Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACTS:
Petitioner Concepcion Roque seeks for partition for a parcel of land sold unto her
by her half brother Ernesto and Victor Roque which is share of Lot 1549
evidenced by a Bilihan Lubos at Patuluyan dated November 27, 1961 but the
said document is unnotarized.
The remaining portion is being owned by Ernesto and Victor Roque from an
extrajudicial partition.
IAC reversed the judgment of the RTC and denied the petitioners Motion for
Reconsideration.
IAC stated in its decision that an action for partition will not prosper as such from
the moment an alleged co-owner asserts an adverse title. The action that may be
brought by an aggrieved co-owner is accion reivindicatoria or action for recovery
of title and possession. Should the reinvidicatory action to prosper, a co-
ownership relation is found to have existed between the parties.
ISSUE:
HELD:
Petitioner Concepcion Roque is a co-owner of Lot 1549 and therefore entitled to
the portion of the said land.
Under Art 494 for the Civil Code, each co-owner may demand at any time the
partition of the thing owned in common, insofar as his share is concerned.
Petitioner Concepcion Roque, the co-owner seeking partition has been and is
presently in open and continuous possession of the portion of the property
owned in common.
CONCLUSION:
If he court after trial should find the existence of co-ownership among the parties-
litigant, the court may and should order the partition of the property in the same
action.
The action for partition of the thing owned in common does not prescribe.
The court notes in this respect the finding of the trial court that petitioner,
following execution of the Bilihan Lubos at Patuluyan whereon the petitioners
house and her sons are erected, had been in continuous occupancy of the
portion of Lot 1549.