Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
Reinforced concrete is one of the most abundantly used construction material, not
only in the developed world, but also in the remotest parts of the developing world. The
RCC structures constructed in the developed world are often found to exhibit distress and
suffer damage, even before their service period is over due to several causes such as
improper design, faulty construction, change of usage of the building, change in codal
provisions, overloading, earthquakes, explosion, corrosion, wear and tear, flood, fire etc.
Such unserviceable structures require immediate attention, enquiry into the cause of
distress and suitable remedial measures, so as to bring the structure into its functional use
again.
1.2 OBJECTIVE
In the last few decades several attempts have been made in India and abroad to
study these problems and to increase the life of the structures by suitable retrofitting and
strengthening techniques. Of the various retrofitting techniques available, plate bonding is
one of the most effective and convenient methods of retrofitting. Among the plate bonding
techniques FRP plates are quite popular now-a-days. But it is observed that the use of FRP
is restricted to developed countries or urban areas of the developing countries due to higher
initial cost and requirement of skilled labour for their application. Thus, there is a need to
develop an alternative technique, which is economical and can be executed at site with the
help of semi-skilled labour available at site. Ferrocement jacketing is found to be one such
attractive technique due to its properties such as good tensile strength, lightweight, overall
economy, water tightness, easy application and long life of the treatment.
1
Many experimental studies have been conducted in recent years to strengthen
flexural members by using various materials. Andrew and Sharma (1998) in an
experimental study compared the flexural performance of reinforced concrete beams
repaired with conventional method and ferrocement. They concluded that beams repaired
by ferrocement showed superior performance both at t h e service and ultimate load. The
flexural strength and ductility of beams repaired with ferrocement was reported to be
greater than the corresponding original beams and the beams repaired by the conventional
method.
The behaviour of ferrocement in flexure depends upon various parameters such as mortar,
type of wire mesh, orientation of wire mesh etc.; hence the behaviour of ferrocement
jackets. In the present paper the effect of wire mesh orientation on the strength, toughness
and ductility of the retrofitted beams is presented.
2
The most widely used construction materials in todays world would be concrete and
steel combined to make reinforced concrete as can be seen in most building construction.
However, the first known example of the usage of reinforced concrete started with the
construction of boats when Joseph Lambot of France began to put metal reinforcing inside
concrete in 1840s. That was the birth of reinforced concrete and from there subsequent
developments followed. The technology at that period could not accommodate the time
and effort needed to produce meshes of thousands of wires. Instead, large rods were used
to make what is now called standard reinforced concrete.
One of the greatest assets of ferrocement is its relatively low unit cost of materials but
in countries which demand higher cost of labor, the usage of ferrocement is not
economical. For countries where unskilled, low-cost labor is available and can be trained,
and as long as a standard type of construction is adhered to, the efficiency of labor will
improve considerably, resulting in a reduced unit cost. With these conditions, ferrocement
proves to be a more favorable option than other materials used in construction, all of which
have a higher unit material cost and require greater inputs of skilled labor. The primary
worldwide applications of ferrocement construction to date have been for tanks, roofs,
silos and mostly boats. In this paper, the flexural behavior of beam strengthened with
ferrocement laminate will be investigated. The result from the testing of ferrocement
strengthened beam will be compared to a control beam to have a clearer insight into the
advantages of using ferrocement. The cracking behavior and ultimate load carrying
capacity will be highlighted in this paper.
3
1.3 HISTORY OF FERROCEMENT/FERROGROUT
The use of ferrocement was first started as early as in 1848. It took the form of a
rowing boat constructed by Jean Louis Lambot. The boat, still in a remarkably good
condition, is on display in a museum at Brigholes, France. Since then, ferrocement was
mainly used in the marine environment.
In the early 1940s, Pier Luigi Nervi resurrected the original ferrocement concept
when he observed that reinforcing concrete with layers of wire mesh produced a material
possessing the mechanical characteristics of an approximately homogeneous material and
capable of resisting impact. After the Second World War, Nervi demonstrated the utility
of ferrocement as a boat-building material. His firm built the 165-ton motor sailor Irene
with a ferrocement hull about 36mm thick.
Ferrocement gained wide acceptance only in the early 1960s in United Kingdom,
New Zealand, and Australia. In 1965, an American-owned ferrocement yacht built in New
Zealand, the 16m Awahnee, circumnavigated the world twice without serious problems,
although it encountered several mishaps.
In 1958, the technology then spread to Russia with the construction of a number of
structures. Examples of these were a ferrocement vault of 17.0m spans in one of the metro
stations in Leningrad and the interior of a hall covered with ferrocement elements.
The more recent ferrocement structures include the Sydney Opera House, built in
1973. Ferrocement tiles were used as surfacing on the vaults of the Opera House, a major
arts centre in Sydney. Similar beautiful buildings and mosque were built in India and
Indonesia using ferrocement.
4
1.4 ADVANTAGES OF FERROCEMENT/FERROGROUT
5
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 GENERAL
Rehabilitation work has emerged as an important subject in an effort to deal with the
problems of deteriorating infrastructure. For that purpose, several strengthening methods
have been used in the past such as enlargement of cross section, reduction of span length,
external post-tensioning, addition of new steel members and external plate bonding with
FRP plate which result in various degree of success. There is a need to develop an
alternative technique, which can be implemented at site with the help of semi-skilled labor
available on site. The advantages of using ferrocement for strengthening work are its high
tensile strength, easy application as well as its low cost in terms of materials and labors.
This has led to a large scale of research on this material and thus produced a lot of
information regarding the design and construction techniques using ferrocement.
6
Nassif and Najm [3] conducted an experimental and analytical investigation of
ferrocement-concrete composite beams whereby the method of shear transfer between
composite layers is examined. It was concluded from this study that full composite action
between both layers cannot be attained based on rough surfaces without shear studs and a
minimum of five studs should be used to ensure full composite action. Shear studs with
hooks exhibited better pre-cracking stiffness as well as cracking strength compared to all
other types of studs. It was also concluded that beam specimens with square mesh are
better for crack control than beam with hexagonal mesh.
A research done by Jumaat and Alam [4] showed that the spacing of the shear
connectors used for the purpose of strengthening of beam also affects the formation of first
crack, mid-span deflections and also the load capacity of the beam. The improvements in
cracking, deflection and ultimate load was greater with smaller shear connector spacing.
They also concluded that the performance of the strengthened beam with higher volume
fraction of reinforcement in ferrocement laminate was slightly better than the one with
lower volume fraction. It has also been found that pre-cracked beams prior to repair did not
affect the ultimate load capacities of the strengthened beams.
The shear behavior of ferrocement thin webbed sections had been studied by Ahmad,
Lodi and Qureshi [5] whereby they studied the shear behavior of ferrocement channel
beams by conducting tests under transverse loads for 15 beam specimens. The dominant
parameters which are the shear span to depth ratio, a/h, the volume fraction of the
reinforcement and the strength of mortar, were varied to determine its effect on the
cracking shear strength. Results from their studies showed that the cracking and ultimate
shear strength of ferrocement channel beams increases as the shear span to depth ratio
decreases and/or the amount of wire mesh or mortar strength increases. The crack initiation
and failure mechanism of the ferrocement beams were greatly influenced by the shear span
to depth ratio. They observed that at shear span to depth ratio less than 2.0, first cracking
usually occurs near the mid depth of the section; whereas bottom fibre flexural cracks
appear first at higher shear span to depth ratios.
7
Kazemi and Morshed [6] performed an experimental study to strengthen shear
deficient short concrete columns using ferrocement jacket reinforced with expanded steel
meshes. Ferrocement was found to be good for crack control purposes. Concrete
specimens that were strengthened with expanded meshes showed distributed fine shear
cracking even at the large amounts of displacement ductility capability. They also
concluded that a small amount of expanded meshes is sufficient to increase the shear
strength considerably but a larger steel volume was needed to attain a good amount of
ductility. According to their finding, ties were not as effective as expanded meshes in shear
strengthening of concrete columns.
The flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete slabs with ferrocement tension zone
cover had been investigated by Al-Kubaisy and Jumaat [7]. Their research proves that
reinforced concrete slabs with ferrocement tension zone cover are superior in crack
control, stiffness and first crack moment compared to similar slabs with normal concrete
cover. Deflection near serviceability limit was significantly reduced in specimens with
ferrocement cover.
8
The addition of thin layer of ferrocement to a concrete beam enhances its ductility
and cracking strength. Composite beams reinforced with square mesh exhibit better overall
performance compared to composite beams reinforced with hexagonal mesh. An increase
in the number of layers improves the cracking stiffness of the composite beams in both
cases. [Nassif, H.H et al, 1998, Vidivelli, B. et al, 2001, Nasif, N.H. et al 2004].
A ferrocement shell improves the flexural behaviour of RCC beams, although there
is no increase in the moment carrying capacity of under reinforced beams. However, the
moment carrying capacity increased by 9 per cent and 15 per cent for balanced and over
reinforced sections respectively [Seshu, D.R., 2000].
The ultimate strength of the reinforced concrete beams, which failed due to
overloading and were repaired using ferrocement laminate, is affected by the level of
damage sustained prior to repairing. However, ultimate strength ductility ratio and energy
absorption have been reported to improve after the repair in all cases. The steel ratio used
in the repair layer has a great influence on the amount of gain in the resisting moment,
ductility ratio and energy absorption. The higher the steel ratio the higher the gain in
resisting moment and energy absorption; conversely, the ductility ratio was found to be
decreased with increase in steel ratio [Fahmy, Ezzat H. et al, 1997].
Thus, ferrocement is a viable alternative material for repair and strengthening of reinforced
concrete structures. It has been accepted by the local building authority in Singapore for
use in upgrading and rehabilitation of structures. The National Disaster Mitigation Agency
(NDMA), Government of India, also accepted the use of ferrocement for this purpose.
9
Finite element method of modeling ferrocement strengthened beam has also been done
using ANSYS software to simulate the behavior of ferrocement beam. Elavenil and
Chandrasekar [8] did a research on this and has come to the conclusion that finite
element models represented by load-deflection plot at mid-span shows good agreement
with the experimental and theoretical results. The research also shows that load carrying
capacity as well as the ultimate load of ferrocement strengthened beam is higher than that
of the control beam. The mid-span deflection at any given loads is also lower than that of
control beam.
Research has shown that ferrocement is effective for strengthening purposes for
various types of reinforced concrete members such as beams, columns and slabs in terms
of increasing the flexural strength, crack control as well as deflection. Columns reinforced
with ferrocement jacket also had increased shear strength and higher ductibility.
Construction costs will be slightly higher with ferrocement cover but this is greatly offset
by the money spent on repairing damaged structure
caused by cracking or spalling of normal concrete cover. In addition to that, ferrocement
allows the existing conventional concrete material and practices to be used and thus, is
more practical as a strengthening material compared to others. The usages of ferrocement
and its advantages compared to a normally reinforced beam is an interesting topic for
further investigation. The short-term behavior, cracking load as well as cracking behavior
could be analyzed further to gain more understanding of the advantages of ferrocement.
As the material ferrocement was used for a long time in boat building and similar
allied structures rather than in structural applications, a rigorous engineering definition of
ferrocement was not followed. Within ACI Committee 549, a considerable discussion on
its definition evolved and it was agreed to group together various available definitions
from many sources to come up with a concise and accurate definition that may be
acceptable to the engineering profession. Some definitions considered by the committee
are presented here.
10
Bigg (1968) has discussed the problem of definition in detail. He pointed out that
according to the American Bureau of Shipping it is:
Although at first glance, the above definition seems an acceptable one, it brought
about a number of questions on the words italicised therein, which may have different
meanings of ferrocement to different people. Bigg went on to discuss various aspects of
ferrocement, suggests various ways of defining it, such as a composite material and points
out how the available engineering approach for composites of fiber reinforced concrete
may be used to come up with a definition of ferrocement.
11
As a composite, certain characteristics of ferrocement may thus be summarised as
follows:
a. Since the wire mesh (reinforcement) is much stronger in tension compared to the
matrix (mortar), the role of the matrix is to properly hold the mesh in place, to give a
proper protection and to transfer stresses by means of adequate bond.
c. It follows from (b) above that the stress-strain relationship of ferrocement in tension
may show either a complete elastic behaviour (up to fracture of reinforcing mesh) or
some inelasticity depending upon the yielding properties of the mesh.
d. Since the properties of this composite are very much a function of orientation of the
reinforcement, the material is generally anisotropic and may be treated as such in the
theoretical analysis.
The above discussion indicates the variety of approaches that have been made in a
structural definition of ferrocement. It became apparent to the ACI Committee 549 that the
first task should be to define Ferrocement as a construction material. Accordingly, the
following definition was adopted:
12
2.3 SUMMARY OF LITERATURE
From various literatures being come across a clear idea has been obtained for
strengthening the flexural member using ferrocement which gives a higher load carrying
capacity to the structure.
13
CHAPTER-3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 GENERAL
The methodology worked out to achieve the above-mentioned objectives is followed as
shown in the flow chart below:
Literature review
Material collection
14
CHAPTER- 4
CONSTITUENT MATERIALS
4.1.1 Matrix
The matrix is a hydraulic cement binder, which may contain fine aggregates and
admixtures to control shrinkage and set time, and increase its corrosion resistance. The
binder is itself a composite material consisting of a hydrated cement paste and an inert
filler material.
4.1.2 Cement
The cement commonly used is Portland cement possibly blended with pozzolan.
The cement should comply with ASTM C 150-85a, ASTM C 595-85, or an equivalent
standard. The cement should be fresh, of uniform consistency and free of lumps and
foreign matter. It should be stored under dry conditions and for a short duration as
possible. Cement factors are normally higher in ferrocement than in reinforced concrete.
Mineral admixtures, such as fly ash, silica fumes or blast furnace slag may be used
to maintain a high volume fraction of fine filler material. Filler material is usually well-
graded sand and this classifies the binder material as a mortar. Since the matrix represents
approximately over 95% of the resulting ferrocement volume, its physical properties and
microstructure, which depend upon the chemical composition of the cement, the nature of
the inert filler, the water-cement ratio and the curing regime, have a great influence on the
final properties of the product.
The reaction of Portland cement and water results in formation of hardened cement
paste. The ranges of mix proportions recommended for common ferrocement applications
are sand-cement ratio by weight, 1.5 to 2.5, and water-cement ratio by weight, 0.35 to 0.5.
15
Fineness modulus of sand, water-cement ratio and sand-cement ratio should be determined
from trial batches to insure a mix that can infiltrate (encapsulate) the mesh and develop a
strong and dense matrix. Water reducing admixtures may be used to enhance mix
plasticity and retard initial set, as with conventional concretes. The behaviour of
mortar is similar to that of plain concrete. The major distinction is the size of the aggregate
used. In general a good quality mortar is stronger and more durable than good quality
concrete; however, their basic response to the environment is essentially the same.
16
4.1.3 Fine Aggregates
Normal weight fine aggregate (sand) is the most common aggregate used in
ferrocement. It should be clean, hard, strong, and free of organic impurities and
deleterious substances and relatively free of silt and clay. It should be inert with respect to
other materials used and of suitable type with respect to strength, density, shrinkage and
durability of the mortar made with it. Grading of the sand is to be such that a mortar of
specified proportions is produced with a uniform distribution of the aggregate, which will
have a high density and good workability and which will work into position without
segregation and without use of a high water content. The fineness of the sand should be
such that 100% of it passes standard sieve No. 8. Table 2.1 gives some guideline on
desirable grading.
No. 8 80-100
No. 16 50-85
No. 30 25-60
No. 50 10-30
Those fractions from 4.75 mm to 150 micron are termed as fine aggregate. The fine
aggregate used for the concrete is natural river sand. Fine aggregates are used to make a
greater building strength between cement and coarse aggregate.
17
Table 4.3 properties of fine aggregate
4.1.4 Admixture
Chemical admixtures used in ferrocement serve one of the following four purposes: water
reduction, which increases strength and reduces permeability; air entrainment, which
increases resistance to freezing and thawing; and suppression of reaction between
galvanised reinforcement and cement.
4.1.5 Reinforcement
The reinforcement of ferrocement is commonly in the form of layers of continuous
mesh fabricated from an assembly of continuous single strands filaments. Specific mesh
types include woven and welded mesh, expanded metal lath and perforated sheet products.
There is a wide variety in mesh dimensions, as well as in the amounts, sizes and properties
of the materials used.
19
4.1.7 Skeletal Steel
Skeletal steel as the name implied is generally used for making the
framework of the structure upon which layers of mesh are laid. Both the longitudinal and
transverse rods are evenly distributed and shaped to form. The rods are spaced as widely
as possible up to 300mm apart where they are not treated as a structural reinforcement and
are often considered to serve as spacer rods to the mesh reinforcements. In some cases
skeletal steel is spaced as near as 75mm centre-to-centre thus acting as a main reinforcing
component wire mesh in highly stressed structures, for example boat, barges, tubular
sections, and others.
Steel rods of different kinds are used in ferrocement construction. Their strength,
surface finish, protective coating and size affect their performance as reinforcing members
of the composite. In general, mild steel rods are used for both longitudinal and transverse
directions. In some cases high tensile rods and prestressed wires and strands are used.
Rod size varies from 4.20mm to 9.5mm whereas 6.35mm is the most common.
Ferrocement panels with longitudinal and transverse rods of this size are about 25mm. A
combination of different rod sizes can be used with smaller diameter rod in the transverse
direction.
Some of the substitute materials include bamboo mesh and bamboo skeletal
reinforcement. Chembi and Nimityongskul (1989) investigated the use of bamboo mesh to
replace steel wire mesh in ferrocement water tank. A bamboo cement tank of 6m3
capacities was constructed in 1983. The tank was kept alternatively full and empty of
water to simulate actual field condition and was monitored regularly. After 5 years, they
found that the tank has not shown structural defects. Bamboo reinforcement 0.3 m from
the top of the tank was investigated and found in good condition.
20
Meanwhile, Venkateshwarlu and Raj (1989) investigated the use of bamboo to
replace skeletal steel in ferrocement roofing elements. Slabs reinforced with bamboo strips
as skeletal reinforcement and chicken wire mesh were subjected to monotonically
increasing uniformly distributed load to study the load deflection behaviour and to
determine its serviceability limit (span/deflection). The investigation showed that by using
bamboo, the cost of roofing elements comes to about 50% of reinforced concrete and 70%
of ferrocement elements. The slabs can be prefabricated in the factory or can be produced
at the site manually. The serviceability limit was suggested as 150 and it was observed,
that at deflections up to 10mm, no cracking occurred. Hence, roofing elements can be
produced up to a maximum span of 1.5m and can be used in multiples to cover longer
span.
4.2.1 Water
Water used in the mixing is to be fresh and free from any organic and harmful
solution, which will lead to deterioration in the properties of the mortar. Salt water is not
acceptable but chlorinated drinking water can be used. Potable water is fit for use as
mixing water as well as for curing ferrocement structures.
4.2.2 Coating
21
4.3 MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Naaman and Shahs (1974) work indicated that the stress level at which the first
crack appeared and the crack spacing were a function of the specific surface of
reinforcement. The ultimate load of the ferrocement specimen was the same as the load
carrying capacity of the reinforcement in that direction. This should be expected since the
load is carried by the reinforcement itself after the mortar is cracked.
22
Al-Noury and Huq (1988) had proposed expressions for predicting the first crack
strength and modulus of elasticity of ferrocement in the uncracked and cracked range. It
was found that the first crack strength of ferrocement in tension might be predicted on the
basis of the strain at the limit of proportionality of mortar and the uncracked modulus of
ferrocement. The modulus of elasticity of ferrocement in the cracked range could be
predicted on the basis of the behaviour of an equivalent composite model aligned wires.
Beyond first crack, the crack formation mechanism in ferrocement in the cracked range is
related to the matrix-wire interfacial bond.
Kameswara Rao and Kamasundra (1986) investigated the stress-strain curve and
Poissons ratio of ferrocement in axial compression. It was found that the specific surface
is the only factor, which controls the behaviour of ferrocement in axial compression.
Equations developed for predicting the increase in strength, strain and modulus of
elasticity by regression analysis were used to generate the stress-strain curve of
ferrocement under axial compression. They have found that ferrocement behaves linearly
up to 50-60% of the ultimate strength in compression; beyond this limit the behaviour
becomes non-linear. The value of ultimate strength, strain at ultimate strength and
Youngs modulus increase with increasing of specific surface area.
23
4.3.3 Flexural Strength
Mansur and Paramasivam (1986) proposed a method to predict the ultimate strength
of ferrocement in flexure based on the concept of plastic analysis where ferrocement is
considered as a homogenous perfectly elastic-plastic material. Simple equations are
derived for direct design of a cross-section. An experimental investigation was also
conducted to study the behaviour and strength of ferrocement in flexure. It was found that
the ultimate moment increase with increasing matrix grade (decreasing water cement ratio)
and increasing volume fraction of reinforcement.
4.3.4 Shear
Venkata Krishna and Basa Gouda (1988) performed testing on ferrocement beams
with different volume fraction of reinforcement in transverse shear. It was found that the
shear strength depends upon mortar, strength of wire mesh, volume fraction and shear
span. Theoretical expressions were developed for predicting the shear strength at first
crack and collapse of ferrocement beams with different type of wire meshes namely
hexagonal, woven and welded.
24
4.3.5 Fatigue Resistance
Singh et al. (1986) investigated the influence of the reinforcement on the fatigue
behaviour of ferrocement. They conducted fatigue tests on ferrocement slabs with
different types of mesh reinforcement, studying the effect of the size of wire, galvanising
of the wire and placing of wire mesh in layers to the fatigue strength of ferrocement.
Samples of the wires were also fatigue-tested in air and a relationship is developed
between the fatigue strength of each type in air and in the composite. It was found that the
fatigues of the wire in air and in ferrocement are related. Most fatigue failures occurred by
fracture of the wires and the range of repeated stress in the wires gave the greatest on the
fatigue strength of ferrocement.
Impact strength was defined as the energy absorbed by the specimens when struck
by a swinging pendulum dropped from a constant height. The damage was measured by
the relative flow of water through the specimen surface for a fixed energy absorbed which
is 600lb-in (66.7kN-mm).
25
Shah and Key (1972) tested 9in2 (5625mm2) and in (12mm) thick ferrocement
slabs using an impact tester. From the test, it indicated that the higher the specific surface
of the meshes and the higher the strength of the mesh, the lower the damage due to impact
loading.
Basanbul et al. (1989) studied the fire resistance of ferrocement load bearing
sandwich panels. The fire resistance of the ferrocement wall was found to be encouraging
for designers of ferrocement buildings. Though the thin shell nature of ferrocement has
raised questions about its fire resistance, it was found that ferrocement retains much of the
load bearing qualities of reinforced concrete. Its heat transmission qualities are not as
good as those of reinforced concrete, which would be just under four hours, but this latter
consideration is more dependent on the mass of the wall. Limited problems of spalling of
the front face sheets occurred during the early portion of the test but this spalling was not
severe enough to cause serious structural damage during the period in which the wall
satisfied the ASTM E-119 performance criteria.
4.3.8 Durability
26
and above all the permeability of mortar. The permeability of mortar largely determines
the vulnerability of the mortar to external agencies, so that in order to be durable the
mortar must be relatively impervious.
4.3. 9 Corrosion
27
4.3.10 Water (or Liquid) Retaining Capacity
There are several means of producing ferrocement. All methods require high-level
quality control criteria to achieve the complete encapsulation of several layers of
reinforcing mesh by a well-compacted mortar of concrete matrix with a minimum of
entrapped air. The most appropriate fabrication technique depends on the nature of the
particular ferrocement application; the availability of mixing, handling and placing
machinery; and skill and cost of available labour.
28
The four major steps in ferrocement construction are:
Mortar mixing,
Curing.
4.5 APPLICATIONS
Precast ferrocement elements have been used in India, the Philippines, Malaysia,
Brazil, Papua New Guinea, Venezuela and the Pacific for roofs, wall panels and fences. In
Sri Lanka, a ferrocement house resistant to cyclones has also been developed and
29
constructed. A pyramidal dome over a temple in India and numerous spherical domes for
mosques in Indonesia have been constructed with ferrocement. The choice was dictated by
low self-weight, avoidance of formwork and availability of unskilled labour.
In countries like Hong Kong, Korea, India, Malaysia, Philippines, Sri Lanka and
Thailand, ferrocement boats generally conform to western standards. In Hong Kong, India
and Sri Lanka, most of the ferrocement crafts constructed are used as mechanised fishing
trawlers while in Korea, as fishing boats. In addition, the Southeast Asian Fisheries
Development Centre, Philippines, has used ferrocement tanks for prawn brood stock and
ferrocement buoys for a floatation system in the culture of green mussels. This is the first
large-scale use of ferrocement for these purposes.
30
4.5.3 Agriculture Applications
Thailo, a conical ferrocement bin; was designed and first constructed at the Asian
Institute of Technology (AIT), Bangkok, Thailand. Storage capacities range from 1 to 10
tons. This bin has proved to be structurally sound and construction has provided adequate
protection to the produce against rodent, insect and bird attacks. The bin costs well within
the means of the farmers. Besides, this type of silo also can hold up to 5000 gallons
(22.7m3) of drinking water.
In Ethiopia, underground pits are the traditional method of grain storage. It has
been found that when the traditional pit is lined with ferrocement and provided with an
improved airtight lid, a hermetic and waterproof storage chamber can be achieved.
Ferrocement can be effectively used for various water supply structures like well
casings for shallow wells, water tanks, sedimentation tanks, slow sand filters and for
sanitation facilities like septic tanks, service modules and sanitary bowls. Some findings
indicated that ferrocement tanks are less expensive than steel or fibreglass tanks.
31
The reasons why ferrocement is cheaper are:
Flexibility of shape, freedom from corrosion, possibility of hot storage, relative lack of
maintenance, and ductile mode of failure are important advantages of ferrocement
over other materials
Ferrocement water tanks of 20 to 2000 gallons (0.09 to 9m3) capacity are mass-
produced in India. Bamboo-cement well casings have been built in Indonesia to prevent
contamination of the water.
CHAPTER-5
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
Two concrete beams of Grade 30 were cast for the experimental testing carried out in
the laboratory. One beam is strengthened with ferrocement on its soffit while the other
beam is without ferrocement which act as a control beam. The beam were measured 1500
mm in length with cross section of size 150 mm150 mm. Both the beams were cast using
the same reinforcement which is 2 bar of 10 mm diameter for top and bottom steel
reinforcement. The shear reinforcements were of 6 mm diameter bars spaced at 150mm
center to center. In ferrocement laminate, square wire mesh with 1 mm diameter and
spacing of 14 mm was used.
32
5.2 MATERIALS PROPERTIES
For the beam strengthened with ferrocement, 5 L-shaped bars of 6-mm diameter were
used as shear connector. For the strengthening mortar, cement and sand were mixed in the
proportion of 1:2 by weight and water to cement ratio of 0.4 which gives compressive
strength of 30 N/mm2 after 28-days.
During casting of the beam to be strengthened by ferrocement, the soffit of the beam is
cast in such a way that it is rough and the aggregates were exposed as shown in Figure 1.
The purpose of providing this rough layer is to ensure a better bonding between the
original concrete beam and the ferrocement layer when mortar is applied.
To form the ferrocement beam, 3 layers of square wire mesh of 14-mm opening were
attached to the soffit of the beam. Five L-shaped shear connector were used to secure the
wire mesh from peeling off during testing. Mortar is placed through hand plastering
whereby mortar is forced through the mesh. Surfaces are finished to about 30mm to assure
proper cover to the last layer of wire mesh and leave to dry for about 1 week before it
undergo flexural testing (Figure 2).
33
Figure 5.1: Experimental set-up. Figure 5.2: Cross section A-A
All the beams were tested under 2-point loading over a span of 1400mm and also
instrumented for the measurement of mid-span deflections. Figure 3 and figure 4shows the
loading point on the beam and the cross-section of ferrocement beam respectively. Loading
is applied until the beam collapsed and the ultimate load is then noted. The ultimate load
capacity and mid-span deflection of the ferrocement strengthened beam is then compared
with that of a normal beam.
Linear displacement transducers were used to measure the mid-span deflection of the
beam. The deflection readings were recorded by a portable data logger. Before testing, it
was made sure that the transducer was touching the soffit of the test beams. During testing,
the load was applied by two hydraulic jacks attached to the pressure gauge. The pressure
gauge records the applied load in unit bar or psi and based on past experiments, 1 unit bar
of pressure from the meter corresponds to 0.31 kN. Cracks were visually detected using a
magnifying glass and its propagation was traced and the corresponding loads were
recorded on the surface of the beam.
34
All the beams were tested with concentrated load applied in 10 bar (3.1 kN) for the
first time and 5 bar (1.55 kN) subsequently. The developments of crack were traced using a
marker and the first crack loads were also recorded. For every load increments, the
corresponding deflections were printed out from the data logger. Loading continued until
the cracking on the beam were severe enough. Cracks started at the soffit of the beam and
moved vertically as more load is applied. Loading is applied incrementally and stop once
the cracks has passed the neutral axis of the beam.
35
CHAPTER - 6
WORK SCHEDULE
WORKPLAN
STUDYING PROPERTIES OF
OCTOBER TO NOVEMBER
MATERIALS
0 1 2 3 4 5 WORKPLAN
WORK PLAN 1
WORK TO BE DONE
MIX DESIGN JANUARY
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
WORK PLAN -2
36
7. CONCLUSION
37
REFERENCES
[1] ACI Committee 549 report, Guide for the Design, Construction and Repair of
Ferrocement, ACI 549.1R-93, 1993
[2] Paramasivam, P., Lim, C. T. E. and Ong, K. C. G., 1997. Strengthening of RC Beams
with Ferrocement Laminates, Cement and Concrete Composites, 20:53-65
[3] Nassif, H. H. and Najm, H., 2003. Experimental and analytical investigation of
ferrocement-concrete composite beams, Cement & Concrete Composites, 26:787-796
[5] Ahmad, S. F., Lodi, S. H. and Qureshi, J. 1995. Shear behaviour of ferrocement thin
webbed sections, Cement and Concrete Research, 25(5):969-979
[6] Kazemi, M. T. and Morshed, R., 2005. Seismic shear strengthening or R/C columns
with ferrocement jacket, Cement and Concrete Composites, 27:834-842
[7] Al-Kubaisy, M. A. and Jumaat, M. Z., 2000. Flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete
slabs with ferrocement tension zone cover, Construction and Building Materials,
14:245-252
[8] Elavenil, S. and Chandrasekar, V., 2007, Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams
Strengthened with Ferrocement, International Journal of Applied Engineering
Research, Volume 2, Number 3, pp. 431-440.
38
[12] Abdullah A, Takiguchi K. an investigation into the behavior and strength of
reinforced concrete columns strengthened with ferro cement jackets. Cement and
Concrete Composite. 2003 Feb; 25(2):23342.
[13] Sujatha A. Case study of ferro cement coating technique on masonry walls.
Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2014 Jun; 7(S5):11.
[14] Nassif H, Najam H. Experimental and analytical inves- tigation of ferro cement
Concrete Composite Beams. Cement and Concrete Composite. 2004 Oct; 26(7)
39