You are on page 1of 9

THE ACUTE HORMONAL RESPONSE TO FREE WEIGHT

AND MACHINE WEIGHT RESISTANCE EXERCISE


AARON A. SHANER,1 JAKOB L. VINGREN,1,2 DISA L. HATFIELD,3 RONALD G. BUDNAR JR,1
ANTHONY A. DUPLANTY,1,2 AND DAVID W. HILL1
1
Applied Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Health Promotion, and Recreation, University of North Texas,
Denton, Texas; 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas; and 3Human Performance
Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

F
Shaner, AA, Vingren, JL, Hatfield, DL, Budnar Jr, RG, Duplanty, AA, ree weight and machine exercises that engage
and Hill, DW. The acute hormonal response to free weight the same major muscle groups and have similar
and machine weight resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res lower-body joint actions, such as the back squat
28(4): 10321040, 2014Resistance exercise can acutely and the leg press exercises, are often used inter-
changeably. However, such exercises are not necessarily
increase the concentrations of circulating neuroendocrine fac-
equivalent (34). For example, the primary movers are the
tors, but the effect of mode on this response is not established.
same for the squat and the leg press exercise (e.g., quadriceps
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of resistance
and gluteus), but the squat is a closed kinetic chain exercise,
exercise selection on the acute hormonal response using similar whereas the leg press is an open kinetic chain exercise. More
lower-body multijoint movement free weight and machine weight importantly, in contrast to the leg press, the squat requires
exercises. Ten resistance trained men (25 6 3 years, 179 6 the individual to balance on two feet and thus requires sub-
7 cm, 84.2 6 10.5 kg) completed 6 sets of 10 repetitions of stantial engagement of stabilizing and core musculature (e.g.,
squat or leg press at the same relative intensity separated by 1 abdominals and back) (3). Research on muscle activation has
week. Blood samples were collected before (PRE), immediately also shown that, even among the primary movers, free
after (IP), and 15 (P15) and 30 minutes (P30) after exercise, and weight exercise results in greater muscle activation than
analyzed for testosterone (T), growth hormone (GH), and cortisol machine exercise (29). Thus, free weight exercises seem
(C) concentrations. Exercise increased (p # 0.05) T and GH at to induce a larger overall muscle mass involvement than
IP, but the concentrations at IP were greater for the squat similar machine weight exercises. This consideration
(T: 31.4 6 10.3 nmol$L21; GH: 9.5 6 7.3 mg$L21) than for
could be important for subsequent physiological adaptations
(i.e., musculoskeletal strength and hypertrophy), as exercises
the leg press (T: 26.9 6 7.8 nmol$L21; GH: 2.8 6 3.2 mg$L21).
involving greater muscle activation or volume of work can
At P15 and P30, GH was greater for the squat (P15: 12.3 6 8.9
elicit a larger acute hormonal response than exercises using
mg$L21; P30: 12.0 6 8.9 mg$L21) than for the leg press (P15:
smaller quantities of muscle mass (18).
4.8 6 3.4 mg$L21; P30: 5.4 6 4.1 mg$L21). C was increased Resistance exercise can provide a potent stimulus for acute
after exercise and was greater for the squat than for the leg increases in concentrations of circulating neuroendocrine
press. Although total work (external load and body mass moved) factors including testosterone (T), growth hormone (GH),
was greater for the squat than for the leg press, rating of per- and cortisol (C). Although resistance exercise often induces
ceived exertion did not differ between the modes. Free weight increases in these circulating anabolic and catabolic hor-
exercises seem to induce greater hormonal responses to resis- mones (15,16,21,22,30), not all resistance exercise protocols
tance exercise than machine weight exercises using similar induce an acute hormonal response (6,27,30). The appear-
lower-body multijoint movements and primary movers. ance and magnitude of an acute resistance exercise-induced
increase in hormones depends, in large part, on the selection
KEY WORDS squat, leg press, testosterone, growth hormone, among the acute program variables: intensity, sets, order of
cortisol, endocrine exercise, rest period duration, and exercise selection
(16,20,30,33). The independent and combined (i.e., volume)
effects of intensity and sets and the effect of rest period
Address correspondence to Jakob L. Vingren, jakob.vingren@unt.edu. duration on the neuroendocrine response have received con-
28(4)/10321040 siderable attention. However, little research exists on the
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research effects of resistance exercise selection on the acute hormonal
2014 National Strength and Conditioning Association response, especially with respect to machine vs. free weight
the TM

1032 Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the TM

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | www.nsca.com

exercise. In the only study that seems to have been published elicit a large acute hormonal response with the squat or leg
on this topic, Kang et al. (12) examined the GH release press exercise. The AHRET consisted of 6 sets of 10
patterns after the back squat and the leg press performed repetitions of the squat or leg press with an initial load of
using 3 different intensity/repetition schemes (3-, 10-, and 80% of 1-RM and 2 minutes of rest between sets. The order
25-RM). In that study, the 10-RM resulted in the greatest of exercise mode for visits 1 and 2 was repeated for visits 3
increase in GH after performing the leg press, whereas 25- and 4. Fasted blood samples were collected before the warm-
RM produced the greatest increase in GH for the squat. up (PRE), immediately postexercise (IP), and 15 minutes
Kang study did not directly compare the effect of the exer- (P15) and 30 minutes (P30) into recovery from exercise, and
cise modality, but the greatest GH response to the squat (25- analyzed for T, GH, C, and lactate concentrations.
RM) was ;10% larger than the greatest response for the leg
Subjects
press (10-RM).
Ten apparently healthy, recreationally resistance trained men
The acute hormonal increase after resistance exercise can
(2131 years, 25 6 3 years, 179 6 7 cm, 84.2 6 10.5 kg)
modulate training adaptations (28); thus, investigations of
completed this study. Participants were resistance trained
appearance and magnitude of the acute hormonal response
for at least 6 months ($2 times a week) before the study
in response to the different selection among acute program
and performed the squat exercise on a regular basis. Partic-
variables are important. Although the neuroendocrine
ipants were screened for potential confounding medical con-
response to manipulation of most of the acute program var-
ditions using a medical history questionnaire. Potential
iables (e.g., intensity and sets) has received substantial atten-
participants were excluded if they had a musculoskeletal,
tion, no study seems to have directly compared the effect of
cardiovascular, metabolic, endocrine, or neurological disor-
the exercise modality using similar multijoint free weight and
der that could inhibit involvement in exercise; previous
machine weight exercises on the acute hormonal response.
orthopedic injuries that limited the range of motion of the
This gap in the literature related to the physiological effects
hip, knee, or ankle joint; back injuries, such as herniated
of commonly interchanged exercises (e.g., squat and leg
discs; steroid use; or inability to meet the demands of the
press) presents a potential dilemma for strength and condi-
exercise protocol (e.g., inability to attain proper squat depth
tioning practitioners in terms of effective resistance exercise
with good technique or inability to perform the leg press
program design. If a difference in the acute hormonal
without the hips lifting off the seat). Before inclusion in the
response exists between free weight and machine weight
study, participants were informed of the procedures and risks
exercises, substitution of exercise, such as the leg press for
associated with the study and subsequently provided written
the squat, might lead to suboptimal resistance training adap-
informed consent to participate. The study was approved by
tations. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine
the University Institutional Review Board.
the effect of resistance exercise selection (free weight vs.
machine weight involving similar multijoint movements) Procedures
on the acute hormonal response to exercise. Visits 1 and 2: Anthropometric Measurements, Familiarization,
and One-Repetition Maximum Determination. Upon arrival at
METHODS the laboratory, participants height and weight were mea-
Experimental Approach to the Problem sured, and their body composition was assessed using
This investigation used a within-participants design to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Lunar Prodigy
compare the acute hormonal responses to the back squat General Electric Company, Madison, WI, USA). Participants
(free weight) and leg press (machine weight) exercises to wore only light athletic clothing and no shoes for these
determine the effect of exercise selection (free weight vs. measurements. Height and body composition were mea-
machine weight involving similar multijoint movements). sured only in visit 1. Participants then performed a standard-
The back squat and the leg press exercises are well suited for ized dynamic warm up (lunges, heel kicks, high knees, body
a comparison of exercise mode since they involve similar weight squats, and shoulder circles) and were familiarized
lower-body multijoint movements, engage a large muscle with the proper technique for performing the back squat
mass, can elicit a substantial hormonal response, and are or leg press exercise following the National Strength and
often used interchangeably in training program design and Conditioning Associations guidelines (1). The specific leg
implementation. Participants reported to the laboratory for 1 press exercise and device are presented in Figure 1. The
visit per week for 4 consecutive weeks. During the first and participant performed the squat with feet placed at approx-
the second visits, participants were familiarized with the imately shoulder width and descended until the femur was
squat and leg press exercises, and their 1-repetition maxi- parallel to the ground (full squat position). Vertical barbell
mum (1-RM) was determined (only 1 exercise mode was displacement was measured from the fully standing position
performed per visit). The order of exercise modes was to the full squat position. To ensure that the participants
assigned using a randomized and counterbalanced design. performed identical displacement for each repetition in the
For the third and fourth visits, participants performed an squat, the participant descended until a researcher observed
acute heavy resistance exercise test (AHRET) designed to proper squat depth and gave the participant a command to

VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2014 | 1033

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Free and Machine Weight Exercise Hormonal Response

The standardized dynamic


warm-up (same as for visits 1
and 2) was performed shortly
after the insertion of the cathe-
ter. After the warm up, partic-
ipants performed 6 sets of 10
repetitions of the squat or leg
press with 2 minutes of rest
between sets. The initial load
for both exercises was set at
80% of their 1-RM. If partici-
pants could not complete 10
repetitions on their own, they
were assisted in completing the
remaining repetitions by a spot-
ter (side spotters for the leg
press and a back spotter for
the squat). If a participant was
assisted in completing repeti-
tions, the load was subsequently
Figure 1. The leg press exercise. lightened with the aim of allow-
ing for the completion of 10
repetitions in the following set.
return to the standing position. The leg press exercise was Blood samples were obtained at PRE, IP, P15, and P30.
performed using a standard hip sled machine with the sled Before blood collection, 3 mL of blood was extracted and
set on tracks at a 458 angle to the ground (Body Masters, discarded to avoid inadvertent saline dilution of the blood
Rayne, LA, USA). The participant lowered the sled until 908 sample. Heart rate (HR) was measured continuously
angle of knee flexion was attained (at which point the thighs using a HR monitor (Polar, Lake Success, NY, USA),
were parallel with the foot platform), and then extended and the values were recorded at PRE, immediately after
their knees to full extension (;1808). Sled displacement at each set, and at P15 and P30. Rating of perceived exertion
458 was recorded and marked on the leg press; the vertical (RPE) was recorded at PRE and immediately after each
sled displacement was determined using vector decomposition set using the 010 category-ratio scale of perceived exer-
of the 458 sled displacement. To ensure participants performed tion (25).
identical displacement for each repetition in the leg press, the
participant lowered the sled until a researcher observed proper Calculation of Work Performed. For each exercise, the (positive)
sled displacement and gave the participant a command to work performed (external work) during each set was cal-
return to the full extension position. Once participants dem- culated based on the external load (e.g., the mass of bar/sled
onstrated proper technique in the exercise, their 1-RM was and weight plates), as (external mass 3 9.81 m$s22 3 verti-
measured using the methods described by Kraemer (13). cal displacement 3 number of repetitions). Conventionally,
the work in resistance exercise is calculated using the pre-
Visits 3 and 4: Acute Heavy Resistance Exercise Test. Partic- ceding equation and using only the external load. However,
ipants reported to the laboratory in the morning (08001000 in this study, because the mass of the body segments moved
hours) after a 12-hour fast and 48 hours without exercise; the differed substantially between the 2 exercises, the total
arrival time was the same for both visits for a particular work performed was also calculated, using the total load
participant. Hydration status was measured using urine (external mass + body mass moved) moved during the exer-
refractometry (Reichert, Depew, NY, USA), and participants cise, as ([external mass + body mass moved] 3 9.81 m$s22 3
with urine specific gravity $1.020 g$mL21 were provided vertical displacement 3 number of repetitions). Body
cold water to drink. To aid participants reporting in a euhy- mass above the knee (determined by DXA) was used in
drated state (urine specific gravity ,1.020g$mL21), they total work calculations for the squat, whereas leg mass
were instructed to drink 0.51.0 L of water the night before (determined by DXA) was used in total work calculations
and the morning of visits 3 and 4. Once hydration status was for the leg press. The vertical displacement for the leg
addressed, a teflon catheter was inserted into an antecubital press was calculated as (sled displacement 3 Cos 458).
forearm vein and kept patent with a 0.9% sodium chloride Work performed for each AHRET was calculated as the
saline solution. The catheter remained in the vein for the sum of the work performed in each of the 6 sets of that
duration of the visit for rapid collection of blood samples. session.
the TM

1034 Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the TM

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | www.nsca.com

Additional Experimental Controls. Participants were asked to


refrain from ingesting alcohol and performing resistance or
exhaustive exercise for the 48 hours before each visit.
Participants were also advised to avoid engaging in sexual
activity the night before or the morning of testing. For 3 days
before visit 3, the participants recorded their nutritional
intake (e.g., all food and beverages consumed) and repeated
the same diet for visit 4. The participants were instructed to
have consistent sleep the night before both visits. All
participants attested that they conformed to these guidelines.
Visits 3 and 4 were performed at the same time of day for
each participant to minimize any potential confounding
effects of circadian rhythms.

Biochemical Analyses. Blood samples were allowed to clot at Figure 3. Growth hormone concentrations before (PRE), immediately
room temperature and were subsequently centrifuged at postexercise (IP), and 15 (P15) and 30 (P30) minutes after exercise for
the squat and leg press exercises. $Significantly (p # 0.05) different
1,500g. The resultant serum was divided into several aliquots from corresponding PRE. *Significantly different from corresponding
and stored at 2808 C until analysis. Samples were analyzed time point for leg press. Mean 6 SE.
for serum T, GH, and C using commercially available
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Alpco, Salem, NH,
USA). The sensitivity and coefficient of variance for each and P30 (squat: 22.5 6 4.8%; leg press: 20.3 6 14.1%). Con-
assay was T, 0.08 nmol$L21 and 7%; GH, 0.5 mg$L21 and centrations of circulating hormones were not corrected for
12%; and C, 11.0 nmol$L21 and 6%, respectively. Hemoglo- plasma volume changes.
bin and blood lactate concentrations were measured in
duplicate using automated analyzers (Hemocue, Angelholm, Statistical Analyses
Sweden and Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA, respec- Data for each variable were analyzed using 2-way analysis of
tively). Hematocrit was measured in triplicate after centrifu- variances (exercise mode 3 time point) with repeated meas-
gation of heparinized microhematocrit capillary tubes ures on both factors. Where appropriate (significant analysis
(Fisherbrand, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). From hemoglobin and of variance), Fishers LSD post hoc was used for specific
hematocrit values, plasma volume shifts were calculated predetermined pair-wise comparisons. Data for C were
using the methods of Dill and Costill (7). Compared with log10 transformed before statistical analysis. For GH and C,
PRE, plasma volume was decreased at IP (squat: 214.3 6 the assumption for sphericity was not met; therefore, the
5.1%; leg press: 211.9 6 9.6%) and gradually returned toward degrees of freedom were adjusted. For hormonal data, the
baseline at P15 (squat: 25.1 6 5.5%; leg press: 22.3 6 12.9%) area under the curve was calculated using the trapezoidal

Figure 2. Testosterone concentrations before (PRE), immediately Figure 4. Cortisol concentrations before (PRE), immediately
postexercise (IP), and 15 (P15) and 30 (P30) minutes after exercise for postexercise (IP), and 15 and 30 minutes after exercise for the squat and
the squat and leg press exercises. $Significantly (p # 0.05) different leg press exercises. #Significantly (p # 0.05, main effect) different from
from corresponding PRE. *Significantly different from corresponding PRE. @Significantly (p # 0.05, main effect) different from leg press.
time point for leg press. Mean 6 SE. Mean 6 SE.

VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2014 | 1035

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Free and Machine Weight Exercise Hormonal Response

method and compared between modes using a paired means


t-test. Alpha level was set at p # 0.05. All statistical analyses

1.4z
were performed using SPSS version 20 (SPSS, Chicago, IL,

14z
1.6z

14z
USA). Data are presented as mean 6 SD unless otherwise
TABLE 1. Lactate concentration, heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) for the squat (SQ) and leg press (LP) exercises. Before exercise (PRE),

30

6
6
6
6
indicated.

5.1
4.0
87
81
2.3z RESULTS
19z
2.1z

17z
Hormonal Responses
15

The T concentrations are shown in Figure 2. A significant


6
6
6
6
main effect was found for time. In both the squat and leg
8.0
6.2
98
87

press, T concentrations were significantly increased (p #


0.05) at IP, P15, and P30 compared with PRE. A significant
2.3z

12z
2.6z

0.7z
0.5z

main effect was found for mode; T was higher for the squat
15z
S6 (IP)

than for the leg press. There was a significant interaction


6
6
6
6
6
6

between mode and quadratic trend for time; post hoc analysis
10.9
7.5
168
149
9.6
9.3

revealed that T was significantly higher for the squat than for
the leg press at IP. The area under the curve was significantly
greater for the squat (1527 6 258 nmol$L21$min) than for the
14z

0.9z
0.6z
13z

leg press (1362 6 143 nmol$L21$min).


S5

6
6
6
6

The GH concentrations are shown in Figure 3. A significant


165
147
9.2
9.2

main effect was found for time. Growth hormone was signif-
icantly increased at IP, P15, and P30 compared with PRE. A
significant main effect was also found for mode; GH was high-
0.9z
14z

0.7z
14z

er for the squat compared with the leg press. After adjusting
S4

the degrees of freedom, there was a significant exercise


6
6
6
6

mode 3 time interaction effect; post hoc analysis revealed


167
143
9.4
8.7

that GH was significantly higher for the squat than for the
leg press at IP, P15, and P30. The area under the curve was
13z

1.1z
0.9z

significantly greater for the squat (433 6 315 mg$L21$min)


14z
after sets 16 (S16), and 15 (P15) and 30 (P30) minutes into recovery.

than for the leg press (163 6 122 mg$L21$min).


S3

6
6
6
6

The C concentrations are shown in Figure 4. A significant


164
139
9.0
8.2

main effect of time was found for C; C concentrations were


significantly increased at IP, P15, and P30 compared with
Significantly different from corresponding time point for leg press.
17z

1.3z
1.3z

PRE. A significant main effect was also found for mode; C


16z

was higher for the squat compared with the leg press. If
S2

6
6
6
6

sphericity was assumed, there would be a significant (exer-


zSignificant (p # 0.05, main effect) difference from PRE.
159
135
8.2
7.7

cise mode 3 time) interaction effect; however, this assump-


tion was not met. Therefore, the degrees of freedom were
1.6z
1.6z

adjusted after which only a statistical trend (p = 0.070.10)


*Significant main effect of mode. Mean 6 SD.
18z
14z

for an (exercise mode 3 time) interaction effect was found.


S1

6
6
6
6

The area under the curve was significantly greater for the
148
132
7.0
7.3

squat (34,344 6 10,179 nmol$L21$min) than for the leg press


(29,193 6 8456 nmol$L21$min).
0.4
0.5

0.7
0.5
10
15

Metabolic Demand
PRE

6
6
6
6
6
6

Lactate concentrations are shown in Table 1. A significant


1.1
1.1
71

1.0
68
0.7

main effect was found for time. Lactate concentrations were


significantly increased at IP, P15, and P30 compared with
SQ

SQ

SQ

PRE. A significant main effect was also found for mode;


Ex

LP

LP

LP

lactate was higher for the squat than for the leg press. There
was a significant (exercise mode 3 time) interaction effect;
Lactate*

post hoc analysis revealed that lactate was significantly higher


RPE
HR*

for the squat than for the leg press at IP, P15, and P30.
A significant main effect of time was found for HR (Table 1).
The HR was significantly increased at each time point
the TM

1036 Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the TM

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | www.nsca.com

TABLE 2. One-repetition maximum (1-RM), vertical displacement, total work for external load, and total work including
body mass moved for the squat (SQ) and leg press (LP) exercises.

1-RM (kg) external 1-RM (kg) including Vertical Total work for Total work including
load only body mass displacement (m) external load (j) body mass (j)

SQ 140 6 24* 215 6 28* 0.58 6 0.07* 35,041 6 7,008 60,509 6 10,759*
LP 366 6 76 395 6 72 0.22 6 0.02 38,372 6 6,600 42,875 6 7,010

*Significantly different from leg press. Mean 6 SD.

following the onset of exercise as compared with PRE. A between free weight and machine weight exercise in this
significant main effect was also found for mode; HR was investigation provide unique insight into the utility of their
higher for the squat than for the leg press. There was a signif- inclusion in resistance exercise programs.
icant (exercise mode 3 time) interaction effect; post hoc anal- Testosterone is important for muscle growth and strength
ysis revealed that HR was significantly higher for the squat because of its anabolic (23) and anticatabolic effects (5).
than for the leg press for each time point with the exception Kvorning et al. (21) found that when T was reduced to cas-
of PRE and immediately following set 1. trate levels in young men, isometric strength did not increase
For RPE (Table 1), a significant main effect was found for after resistance exercise training, and muscle hypertrophy
time. Rating of perceived exertion was significantly increased was attenuated. In this study, both the squat and leg press
following each set compared with PRE. There was no main acutely increased T. This finding is consistent with previous
effect for mode. There was a significant (exercise mode 3 investigations, which have reported that a high volume bout
time) interaction effect; post hoc analysis revealed that RPE of heavy resistance exercise acutely increases circulating T
was significantly higher for the squat than for the leg press (10,18,22,30,32). In this study, the T concentration was sig-
following set 4. nificantly higher after performing the squat than after per-
forming the leg press. The magnitude of increase in T
Work Performed
concentration is affected by the muscle mass involved during
Results for work are presented in Table 2. The external work
exercise (18) and by the total work performed (31). The
(calculated using external load only) performed did not differ
squat incorporates more muscle mass than the leg press
between exercise modes; however, when the body mass
(34), in part because the squat involves the activation of
moved during each exercise (squat: total body massshank
a greater amount of upper body musculature than the leg
mass; leg press: leg mass) was included in the load (added to
press. Furthermore, the partially flexed starting hip position
external load), the resultant total work was significantly
in the leg press allows for less hip range of motion and thus,
greater for the squat compared with the leg press exercise.
less displacement of the mass that could lead to less work
being performed per repetition. In this study, the squat
DISCUSSION involved greater total work performed (e.g., when work
This investigation seems to be the first study to directly was calculated including body mass) than the leg press.
compare the T, GH, and C response with similar multijoint Combined, these factors (greater muscle mass involvement
free and machine weight resistance exercise: the free weight and more work performed) might explain the greater acute
squat and machine weight leg press. The primary finding of T response for squat than for the leg press exercise.
this investigation was that differences exist between the Growth hormone is a complex superfamily of polypep-
acute hormonal and metabolic (based on HR and lactate) tides and is an anabolic hormone that supports muscular and
responses to the 2 exercise modes; in general, the squat skeletal growths (15). The most abundant form of GH is the
induced greater hormonal and metabolic responses than the 22 kDa isoform, although over 100 isoforms of GH exist (2).
leg press. The total external work performed in the 2 The biological activities of many of these non-22 kDa GH
exercises was similar, but when the work of moving body isoforms (e.g., GH aggregates such as dimers) appear to be
mass during each exercise mode was included in the greater than that of the 22 kDa GH isoform; however, the
calculation, the total work was greater for the squat exercise. acute response of such GH aggregates to resistance exercise
Greater total work in the squat exercise might explain, at has not been fully elucidated. In accordance with most pre-
least in part, the observed differences in the acute hormonal vious investigations (14,19,22,26,28), this study investigated
and metabolic response to exercise between modes. Regard- only the immunoreactive 22 kDa isoform of GH. Thus, the
less, the differences found in acute physiological responses current findings for GH do not necessarily represent the

VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2014 | 1037

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Free and Machine Weight Exercise Hormonal Response

entire acute GH family response to resistance exercise than the leg press and is consistent with the finding of
modes. In this study, 22 kDa GH concentration was signif- greater total work performed in the squat. It is possible that
icantly elevated after both the modes of exercise; the the lower HR in the leg press than the squat might be, at
increase was significantly greater for the squat exercise. As least in part, because of the partially supine (;308 incline)
in previous studies (14), the increase in GH followed a pat- body position during exercise. In this position, venous return
tern similar to that of lactate. Elias et al. (8) found that the might not be hindered by gravity to the extent it is hindered
anterior pituitary secretes GH in response to the reduction in the upright standing (e.g., squat) position, resulting in
in pH that is associated with increased lactate concentration increased stroke volume and thus, a reduced HR for the
in the blood. Increases in circulating lactate and GH have same cardiac output. Interestingly, despite that the squat
also been observed when the rest period duration is abbre- resulted in a greater physiological demand (HR and lactate)
viated (16). This suggests that increases in GH may be and involved more total work than the leg press, the partic-
dependent on the metabolic demand of the exercise. In the ipants reported similar RPEs for both exercise modes. From
present study, the greater increase in GH after performing this, it seems that there is a divergence between perceived and
the squat was likely influenced by the larger work performed actual demand of the exercise across the 2 exercise modes.
and the greater metabolic demand (exemplified by the Our study presents a few limitations that might reduce the
greater HR and blood lactate concentration) (14). transferability of the current findings to comparisons
It is also likely that the greater amount of work performed between other free weight and machine exercises. First,
in the squat affected the GH response. Total volume (work) the amount of total work was somewhat crudely estimated.
influences the acute GH response to resistance exercise, and During exercises such as the squat, the individual must lift
high volume protocols that use a large muscle mass are not only the loaded barbell but also the portion of the body
effective for acutely increasing circulating GH concentra- mass that is moved vertically during the exercise. Therefore,
tions (10,20,22,24,30). Craig and Kang (4) reported greater the mass of the moving body parts were included in the
increases in GH after performing multiple sets of squats than work calculations to account for the effect of body mass on
for a single set of squats using the same intensity and sug- total work performed. Although this method should be more
gested that total work was more important than intensity for accurate than using only the external loads of the exercises,
stimulating a GH response. However, a greater acute GH the estimation of body mass involvement was limited by the
response to higher volumes of total work has not been dem- lack of direct measurement of vertical displacement of the
onstrated in all studies. Kang et al. (12) found a ;33% larger center of gravity for the body. It is possible that the present
GH concentration 16 minutes postexercise for the leg press method overestimated the vertical displacement of the
than for the squat when the intensity was set at 10-RM, even bodys center of gravity by using simply the vertical displace-
though the squat protocol involved more external work ment of the barbell or sled. However, considering the large
(external mass 3 9.81 m$s22 3 vertical displacement 3 difference in body mass moved during the exercises and
number of repetitions). thus, large difference in vertical displacement of the bodys
Cortisol can modulate muscle metabolism by inhibiting center of gravity combined with a similar external work
components of the AKT-mTor pathway and subsequently performed, it seems reasonable to conclude that the total
inhibiting protein synthesis (31) and is important in blood work performed was greater for the squat than for the leg
glucose mobilization and preservation. After a bout of heavy press. Second, the range of motion in the hip and knee joints
resistance exercise, C increases acutely (11,17). Like T and differed between the 2 exercises because of the nature of the
GH, the magnitude of the C response is related to the total equipment used. In the leg press, less knee flexion and hip
volume of work performed; a greater volume of work pro- extension are performed than in the squat because the hip is
duces a greater acute increase in circulating C (9,10). As partially flexed at the start position. The squat exercise al-
expected, in this study, exercise significantly increased C at lowed for a greater range of motion and a greater vertical
all postexercise time points. Importantly, it was found that C displacement of the center of mass, and consequently
was significantly greater for the squat than for the leg press. a greater amount of work at a similar relative intensity than
The greater acute C response for the squat than for the leg for the leg press. Although this difference in range of motion
press exercise could be explained by the greater total work is a limitation when comparing the 2 exercises, it cannot be
performed (30,35), muscle mass involved (28), and metabolic avoided when using the proper technique and equipment for
demand (9,17). each exercise. Finally, this study was performed in the early
Consistent with previous findings (12), HR was elevated morning with participants in the fasted state. It is possible
during the squat and leg press exercise tests; however, the that the magnitude of the acute hormonal response would
increase was greater for the squat than the leg press. Simi- have been different in the fed state or at a later time of day,
larly, lactate was elevated following both exercise protocols, but it is unlikely that the observed pattern of responses
but the magnitude of increase was greater after performing between exercise modes would have been different.
the squat. The greater exercise-induced HR and lactate In summary, the hormonal milieu and the acute hormonal
response suggests a greater metabolic demand in the squat response to resistance exercise are important considerations
the TM

1038 Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the TM

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | www.nsca.com

in resistance exercise program design. The acute program 3. Clark, DR, Lambert, MI, and Hunter, AM. Muscle activation in the
variables, such as exercise selection, directly influence the loaded free barbell squat: A brief review. J Strength Cond Res 26:
11691178, 2012.
acute hormonal response to exercise. Consequently, one
4. Craig, BW and Kang, HY. Growth hormone release following single
must evaluate the efficacy of each exercise included in versus multiple sets of back squats: Total work versus power.
a training program to ensure the optimal benefits from that J Strength Cond Res 8: 270275, 1994.
program; one such measure of efficacy might be the 5. Demling, RH and Orgill, DP. The anticatabolic and wound healing
magnitude of the hormonal response. At similar relative effects of the testosterone analog oxandrolone after severe burn
injury. J Crit Care 15: 1217, 2000.
intensities and RPE, the free weight (squat) exercise pro-
6. Di Loreto, C, Ranchelli, A, Lucidi, P, Murdolo, G, Parlanti, N, De
duced a greater acute hormonal response than the machine Cicco, A, Tsarpela, O, Annino, G, Bosco, C, Santeusanio, F,
weight (leg press) exercise. Although participants reported Bolli, GB, and De Feo, P. Effects of whole-body vibration exercise
similar RPEs between exercise modes, markers of metabolic on the endocrine system of healthy men. J Endocrinol Invest 27: 323
327, 2004.
demand (lactate and HR) were also significantly greater
following the squat. The findings of greater hormonal response 7. Dill, DB and Costill, DL. Calculation of percentage changes in
volumes of blood, plasma, and red cells in dehydration. J Appl
and the markers of metabolic demand are likely because of the Physiol 37: 247248, 1974.
greater quantity of muscle mass involved and higher amount 8. Elias, AN, Wilson, AF, Naqvi, S, and Pandian, MR. Effects of blood
of total work in the squat. Thus in conclusion, one should pH and blood lactate on growth hormone, prolactin, and
consider choosing free weight exercises over machine weight gonadotropin release after acute exercise in male volunteers. Proc Soc
Exp Biol Med 214: 156160, 1997.
analogs to induce a greater acute hormonal response, as this
9. Gotshalk, LA, Loebel, CC, Nindl, BC, Putukian, M,
might subsequently induce superior physiological adaptations. Sebastianelli, WJ, Newton, RU, Hakkinen, K, and Kraemer, WJ.
Hormonal responses of multiset versus single-set heavy-resistance
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS exercise protocols. Can J Appl Physiol 22: 244255, 1997.
10. Hakkinen, K and Pakarinen, A. Acute hormonal responses to two
The hormonal milieu and the acute hormonal response to different fatiguing heavy-resistance protocols in male athletes. J Appl
resistance exercise are important considerations in resistance Physiol 74: 882887, 1993.
exercise program design. The acute program variables, such 11. Hakkinen, K, Pakarinen, A, Alen, M, Kauhanen, H, and Komi, PV.
as exercise selection, directly influence the acute hormonal Neuromuscular and hormonal responses in elite athletes to two
successive strength training sessions in one day. Eur J Appl Physiol
response to exercise. Consequently, the strength and condi- Occup Physiol 57: 133139, 1988.
tioning professional must evaluate the efficacy of each 12. Kang, HY, Martino, PF, Russo, V, Ryder, JW, and Craig, BW. The
exercise included in a training program to ensure the optimal influence of repetitions maximum on GH release following the back
benefits from that program. Interchanging what appear to be squat and leg press in trained men: Preliminary results. J Strength
Cond Res 10: 148152, 1996.
similar multijoint free weight and machine exercises (e.g., the
13. Kraemer, WJ. Endocrine responses to resistance exercise. Med Sci
squat for the leg press) might seem acceptable for the Sports Exerc 20: S152S157, 1988.
development of muscle size and strength, as both exercises
14. Kraemer, WJ and Ratamess, NA. Hormonal responses and
use the same large muscle groups. But, based on the results adaptations to resistance exercise and training. Sports Med 35: 339
of the present study, it is clear that these exercise modes do 361, 2005.
not produce the same acute physiological response. At 15. Kraemer, WJ, Fleck, SJ, Dziados, JE, Harman, EA, Marchitelli, LJ,
similar intensities and RPE, the free weight (squat) exercise Gordon, SE, Mello, R, Frykman, PN, Koziris, LP, and Triplett, NT.
Changes in hormonal concentrations after different heavy-resistance
produces a greater acute hormonal response than the exercise protocols in women. J Appl Physiol 75: 594604, 1993.
machine weight (leg press) exercise. The strength and 16. Kraemer, WJ, Hakkinen, K, Newton, RU, McCormick, M,
conditioning professional should therefore consider choos- Nindl, BC, Volek, JS, Gotshalk, LA, Fleck, SJ, Campbell, WW,
ing free weight exercises over machine weight analogs to Gordon, SE, Farrell, PA, and Evans, WJ. Acute hormonal responses
to heavy resistance exercise in younger and older men. Eur J Appl
induce a greater acute hormonal response, as this might Physiol Occup Physiol 77: 206211, 1998.
subsequently result in superior physiological adaptations. 17. Kraemer, WJ, Hakkinen, K, Newton, RU, Nindl, BC, Volek, JS,
McCormick, M, Gotshalk, LA, Gordon, SE, Fleck, SJ,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Campbell, WW, Putukian, M, and Evans, WJ. Effects of heavy-
resistance training on hormonal response patterns in younger vs.
This study was supported in part by a university thesis award older men. J Appl Physiol 87: 982992, 1999.
grant (A.A.S). The authors declare that they have no conflict 18. Kraemer, WJ, Marchitelli, L, Gordon, SE, Harman, E, Dziados, JE,
of interest. Mello, R, Frykman, P, McCurry, D, and Fleck, SJ. Hormonal and
growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise protocols.
J Appl Physiol 69: 14421450, 1990.
REFERENCES 19. Kraemer, WJ, Noble, BJ, Clark, MJ, and Culver, BW. Physiologic
1. Baechle, TR and Earle, RW. Resistance training and spotting responses to heavy-resistance exercise with very short rest periods.
techniques. In: Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. T.R. Int J Sports Med 8: 247252, 1987.
Baechle and R.W. Earle, eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008. 20. Kraemer, WJ, Ratamess, NA, Fry, AC, and French, DN. Strength
pp. 326376. training: Development and evaluation of methodology. In:
2. Baumann, G. Growth hormone heterogeneity: Genes, isohormones, Physiological Assessment of Human Fitness. P.J. Maud and C. Foster,
variants, and binding proteins. Endocr Rev 12: 424449, 1991. eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2006. pp. 119149.

VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 4 | APRIL 2014 | 1039

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Free and Machine Weight Exercise Hormonal Response

21. Kvorning, T, Andersen, M, Brixen, K, and Madsen, K. Suppression 28. Ronnestad, BR, Nygaard, H, and Raastad, T. Physiological elevation
of endogenous testosterone production attenuates the response to of endogenous hormones results in superior strength training
strength training: A randomized, placebo-controlled, and blinded adaptation. Eur J Appl Physiol 111: 22492259, 2011.
intervention study. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291: E1325 29. Schwanbeck, S, Chilibeck, PD, and Binsted, G. A comparison of free
E1332, 2006. weight squat to Smith machine squat using electromyography.
22. Linnamo, V, Pakarinen, A, Komi, PV, Kraemer, WJ, and J Strength Cond Res 23: 25882591, 2009.
Hakkinen, K. Acute hormonal responses to submaximal and 30. Smilios, I, Pilianidis, T, Karamouzis, M, and Tokmakidis, SP.
maximal heavy resistance and explosive exercises in men Hormonal responses after various resistance exercise protocols.
and women. J Strength Cond Res 19: 566571, 2005. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35: 644654, 2003.
23. Mauras, N, Hayes, V, Welch, S, Rini, A, Helgeson, K, Dokler, M, 31. Spiering, BA, Kraemer, WJ, Anderson, JM, Armstrong, LE,
Veldhuis, JD, and Urban, RJ. Testosterone deficiency in young Nindl, BC, Volek, JS, Judelson, DA, Joseph, M, Vingren, JL,
men: Marked alterations in whole body protein kinetics, Hatfield, DL, Fragala, MS, Ho, JY, and Maresh, CM. Effects of
strength, and adiposity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83: 18861892, elevated circulating hormones on resistance exercise-induced Akt
1998. signaling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40: 10391048, 2008.
24. McCall, GE, Byrnes, WC, Fleck, SJ, Dickinson, A, and Kraemer, WJ. 32. Vingren, JL, Kraemer, WJ, Hatfield, DL, Volek, JS, Ratamess, NA,
Acute and chronic hormonal responses to resistance training Anderson, JM, Hakkinen, K, Ahtiainen, J, Fragala, MS, Thomas, GA,
designed to promote muscle hypertrophy. Can J Appl Physiol 24: Ho, JY, and Maresh, CM. Effect of resistance exercise on muscle
96107, 1999. steroid receptor protein content in strength-trained men and
25. Noble, BJ, Borg, GA, Jacobs, I, Ceci, R, and Kaiser, P. A women. Steroids 74: 10331039, 2009.
category-ratio perceived exertion scale: Relationship to blood 33. Vingren, JL, Kraemer, WJ, Ratamess, NA, Anderson, JM, Volek, JS,
and muscle lactates and heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15: and Maresh, CM. Testosterone physiology in resistance exercise and
523528, 1983. training: The up-stream regulatory elements. Sports Med 40: 1037
26. Raastad, T, Bjoro, T, and Hallen, J. Hormonal responses to high- 1053, 2010.
and moderate-intensity strength exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 82: 34. Wilk, KE, Escamilla, RF, Fleisig, GS, Barrentine, SW, Andrews, JR,
121128, 2000. and Boyd, ML. A comparison of tibiofemoral joint forces and
27. Ratamess, NA, Kraemer, WJ, Volek, JS, Maresh, CM, Vanheest, JL, electromyographic activity during open and closed kinetic chain
Sharman, MJ, Rubin, MR, French, DN, Vescovi, JD, Silvestre, R, exercises. Am J Sports Med 24: 518527, 1996.
Hatfield, DL, Fleck, SJ, and Deschenes, MR. Androgen receptor 35. Williams, AG, Ismail, AN, Sharma, A, and Jones, DA. Effects of
content following heavy resistance exercise in men. J Steroid Biochem resistance exercise volume and nutritional supplementation on
Mol Biol 93: 3542, 2005. anabolic and catabolic hormones. Eur J Appl Physiol 86: 315321, 2002.

the TM

1040 Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

You might also like