Professional Documents
Culture Documents
innovation
and growth
Top innovators expect US$250
billion five-year revenue boost
Growth
60%
+62.2%
The most innovative
companies are
predicting growth of
62.2% over the next
50%
five years
40%
+35.4%
Against the global
30% average of 35.4%
20% +20.7%
The least innovative
companies in our
survey are expecting
10% growth of 20.7% over
the same period
www.pwc.com/innovationsurvey
Contents
Foreword.......................................................................1
About this report.........................................................2
Executive summary....................................................4
Chapter 1: Innovation: a powerful driver for growth....6
A view from China: from imitation to innovation......10
Chapter 2: What are the leading innovators doing
differently and what can we learn from them?..............12
A view from India: becoming an innovation leader...16
The road to growth...................................................18
Chapter 3: Making innovation work for
your business.................................................................20
Conclusions and key takeaways............................38
Want to find out more?.............................................40
Appendix: a note on methodology...............................41
Rob Shelton David Percival Our research shows that, over the last 3 years, leading
rob.shelton@us.pwc.com david.percival@uk.pwc.com innovators have grown at a rate 16% higher than the least
innovative. Moving forward, these same leading innovators
forecast their rate of growth will increase to almost double
the global average, and over three times higher than the least
innovative companies. That translates into an average for all
companies of $500 million in revenue over a 5 year timeframe.
September 2013
1
About this
report
1757
Breakthrough innovation and growth
explores the impact that innovation has to incremental, breakthrough and
on growth and examines how leading radicalinnovation:
companies are making innovation work
for their organisations. The report Incremental innovations are
explores three key questions: changes to an existing product or C-suite and executive-
service. The changes to technology level respondents
1. How are companies using and business model are primarily
25
innovation to drive growth and what aimed at protecting market
is the return on this investment? share and maintaining margins.
From more
Competitors usually respond quickly
than 25
2. How are approaches to innovation to incremental innovations.
countries
changing, particularly in
30
light of a trend towards more Breakthrough innovations make From across
disciplinedinnovation? much more substantial changes to more than
technologies and business models. 30 sectors
3. What are the best practices and Often called game-changers,
critical success factors that deliver breakthrough innovations create
tangible business results? greater competitive advantage
than incremental innovations.
To answer these questions we draw Competitors have greater difficulty
on insights obtained from interviews responding to breakthrough
with board-level executives from innovations. As a result, a company
1,757 companies, across more than with a successful breakthrough
25 countries and 30 sectors, who are innovation increases revenues
responsible for overseeing innovation andmargins.
within their company.
A radical innovation creates
This is the largest and most drastic changes to the competitive
comprehensive study of its kind environment for a product or
exploring innovation from a global, service, or creates entirely new
multi-sector perspective. businesses. Radical innovations
occur infrequently but can generate
explosive growth in major new
categories of products and services.
Location of respondents
3%
3%
3%
11% 3%
12%
4% 4%
19% 3%
4% 3%
3%
8% 2%
3% 3%
3%
3%
13%
Head of R&D / Product
Industrial Retail Technology Entertainment Information & Healthcare
Development
manufacturing & Media communication providers
13%
HR Director /
4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% Head of HR
12%
Head of Innovation /
Chief Innovation Officer
Pharmaceuticals Banking Automotive Petroleum, Insurance Consumer
oil, gas packaged 9%
goods Chief Information
Officer (CIO)
3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 8%
CFO / FD
7%
COO / Head of
Utilities Medical Chemicals Aerospace Metal Mining Operations
devices and defence
7%
CEO / MD
1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 5%
Head of Strategy /
Strategic Planning
4% 1%
1% 1% Chairman
6%
Other
Executives are looking for growth: Innovation is They collaborate more than their
35.4% on average, over the next five transformingbusiness less innovative peers. When it
years. Twenty six percent of executives Leading innovators are taking a more comes to new products and services
say they are aiming for aggressive sophisticated approach to innovation: that are collaboratively developed
growth over the same period. with external partners, the most
Seventy nine percent of the most innovative companies collaborate
Five years ago, globalisation would innovative companies in our study over three times more often (34%)
have been the most powerful lever have well-defined innovation than the least innovative (10%).
for growth and every business would strategies, compared with only 47%
have been talking about China. But of the least innovative companies. The competitive challenge
now, the growth lever that has the Business leaders need to realise that
greatest impact is innovation. Ninety Top innovators treat innovation innovation pioneers already exist
three percent of executives tell us that just like any other business or within their own industry and across
organic growth through innovation management process that can be all parts of the world and that if they
will drive the greater proportion of disciplined and successfully scaled. are not among those pioneers, they
their revenue growth. Only 2% of Only a fifth of the most innovative need to be ready to step up to that
companies expect their growth to be manage innovation informally, competitive challenge, to avoid being
mainly inorganic (i.e. M&A-driven). compared with a third of the least marginalised.
innovative companies.
Leading innovators can expect Innovation is not limited to a small
significant rewards both financially They are targeting a higher number of industries or countries.
and in terms of competitive proportion of breakthrough and There are numerous lessons that can be
positioning. Over the last three years, radical innovations, particularly borrowed, tailored and made to work
the most innovative companies in our around products, services, for any business. Our study starts to lay
study delivered growth at a rate of technology and business models. In the ground for this learning.
16% above that of the least innovative some areas the proportion is around
and they are more bullish about their twice that of the less innovative
growth prospects. companies.
In five years time, the leading They are planning a wider range of
innovators in our study forecast that innovation operating models. For
their rate of growth will further example, the top 20% of innovators
increase to almost double the global in our study are twice as likely to
average, and over three times higher consider corporate venturing as a
than the least innovative. For the means to drive growth.
average company, this equates to
$0.5bn more revenue than their less
innovative peers. Companies who
are less innovative need to think
about the additional revenue that
they are forsaking and the impact
this will have on their share price and
shareholderreturns.
2%
Inorganic growth
(i.e. M&A activity)
5% 93%
An equal mix of Organic growth
organic and (i.e. innovation)
inorganic growth
2S
ources used include individual annual company
reports, Bloomberg, Google Finance.
70%
+62.2%
20% most
60% innovative
50%
40%
+35.4%
Global average
30%
+20.7%
20% 20% least
innovative
10%
79% 65%
Unsurprisingly, the Chinese companies in As companies make this transition they are
our study have ambitious growth plans: a being supported by the Chinese government,
third (34%) say they are focused on driving which has given companies a clear innovation
aggressive revenue growth over the next five mandate. Sixty percent of the Chinese companies
years, compared with just a quarter (26%) of we interviewed say they take advantage of
companiesglobally. government funding for innovation, the fourth
highest level of all countries in which we carried
Chinas economic history over the last few out research.
decades and its large proportion of state-owned
enterprises mean that executives have typically Challenges do remain, particularly with
not wanted to take too many risks. This has led collaboration. Large Chinese companies tend
to a strategy of fast-follower imitation rather to have a hierarchical culture making it hard for
than innovation, where Chinese companies internal functions to truly collaborate. They also
copy proven concepts from elsewhere in the have less experience collaborating externally as
world. This approach is reflected in the higher they tend to be more vertically integrated than
proportion of Chinese companies who describe companies in the West, says Huw Andrews. For
themselves as innovation followers: 38% example, makers of electronic goods tend to use
compared with 30% globally. contract manufacturers less; they will set up their
own factories.
Because of the bias for a fast follower strategy, the
speed of execution in Chinese companies is often So what will the future of innovation in China
far faster than other nations. Chinese companies look like? Huw Andrews believes that the picture
excel at making incremental improvements in China will change rapidly. Within five years,
really fast , says Huw Andrews, PwCs China I think we will see a broader range of innovation
Innovation Lead. Their ability to create products activities: from imitation and fast following
with core functionality at extremely low cost is through to business model innovation. China is
well known, he says. This too is supported by our already spending more on R&D than any other
study findings: 79% of Chinese companies say country apart from USA. Importantly, the larger
their innovations will be focused on lower cost companies are also starting to integrate deep
models compared with 65% globally. international experience into their management
teams via the brain gain as Chinese professionals
There are signs that this mindset is shifting. 56% from foreign companies return to China, Chinese
of Chinese companies agree that innovation is a executives rotate back from overseas postings,
competitive necessity compared with just 43% and experienced hires join as part of overseas
globally. Chinese executives are most concerned acquisitions, he says.
about developing the right innovation operating
model 34% compared with 25% globally they
are catching up fast with leading approaches
developed elsewhere.
Chapter 2: What are
the leading innovators
doing differently and
what can we learn
fromthem?
Its not geography or industry that sets innovation leaders apart,
its their strategy, approach and execution.
In this chapter we focus on what sets Companies have concerns around all Leaders have a clear
the leaders apart. Understanding the key steps for effective innovation, innovationstrategy
whats working (and whats not) can see Figure 4. The top 20% innovative The leading innovators in our study
help executives who are looking to companies in our study are more understand the importance of having
improve the innovation capabilities of concerned about developing the right a coherent innovation strategy:
their organisation. innovation strategy (32% compared 79% of the top innovators tell us
with a global average of 27% and 20% they have a well-defined innovation
In summary, the leading innovators: for the least innovative). All companies, strategy compared with only 47%
from the most innovative down to of the least innovativecompanies.
innovate with purpose, the least innovative recognise the They recognise the need for a clear
have a well-defined innovation importance of executing on innovation innovation strategy as the foundation
strategy, (27% for the top innovators compared for successfulexecution.
take a more formal and structured with 29% global average and 28% for
approach to innovation, the least innovativecompanies).
are concentrating on a greater
proportion of breakthrough and
radical innovations,
are planning a broader range of
business model innovation,
are exploring a wider range of
innovation operating models, Figure 4: Businesses current concerns range across the innovation cycle:
are planning to collaborate much from developing the right business strategy to executing on innovation
more than the bottom 20%, and Which of the following is of greatest concern to you currently?
generate a greater proportion
of revenue from new products Developing the right business strategy
andservices 20%
Leaders align business and Developing the right innovation strategy to achieve growth ambitions
innovation objectives: they 27%
innovate with purpose
Leading innovators align their Developing the right innovation operating model
innovation practices with their 25%
intended business outcomes. Paul
Kenmir, COO for Global Life Europe at Executing this operating model to make innovation happen
29%
insurance firm, Zurich Life, expresses
the point well: What I look for in 0% 10% 20% 30%
innovation is something that will
generate more income for a set amount
of expense, something that allows
us to be more efficient and effective
in the markets we are aiming at, or
something that allows us to access
markets we couldnt access using
existing approaches.
Leaders are taking a more Leaders focus on a greater Leaders are planning a
formal or structured approach proportion of breakthrough and broaderrange of business
toinnovation radical innovations model innovation
The most innovative companies in our The leading innovators in our study Innovation is no longer just for
study have clear preferences for a more are targeting a higher proportion of products and services. Leaders are
structured innovation approach. Only breakthrough and radical innovations, using innovation to transform the
a fifth (21%) of the most innovative particularly around products, services, business models that define the way
manage innovation informally, technology and business models, see they do business. Companies are
compared with a third (32%) of Figure 5. In some areas the proportion innovating and commercialising new
the least innovative companies. In is around twice that of the less value propositions for their customers
our experience, many leaders are innovative companies. that provide complete solutions where
shifting away from total reliance on historically they have provided a single
informalstructures. Including significantly higher product or service. Some companies
amounts of breakthrough and radical are delivering their products and
Leaders are exploring a innovation is a major shift in the services in new ways, such as Software
wider range of innovation traditional approach to innovation. as a Service and omnichannel retail
operatingmodels Historically companies used portfolios experiences. And many companies are
As leading companies look to innovate heavily weighted toward incremental looking for new ways to monetise their
on innovation, they are realising innovations. Sometimes companies offerings, charging for the quality of
that traditional innovation operating spent as much as 90% of their total the outcome as opposed to the product.
models are inadequate for the desired investment driving incremental Combined with technology innovation,
growth. Leading companies have been improvements. By paying more these business model innovations
experimenting with new innovation attention to breakthrough and radical provide a powerful source of growth.
operating models including open advances, companies are setting the
innovation, incubation, and design stage for higher growth rates.
thinking for the last decade. The goal
was to find better ways to organise and
operate innovation for growth. Some of
the earlier attempts were successful but
many did not work as well as expected.
But companies did not give up. They
kept experimenting and improving the
new operating models.
Leaders are planning to Figure 5: Leading innovators are planning for a greater proportion of
collaborate more breakthrough and radical innovation
Our innovation leaders have realised How significant will your innovations in the following areas be over the next three
the value of collaboration and are years? All citing breakthrough or radical innovation
pursuing more of it. The 20% most
innovative companies co-create almost
twice the proportion of their new 45% 47% 53%
products and services with customers 22% 25% 30%
compared to the 20% least innovative:
Products Services Technology
25.3% compared with 13.0%. For
the proportion of new products and
services collaboratively developed
with other external partners the
difference is even starker: the most
innovative collaborate over three times 43% 37% 44%
more often (34.0%) than the least 31% 23% 27%
innovative(10.0%).
Systems Supply Customer
Leaders generate a greater and chain Experience
proportion of revenue from new processes
products and services
The most innovative companies
generate a greater proportion of
revenue from new products and 45% 45%
26% 20% most innovative companies
services. In our study, the leading
innovators receive 25.0% of their
Business 45%
revenue from innovative products
model 20% least innovative companies
and services launched in the last year
compared with only 6.6% for the
20% least innovative companies. The
experience of BSN Medical, a global
medical devices company, confirms
this: As we have increased our focus
on innovation, our revenue derived
from products less than five years old
has grown from 6% to 20% in the last
five years, says Dr Bernhard Mller,
Vice President for Global Research
&Development.
73% 63%
As India moves from being a developing country One of the key innovation drivers for Piramal
towards being a developed country its companies has been the opportunity to learn from other
are taking huge strides forward and are, in many companies outside of the pharmaceuticals
cases, out-performing international peers. What sector. The Indian government is encouraging
are the reasons for this? Indian companies are companies to innovate, says Debasish
more likely to agree they have a well-defined Chakravorty, so that they quickly come up to the
innovation strategy (73% compared with 63% level of international standards. One of the ways
globally). Only 12% say they manage their this happens is through industrial forums which
innovations informally, compared with 26% promote innovation and innovation practices
globally. Perhaps most importantly, 92% agree across different sectors. Prizes are awarded for
innovation is important to the success of their innovative problem-solving approaches. This
company compared with 83% globally. gives an opportunity to learn from how other
leading companies solve problems.
Debasish Chakravorty, Vice President and
Site Head at Indias Piramal Enterprises, a The trend towards much greater collaboration
pharmaceutical company, agrees that innovation is reflected in our study responses. Indian
is a significant contributor to his companys companies, on average, create 26% of their new
success. Being a pharmaceuticals company, the products and services in collaboration with
regulations we have to follow are quite restrictive external partners, compared with 22% globally.
thus making innovation with operations very An impressive 90% of Indian companies have
challenging he argues, but the majority of our a plan in place to collaborate with strategic
innovations are within the regulatory framework partners. And 58% plan to collaborate with
and orientated primarily around a customer- competitors, the second highest level of all the
centric focus. Understanding customer needs countries where we undertook research.
has helped Piramal to innovate its business model
by becoming more backwards and forwards Do these more innovative approaches really
integrated, and offering a complete end-to- translate into measurable benefits? According to
end service to customers. This has allowed us Debasish Chakravorty they do: Piramal makes
to tap into new opportunities in the market conscious efforts to quantify the benefits of their
saysChakravorty. innovations. On a monthly basis we review
our performance against innovation targets,
both for new innovation projects and those that
we would consider to be in the mainstream.
Sites or functions who meet and exceed their
innovation targets are recognised through
various benchmarking exercises and the best are
celebrated during the Annual Communications
Meeting with the Chairman .
The road to growth
We found a direct correlation between excellence in innovation and superior revenue growth. While there is no single
roadmap for success in innovation, there are lessons that can be borrowed, tailored and made to work for any business.
The leading innovators in our study are each anticipating an extra 6% per annum in growth (on average), compared with
their less innovative peers. Heres some advice based on what theyre doing differently.
79%
Have a coherent
47% strategy. Nearly 80% of the
most innovative say they have
a well-defined innovation
strategy compared with 47%
of the least innovative
18
We found a direct correlation between
excellence in innovation and superior
revenue growth
79%
Innovate your business
Target a higher proportion
x2 model(s), not just your 59%
of breakthrough (or even products and services.
radical) innovations. The most innovative companies
The most innovative companies are planning to enhance the
are almost twice as likely to be business model with new value
targeting breakthrough and offerings over the next 3 years:
radical innovations 79% vs. 59%
67%
39% Use social media to help you
innovate. The most innovative
companies use social media
more often to collaborate
externally: 67% vs. 39%
Collaborate more.
Reap the rewards.
The most innovative
62.2%
When it comes to companies are growing
developing new at a much faster rate:
products and services
with external partners,
34% 62.2% vs 20.7% over the
20.7%
next five years
the most innovative
companies collaborate
10%
over three times
more often
Chapter 3:
Making innovation work
for your business
by companies that have nothing Not at all a challenge Fairly easy Neither easy nor a challenge
to lose, and, as a result, demolish Somewhat challenging Very challenging
the established business models of
largerorganisations.
2. Innovation strategy
Seven in ten of the executives Not at all important Unimportant Neither important or unimportant
interviewed for our survey also feel Somewhat important Very important
that a successful innovation culture
relies on the organisations ability
to foster an environment where
smart exploration is encouraged
even if does not always lead to a
successful outcome. Leaders know
that breakthrough innovations
require exploration of entirely
new types of business models
and technologies. Sometimes, the
experiments do not provide the
expected results. Sometimes called a
failure, those unexpected results are
valuable discoveries that can guide
the innovation team to bigger and
betteroutcomes.
Average proportion of
products and services
co-created with customers
Average proportion of
products and services
co-created with
externalpartners
that you can use if you know how to practices and tools for meaningful
collaborateeffectively. collaboration.
Figure 11: Companies believe open innovation will drive the most growth,
but new approaches such as incubators and corporate venturing are on
Which of these approaches do you think will lead to innovations that drive the
most growth for your company?
Open innovation
But what does a well-defined process 32%
look like?
Individual freedom to conduct innovation projects
Effective innovation processes are 25%
iterative, beginning with the collection
of ideas and progressing through stages Design thinking
of idea prioritisation, experimentation 20%
and decision-making about which
ideas should be commercialised Corporate venture groups
and ending with the delivery and 11%
monetisation of the innovation. When
Incubators
it works well, this process allows for
10%
the rapid development of successful
ideas, and the fast failure of bad ones. 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Dyson, for example, generated 5721
prototypes in just four years before
releasing its revolutionaryand Figure 12: New innovation processes, such as corporate venturing and
highly successfulcyclonic upright design thinking, are popular among sectors as diverse as medical devices
vacuumcleaner. and mining
Open innovation Individual freedom
To make breakthrough innovations Insurance 41% Logistics & Transportation 31%
happen, companies are looking to Healthcare 40% Technology 30%
new models such as open innovation Metals 38% Banking 29%
(collaboration with outside partners), Utilities 38% Design thinking
design thinking (looking at the need Pharmaceuticals 36% Retail 34%
from an anthropologists perspective), Aerospace and defence 35% Medical devices 32%
corporate venturing, and incubators Consumer packaged goods 35% Corporate venture groups
(small groups of intrapreneurs that Oil & Gas 35% Mining 28%
use rapid prototyping), see Figure 11. Retail 34%
These new approaches are being used
Entertainment 33%
by a small but significant proportion of
Automotive 32%
companies. Corporate venturing, for
Chemicals 32%
example, is the most popular approach
Media 32%
among technology companies, and
Agriculture 30%
design thinking is very popular in
medical devices, see Figure 12. Industrial manufacturing 27%
This chart reflects the number one choice of new innovation processes for each of the
sectors. Most sectors picked open innovation, but some other sectors have a clear
preference for some of the other approaches.
100%
Breakthrough Radical
0%
Products Technology Services System Business Customer Supply
and model experience chain
processes
32 Breakthrough innovation and growth
Seventy one percent of the companies
who are planning to innovate their
business model, will introduce new
value offerings, see figure 16. New
value comes from changing what is
delivered to customers. Companies
that pair service and product
innovation providing customers with
a solution will reap rewards including
higher revenues, better returns on their
innovation investments, stronger brand
loyalty, and bigger market share, says
PwCs Rob Shelton.
Organisations that are disciplined Formally, all innovation activities are coordinated and managed
for maximum efficiency
about other processes can be
surprisingly ill-disciplined about
32%
innovation, says PwC John Sviokla.
In a structured way, there is alignment from concept to market
In an undisciplined world, open
41%
innovation without purpose and
collaborative innovation without a
Informally, projects arise out of market needs or good ideas
strategy doesnt yield results.
26%
The key issue is therefore not whether 0% 15% 30% 45%
innovation should be disciplined, but
what is the right kind and amount of
Figure 18: Companies are more likely to devolve responsibility for
discipline. According to Chris Wasden, innovation to individual products and services than to individual markets
PwCs Global Healthcare Innovation
Which of the following approaches to managing innovation does your company take?
Leader, the discipline that works today,
in operationally-focused companies, is Individual product areas or services are responsible for their own innovations
not the discipline needed to create the 72%
business of tomorrow. We drive innovation across the entire organisation, across business units
and territories
Having a well-defined organisational 63%
structure around innovation
helps build alignment and higher We have formal innovation structures within individual business units
performance through the sharing of 61%
best practices, resources and mental
We have separate innovation facilities in important markets
models for growth and innovation.
44%
These drive disciplined execution
and lead to repeatable and scalable 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
innovation commercialisations. The
majority of executives say they set up
their innovation structures to support
individual product areas (72%) or
business units (61%), see Figure 18.
Fewer hand responsibility to separate
facilities in individual markets.
Of companies take
advantage of government
funding to support their
innovation efforts
For help and advice with your innovation strategy and process,
please contact one of our innovation leaders.
Canada Russia
Philip Grosch Alexander Ordinartsev Global Insurance Leader
Tel: +1 416 814 5855 Tel: +7 495 967-6394 David Law
pgrosch@ca.pwc.com alexander.ordinartsev@ru.pwc.com Tel: +44 0 771 017 3556
david.law@uk.pwc.com
China, Hong Kong and Singapore South Korea
Huw Andrews Hong-Ki Moon Global Asset Management Leader
Tel: + 86 21 2323 2002 Tel: +822-709-0394 Barry Benjamin
huw.andrews@cn.pwc.com hkmoon@kr.pwc.com Tel: +1 410 659-3400
barry.p.benjamin@us.pwc.com
France Spain
Peter Vickers Raquel Garcs Saudo Global Banking Leader
Tel: + 33 1 56 57 86 66 Tel: +34 915 684 647 Robert P. Sullivan
peter.vickers@fr.pwc.com raquel.garces.sanudo@es.pwc.com Tel: +1 646 471-8388
robert.p.sullivan@us.pwc.com
Jean Christophe Saunires Nordics
Tel: + 33 1 56 57 88 78 David Skov Global Energy, Utilities and
jean-christophe.sauniere@fr.pwc.com Tel: +46 0 723 530534 MiningLeader
david.skov@se.pwc.com Norbert Schwieters
Germany norbert.schwieters@de.pwc.com
Sebastian Feldmann Switzerland Tel: +49 211 981 2153
Tel: +49 89 5790-5273 Matthias Memminger
sebastian.feldmann@de.pwc.com Tel: +41 58 792 13 88 Global Automotive Leader
matthias.memminger@ch.pwc.com Rick Hanna
Steffen Gackstatter Tel: +1 313 394 3450
Tel: +49 711 25034-5291 United Kingdom richard.hanna@us.pwc.com
steffen.gackstatter@de.pwc.com David Percival
Tel: +44 0 7714 229219 Global Industrial Products Leader
david.percival@uk.pwc.com Joe Herron
India
Tel: +1 860 241 7007
Rachna Nath
United States jherron@us.pwc.com
Tel: +91 22 66691539
Rob Shelton
rachna.nath@in.pwc.com
Tel: +1 408 817 3700 Global Pharmaceuticals & Life
rob.shelton@us.pwc.com Sciences Leader
Ramaswami Lakshman
Mike Swanick
Tel: +91 99800 27354
Global Technology, Communications, Tel: +1 267 330 2742
ramaswami.lakshman@in.prtm.pwc.com
Entertainment and Media Leader mike.swanick@us.pwc.com
Dan DiFilippo
Italy
Tel: +1 646 471 8426 Global Health Industries Leader
Andrea Samaja
dan.difilippo@us.pwc.com Patrick Figgis
Tel: +39 0266720555
Tel: +44 0 20 780 44310
andrea.samaja@it.pwc.com
Global Technology Leader patrick.figgis@uk.pwc.com
Raman Chitkara
Japan
Tel: +1 408 817 3746 Global Retail & Consumer Leader
James So
raman.chitkara@us.pwc.com John Maxwell
Tel: +81 3 5326 9090
Tel: +1 973 236 4780
james.so@us.pwc.com
Global Communications Leader john.g.maxwell@us.pwc.com
Pierre-Alain Sur
Middle East
Tel: +1 646 471-6973
Anil Khurana
pierre-alain.sur@us.pwc.com
Please contact one of our innovation
Tel: +97143043100 (ext. 3652) leaders, or else visit our website:
anil.khurana@ae.pwc.com
Global Entertainment and http://www.pwc.com/
Media Leader innovationsurvey
The Netherlands
Marcel Fenez
Sander Kranenburg
Tel: +852 2289 2628
Tel: +31 0 88 792 53 09 We look forward to speaking to you.
marcel.fenez@hk.pwc.com
sander.kranenburg@nl.pwc.com
We would like to thank the 1,757 How important the interviewee said
executives who took part in our study. innovation is to their company;
For the purpose of our analysis, from The proportion of products and
the 1,757 companies interviewed we services co-developed with
have identified the top 20% innovators externalpartners;
(359 companies), and the bottom
20% innovators (395 companies) to Their projected revenue growth
compare and contrast their relative over the next five years.
characteristics and experiences. These
companies were identified based on a For each of the six attributes every
balanced scorecard comprising their company was given a score between
responses to the following six areas 1 and 5. The most innovative 20% of
explored in our study: companies scored a total of 23 or more
out of 30, whilst the least innovative
20% of companies scored a total of
between 7 and 15 out of 30.
PwC helps organisations and individuals create the value theyre looking for. Were a network of firms in 158 countries with more than 180,000 people who are committed to delivering quality
in assurance, tax and advisory services. Tell us what matters to you and find out more by visiting us at www.pwc.com.
This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this
publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in
this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwC does do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or
refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
2013 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for
further details.