Professional Documents
Culture Documents
07/30/2017
EDTECH 592
Artifact Rationale Paper
1.1 Creating: Candidates demonstrate the ability to create instructional materials and
learning environments using a variety of systems approaches.
1.2 Using: Candidates demonstrate the ability to select and use technological resources
and processes to support student learning and to enhance their pedagogy.
1.3 Assessing/Evaluating: Candidates demonstrate the ability to assess and evaluate the
effective integration of appropriate technologies and instructional materials.
1.5 Ethics: Candidates demonstrate the contemporary professional ethics of the field as
defined and developed by the Association for Educational Communications and
Technology.
2.5 Ethics: Candidates design and select media, technology, and processes that
emphasize the diversity of our society as a multicultural community.
Utilizing the Quality Matters standards rubric to assess the quality of an online
course I was able to make sound decisions when developing my own online Moodle
course. The assessment strategy utilizes a scoring matrix to assess each section of an
online course. These sections include the courses overview, objectives, assessments,
instructional material, learner engagement, support, and accessibility. Utilizing this
method of assessment improved my understanding of the critical attributes required
of a quality online course. By evaluating the Quality Matters rubric, I was able to
improve my syllabus to ensure students understood all the course objectives and
standards required to complete the course.
The Coast Guard, as part of a performance technology graduate program,
directed me to conduct a job task analysis of the Master Training Specialist
qualification. The analysis included a comprehensive assessment plan for all tasks
associated with the job. Conducting this evaluation resulted in an improved
understanding of the frequency, difficulty, and importance of the job's objectives. I
conducted this evaluation by interviewing accomplished performers, surveying
qualified members, and analyzing extant data. Through this exhaustive review of
data, I was able to recommend improvements to instructional practices and learning
objectives, including the recommendation for a distance learning online course.
3.5 Ethics: Candidates foster a learning environment in which ethics guide practice that
promotes health, safety, best practice, and respect for copyright, Fair Use, and
appropriate open access to resources.
Not all learners are the same, as I learned through various analyses in this
masters program. However, regardless of the learners background or abilities they
still have the right to learn. In my Integrating Technology into the Classroom
Curriculum course, I presented ways to potentially mitigate disabilities of learners to
support their continued educational growth. Some of the common applications that
support learners include text to speech and speech to text application and virtual
reality.
In my Creating Educational Websites course, I created a web accessibility hot
links website about the sixteen different U.S government web accessibility standards.
The website provides access to the code of federal regulations which provides the
rules for ensuring internet sites provide accommodations to people that are vision
impaired, physically disabled, and auditory impaired among other accessibility
concerns. Primarily, I focused the website on educating learners on color blindness by
providing information on different types of color blindness and how designers of
instruction can ensure that their media is accessible. This website provides valuable
information to support instructional designers build online instruction which
empowers learners of all abilities. Personally, I was also able to utilize the
information in the creation of my own instructional products.
4.1 Collaborative Practice: Candidates collaborate with their peers and subject matter
experts to analyze learners, develop and design instruction, and evaluate its impact on
learners.
4.2 Leadership: Candidates lead their peers in designing and implementing technology-
supported learning.
4.3 Reflection on Practice: Candidates analyze and interpret data and artifacts and
reflect on the effectiveness of the design, development and implementation of
technology-supported instruction and learning to enhance their professional growth.
Throughout the course of both EDTECH 541 and EDTECH 543, I reflected
on each weekly module. Through this reflection, I was able to better understand the
content and apply it to real world scenarios. From EDTECH 541, Integrating
Technology into the Classroom Curriculum, I was able to reflect back on the
understanding that appropriate technology under the circumstances is the best way to
improve student learning. By creating unique lesson plans utilizing word processing
or presentation software encouraged me to continue my own professional growth
regardless of the resources my organization has available.
I also reflected on my Social Networking Learning course, particularly about
professional development and communities of practice. Integrating Twitter,
Facebook, and other social technologies into the classroom or simply into the sphere
of understanding for a student is a powerful tool for growth. Reflecting on my own
personal use of Twitter live chats for professional development in this course helped
me understand the effectiveness of these technologies to enhance student and
instructor performance outside the classroom. Lastly, the biggest takeaway from both
of these courses was that on its surface many technologies might not appear to be
either designed for education or innovative enough to make a difference in improving
learning environments. However, through creative instructional design and
implementation, most technologies can support students under the right conditions.
4.5 Ethics: Candidates demonstrate ethical behavior within the applicable cultural
context during all aspects of their work and with respect for the diversity of learners in
each setting.
STANDARD 5 - RESEARCH
Candidates explore, evaluate, synthesize, and apply methods of inquiry to enhance learning and
improve performance.
5.2 Method: Candidates apply research methodologies to solve problems and enhance
practice.
5.4 Ethics: Candidates conduct research and practice using accepted professional and
institutional guidelines and procedures.
LIST OF ARTIFACTS
EDTECH 541 - (Integrating Technology into the Classroom Curriculum): Gerstein, Spring 2017
19. Acceptable Use Policy Blog (1.5)
20. Interactive Presentation Lesson (1.2)
21. Social Networking and Community Building Lesson (1.2)
22. Instructional Software Lesson Plan (2.1)
23. Adaptive and Assistive Technology Presentation (2.5, 3.6)
24. Learning Log (4.3)