Technical Financial Proposal Evaluation Report- 9 Tourism Properties_V1 (3).

docx [Read-Only]

Main document changes and comments

Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
3
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
33
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
3
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
4
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
445
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
4
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
4
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
5
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
556
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
5
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
5
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
6
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
66
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
6
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
9
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
99
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
9
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
9
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
99
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
9
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
14
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
141412
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
14
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
14
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
14
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
141413
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
14
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
14
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
16
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
161615
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
16
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
16
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
20
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
2020
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
20
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
22
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
222221
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
22
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
22
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
23
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
232322
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
23
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
23
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
24
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
242425
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
24
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
24
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
28
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
282856
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
28
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
28
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
29
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
292958
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
29
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
29
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
75
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
757579
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
75
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
75
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
76
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
767685
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
76
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
76
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
Error!Bookmarknotdefined.
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
Error!Bookmarknotdefined.Error!Bookmarknotdefined.99
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
Error!Bookmarknotdefined.
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
Error!Bookmarknotdefined.
Page 2: Inserted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
Error!Bookmarknotdefined.
Page 2: Deleted Sudeep Shaurya 18-06-2017 19:50:00
Error!Bookmarknotdefined.Error!Bookmarknotdefined.101
Page 2: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:06:00
Error!Bookmarknotdefined.
Page 2: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 11:44:00
Error!Bookmarknotdefined.
Page 2: Comment [SP1] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00
Pleasecheckthepagenumber

Page 3: Comment [SP2] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 11:57:00

TheCorrigendumextendedtheagreementperiodof20years.Changethisaccordingtothecorrigendum.

Page 4: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:58:00

1.4
Page 4: Comment [SP3] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 16:02:00
Pleasementionthedetailsoftheproposalreceived(Clause2.1)asfirstpointandthenmentiondetailsofthe
propertiesforwhichnoproposalswerereceivedandgivenumbertoeachpoint

Page 5: Deleted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 17:46:00

said 8 (Eight)
Page 5: Comment [SP4] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00
TechnicalProposalsubmittedby8biddersfor6tourismproperties

Page 5: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 17:46:00

5 tourism properties (except Tourist Information Cent
Page 5: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:50:00
r
Page 5: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 17:47:00
er, Jamshedpur due to receipt of single bid)
Page 5: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:50:00
r
Page 5: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:51:00
From the 6 (Six) Tourism Properties for which the Proposals were received,
Page 5: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:52:00
T
Page 5: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:52:00
t
Page 5: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:52:00
Bid
Page 5: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:52:00
Proposal received
Page 5: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:52:00
as there was only
Page 5: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:52:00
since
Page 5: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:52:00
was received
Page 5: Comment [SP5] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00
Mentionthispointbefore3.1above.
Page 5: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:53:00
were evaluated for all the bids against
Page 5: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:53:00
received for
Page 5: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 11:53:00
were evaluated
Page 5: Inserted Sandeep P 13-06-2017 17:49:00
The evaluation criteria provided in this regard in the RFP document is set out in Annexure ________.
Page 5: Comment [SP6] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 12:06:00
Pleaserefertocomment7below;

Page 6: Comment [SR7] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:00:00

Foreaseofreferenceandclarityinthereport,itissuggestedthisentiresectionbeprovidedasAnnexure,asthe
sameisreproductionoftheRFPprovisions.

Page 9: Comment [SR8] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 16:30:00

Theflowofthereportshouldbeasfollow;(i)outcomeoftestofresponsiveness,(ii)outcomeofevaluationof
technicalcapacityand(iii)financialcapacity.Reportmaybemodifiedonthisbasis.

Page 9: Comment [SR9] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:19:00

ItisnoticedthatthesectiononTestofResponsiveness(A)andthestageofevaluationofqualificationcriteriaare
mixedupinthissectionofthereport(eg.see5.3.1(v),asperthatthebidderisnotmeetingtheeligibility
conditions.Sorejectionisnotbecausehisbidisnonresponsive,butbecausehefailedtomeettechnicalcapacity.
Therefore,bringingthisundertheheadingTestofResponsivenessisnotcorrect).So,itissuggestedthatthe
headingberenamedandTestofResponsivenessandEvaluationofTechnicalProposalandSectionA,BandCof
thisreportbeprovidedunderthisheadinginasuitablemanner.(specificcommentshoweverisgivenforthis
section)

Page 9: Comment [SP10] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 16:35:00

Here,youcanmentionthat,theproposalswerecheckedfortestofresponsivenessandforproposalswhichwere
provisionallyresponsivesubjecttoclarification,letterswereissuedseekingclarification.Onreceiptofclarification
fromthebidders,testofresponsivenesswascompletedandtheirtechnicalandfinancialcapacitywasevaluated.

Page 9: Comment [SP11] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 06:43:00

Removethistable,youaregivingtheresponsiveproposal/bidderslistin5.3

Page 10: Comment [SP12] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 12:14:00

Whileprovidingsummaryofevaluationforeachofthebidder,providecategorywiseoutcomeforeachbidder.For
eg.ifthebidderhassubmittedforcategoryIandcategoryII,thenmentioncategoryIfirstandcompletethe
summaryandthenwriteforcategoryIIprojects.


Alsoasyouhaveclubbedtheprovisionsoftestofresponsivenessandeligibilityconditions,itisbetterfirsttogive
outcomeofthetestofresponsivenessandthenoutcomeoftheeligibilityconditions.[Howevernotethat,ifa
bidderhasbeenrejectedintestofresponsivenessasnonresponsivebid,thenbidsofsuchbiddershallnotbe
consideredfurtherforevaluationoftheTechnicalProposal(eligibilityconditions)].

Requestyoutorewritethesummaryintheorderofcategory,testofresponsivenessandtheneligibilitycondition.

Page 10: Comment [SP13] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 12:12:00

Firstly,giveaoutcomeoftestofresponsivenessforthedocumentssoughtunderTechnicalProposal.Postthat,
youmentioncategorywiseproposalandsummaryintermsofTestofResponsivenessandEligibilityconditionand
whethertheproposalisresponsiveornotandeligibleforfurtherevaluationornot.

Page 10: Comment [SP14] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 06:37:00

ForTalwantiConstructionyouhavementionedboththecategoriesandhaveconcluded,howeverherefor
PanchananRaut,youhavesplittheevaluationofproposalintoAandB.

RequestyoutosplittheevaluationsummaryofTalwantiConstructionasA,Bcategorywise.Itwouldbeeasyfor
theauthorityforcheckingwhichproposalforwhichcategoryandwhetheritisresponsive/eligibleornot.

Page 10: Comment [SP15] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 06:32:00

Numberingiswrong,after5.2,itscoming5.3.1.pleasecorrectthenumberinginthedocument.

Page 10: Comment [SP16] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00

Usually,intestofresponsiveness,thedetailsaregivenintheformofatableinannexuresandinthemain
documentwheresummaryisgiven,itneedstobementionedwhetherthebidderisresponsiveornot.

Page 10: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:33:00

mandatory requirement of
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:33:00
terms of
Page 10: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:33:00
clearly
Page 10: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:33:00
assigned by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India or equivalent organisation abroad
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:33:00
. It is found that
Page 10: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:33:00
, however
Page 10: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:33:00
same has not been mentioned in the
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:34:00
Auditors
Page 10: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:33:00
towards
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:33:00
for demonstrating
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:33:00
does not provide the membership number
Page 10: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:34:00
towards
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:34:00
for demonstrating
Page 10: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:35:00
have any
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:35:00
mention the
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:36:00
Further, inconstancy in the name of the person issuing work order is also found,
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:35:00
is
Page 10: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:35:00
however
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:35:00
but
Page 10: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:35:00
mentioned as
Page 10: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:35:00
, which is a severe inconsistency
Page 10: Comment [SR17] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 14:58:00
Conclusionforeachproposalundereachcategorymaybedrawnafterprovidinginformationaboutoutcomeof
evaluationwithrespecttoresponsiveness,technicalandfinancialcapacity.

Page 10: Inserted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 14:17:00

.
Page 10: Inserted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 14:17:00
.
Page 10: Comment [SP18] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 06:37:00
Firstly,giveatestofresponsivenessforthedocumentssoughtunderTechnicalProposalandtheresponsivenessof
theProposalsubmittedbythebidder.Postthat,youmentioncategorywiseproposalandsummaryintermsofToR
andEligibilityconditionandwhethertheproposalisresponsiveornotandeligibleforfurtherevaluationornot

Page 11: Comment [SP19] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 15:05:00

Howitcametobenoticed.Whetheritisnoticedbytheauthorityorevaluationteam?Whetherithasbeen
broughttothenoticeoftheauthority?

Page 11: Comment [SP20] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 06:50:00

PleasemakeitclearforwhichprojectthebidderhassubmittedtheBidSecurityandforwhichonehehasnot
submittedit.

Page 11: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:08:00

are the short-comings found in
Page 11: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:08:00
observations were made in
Page 11: Comment [SR21] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:11:00
Thismodifiedlanguagebeadoptedwhereverapplicableinthisreport

Page 11: Comment [SR22] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:09:00

Refercommentabove.Alsothesentencewillrequiretobewrittenproperlytoconveythemeaning.

Page 11: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:09:00

e
Page 11: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:09:00
r
Page 12: Comment [SP23] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 15:25:00
Reworditasthecommitteerecommendedtoseekclarificationontheaboveobservations.Accordinglythe
clarificationletterswereissued.Basedontheclarificationreceived,theproposalwasfoundtoberesponsiveand
wasconsideredforfurtherevaluation.

Page 12: Comment [SP24] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 15:26:00

Rewordthisasmentionedincomment24above

Page 12: Comment [SP25] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 15:26:00

Rewordthisasmentionedincomment24above

Page 13: Comment [SR26] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:29:00

Conclusionmayberewrittenreferringtotheobservationsmadeontheproposalsubmitted.
Page 13: Comment [SP27] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 15:30:00
Rewordthisasmentionedincomment24above

Page 13: Comment [SP28] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 15:30:00

Rewordthisasmentionedincomment24above

Page 13: Comment [SP29] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00

Thisparagraphshouldbemodifiedtotheeffectthat,itgivesinformationcategorywiseandtourismpropertywise,
notbidderwisesummary.

Page 13: Comment [SR30] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:32:00

Itmaybenoticedthattherearelotofinconsistencieswithinthereport.Inthissectionitismentionedthatthe
technicalproposalof5bidderswereconsideredforfurtherevaluationoffinancialandtechnicalcapacity.Butin
section5.4,theparaprovidesthatthefinancialcapacityof5bidderswereevaluated,butthetablethereunderhas
detailsof6bidders.Further,para5.7whichprovidesonTechnicalcapacityevaluation,mentionsthatexperience
of7bidderswereevaluated.Pleaselookintothisandwhileprovidingthedetails,thesekindofinconsistenciesbe
addressed.

Page 14: Comment [SP31] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 06:44:00

Thereisdiscrepancyinmentioningnetworthinsl.no1andsl.no6forDaffodilsFoods.

Requestyoutocheckthenumberforallthebiddersandmentionitcorrectly.

Page 14: Comment [SR32] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 12:29:00

NotclearwhyDaffodilsdetailsareappearingtwice??Andthattoasmentionedincommentabovewith
discrepancieswithinthedetails!!

Page 14: Comment [SP33] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 06:46:00

PleasemergethisandthenFinancialCapacityevaluationwithTestofResponsiveness.ThenyouwritetheFinancial
Proposalevaluation.

Page 14: Comment [SP34] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 15:33:00

MaaAmbeyandPanchananRautaredisqualifiedinTestofResponsivenessandEligibilitycriteriaevaluation.When
youclubtheportionofTestofResponsivenessandTechnicalProposalevaluation,pleaseseethatthebidderswho
aredisqualifiedarenotfurtherevaluated.

AlsowhereisZaika?Pleasecheckthenameofthebiddersmentionedhere.

Page 15: Comment [SR35] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:35:00

Theobservationsmadeonthetechnicalproposalandtheclarificationrequiredisalreadycoveredaspartofthe
testofresponsiveness.So,thiswillbearepetition.Thusneedstobesuitablyplacedwhenyoureworkonthe
report.
Page 15: Comment [SR36] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:38:00
Theorderofdetailsforeachbiddersisdifferentindifferentsections.Suggestedtomaintainuniformityinthis
regardandalsopackagewiseorderbemaintained.

Page 15: Comment [SP37] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00

Incompletesentence.

Page 16: Comment [SP38] Sandeep P 14-06-2017 09:08:00

Addacolumnmentioningthecategoriesandthetourismproperty

Page 16: Comment [SP39] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00

Pleasegivetheinformationinthetablecategorywiseandtourismpropertywise.

EveninClause5.12,pleasegivedetailscategorywiseandtourismpropertywise.

Page 16: Comment [SR40] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:52:00

Section6.1maybemovedtoannexureasitisareproductionoftheRFPprovisiononprocedureforfinancial
proposalevaluation.

Page 19: Comment [SR41] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:50:00

Thisismentionedearlieritself.ThisproposalisanywaynotconsideredforTechnicalProposalevaluation.Sono
needtomentionitinthisstage.

Page 19: Comment [SR42] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:53:00

Whatisremainingtourismproperty?Wehaveonly3categoriesright.Pleaserecheck

Page 20: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:48:00

respective
Page 20: Comment [SR43] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:49:00
Belowtablegivesforonly3tourismpropertiesandnotfor6properties!!!!

Page 20: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:54:00

Considering the above
Page 20: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:54:00
Based on evaluation of the
Page 20: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:54:00
it is observed that the
Page 20: Deleted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:54:00
have submitted the
Page 20: Inserted Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:54:00
were found to have quoted
Page 20: Comment [SR44] Sumitha Rao 14-06-2017 15:54:00
Seeabovecomment

Page 20: Inserted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 15:16:00

.
Page 20: Inserted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 15:17:00
.
Page 21: Inserted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 15:17:00
.
Page 33: Formatted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 15:19:00
Highlight
Page 37: Formatted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 15:19:00
Highlight
Page 38: Formatted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 15:48:00
Highlight
Page 39: Formatted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 15:46:00
Font:English(U.S.),Highlight
Page 39: Formatted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 15:46:00
Font:Highlight
Page 41: Formatted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 15:46:00
Highlight
Page 46: Formatted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 16:14:00
Highlight
Page 48: Formatted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 16:15:00
Font:English(U.S.),Highlight
Page 51: Formatted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 16:16:00
Font:Highlight
Page 52: Formatted Sandeep P 12-06-2017 16:17:00
Font:English(U.S.),Highlight
Page 75: Comment [SP45] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00
Pleasementiontheunits

Page 75: Comment [SP46] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00

Pleasementiontheunits

Page 76: Comment [SP47] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00

Pleasementiontheunits

Page 76: Comment [SP48] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00

Pleasementiontheunits

Page 77: Comment [SP49] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00

Pleasementiontheunits

Page 77: Comment [SP50] Sandeep P 13-06-2017 18:03:00

Pleasementiontheunits

Header and footer changes

Text Box changes
Header and footer text box changes
Footnote changes
Endnote changes