You are on page 1of 4

2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Conference - Xi'an - China

Research on Characteristics of Electric Vehicle


Charging Load and Distribution Network
Supportability
Xin Tong, Chunlin Guo, Xiaoyan Yang, Chenchen Chen
State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources
North China Electric Power University
Beijing, China
xinxinI326120@163.com

Abstract-As the electric vehicle (EV) charging is playing an power quality and three-phase unbalance of the distribution
important role in distribution network, it has attracted more grid when the EVs in charging and discharging state, the
and more attention. In order to clarify the relationship between influence on the load curve of distribution grid in different
the operation mode of EVs, peak charging load and peak power permeability ofEVs are analyzed [7], [8].
load of grid, this paper defines two key parameters: coincidence
factor and mutual coincidence factor. The variation tendencies With further research and demonstration, it is found that
of these two parameters under different EVs scale and charging EV sand power grid needs to form a coordinated whole [9-11].
rate are also analyzed. Based on the characteristics of EV A comprehensive evaluation method is proposed which can
charging load and the power load of distribution network in evaluate the investment and energy loss of distribution grid in
residential area, an evaluation method for distribution network different permeability of EVs [12] . And in order to assess the
supportability is proposed. Finally effectiveness of the evaluation carrying capacity of distribution network for electric vehicle
method are verified by distribution network in residential charging load, seven parameters are selected including voltage
area .The results show that by choosing the capacity of qualification rate and so on[13]. However, due to the
transformer properly, the ability of the distribution network for complexity of the EVs and power grid system, it' s necessary
the integration of EV can be greatly improved. to further study the analysis and design ofthe system.
Index Terms--Charging load, distribution network, electric This paper starting with the charging load characteristics
vehicle, supportability of EVs, defines coincidence factor and mutual coincidence
factor to c1arify the relationship between EV charging load
I. INTRODUCTION
and power load of grid. Based on the characteristics of EV
charging load and the power load of distribution network in
With the rapid development of electric vehicle (EV) in residential area, the mathematical model of the distribution
recent years, research on the charging of EVs is also in the network supportability of EV charging is established and an
ascendant at horne and abroad. The charging of large number evaluation method for distribution network supportability is
of EVs will affect the operation of power grid in all aspects. proposed.
The most direct impact is increasing load in grid, and then it
will affect the stability, security and economy of the power 11. CHARACTERISTICS OF ELECTRIC V EHICLE CHARGING
grid [1], [2]. LOAD
By far, the impact of EV charging load on the power grid A. Coincidence Factor ofElectric Vehicles Charging Load
are studied widely and deeply. As the charging of EVs needs
to be connected to the distribution grid, the impact of EV s on The EV charging load is influenced by the travel mode of
the distribution grid is especially obvious and direct [3]. the driver, so it has obvious peak and valley difference which
Taking a distribution line as an example, the impact of is similar to the electric load ofthe power grid. In the study of
different scales of EV scharging on the load loss and node the interaction between EV charging and power grid, it is
voltage exceeding specified limits on the distribution grid are particularly important to c1ear the relationship between the
analyzed, and a smart charge control strategy is proposed [4] . peak value of the EV charging load and the scales of the EVs.
The results show that the influence on using the transformer is So the paper defines the coincidence factor of the EV s
particularly evident when charging disordered in high power charging load:
[5], [6] . Considering the impact on the node voltage deviation,
This work is joint/y supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for
the Central Universities (20J5MS05), and State Key Laboratory of
Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources (North
China Electric Power University) (LAPS20/6-05)

978-1-5090-5417-6/16/ $ 3l.00 2016 IEEE

1539
and the peak load of the district is 186kW. Fig.l shows the
(1) impact of different level ofEVs penetration on the distribution
network when charging power is 3kW.
Where PEVm is the EV charging load peak (kW); P EV is
the EV charging power (kW); N EV is the total number ofEVs.
The physical significance of K EV is the ratio between the
largest number ofEVs charging at the same time and the total
number of the EV s.
In order to confirm the trend of the EV charging load, this
paper set the situation: the number of the EVs is 20 ~ 10000 ,
EV charging power set 2kW, 3kW, 6kW and 15kW. The
coincidence factors of the EV scharging load are shown in
Table I: 5 10 15 20
Time(h)

TABLE T. THE COINCIDENCE FACTOR OF THE EVS CHARGTNG Figure I. The total load of distribution network with different levels ofE Vs
LOAD penetration

~pow
2kW
20
0.65
50
0.54
100
0.50
500
0.43
1000
0.41
5000
0.38
10000
0.38
It can be found in Fig.l that the EVs charging will increase
the electricity load of distribution network, and electricity load
3kW 0.65 0.46 0.4 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.28
increased significantly at 15: 00-23: 00; When EVs'
penetration rate is 100%, the peak load of the system will
6kW 0.45 0.36 0.27 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.16
exceed the transfonner capacity in a short time.
15kW 0.36 0.20 0.18 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.07
At the same time, with higher charging power of EV s, the
total load of the distribution network fluctuates remarkably
As is shown in Table I. the peak load ofthe EVs in certain which is not conducive to the safe and stable operation of the
region is closely related to the scale of the EVs and the distribution network. According to (2), the mutual coincidence
charging power, but it can't be simply estimated to multiply factor of EV charging in the distribution network can be
the number of EVs by the charging power. Therefore, the obtained. When small-scale of EVs charge in distribution
coincidence factor of the EVs charging load need to be network, the mutual coincidence factors are not constant, but
considered when configure charging facilities of EVs in the in a certain range. The mutual coincidence factors of EVs are
power grid or study the impact ofEV charging on the grid. shown in Table 11.
B. Mutual Coincidence Factor ofEVs Charging Load
TABLE 11. T ABLE II THE MUTUAL COINCIDENCE FACTOR OF
The most important effect of the EV charging in the grid is EVS
the power load increase. Therefore, mutual coincidence factor
of charging load is defined to clarify the influence of the EV Charging
2kW 3kW 6kW 15kW
charging on grid peak load. The mutual coincidence factor power
characterizes the superposition degree of the EV scharging KE_ L 0.96-0.99 0.94- 0.99 0.90---0.96 0.80---0.94
load and grid load. The larger values mean the charging peak
load time is closer to the background peak load hours.

K = ~nax (2) III. EVALUATION OF THE DISTRIBUTION NETWORK


E-I
" "
pEVm + PLm SUPPORT ABILITY FOR EVs CHARGING

Where K E _ L is the mutual coincidence factor of EVs Based on the most common radial distribution network, an
evaluation model of distribution network supportability for the
charging load; ~nax (kW) is the total system peak load after residential area is proposed with the mathematical analysis
EVs connected to the grid; FEvm (kW) is peak load power of methods.
EV charging and FLm (kW) is background peak load of the Suppose the regional distribution network load is the
grid. residential electricity load, which determines the size of the
distribution transfonner capacity, and then it becomes one of
This section studies characteristics of the mutual the main factors to limit load regulation capability of
coincidence factor when the EVs charge in the residential area distribution network for EV charging.
of distribution network. Different size and different charging
power of EVs are simulated by the Monte Carlo, then the Residential electricity consumption load is mainly affected
charging load is added to the measured load of a residential by the number of users as weil as type of community.
area in Beijing. The residential area contains 95 households Residential electricity load under each of the distribution
transfonner is presented as follow:

1540
(3)
a = (S . cos 'f'n\ - P . n . k K E _ L)'17 (10)
Where p (kW) is calculation load of each household; n
m P EV n . K EV K E-L
is the number of households in the region; is the required
coefficient of the residential electricity load; k is coincidence This penetration rate of EVs is defined as the maximum
factor of electricity load. permeability of the distribution network. a m is related to the
The capacity of the distribution transformers can be size of residential area, EV charging power, mutual
calculated by: coincidence factor and so on. When the penetration rate is
greater than a m , the transformer may be overloaded, in which
S' (4) case the scales of the EVs will be more than the distribution
network supportability ..
Where S' (kV A) lS the capacity of the distribution IV. EXAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
transformers; k 2 is the planning margin of the electricity load; In this paper, 500 residential areas were selected which are
cos rp is power factor of the residential electricity load. the basic distribution networks, and the topology is shown in
Fig.2. It is assumed that the calculation load of residential
According to (5), the load rate of the distribution electricity is 6kW for each household; the required coefficient
transformer can be obtained when the residential area is in is 0.6; electricity load power factor is 0.85 and the planning
actual operation: margin of residential electricity load is 0.7. The charging
power of EVs are 2kW, 3kW and 6kW; EV charging
,1,= li (5) coincidence factor and mutual coincidence factor as shown in
Scosrp Table I. and Table 11.
The number of EVs directly determines the EV charging IOkV O.4kV
peak load. Therefore, the EVs penetration rate has become an
important basis for evaluating the regulation capacity of } - - + - - - - - - - -..... Sioad
distribution network for charging load:
n
a=n EV T
(6)
n
Where a is the EV penetration rate in residential areas;
nEV is the total number of EVs; n is the number of Figure 2. The topology ofthe distribution network
households.
The overload rates of distribution transformer in the 500
The maximum power of the EV scharging load when residential areas are calculated using the evaluation method
converted to the grid side can be expressed by: proposed in this paper. The results are shown in Fig.3.

p.
EV
= Pmax (7)
lJ
Where Pmax is the load peak of EV charging (kW); 17 is
E 0.8
."

the charging efficiency. ~"


.,~ 0.6
According to the definition of the coincidence factor, the ~

"
peak load ofEVs charging can be calculated. E
~ 0.4
c
g
P.nax = P EV anKEV (8)
~" 0.2
Due to the concept of the mutual coincidence factor of
EVs charging, we can get the maximum power load when the
electric vehicles connected to the grid. Therefore, when the
distribution transformers in the fully-Ioaded, the relationship The pe.etrat; rate of EVs (%)
between the capacity of the transformer, the electric vehicle Figure. 3 Overload rate of distribution transformer
charging load and the residential electricity load can be
described below: The transformer overload rates will increase with the
penetration ofEVs increasing, as shown in Fig.3. Taking 3kW
(9) charging as an example, when the EV penetration rate less
than 30%, residential distribution transformers don't overload,
The residential area's maximwn penetration rate of EVs however, when the penetration rate reaches 80%, the
can be obtained by:

1541
distribution transformer overload rate exceeds 90%. When the penetration of EVs reaches a certain level, some residential
same scale of EVs charge with higher charging power, the distribution transformers will overload. At the same time, the
overload rate of distribution network transformers also distribution transformers are easier to appear overload with the
become higher. higher charging power. Therefore, it's effective to evaluate a
reasonable capacity of transformers for improving the
In the beginning of planning the distribution network,
distribution network supportability.
different transformer capacity will result in different load rate.
The distribution network supportability for EV charging is
closely related to the load rate oftransformers. And maximum REFERENCES
penetration rate of EV s under different transformer load rates [I] Z. Hu, Y. Song, Z. Xu, Z. Luo, K. Zhan, and L. Jia, "Impacts and
are shown in Table III. Uti lization of Electric Vehicles Integration Into Power Systems,"
Proceedings ofthe CSEE, vol. 32, no.4, pp. 1- 10, 2012.
[2] X. Wang, C. Shao, and X. Wang, "Survey of Electric Vehicle Charging
T ABLE TTT. MAXIMUM PENETRATION RA TE OF EVS UNDER Load and Dispatch Control Strategies," Proceedings of the CSEE,
DIFFERENT TRANSFORMER LOAD RATES vo1.33 , pp. 1-10, Jan. 2013.
[3] G. Xu, Y. Liu, and T. Li , "Study on the impact of electric vehicles
A 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 charging load integrated into distribution network based on analytic
hierarchy process and probabilistic simulation," Power System
2kW 100% 100% 78% 34% 8%
Protection and Control, vol. 40, no.22, pp. 38-45, 2012.
am 3kW 100% 100% 66% 28% 7% [4] H. Li, and X. Bai. "Impacts of Electric Vehicles Charging on
6kW 100% 100% 47% 20% 5% Distribution Grid," Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 35,
no.17, pp. 38-43, 2011.
[5] Q. Gong, S. Midlam-Mohler, V. Marano and G. Rizzoni , "Study of
PEV Charging on Residential Distribution Transformer Life," IEEE
It can be found that the trends of a m are consistent with Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. I, pp. 404-412, March. 2012.
different charging power in Table III. When the transformer [6] L. Kelly, A. Rowe and P. Wild, "Analyzing the impacts of plug-in
load rate less than 0.3, three kinds of charging power are electric vehicles on distribution networks in British Columbia," in
Montreal, QC. 2009 IEEE Electrical Power & Energy Conference
100%. As the load rate increases, a m decreases rapidly, but (EPEC), pp. 1-6.
the rate of descent begins to slow down as the load rate [7] G. A. Putrus, P. Suwanapingkarl, D. Johnston, E. C. Bentley and M.
gradually close to l. Narayana, "Impact of electric vehicles on power distribution networks,"
in Dearborn, MI. 2009 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference,
The results illustrate that the supportability of distribution pp. 827-831.
network is limited, and distribution transformers are more [8] X. Zhang, X. Jiang, L. Wang, C. Zhang, 1. Tian, and 1. Ma, " Research
on assessment methods of distribution network ' s abi lity of admitting
likely to overload when the penetration rate of EVs is higher.
electric vehicles," Power System Protection and Control , vol. 43, no.12,
Furthermore, the supportability of distribution network is pp. 14-20, 2015.
related to EV charging power. For the same penetration rate of [9] M. Yilmaz and P. T. Krein, "Review of Battery Charger Topologies,
EVs, overloads are easier for the distribution network with Charging Power Levels, and Infrastructure for Plug-In Electric and
higher charging power. However, different capacity options of Hybrid Vehicles," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 28, pp.
transformer will result in different transformer load rate. By 2151-2169, May. 2013.
[10] 1. Kiviluoma, and P. Meibom. "Methodology for modelling plug-in
choosing the capacity of transformer properly, the ability of electric vehicles in the power system and cost estimates for a system
the distribution network for the integration of EV can be with either smart or dumb electric vehicles," Energy, vol. 36, pp. 1758-
greatly improved. 1767, March. 2011 .
[11] Y. Liu, 1. Wang, and K. Ari. " EV demonstration policy and business
V. CONCLUSI0N model innovation : global experiences and Ch ina' s pratices," China Soft
Science Magazine, vol. 12, pp. 1-16, 2014.
With the popularity ofEVs, the influence ofEVs charging [12] L. Pieltain Fernandez, T.Gomez San Roman, and R. Cossent, C. Mateo
on the power grid has become a hot topic. This paper defines Domingo and P. Frias, " Assessment of the Impact of Plug-in Electric
two key parameters: coincidence factor and mutual Vehicles on Distribution Networks," IEEE Transactions on Power
Systems, vol. 26, no. I, pp. 206-213, Feb. 2011.
coincidence factor to characterize the relationship between
[13] W. Chen, B. Yang, Z. Zhang, M. Wen, and X. Chen. "Distribution
EV scharging load and grid load. Then a model of the carrying Networks Supportabi lity Evaluation and Optimization Considering
capacity of residential distribution grid for the EV charging Electric Vehicles Charging Stations," Transactions of China Electro
load is established, and an evaluation method for distribution technical Society, vol. 29, no.8, pp. 27-35, 2014.
network supportability is proposed. The results show when the

1542

You might also like