Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DePasquale,
Applications Douglas Leatherman,
and Randy Thomas
Reprinted with permission from Geotechnical Fabrics Report. A publication of the Industrial Fabrics Association International
In the summer of 1999, the U.S. Army along the 2.5-mile stretch of the brook mount when designing flood protection pro-
Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District, have been subject to repetitive flooding as jects in any environment, but its even more
designed and constructed a flood protec- a result of inadequate channel capacity. critical in an urban setting, due to limited
tion project for Molly Anns Brook, lo- Within this location, there was also lim- space and the proximity of structures.
cated mainly in Paterson and Haledon, ited right of way, undulating and outcrop- In addition to these challenges, the de-
N.J. The brook is a tributary to the Pas- ping bedrock, and high stream velocities due sign of the Molly Anns Brook project
saic River, which flows through an urban to storm-water runoff from the surrounding varied from a trapezoidal riprap section
area in New York Harbor. Communities developed areas. Erosion protection is para- to a rectangular section formed by pre-
cast concrete walls. Conventional solu-
tions such as riprap, wire mesh gabions,
cabled concrete mats, and more than
3,000 linear feet of precast concrete re-
taining walls were used to protect the
banks of the brook and contain floods
on adjacent areas.
Given the savings and ease of con-
struction of a geocell system, the Corps of
Engineers employed this innovative ap-
proach at two difficult locations. The
geocellular approach in these two chan-
nel sections saved the Philadelphia Dis-
trict $395,000 overall. In addition, the
District estimates that it designed and
constructed the geocell wall for less than
half the cost of an equal length of rein-
forced concrete retaining wall. The chan-
Photo 1: Geocell sections underlain with a geotextile are placed on the
nel lining was completed at about 25%
prepared segment of the channel bend. of the cost of a 54-in. riprap section of
equal length.
Figure 1: Cross section of geocell channel lining taken from construction plans.
Geotechnical Fabrics Report January/February 2001
Design
Two areas of the channel protection pro-
ject were chosen to utilize the geocell ap-
proach to bank protection. In both areas,
the Corps utilized Prestos perforated Ge-
oweb cellular confinement system.
The first area implemented the geocell
system for channel lining protection. De-
sign velocities approaching 20 ft. per sec-
ond along 300 ft. of a sharp bend in the
channel would typically be designed with
a 54-in. thick riprap section. As an alter-
native to the riprap, a 4-in. layer of perfo-
rated geocell filled with low-slump con-
crete was used, to reduce construction time
and costs.
The second area applied the un-
precendented use of geocells in the con-
struction of an earth retention structure.
Perforated 8-in.-deep geocell layers, filled
with compacted soil or aggregate, were
used to construct a 400-ft.-long gravity
wall along the right bank of the brook.
The geocell wall was designed to replace
Photo 2: Concrete infilling of the geocell sections on the 1v:2h channel
reinforced concrete retaining walls. Rang- side slopes.
ing in height from 9 to 14 ft., the wall is
protected from scour by a 4-in. concrete-
filled geocell layer along its base, since Figure 2: Design cross section for geocell wall taken from construction plans.
the structure will be subject to flash flood-
ing and high velocities during its 50-year
design life.
Channel lining
As the design parameters were established, it
became clear that the velocities in the first
channel bend were excessive, requiring sub-
stantial reinforcement. Traditional 54-in.
riprap could be used, but a geocell alterna-
tive would save time and cost during con-
struction by reducing labor, excavation and
materials. Cabled concrete mats, previously
Geotechnical Fabrics Report January/February 2001
joints was helpful. The cells act as ex- of the channel in this area, impacts to
pansion joints throughout and prevent channel capacity due to the rock outcrops
future uncontrolled cracking. The flexi- were acceptable.
bility of the geocell system was a positive Initially, the design called for filling the
attribute in constructing the low-flow cells with native materials. Due to the pres-
channel, since the material had to be ence of many large rocks and the need to
flexible enough to cover a trapezoidal overfill the cells for compaction, the geo-
channel 8-ft.-wide-by-2-ft.-deep, while cell infill was changed to 3/4-in. stone. In-
maintaining the integrity of the cells. clusion of stone infill alleviated the need
The 300 linear ft. of channel lining were for meticulous compaction and removal of
completed in less time than it would have excess materials and made the drain un-
taken to complete an equal length of 21- necessary. The effect of the free-draining
in.-thick riprap. stone, combined with the perforated cells,
Geocell Gravity Wall: Prior to exca- allowed the entire wall to act as a drain.
vation to the final stream grades, the exact Previous stability concerns regarding slow
location and elevation of the bedrock was draining of the backfill after a flood event
unknown. Once the overburden was re- were alleviated.
moved, the bedrock was exposed under Inadvertent damage to some of the ex-
Geotechnical Fabrics Report January/February 2001
the footprint of the wall in four major terior cells during construction demon-
areas. Beginning at one end of the wall, strated the redundant nature of geocell
layers of geocell were brought up one level wall construction. With the 8-in. hori-
at a time. When outcrops protruded in zontal cell depth, the breach of an outer
the path of the wall, the geocell was sim- cell exposed the next cell completely in-
ply cut and the next layer started. As the tact. Multiple cell breaches would be un-
layers were constructed, the outcrops were likely under even the worst conditions.
eventually encapsulated beneath addi-
tional layers of geocell. Outcrops that ex- Conclusion
tended beyond the face were incorporated Although the Molly Anns Brook project
in the final structure. Due to the width required only 300 linear ft. of concrete-