Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SBQ
1st Para
E- Evidence
From the evidence, the reason for the origins of Cold War was due to (Explain
the evidence) the deliberate Soviet desire to expand the influence of
Communism to other parts of the world outside of the European Continent, which
provoked the Western world, thus causing a response that led to the Cold War.
2nd Para
E- Evidence
From the evidence, the reason for the origins of Cold War was due to (Explain
the evidence) the deliberate USA economic imperialism that made the Soviet
Union perceive the USA as attempting to buy over the loyalty of other countries
with their wealth, thus causing the USSR to feel insecure and to embark on
measure to protect their security, which then led to the Cold War.
E- Evidence
From the evidence, the reason for the origins of Cold War was due to (Explain
the evidence) the deliberate Soviet desire to expand the influence of
Communism to other parts of the world outside of the European Continent, which
provoked the Western world, thus causing a response that led to the Cold War.
b)To what extent was the UN unable to uphold human rights from 1945-2000?
(30 marks)
SBQ template
No need for introduction. Go for L2 and L3 straightaway
E Evidence
Cross reference with discernment. Use specific sources that support
the ISSUE you have raised in your statement. Do not quote
indiscriminately. Otherwise, you will simply be repeating the L2 and L3
skills.
Eg For instance, Sources C shows how America .. Also, this is further
reinforced by in Source E.
E Explanation
Good to have elaboration to show analysis and to LINK back to the
question.
Eg From these sources, it can be seen that the America wanted to promote
its economic and strategic interests in the Cold War. USSR also wanted
to propagate its influence in the Third world countries. This clash of
interests of the more prominent member states of the Security Council
paralysed the UN in the implementation of consistent human rights
standards.
OR
From these sources, the UN was effective particularly in the drafting of
proposals and resolutions that gave countries the legal power and
legitimacy to promote human rights in the political and economic arena.
Also the strong cohesive partnership between the UN and NGOs fortified
the overall effectiveness of the passing of human rights
recommendations.
E Evidence
Simply provide some concrete details about the example you have
raised from contextual knowledge.
Eg For example, in that particular episode, the UN. And the more
dominant members of the Security Council
E Explanation
Good to have brief elaboration to show analysis and to LINK back to the
question.
Eg This incident, together with the content information from the Sources,
agree strongly with the hypothesis as
OR
This incident seems to contradict the evidence in the sources in this
particular aspect. This is because
Note: While there is no need for introduction, bear in mind that your main
stand will be reiterated in the conclusion later. Must make your main
argument and stand as obvious as possible in the midst of your SBQ
response before you conclude.
OR
b) You can modify your hypothesis if there is no clear indication that one
stand is more prominent.
From contextual knowledge, the Universal Declaration of Human rights
was signed by the General Assembly to set out basic rights but it was
not a legally binding document in anyway. This meant that the UN
members had problems giving legal force to the principles espoused. It
was only a norm and a widely recognised standard. Hence, the UN could
be considered as successful only to the extent of setting international
standards to be observed. However, when it came to implementing these
standards, the UN was hindered as there was no proper machinery to
examine complaints of abuse of human rights. The hypothesis should be
modified as such- To what extent was the UN empowered to effectively
implement human rights?.