Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COP DITERIMA/APPROVED
STAMP
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
COURSE INFORMATION
1. INTRODUCTION
2. OBJECTIVES
The objective of this experiment is to show the totals of distributed load may
be considered as equivalent concentrated load acting on the beam at the
centre of gravity and the reactions of the support for the beam can be
calculated by applying the principle of moments.
3. LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of this topic, the students will be able to display basic skills and
knowledge of equilibrium of rigid body using laboratory equipments, analyze
observable data obtained from equilibrium of rigid body experiment properly,
work effectively in a group through laboratory experiment and presentation,
and demonstrate comprehension of the general ideas of the topic through
written report that comply with specified standards.
4. THEORY
BDA17001-2012 3
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
Beams which are not symmetrically loaded must still carry the total load at
the supports, but the proportion of the total weight carried by each support
will depend on the weight of each individual load and the position which is
occupies along the beam.
A beam may also be subjected to a moment load, M. Imagine that the beam
from the left support and right support has a symmetrical load, so the beam
supports load is:
1
Total of Distributed Loading
2
BDA17001-2012 4
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
5. EQUIPMENTS
6. PROCEDURES
P7 P10
2. Adjust the centre hook until the hole in the centre of the beam
lines up with the panel board hole.
3. Attach the spring balance to the upper holes at each end of the
beam with their scales at the ends furthest from the beam and hang
over the remaining two adjustable hooks.
4. Adjust the balance support hooks so that the large hole in the
centre of the beam coincides with hole (Step 2) and the beam is
horizontal. (Set the balance scales to zero).
BDA17001-2012 5
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
All dimensions are in millimetres (mm) and all weights are in Newton (N).
5.1 N
EX 8A EX 8A
RA RB RA RB
Figure 3a Figure 3b
5.1
2.1 2.1 5.1
EX 8A EX 8A
RA RB RA Figure 3d RB
Figure 3c
2.1 2.1
EX 8A EX 8A EX 8A
BDA17001-2012
RA RB 6 RA RB
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
Figure 3f Figure 3g
5.1
2.1 2.1 2.1
EX 8A EX 8A EX 8A EX 8A
RA RB RA RB
Figure 3h Figure 3i
0.1 N
Figure 4
Consider the beam loaded by the force W. This indicates a point load (Fig. 4)
and is applied to the beam by adding weights to a weight hook and hooking
into hole in the lower row of the beam.
EX 8A
Figure 5
Distributed load (Fig. 5) was applied to the beam by placing the groove over
the top edge of the beam.
BDA17001-2012 7
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
Figure 6
7. RESULTS
BDA17001-2012 8
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
Comparison
Experimental value Calculated value (theory)
Test
Ra Rb Ra + Rb Ra Rb Ra + Rb Same /
(N) (N) (N) (N) (N) (N) Not same
Figure
2.55 2.55 5.10 2.55 2.55 5.10 Same
3.1
Figure
2.65 2.65 5.30 2.66 2.66 5.32 Not same
3.2
Figure
5.15 5.15 10.30 5.21 5.21 10.40 Not same
3.3
Figure
5.90 2.15 8.05 5.91 3.39 9.30 Not same
3.4
Figure
3.15 2.15 5.30 3.19 2.12 5.31 Not same
3.5
Figure
4.40 5.05 9.45 4.45 5.06 9.51 Not same
3.6
Figure
2.50 6.95 9.45 3.70 6.33 9.70 Not same
3.7
Figure
6.55 5.95 12.5 6.90 7.97 14.87 Not same
3.8
BDA17001-2012 9
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
8. CALCULATION
Figure 3.1
Ra = Rb = P/2
When P = 5.1,
P/2 = 5.1/2
= 2.55
Figure 3.2
Ra = Rb =2(EX8A) . (2C+B)
2(L)
= 2(2.66) . (2(150)+200)
2(500)
= 5.32 .(500)
1000
= 2.66
Figure 3.3
Ra = Rb = P/2
When P = 5.1,
P/2 = 5.1/2
= 2.55
Ra = Rb = 2(EX8A) . (2C+B)
2(L)
= 2(2.66) . (2(150)+200)
2(500)
= 5.32 .(500)
1000
= 2.66
Figure 3.4
Ra = P1 (l - a) + P2(l - b) + P3C
L
=2.1(500 - 50) +2.1(500 -150) + 5.1(250)
500
= 5.91
BDA17001-2012 10
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
500
= 3.39
Figure 3.5
Ra = w1a(2l - u) + w2c2
2l
= 2.66(2(350) + 100)+ 2.66(2(150)+100)
2(500)
= 3.192
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.8
BDA17001-2012 11
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
9. OBSERVATIONS
In the figure 3.1, the load of 5.1N was added at the middle of beam
with distance 250mm from the left and right. Then we found that the reading
of Ra and Rb are equal.
In the figure 3.2, the two distributed load were put at the middle of the
beam with distance 150mm from the spring balance both side. Then we
found that the reading of spring balance of spring balance Ra and Rb are
equal but a little bit different with reading in figure 3.1 .
In the figure 3.3, the load of 5.1N and two distributed load were put at
the middle of beam. Then, we found that the reading of Ra and Rb are equal
and it is greater than reading in the figure 3.1 and 3.2 .
In the figure 3.4, the load of 2.1N was put at distance 50mm and
150mm from Ra and the load of 5.1N at 250mm from Rb. Then, we found
that the reading of spring balance Ra is larger than Rb. It is mean that the
beam is not in the equilibrium.
In the figure 3.5, the two distributed load were put at 50mm from Ra
and 150mm from Rb. Then, we found that the reading of Ra is larger than
Rb. It is mean beam is not equilibrium because the load of Ra more than Rb.
In the figure 3.6, the two load of 2.1N were put at middle of beam and
it was 50mm from Rb and the load of two distributed load were put at the
50mm from Ra and150mm from Rb. Then we found that the reading of Rb is
larger than Ra. It is mean that the beam is not in equilibrium where the load
Rb larger than Ra.
In the figure 3.7, the spring balance of Rb was changed. Rb was put at
100mm from the end of right side but the Ra remain unchanged. When the
load of two 2.1N were put at middle of distributed load and 50mm to the right
of Rb. The load of two distributed load were put at the 50mm from Ra and
50mm to the left of Rb. Then we found that the reading of Rb is larger than
Ra.
In the figure 3.8, spring balance Rb remains unchanged as figure 3.7
but spring balance Ra changed to 150mm from end of left side. First
distributed load was put 25mm from left side of Ra. While second distributed
load was put 50mm from left side of Rb. Then, the load of 2.1N was put
50mm from right side of Rb. We found that the reading of Ra is larger than
Rb.
BDA17001-2012 12
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
10. DISCUSSIONS
Most of the values of experimental and theoretical value are not same.
This is because some error happened when the experiment was
conducted. Firstly, wind error where when we take the reading of
spring balance, the reading was moved up and down so the reading
obtained not too accurate. Secondly, apparatus error where most of
the apparatus that we used in this experiment is old apparatus, so the
reading also not too accurate. For example of apparatus error is the
elasticity of spring balance was decreased, so the reading obtained
must higher than original reading.
3. Explain how are the steps to study and analyze a beam. What
must be known first before we study a beam?
The steps to study and analyze a beam areanalyzing the weight of the
beam and the distances between hole-to-hole. First thing we must
know before we study a beam is that we know the law of rigid body
and all its equation.
10.2 QUESTIONS
BDA17001-2012 13
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
3. What type of load would be carried by the beam supporting the roof if
a heavy snow fall lay on a flat roof?
11. CONCLUSION
From the experimental work, experimental value for figure 3.1 is same
as theoretical value but the rest of figure are not same.
During handle this experiment, we have problems.Firstly, wind error
where when we take the reading of spring balance, the reading was moved
up and down so the reading obtained not too accurate. Secondly, apparatus
error where most of the apparatus that we used in this experiment is old
apparatus, so the reading also not too accurate. For example of apparatus
error is the elasticity of spring balance was decreased, so the reading
obtained must higher than original reading.
To overcome this problem, windows and fans must turn off to avoid
error during reading and replace old apparatus with new one to get an
accurate reading.
12. REFERENCES
BDA17001-2012 14