Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Educational Philosophy
Elizabeth Holsman
2
As individuals in the teaching profession, we may not think about our own educational
philosophy until times when we really need really need it, like the interview process. I feel that a
teachers own educational philosophy is important to keep close at hand. There may be days
when teachers ask themselves, Why am I a teacher?. Taking a look at and truly understanding
Before anyone can truly answer as to what their educational philosophy is, one question
needs to be answered: What is Education? Many teachers may have different views on what
education actually is and to establish a philosophy of it, one must have an understanding of what
they think education is. For me education is about learning knowledge, skills, and developing
self-concept. I believe that teaching by itself does not constitute learning. An effective education
will lead a student to incorporate the knowledge or skills that they have learned into their own set
of values and behaviors. There is a quote by David Orr (1991) that I believe explains my
thoughts on what education is very well. Orr (1991) said: Subject matter is simply the tool.
Much as one would use a hammer and chisel to carve a block of marble, one uses ideas and
knowledge to forge one's own personhood. When education is student centered, I believe that it
has the power to shape students and change their lives, and that is the basis that my entire
My personal teaching philosophy leans very much towards humanism, with a few aspects
of constructivism. There are many aspects of both theories that I agree with and plan to
incorporate into my classrooms. Humanism focuses on improving the goodness that is found in
everyone and helping students to become more independent learners and individuals (Tomei,
2004). It emphasizes that how a person feels about learning is just as important as how the
person thinks or behaves (Tomei, 2004). According to Tomei (2004), individuals like Carl
3
Rogers were on the forefront of Humanism and brought forth the humanistic approach, which
positive communication.
Rogerss beliefs very much echo my own. He believed that all people have a natural
desire and eagerness to learn, which I cannot disagree with (Tomei, 2004). Seeing young
children and their drive to acquire knowledge reinforces that fact for me. I believe that as
children grow and develop, the way that they are taught hinders their eagerness to learn. I feel as
though if teachers could be more student-centered and engage students more in learning, then the
want for knowledge and understanding would still be instilled in students as they age.
Rogers also believed in meaningful learning, and explained that he believed that learning
occurs when students feel that the subject matter is relevant to their own needs (Tomei, 2004). I
completely agree with Rogers in his belief meaningful learning. I also believe that all subject
matter can be taught in a way to help students realize the importance and relevance to their own
needs. It is all about engaging students, making things fun and getting them to understand where
and how their education will benefit them in life. Being able to put information and knowledge
that you are trying to teach a student into practical use is key. I believe that more teachers need to
structure their lessons and ways of teaching around that one very important point.
Another view that Rogers had was that he believed a learning environment should be free
from threat (Tomei, 2004). I believe and have seen that students work better when they are not
pressured or criticized. Having a hostile environment in the classroom will affect not only the
students but the teacher as well. Rogers believed that students need the freedom to test their own
abilities, allow for new experiences, and even experience mistakes without being teased or
One view that Rogers had that I feel is one of the most important is self-initiated learning.
He believed that learning is best when it is self-initiated and it also involves both the feelings and
the mind of the learner (Tomei, 2004). He believed in choosing one's own direction for learning
because he felt that it brought in feelings of responsibility (Tomei, 2004). Learning to do things
on your own, he believed would enhance students feelings of belonging and promote further
learning, and the cycle would continue as the student grows (Tomei, 2004). Having seen the
Most of the observations that I have made of self-initiated learning are in the form of playtime
for younger students. Playtime becomes self-initiated learning is because students make
decisions about what they want to do, where, with whom, and what they will need to do it.
Support from a teacher is needed during this playtime though, to model learning. Ive heard
many objections to this kind of teaching/learning method, because some teachers feel that if they
have not planned an activity or are not directing what the students are doing, learning is not
happening. I disagree with that because efficient self-initiated learning cannot happen without a
teachers help and support. Teachers do plan when they take part in an unstructured learning
environment by deciding and organizing what is available to students in the classroom, and
planning so that the children have enough time to devote to the unstructured learning.
The last view that I agree with Rogers on, is his view of metacognition. He believed that
metacognition was an important part of student learning, and that a students ability to
understand how to learn in a constantly changing environment helped them become more self-
efficient individuals (Tomei, 2004). I could not agree more. I believe that metacognition, or
learning how to learn helps students become independent, helps with self-regulation, and
allows students to reflect on their own strengths, weaknesses, learning and study strategies. As
5
stated before, reflection is such a huge part of education. If you cannot step back and evaluate
I also believe that the constructionist view should be used in the classroom.
Constructivism says that people construct their own understanding and knowledge of the world,
through experiencing things and reflecting on those experiences (Thirteen Ed Online Team,
2004). With constructivism, we create our own knowledge by asking questions, exploring, and
assessing what we know (Thirteen Ed Online Team, 2004). I plan on using constructivist
world tasks, and relating what were learning to everyday life. Again, even with constructivism,
reflection is a large part. After accomplishing the experiments and everyday life related
activities, students need to reflect on what they have learned and realize how their views have
According to Jacqueline and Martin Brooks (2001), constructivism is like humanism the
sense that it works best without a standard curriculum. Instead if a cut and dry curriculum,
constructivism promotes using a curriculum customized to the knowledge students already have
and focuses on developing students prior concepts of things (Jacqueline and Martin Brooks,
2001). I believe that this aspect of constructivism goes along well with Rogers belief of
meaningful learning. When you build on students prior knowledge of things, you essentially
have the chance to make the students feel that the subject matter is relevant to their own needs.
The constructivist approach is also very hands on and self-initiated learning can occur during
times when students are doing hands on activities or going on field trips. I would also use
constructivist techniques like open-ended questions and promote dialogue among students to
help foster self-initiated learning. Another way that the two theories go hand in hand in my eyes
6
is with assessment. In a constructivist classroom grades are not as important on certain tasks and
students learn how to judge their own progress (Jacqueline and Martin Brooks, 2001). I believe it
is the same for humanism as well. Of course as a teacher, there is no way to eliminate grades and
standardized tests. But, I believe a classroom needs to be structured more around students
understanding and grasping of a concept no matter how long it takes, rather than forcing a
student to try and understand a concept one time, and giving them an F if they dont.
philosophy is discipline. As a teacher I will need to use ways to prevent negative behavior in the
classroom and ways to actively discipline negative behaviors when they arise. When it comes to
disciplining, I believe that respect has a lot to do with bad behavior in the classroom. The
students should know that I have respect for them, as well as they should be able to establish a
respect for me as a teacher. To gain respect from my students I do not plan on ever deliberately
embarrassing a student or putting them in a position where they feel uncomfortable, as well as
ever talking down to them. I feel that if students dont feel they are being respected then they
I also plan to use rewards in the classroom when I see appropriate behavior, when a
student is following class rules or when the whole class has behaved in a way that I see fit for
recognition. I believe in rewards like praise, stickers, homework passes, free time at the end of
class, and pizza parties, and believe that they will have an impact on students behavior.
When it comes to actually disciplining a student I believe that taking away privileges may
be an appropriate discipline technique, but I also believe that it is important to relate the
disciplinary action to the bad behavior. The student must know why he or she is being
7
disciplined. I also have no qualms about calling a students parents about a disciplinary problem,
but only if it gets to the point when I cannot control it in the ways I would like to in the
classroom. The next step after calling parents is to send the child to the principals office. I feel
that this is a last resort for me because I should be able to handle the situation within the
As my career as a teacher goes on I may learn different and better techniques along the
way and will adapt my philosophy of discipline to incorporate them. I believe as well that every
situation is different, and I may come upon a student or even a class that I may need to change
my rules around a bit for. Even so, I know that it all comes with the territory of becoming a
promote constructive and productive learning. I believe that every student, with or without a
disability has strengths and weaknesses and that the whole student should be recognized and
respected. Although I chose two theories of education that I believe I will use in my classroom,
as new teaching strategies are developed and used, I will continue to evaluate my educational
philosophy for use in the learning environment and with each student
8
Works Cited
Jacqueline Brooks, M. B. (2001). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist
Teaching and Learning. Retrieved April 27, 2010, from Thirteen, Ed. Online:
http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/index.html
Tomei, L. (2004). Learning Theories -- A Primer Exercise. Retrieved April 27, 2010, from Rober