift and ecient conclusion.
Kindly update your records accordingly.

Without malice, mischief, ill-will, frivolity or vexation; in sincerity and honour,

By: FATHERS STRAWMAN

For & on behalf of MOTHERS STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice Without Recourse Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Declaration of Denial of Consent to Register Children

Strictly Private & Condential

We, the authorized representatives for the legal persons, FATHERS STRAWMAN and
MOTHERS STRAWMAN, do hereby declare that the following is a Veried Plain
Statement of the Facts as we perceive them.

Let it be known by all concerned, interested and aected parties that:

1. We have been granted irrevocable superior guardianship rights over our children
by the Creator of the Universe.
2. We have accepted irrevocable Power of Attorney over our childrens well-being
and property until the eighteenth anniversary of their birth.
3. For and on behalf of our children, we have settled their entire legal estate into a
private trust which is administered for their maximum benet.
4. The property settled into said private trust includes (without limitation) any and
all information pertaining to the existence of our children, strictly precluding the
disclosure of the details of their birth to any party whatsoever.
5. Any and all disclosures of information pertaining to the existence of our children
would represent a breach of the aforementioned private trust and all those parties
responsible for said breaches will be liable for charges of THIRTY THOUSAND
POUNDS STERLING (or functional currency of the United Kingdom) per occurrence.
6. We do not recognise or consent to any perceived obligation, whether statutory or
otherwise, to register the births of our children, under any circumstances
whatsoever.
7. As Trustees of the aforementioned private trust, we arm, jointly and without
division that we refuse to grant our consent and/or authorisation to the Registrar
or any other individual, organization or legal entity, to register information
pertaining to the birth of our children, under any circumstances whatsoever.

DECLARATION
We, the undersigned, hereby arm that, to the very best of our knowledge, the
entirety of the foregoing is true, correct and not misleading, In the geographical
area known as ANNUITY-UPON-CRIME, England, this declaration is autographed,
sealed and date-stamped by the Post Oce, on the tenth day of the month of May,
in the year known as two thousand and ten AD (Dwapara 310 ascending).

By: __________________________________FATHERS STRAWMAN

All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice Without Recourse Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

By: _________________________________MOTHERS STRAWMAN

All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice Without Recourse Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Needless to say, the Registrar took exception to our declaration and sent us an
aggressive notice threatening prosecution if our persons failed to comply, in
response to which we sent the following missive.

STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED
REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS
CIVIC CENTRE
ANNUITY-UPON-CRIME
N66 6XL

27 MAY 2010
NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED,

Following receipt of your notice dated 24 May 2010 and pursuant to the enclosed
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT; I hereby serve NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE.
Wherefore, MOTHERS STRAWMAN and FATHERS STRAWMAN agree to register the
births of their children in the most expedient manner possible, upon receipt of the
following items:
1. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHERS STRAWMAN and FATHERS
STRAWMAN have not been granted irrevocable superior guardianship rights over
their children by the Creator of the Universe.
2. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHERS STRAWMAN and FATHERS
STRAWMAN have not accepted irrevocable Power of Attorney over their childrens
well-being and property until the eighteenth anniversary of their birth.
3. Material evidence demonstrating that the information requested has not been
settled into a private trust, precluding the disclosure of any and all details of their
childrens births to any third party whatsoever.
4. Material evidence demonstrating that all disclosures of information pertaining to
the existence of their children would not represent a breach of the aforementioned
private trust, as well as the Laws of Equity.
5. Material evidence demonstrating that all those parties responsible for said
breaches would not be liable for charges of THIRTY THOUSAND POUNDS STERLING
(or functional currency of the United Kingdom) per occurrence.
6. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHERS STRAWMAN and FATHERS
STRAWMAN have consented to the statutory duty prescribed by the Births and
Deaths Registration Act 1953, without which no sustainable cause of action for
prosecution can arise.
7. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHERS STRAWMAN and FATHERS
STRAWMAN have not unequivocally denied their consent and/or authorisation to
the Registrar and/or any other individual, organization or legal entity, to register
information pertaining to the birth of their children, under any circumstances
whatsoever.
8. Material evidence demonstrating that your statement that a female child was
born to [MOTHERS STRAWMAN] on or about DATE OF BIRTH does not
represent two clear breaches of trust by the Registrar of Births and Deaths.
9. Material evidence demonstrating that any and all attempts to enforce statutes
upon persons who have not consented to perform under said instruments would
not represent fundamental breaches of international human rights laws, as well as
the Laws of Nature.
Please nd enclosed a certied copy of the DECLARATION OF DENIAL OF CONSENT
TO REGISTER CHILDREN dated 10 May 2010, delivered to your oce by Royal Mail
Recorded Delivery on 12 May 2010. In good faith, we look forward to receiving the
foregoing reasonably requested substance within seven (7) days of your receipt of
this notice. Failure to deliver an appropriate response will result in the lawful
presumption that the non-negotiable conditions cannot be met and that your
request has been duly withdrawn, with no further action required.

Without malice, mischief, ill-will, frivolity or vexation; in sincerity and honour,

By: FATHERS STRAWMAN

For & on behalf of MOTHERS STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice Without Recourse Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

A reply [of sorts] was sent by the Registrar, in the form of an almost identical notice,
to which we responded in kind.

STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED, REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS
CIVIC CENTRE
ANNUITY-UPON-CRIME
N66 6XL

16 June 2010
NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DISHONOUR

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED,

Following receipt of your letter dated 11 June 2010, the contents of which are
refused for cause on the basis that you have failed to respond appropriately to the
NOTICE OF CONDITIIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated 27 May 2010; for and on behalf of
MOTHERS STRAWMAN, I hereby serve NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
DISHONOUR.

Wherefore, in good faith, MOTHERS STRAWMAN and FATHERS STRAWMAN agree

to register the births of their children in the most expedient manner possible, upon
receipt of the following items:
1. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHERS STRAWMAN and FATHERS
STRAWMAN have not been granted irrevocable superior guardianship rights over
their children by the Creator of the Universe.
2. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHERS STRAWMAN and FATHERS
STRAWMAN have not accepted irrevocable Power of Attorney over their childrens
well-being and property until the eighteenth anniversary of their birth.
3. Material evidence demonstrating that the information requested has not been
settled into a private trust, precluding the disclosure of any and all details of their
childrens births to any third party whatsoever, unless that action is of signicant
benet to the beneciaries.
4. Material evidence demonstrating that all disclosures of information pertaining to
the existence of their children would not represent a breach of the aforementioned
private trust, as well as the Laws of Equity.
5. Material evidence demonstrating that all those parties responsible for said
breaches would not be liable for charges of THIRTY THOUSAND POUNDS STERLING
(or functional currency of the United Kingdom) per occurrence.
6. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHERS STRAWMAN and FATHERS
STRAWMAN have consented to the statutory duty prescribed by the Births and
Deaths Registration Act 1953, without which no sustainable cause of action for
prosecution can arise.
7. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHERS STRAWMAN and FATHERS
STRAWMAN have not unequivocally denied their consent and/or authorisation to
the Registrar and/or any other individual, organization or legal entity, to register
information pertaining to the birth of their children.
8. Material evidence demonstrating that your statement that a female child was
born to [MOTHERS STRAWMAN] on or about DATE OF BIRTH does not
represent two clear breaches of trust by the Registrar of Births and Deaths.
9. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHERS STRAWMAN good faith
presentment of a conditional acceptance of the unsubstantiated statutory
obligation does not comprise a response delivered in a positive manner.
10. Material evidence demonstrating that, in accordance to the Contracts (Rights of
Third Parties) Act 1999 and pursuant to the NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT dated 27
May 2010, the Registrar of Births and Deaths has not incurred default charges of
FIFTEEN HUNDRED POUNDS STERLING (or functional currency of the United
Kingdom).
11. Material evidence demonstrating that the children of MOTHERS STRAWMAN
and FATHERS STRAWMAN will benet signicantly from the registration of their
births.
12. Material evidence demonstrating that, in stating your daughter will face
considerable diculties in the future if she does not have a birth certicate in your
letter of 11 June 2010, the Registrar of Births and Deaths has not breached the
Malicious Communication Act 1988.
13. Material evidence demonstrating that any and all attempts to enforce statutes
upon persons who have not consented to perform under said instruments would
not represent fundamental breaches of international human rights laws, as well as
the Laws of Nature.
In good faith, MOTHERS STRAWMAN looks forward to receiving the foregoing
reasonably requested substance within seven (7) days of your receipt of this
notice. Failure to deliver an appropriate response will result in the lawful
presumption that the non-negotiable conditions cannot be met and that your
request has been duly withdrawn, with no further action required.

Without malice, mischief, ill-will, frivolity or vexation; in sincerity and honour,

By: FATHERS STRAWMAN

For & on behalf of MOTHERS STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice Without Recourse Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Three months after our daughters birth, the Home Oce sent a letter conrming
that no further action would be taken, but not without attempting to convince us
that obtaining a passport and a place at a state school would be extremely dicult
for her because of the position we have taken.

Thus far, we have had no need to take our daughter to the local NHS surgery, but
her name is privately registered with the practice for the purposes of dealing with
any situation which necessitates a visit to the doctor. This was oered by our family
GP without any fuss, after it was established that our daughters birth had not been
registered on perfectly valid grounds, following a private meeting at our home with
the doctor and a local authority Health Visitor.

During the meeting, which we agreed to in order to ensure that our position was
fully understood by the extremely nervous, but ultimately supportive, people who
were initially sent by their purported superiors to determine whether we posed any
risk to our beautiful child, following the senior registrars reluctant decision to
allow our refusal to register her birth to remain unchallenged, despite the previous
threats of legal proceedings.

The main outcome of the meeting was that we accepted that our family doctor and
the Heath Visitor had a common law obligation to make sure that a child who has
not been registered is coming to no harm. Since this could only be established over
a certain period of time, my wife and I agreed to allow the Health Visitor to visit us
again when our daughter around her rst and second birthdays.

These visits took place without any problems arising and involved little more that
informal chats about her diet, sleeping patterns and susceptibility to illness, as well
as growth rates and cognitive development. During these relaxed conversations my
wife and I expressed our reasons for refusing to allow the NHS to vaccinate our
daughter and our decision to take responsibility for the education of our children,
none of whom will be attending the mind-programming open prison for children,
more commonly known as school. Whilst eyebrows were certainly raised, no
objections were, as it was abundantly obvious from the rst visit to the last that our
daughter is thriving.

When the doorbell rang for the nal visit, the Health Visitor was welcomed into our
home by a smiling two year old, who opened the door and proclaimed Hello Sarah!
Come in an have a cup of tea! About half an hour later, following a conversation
about the eect of our refusal to register upon the purported local authority
because of certain nancial implications, which we took as implicit conrmation
that certain funds are lost by the council every time a child is not registered, she
told us that it was obvious how well our daughter is progressing and that we were
the future of parenting. The registrar of births and deaths would no doubt take
a dierent view.

With the common law obligations of the Health Visitor now fullled, she conrmed
as she was leaving that the information given was to remain private and
condential in a closed le, which would be made available to us in the event of our
request for such. However, for all intents and purposes, the Crown, its agencies and
ocers have accepted the fact that our lawfully declared superior guardianship
rights cannot be superseded by government legislation.
The Passport Issue

We also wasted no time in applying for a passport from the Home Oce, in support
of which we sent the Certicate of Birth Record that we created ourselves, along with
the following notice.

MR CHRISTOPHER DIDDLE
BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER
IDENTITY & PASSPORT SERVICE
PO BOX 666

28 JULY 2010
NOTICE OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear MR DIDDLE,

In my capacity as agent for my partner, MOTHERS STRAWMAN; following receipt of

your letter dated 09 July 2010 requesting a Full Birth (or Full Adoption) Certicate
or equivalent, please nd enclosed a Certicate of Birth Record for our daughter.

We fully understand the unusual nature of this presentment, which nevertheless

provides the IDENTITY & PASSPORT SERVICE with all the necessary information to
determine the unequivocal eligibility of our daughter for a UNITED KINGDOM
PASSPORT: the name of the applicant; details and evidence of the place and date of
her birth; evidence of the UK citizenship of her parents.

We acknowledge the fact that we have chosen not to register the birth of our
children, since we are of the heartfelt belief that to do so would not be in their best
interests, but we are also acutely aware that this enclosure more than adequately
demonstrates our daughters entitlement to UNITED KINGDOM citizenship, whilst
the right of all subjects [citizens] to travel to and from any port or place within
those territories considered Her Majestys dominions is clearly prescribed by
statute in the Union with Scotland Act 1706, for the purposes of which the issue of
a passport is generally required.

Wherefore, in good faith, we trust this presentment meets with all reasonable
requirements and look forward to receiving a UNITED KINGDOM PASSPORT for our
daughter in due course. Should you have any questions or queries, please do not
hesitate to contact me.

Without malice, mischief, ill-will, frivolity or vexation; in sincerity and honour,

By: FATHERS STRAWMAN

For & on behalf of MOTHERS STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
Without Recourse Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Predictably enough, the I&P Oce wrote back claiming that the Certicate of Birth
Record was not sucient evidence of our daughters right to a UK Passport, but they
did concede that the application would be successful if we complied with the specic
requirements stipulated by the Home Oce.

MR CHRISTOPHER DIDDLE
BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER
IDENTITY & PASSPORT SERVICE
PO BOX 666

17 SEPTEMBER 2010

NOTICE OF FURTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear MR DIDDLE,

Following receipt of your letter dated 25/08/2010, in relation to the issue of a

passport for DAUGHTERS STRAWMAN; for and on behalf of MOTHERS STRAWMAN,
as requested, please nd enclosed the following documents:

a. Letter dated 04/06/2010 from the partners of LOCAL SURGERY, with regard to
our daughters six week development check, which was subsequently done by
FAMILY DOCTOR at the address below.
b. Letter from the General Register Oce dated 21 July 2010, clearly stating that
our daughters birth has not been registered.

Since this presentment would seem to meet the requirements outlined in your letter
of the 25th of August, we look forward to receiving our daughters passport within
seven (7) days of your receipt of this notice, as it our intention to travel abroad
shortly after that date.

In sincerity and honour,

By: FATHERS STRAWMAN

For & on behalf of MOTHERS STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice Without Recourse Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Shortly afterwards we received another letter, this time stating that the letter from
the partners of our local surgery did not comply with the strict requirements for the
information for a successful application, to which we replied with the following
notice.

MR CHRISTOPHER DIDDLE
BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER
IDENTITY & PASSPORT SERVICE
PO BOX 666

21 October 2010

NOTICE OF FURTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear MR DIDDLE,

As requested, please nd enclosed a letter from our family doctor, conrming that
our daughter was born on DATE OF BIRTH at PLACE OF BIRTH, and that she has
lived with us at the address below since her birth, where FAMILY DOCTOR has
performed two physical examinations.

Since this presentment would seem to meet the requirements discussed, we look
forward to receiving our daughters passport in due course. Many thanks.

In sincerity and honour,

By: FATHERS STRAWMAN

For & on behalf of MOTHERS STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice Without Recourse Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Fourteen days later, the documents we submitted with the application were
returned, along with a note conrming that the application was being processed.
The passport arrived in the post the following morning, thus demonstrating that the
Home Oce has no legal recourse to deny a passport to an unregistered child,
provided that the right to have one issued can be demonstrated with a simple letter
from the family doctor or a statutory declaration by an individual who has rsthand
knowledge of the time and place of birth.

It is a wonderful feeling to know that our daughters future sweat equity has not
been pledged to the Crown, in return for a Birth Certicate and the dwindling benet
privileges of the failing Welfare State. It is also reassuring to know that the
government does not have the jurisdiction to interfere in our daughters life.

Until such time that we have an alternative, a security agreement on loan from
Elizabeth II will be more than sucient for our short-term international travel
purposes, pursuant to the Law of Necessity. Once a diplomatic family passport has
been acquired, Her Majestys will be duly disposed of.

References

Legitimacy Act 1926

An Act to amend the law relating to children born out of wedlock.

[...] Act modied by Legitimacy Act 1959 (c. 73), s. 1(2) (s. 1 of which said Act is
repealed by Legitimacy Act 1976 (c. 31, SIF 49:7), Sch. 2 (subject to savings in
Sch. 1 para. 4(2)(3) in relation to any dignity or title of honour or the devolution of
property along therewith and in Sch. 1 para. 5 in relation to Succession to the
Throne))

Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953

An Act to consolidate certain enactments relating to the registration of births and

deaths in England and Wales with corrections and improvements made under the
Consolidation of Enactments (Procedure) Act 1949.

[...] 2. Information concerning birth to be given to registrar within fortytwo days.

In the case of every birth it shall be the duty
(a) of the father and mother of the child; and
(b) in the case of the death or inability of the father and mother, of each other
qualied informant, to give to the registrar, before the expiration of a period of
fortytwo days from the date of the birth, information of the particulars required to
be registered concerning the birth, and in the presence of the registrar to sign the
register: Provided that
(i) the giving of information and the signing of the register by any one qualied
informant shall act as a discharge of any duty under this section of every other
qualied informant;
(ii) this section shall cease to apply if, before the expiration of the said period and
before the birth has been registered, an inquest is held at which the child is found
to have been stillborn

[...] 4. Registrars power to require information concerning birth.

Where, after the expiration of fortytwo days from the date of the birth of any child
or from the date when any [F1 stillborn child] is found exposed, the birth of the
child has, owing to the default of the persons required to give information
concerning it, not been registered, the registrar may by notice in writing require
any qualied informant
a) to attend personally at the registrars oce, or at some other place appointed by
the registrar within his subdistrict, before such date (being not less than seven
days after the receipt of the notice nor more than three months after the date of
the birth or nding) as may be specied in the notice; and
b) to give information to the best of that persons knowledge and belief of the
particulars required to be registered concerning the birth; and
c) to sign the register in the presence of the registrar:
Provided that any such requirement shall cease to have eect if, before the date
specied in the notice and before the person to whom the notice is given complies
with it, the birth is duly registered.

[...] 36. Penalties for failure to given information, etc.

If any person commits any of the following oences, that is to say

a) if, being required by or under this Act to give information concerning any birth or
death . . . F1 or any dead body, he wilfully refuses to answer any question put to
him by the registrar relating to the particulars required to be registered concerning
the birth or death, or save as provided in this Act, fails to comply with any
requirement of the registrar made thereunder;
b) if he refuses or fails without reasonable excuse to give, deliver or send any
certicate which he is required by this Act to give, deliver or send;
c) if, being a parent and save as provided in this Act, he fails to give information
concerning the birth of his child as required by this Act; or
d) if, being a parent of a legitimated person . . . F2 , he fails to comply with any
requirement of the Registrar General made under or by virtue of section fourteen of
this Act; or
e) if, being a person upon whom a duty to give information concerning a death is
imposed by paragraph (a) of subsection (3) of section sixteen or seventeen of this
Act, he fails to give that information and that information is not given,
he shall be liable on summary conviction to a ne not exceeding [F3 2] for each
oence.

[...] 38. Prosecution of oences and application of nes.

(1) Subject as may be prescribed, a superintendent registrar may prosecute any

person for an oence under this Act committed within his district, and any costs
incurred by him in any such prosecution, being costs which are not otherwise
provided for, shall be defrayed out of moneys provided by Parliament.

From Bouviers:

DUTY, natural law. A human action which is, exactly conformable to the laws which
require us to obey them.

2. It diers from a legal obligation, because a duty cannot always be enforced by

the law; it is our duty, for example, to be temperate in eating, but we are under no
legal obligation to be so; we ought to love our neighbors, but no law obliges us to
love them.

3. Duties may be considered in the relation of man towards God, towards himself,
and towards mankind. 1. We are bound to obey the will of God as far as we are able
to discover it, because he is the sovereign Lord of the universe who made and
governs all things by his almighty power, and innite wisdom. The general name of
this duty is piety: which consists in entertaining just opinions concerning him, and
partly in such aections towards him, and such, worship of him, as is suitable to
these opinions.

4. 2. A man has a duty to perform towards himself; he is bound by the law of

nature to protect his life and his limbs; it is his duty, too, to avoid all intemperance
in eating and drinking, and in the unlawful gratication of all his other appetites.

5. 3. He has duties to perform towards others. He is bound to do to others the

same justice which he would have a right to expect them to do to him.
 Refusing to Register a Birth YouTube

Share: 7 1 0 387 0 0

13/06/2013

Previous Next
 View Full Site

Proudly powered by WordPress