Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245281627
CITATIONS READS
3 26
2 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by John Joseph Myers on 22 October 2015.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
PRACTICAL ISSUES FOR THE APPLICATION OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE
CONCRETE TO HIGHWAY STRUCTURES
By John J. Myers,1 P.E., Member, ASCE, and Yumin Yang2
ABSTRACT: In recent years, the advantages of high-performance concrete (HPC) have been well documented.
Among others, these advantages include enhanced design flexibility and improved durability performance that
results in reduced maintenance costs and an increased service life. Despite these obvious benefits, the imple-
mentation of HPC has been very slow. This can be attributed to several factors including the uncertainty related
to current design codes and a lack of familiarity of designers and contractors with practices and requirements
for proper design and construction of high-performance concrete structures. This paper introduces and discusses
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by LIBRARY PERIODICALS on 10/22/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
several fundamental issues that affect the implementation of HPC and impact the practitioner. These include
issues related to quality control/quality assurance, specifications, material performance, and structural behavior.
Within the scope of this discussion, the fundamental differences and similarities between HPC and conventional
concrete are discussed. The objective of this discussion is to provide the practicing engineer with a conceptual
understanding of the practical issues that affect the design and use of HPC for highway structures with the desire
to further stimulate the implementation of HPC.
tations of conventional concrete may be called high-perfor- that the contractor has to transport and erect.
mance concrete. The added benefits include reduced complexity and con-
Others have developed a performance-based method to de- struction time for the contractor, and thereby additional cost
fine HPC. Based on the results of the SHRP, the FHwA has savings. In addition to the benefits of higher strength, HPC
proposed performance-based specifications for four different also provides increased durability compared to conventional
performance grades of HPC (Goodspeed et al. 1996), as pre- concretes, which translates into reduced maintenance costs and
sented in Table 1. The specifications are expressed in terms of longer life structures. This is particularly attractive within the
eight performance characteristics including strength, elasticity, present infrastructure, where many of the bridges in the United
freeze-thaw durability, chloride permeability, abrasion resis- States are deficient. The typical design life of todays conven-
tance, scaling resistance, shrinkage, and creep. By restricting tional concrete bridges is estimated at 40 years, while the de-
the definition to long-term performance parameters, designers sign life of the HPC bridges presented above has been esti-
who develop concrete mixture proportions may be more will- mated at 75 years (Myers and Carrasquillo 1999b). This is
ing to incrementally modify mixture designs, change concrete where the real long-term cost savings and advantages lie.
curing procedures, and use admixtures and alternative hydrau-
lic cements. QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
According to Mather (1993) both the designer of concrete Introduction
mix proportions and the bridge engineer play a key role. He
stated that for the bridge engineers to adopt an HPC perfor- A clearly defined and well-understood quality control/qual-
mance definition, the definition must include adequate dura- ity assurance (QC/QA) program is key to the successful im-
bility and strength parameters. The performance-based ap- plementation of HPC since the sensitivity of HPC to many
proach by the SHRP has tried to focus on this approach. Using QC/QA procedures is greater than conventional concretes. The
grades to represent performance, a bridge design engineer can generally accepted definitions of QC and QA are as follows:
specify a mixture to yield a desired concrete service life. Each
parameter can be independently specified by a designated Quality control: Actions taken by a producer or contrac-
grade based on desired performance. tor to provide control over what is being done and what
An example of this may be a bridge deck in San Angelo, is being provided so that the applicable standards of good
Tex., similar to the North Concho River U.S. 87 & South practice for the work are followed
Orient Railroad (S.O. RR) Overpass Bridge, discussed in more Quality assurance: Actions taken by an owner or the
depth later in this paper. In a climate such as San Angelo, owners representative to provide assurance that what is
Tex., the bridge deck is subjected to deicing salts, a moderate being done and what is being provided are in accordance
number of freeze-thaw cycles, and a narrow beam spacing. with the applicable standards of good practice for the
Based on the current working definition presented in Table 1, work
this may be specified by a high grade (Grade 2) to resist freez-
ing and thawing distress; a medium grade (Grade 2) to resist The approach in the transportation industry has always been
scaling, abrasion, and chloride penetration; and a low grade to use concrete with characteristics at appropriate levels to
(Grade 1) to obtain strength and elastic modulus. Naturally the ensure satisfactory performance for the intended service life.
use of a performance definition alone cannot address all de- In the past, many have tried to accomplish this through pre-
terioration mechanisms. scriptive specifications rather than performance-based specifi-
Tikalsky and Scanlon (2000) have also recently developed cations. The reasons vary why the vast majority of designers/
a guide to specify durability performance grades where the specifiers select prescriptive specifications. Many designers/
specifier responds to a series of questions to select an appro- specifiers want to avoid additional QC/QA requirements or the
priate performance grade. This performance-based model is presence of additional constraints placed upon the concrete
presented in Table 2. producer or contractor. The reason that is cited most often by
designers and/or specifiers is that the owner is unwilling to
pay the additional project costs associated with the perfor-
Advantages of HPC for Application to Highway mance-related requirements.
Structures Additionally, many design engineers and owners are short-
sighted and are most interested in front-end costs, not placing
The benefits of HPC in the bridge industry have been well a great deal of emphasis on the long-term durability perfor-
documented over the years. The higher strength associated mance of exposed structures. The current state of the infra-
with many HPC mix designs translates into longer spans with structure serves as a living example of this. As implied in the
a reduced number of supports. The substructure costs associ- performance-based definition of HPC, many designers are re-
ated with most bridges are approximately 50% of the cost of considering this approach in lieu of performance-based spec-
the bridge on the average nationally. Therefore, if one support ifications using an engineered concrete to meet specific per-
can be eliminated over five spans for example, a 20% reduc- formance requirements.
614 / JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2001
Alkali silica
Freeze-thaw durability Scaling durability Abrasion resistance reaction durability Chloride permeability Workability
(FT) (SR) (AB) (AS) (CP) (WK)
Is the concrete ex- Is the concrete ex- Is the concree ex- Does the concrete Is the concrete ex- Is there a congestion
posed to freezing posed to deicing posed to surface contain reactive ag- posed to chloride need because of
and thawing envi- salt? abrasion? gregates? salts or soluble sul- formwork or rein-
ronment? fates environments? forcing constraints?
No. FT grade should No. SR grade should No. AB grade should No. AS grade should No. CP grade should No. TS grade should
not be specified. not be specified. not be specified. not be specified. not be specified. not be specified.
Stop here. Stop here. Stop here. Stop here. Stop here. Stop here.
Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next
question. question. question. question. question. question.
Is the member ex- Is the exposure a di- Is the member ex- Is the member ex- Is the member ex- Is there a need for
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by LIBRARY PERIODICALS on 10/22/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
posed to deicing rect application of posed to deicing posed to moisture? posed to a poten- flowing concrete or
salts? salt? salts? tially moist envi- congestion in more
ronment? than one area?
No. Use FT-Grade 1. No. Use SR-Grade 1. No. Use AB-Grade 1. No. Use AS-Grade 1. No. Use CP-Grade 1. No. Use WK-Grade
Stop here. Stop here. Stop here. Stop here. Stop here. 1. Stop here.
Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next
question. question. question. question. question. question.
Will the member be Will the member be Will the member be Will the member be Will the member be Is there a need for
saturated during subjected to surface exposed to tire saturated during saturated during concrete to flow
freezing? loadings? studs or chains? freezing? freezing? horizontally more
than 2 m?
No. Use FT-Grade 2. No. Use SR-Grade 2. No. Use AB-Grade 2. No. Use AS-Grade 2. No. Use CP-Grade 2. No. Use WK-Grade 2.
Yes. Use FT-Grade 3. Yes. Use SR-Grade 3. Yes. Use AB-Grade 3. Yes. Use AS-Grade 3. Yes. Use CP-Grade 3. Yes. Use WK-Grade 3.
TABLE 2. (Continued )
Compressive strength Strength development Modulus of elasticity Shrinkage Sulfate resistance Tensile strength
(CS) (SD) (ME) (SH) (SU) (TS)
Is the concrete struc- Will the concrete go Is there a structural Is the concrete ex- Is the concrete ex- Does the design de-
tural or a pave- into service after a need for stiffness? posed to moisture, posed to more than pend on concrete to
ment? minimum of 7 days chloride salts, or 0.10% soluble sul- carry tension?
after being cast? soluble sulfates en- fates?
vironments?
No. Specify a mini- No. SD grade should No. ME grade should No. SH grade should No. SU grade should No. TS grade should
mum of 21 MPa not be specified. not be specified. not be specified. not be specified. not be specified.
(3,000 psi). Stop Stop here. Stop here. Stop here. Stop here. Stop here.
here.
Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next
question. question. question. question. question. question.
Is the member a slen- Will the member ben- Is there a particular Is the member con- Is there a member ex- Does the structural
der column or pre- efit from long-term benefit to a higher structed without posed to more than performance rely
stressed beam? strength gain? than normal stiff- joints? 0.20% soluble sul- on tensile strength?
ness? fates?
No. Specify a com- No. Use SD-Grade 1. No. Use ME-Grade 1. No. Use SH-Grade 1. No. Use SU-Grade 1. No. Use TS-Grade 1.
pressive strength Stop here. Stop here. Stop here. Stop here. Stop here.
within CS-Grade 1.
Stop here.
Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next Yes. Proceed to next
question. question. question. question. question. question.
Is the member opti- Is thermal cracking a Is high stiffness criti- Is the member de- Is the member ex- Is there a design need
mized for high potential in the cal to the structural signed to be water- posed to wet-dry for TS > 6 MPa?
strength? member? design? tight or crack free? cycles?
No. Specify a com- No. Use SD-Grade 2. No. Use ME-Grade 2. No. Use SH-Grade 2. No. Specify a com- No. Use TS-Grade 2.
pressive strength pressive strength
within CS-Grade 2. within SU-Grade 2.
Yes. Specify a com- Yes. Use SD-Grade 3. Yes. Use ME-Grade 3. Yes. Use SH-Grade 3. Yes. Specify a com- Yes. Use TS-Grade 3.
pressive strength pressive strength
within CS-Grade 3. within SU-Grade 3.
Material selection and mix design development are outside Preconstruction Meeting
the scope of this paper, but in general, higher-quality materials
and concrete admixtures are often selected or specified to meet The sensitivity of HPC is greater than standard conventional
special project requirements such as high strength or high du- concretes. Small variations in mixture proportions and devia-
rability. The designer/specifier should consider the impact of tions from good testing practices can have a greater effect on
mixture constituents when developing the project require- the strength and other properties than conventional concretes
ments/specifications for production, transporting, placing, cur- (ACI 1998). Prior to construction, all of the participants should
ing, and testing of HPC. The following sections introduce meet to clarify contract requirements, special project require-
QC/QA issues that should be considered for any HPC project. ments, placement conditions, and to review the planned in-
616 / JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2001
FIG. 1. North Concho River U.S. 87 and South Orient Railroad Overpass Comparison Spans of HS/HPC Girders and Conventional Strength Girders
spection and testing programs of the various parties. The ef- mixes may be warranted to establish a promising mixture
fects of time, environmental conditions (temperature, wind, when historical records of established plant mixes do not sat-
relative humidity, etc.), placing, curing, and acceptance criteria isfy specification requirements.
should be reviewed. The capabilities of the contractors work- Spot checking the plant is also recommended unless the
force, inspection staff, and the testing and batching facilities complexities of the project demand full-time monitoring. In
should also be reviewed, as HPC often requires additional many cases, full-time inspection at the batching facility is not
workforce needs for placement and QC/QA. necessary. Full-time inspection is often recommended for con-
The meeting should establish lines of communication and cretes with design strengths >70 MPa (10,000 psi). Adequate
identify responsibilities. It is especially important to review job controls must be established to prevent delays that may
the procedures the inspector will follow when noncompliance cause slump loss and result in lower workability. At the job
with contract requirements is determined or suspected. This site preparations should be made as detailed as possible. If
advance understanding will minimize future disputes and con- different concrete strengths are required at the job site, the
tribute to a quality process. Timely and accurate reporting is contractor should take precautions to avoid mixing of concrete
a necessity by all parties involved. Trial production batches in construction.
should have established a workable mixture, but it may be- When transporting concrete to the site, two issues in partic-
come necessary to make adjustments due to site conditions ular should be considered by the producer: mainly the maxi-
such as weather. mum transport volume and the transport time. A standard tran-
Guidelines for field addition of materials should be well sit mixer that can accommodate a maximum of 7.6 m3 (10 cu
clarified including preexisting specification requirements due yd) of concretes should not exceed 6.9 m3 (9 cu yd) of con-
to the often-low water to binder ratio of the mixes. The ready- crete to prevent spillage due to the higher fluidity of the higher
mix producer is essential to this discussion. Only designated slump concrete if a water reducer is used. Transporting time
individuals should have the authority for the addition of any may also be an issue. Low water to binder ratio concretes are
materials at the site, particularly water. No water in excess of very cohesive in nature. While retarding agents and redosing
the approved mixture proportions should be added to the HS/ of high range water reducers can be used effectively to extend
HPC mixtures. preset times and thereby transportation times, the time interval
between the addition of cement to the batch and the placing
Production, Transporting, Placing, and Curing of concrete in the forms should be considered when the spec-
of Concrete ifications are written.
Naturally there is no substitution for experience, particularly Only if properly cured for an adequate time period prior to
in the area of HPC production, so it is often advisable for a being placed in service will the potential strength and dura-
designer/specifier to require that all bidders be prequalified bility performance of an HPC be realized. During hot weather,
prior to the award of a concrete supply contract. However, this proper casting times for casting of concrete bridge decks
may not be practical in all applications. To date, many concrete should be selected. Fogging to avoid plastic shrinkage cracks
producers who are located in rural areas within the United is recommended for low water to binder mix designs that are
States have little or no experience with mineral and chemical subjected to environmental conditions including high wind
admixtures. In this situation, a more detailed prequalification speed, high temperature, and low relative humidity. Special
process should be carried out. This would culminate with the attention should be paid to curing of HPC decks, particularly
production of a trial batch of the proposed mix proportions to those that include pozzolans. Proper curing is one of the least
familiarize themselves with the mix design and to verify that expensive techniques that can be practiced and has a signifi-
the mixture satisfies all of the specification requirements. Quite cant impact on later-age mechanical property development.
often special aggregates, cements, or admixtures will be re- Temperature control for HPC precast beams and cast-in-place
quired to satisfy specification requirements. Laboratory trial HPC decks is recommended to avoid high hydration temper-
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2001 / 617
atures and excessive cracking on the microstructure level (My- the bridge projects to serve as a long-term in situ durability
ers and Carrasquillo 2000). study on HPC.
One method that has been developed to produce QC/QA
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by LIBRARY PERIODICALS on 10/22/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
the following:
ACI (1992b) has stated that deviations from the predicted
fsp = 7.4( fc)0.5 (psi) (1) values of (4) are highly dependent on the properties of the
coarse aggregate. This was consistent with the results obtained
fr = 11.7( fc)0.5 (psi) (2)
from the Texas HPC bridges (Fig. 4) and other research studies
Other researchers (Shah et al. 1985; Iravani 1996) have sug- (Iravani 1996; Mokhtarzadeh and French 2000a). No one em-
gested other empirical relationships for tensile strength based pirical equation accurately represented the elastic modulus,
on compression strength. Perhaps the most appropriate tensile flexural strength, or splitting tensile strength characteristics of
strength empirical relationship to use for design is one based an HS/HPC mix design. Some of the empirical expressions
on historical test results from the mix design that will be used presented in (3)(11) consider aggregate type as a variable,
in production. but no one empirical expression effectively addresses the var-
iations within an aggregate source or the multitude of other
Modulus of Elasticity variables that can affect the elastic modulus such as aggregate
content, curing condition, or the characteristics of the paste
The elastic modulus or modulus of elasticity of concrete is structure. In the authors opinion, any elastic modulus, flexural
one of the most important mechanical properties of concrete tensile strength, or splitting tensile strength that is assumed,
since it impacts the serviceability and structural performance based on a function of the compressive strength for the design
of reinforced concrete structures. The elastic modulus of con- of HPC members by the design engineer, should be verified
crete is closely related to the property of the cement paste, the through a series of field trial batches for the specific mix de-
stiffness of the selected aggregates, and also the method of sign, or by the documented historical properties performance
determining the modulus. The elastic modulus is greatly af- for that mix design to verify the design assumptions within
fected by the size, shape, stiffness, and quantity of its coarse limits.
aggregate (Mindness and Young 1981; Neville 1981; Shah and In most cases, high elastic modulus for HPC members is
Ahmad 1994). A significant amount of research work has been often desirable to control serviceability since typical HPC
conducted on both conventional concrete and high-strength members have greater span lengths and/or carry a higher grav-
concrete in order to predict the elastic modulus as a function ity load per unit volume than conventional concrete members.
of the compressive strength of the concrete. Current code rec- Two simple methods can be suggested to improve the elastic
ommendations use empirical equations to predict the elastic modulus of a concrete mix design. One method is to increase
modulus based on the compressive strength of the concrete. the coarse aggregate content of the mix, as illustrated in Fig.
Eq. (3) presents the recommended empirical code equation for 5 (Myers 1999). Note that the curing condition of the concrete
conventional concretes (normal weight concrete) by AASHTO can also impact the elastic modulus, so again it is important
(1996) and ACI (1999). to implement a QC/QA program that includes control speci-
Ec = w 1.5( fc)0.5 = 57,000( fc)0.5 for w = 150 pcf (psi) (3) mens that are representative of the concrete within the mem-
ber. This will result in a more accurate prediction of service-
ACI (1992b) stated that (3) overestimates the elastic mod- ability performance. The other method to enhance the elastic
ulus for compressive strengths over 41.4 MPa (6,000 psi) and modulus is to select hard, dense aggregate sources that are
proposed (4) for concretes with compressive strengths in the compatible with the paste matrix characteristics (Myers 1999).
range of 41.482.7 MPa (6,00012,000 psi). Several other
recommendations for high-strength concrete have been pro-
posed including (5) by Cook (1989), (6) by Shah et al. (1985),
(7) by Berke et al. (1992), (8) by Tomosawa and Noguchi
(1993), and (9) by Radain et al. (1993). Eq. (10) is rec-
ommended in the Federation International de la Precon-
trainte/Comite Euro-International du Beton (FIP/CEB) (1990)
state-of-the-art report, and (11) is reported by Norges Stan-
dardiseringoforbund (1992) concrete structures design rules.
The Comite Euro-International du Beton-Federation Interna-
tional de la Precontrainte (CEB-FIP) model code (CEB-FIP
1991) relates the modulus of elasticity to the cube root of the
compressive strength, rather than the square root
Ec = 40,000( fc)0.5 106 (psi) (4)
2.5 0.315
Ec = w ( fc) (psi) (5)
FIG. 4. Elastic Modulus versus Square Root Compressive Strength by
where w = 151 pcf Coarse Aggregate Type
HPC Creep and Shrinkage Test Results cementitious ratio can no longer be effectively used to predict
Long-term creep and shrinkage tests conducted in Texas the durability or permeability performance of a concrete mix
(Gross and Burns 1999) indicated that both creep and shrink- design with the use of todays mineral and chemical admix-
age were largely dependent on the amount of mix water, and tures. Varying degrees of permeability performance at any sin-
less than the ACIs (1992a) standard values, as illustrated gle water to binder ratio were exhibited depending on the mix-
in Figs. 6 and 7. Gross and Burns (1999) suggested that this ture constituents and characteristics investigated by Myers and
may result in fewer prestress losses compared to the values Carrasquillo (1999b). The formation of bands or regions of
determined by the prediction method for conventional con- performance were distinguishable for a series of trial mixes
crete. Other investigations (ACI 1992b) have indicated that with and without an ASTM Class C fly ash replacement. These
creep and shrinkage results were similar to results found for bands are schematically illustrated in Fig. 8. The variation of
normal strength concrete, while other (Mokhtarzadeh and the permeability due to changing the coarse aggregate type
French 2000b) have reported results similar to the Texas find- was minimal. For a designer or practitioner to achieve a spe-
ings. cific level of permeability or durability performance, a perfor-
mance-based methodology may be implemented rather than
Permeability using traditional prescriptive methodologies such as a water to
binder ratio.
To date there is no recognized standard test method to mea- AASHTO T-277 and T-259 test methods were used to eval-
sure the permeability of concrete. In general, there are three uate the permeability performance of the CIP bridge decks for
categories of methods: air (or gas) permeability, hydraulic per- the Texas HPC bridges, as illustrated in Figs. 9 and 10. Both
meability, and chloride ion permeability. High-performance test methods indicated lower permeability for the HPC decks.
concrete with low permeability is most often desired for bridge The level of permeability performance is greatly impacted by
deck applications in an effort to extend the service life of the not only the material constituents used, but also the level and
structure. Many, including the authors, believe that a water-to- type of curing, as reflected in Fig. 9. The HPC bridge decks
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2001 / 621
FIG. 10. Chloride Ion Penetration (90-Day Ponding) for North Concho FIG. 11. Durability Performance of HS/HPC Mixes with Entrained Air
River Overpass Cast-in-Place Decks
Freeze-Thaw Resistance
Damage of concrete under repeated cycles of freezing and
thawing (frost attack) has been a major performance issue for
bridges and infrastructure components. Stark (1976) found that
the long freeze-thaw cycles were more severe than the short
freeze-thaw cycles for same number of cycles, even where air
void spacing factors were no greater than 0.2 mm (0.008 in.).
For a freeze-thaw cycle to be detrimental to the concrete, the
concrete must reach an internal temperature of at least 5C FIG. 12. Freeze-Thaw Resistance for North Concho River Overpass
(23F) for a minimum of 6 h and exceed a critical saturation Decks Durability Factor versus Number of Freeze-Thaw Cycles
threshold during this time period. An internal concrete tem-
perature of 5C (23F) is equivalent to an ambient air tem-
perature of 9C (15F) for concrete 75 mm (3 in.) below the
surface. This is approximately the center of most bridge decks
that are 190203 mm (7.58 in.) in thickness. Ernzen and
Carrasquillo (1992) have suggested that a minimum of 3% air
entrainment is required for HS/HPC, as illustrated in Fig. 11.
This is slightly lower than conventional mix designs due to
the pore structure of HS/HPC with low water to binder ratios.
Members that are not subjected to becoming saturated above
the critical saturation threshold of 91.7% do not warrant air
entrainment for freeze-thaw protection. These would include
members such as beams, pier caps, or other substructure ele-
ments not subjected to a splash zone and protected from ver-
tical saturation by a bridge deck or other element. In the con-
text of a bridge, the only component that generally warrants FIG. 13. Freeze-Thaw Resistance for North Concho River Overpass
air entrainment are the bridge decks themselves. Decks Percent Mass Change versus Number of Freeze-Thaw Cycles
in-place deck slab and beams, and early-age thermal and FIG. 14. Measured and Predicted Prestress Losses
shrinkage effects in beams before release of prestress. These
sources may or may not be significant, depending on a variety
of factors, and are typically not considered in design. In gen-
eral, any effect that causes a strain gradient (curvature) over
the depth of the member will cause a change in the deflection
behavior. The source of the strain gradient need not be load
related.
Camber and deflection are affected by several material prop-
erties and structural parameters. Modulus of elasticity, unit
weight, and creep of concrete all influence the magnitude of
camber and deflection. The moments of inertia of the beam
and composite cross section also affect the magnitudes of var-
ious camber and deflection components. Beam spacing, deck
thickness, beam cross section, prestress force, and prestress
eccentricity are some of the important structural parameters
that must be known for accurate prediction of deflection be-
havior.
In general, each elastic component of camber or deflection
can be related to the curvature or strain gradient at some point FIG. 15. Upper- and Lower-Bound Camber for HPC and NSC Com-
panion Member
(or points) along the member. This relationship is shown in
(16) where the coefficient k represents the shape of the cur-
vature diagram along the member. Since the curvature will Prestress LossesComparison of Measured and
generally be uniform, linear, or parabolic along the length of Predicted Values and Their Effect on HPC Members
the member, the deflection will be related to the square, cube, The simplified AASHTO and Prestressed/Precast Concrete
or fourth power of the span length Institute equations for HPC prestress losses were found to be
conservative when compared to measured values on the Texas
L2 f (L2, L3, or L4) HPC bridges by Gross and Burns (1999), as illustrated in Fig.
= k = (16) 14. Gross and Burns proposed a modified general form of
EI EI
these component methods and noted that to accurately predict
prestress losses for HPC members, it is largely dependent on
When HPC is implemented to accommodate larger girder the accurate estimation of material properties.
spacing, but span lengths are not increased, each camber or The long-term deflection behavior of concrete members is
deflection component can be expected to be higher than for extremely sensitive to small variations in material properties
typical designs by a proportional amount. For example, if and prestress losses. This sensitivity is even higher for HPC
girder spacings is 50% larger than typical (and the same members, as reported by Gross and Burns (1999) (Fig. 15).
cross section is used), then the deflection due to deck loads Consequently, small variations in estimating the material prop-
may be expected to be about 50% larger as a result of the erties can have a significant impact on the deflection behavior
increased spacing. However, this increase is offset by the po- of bridge girders.
tentially higher modulus of elasticity and lower creep coeffi- The effect of thermal gradients during hydration and differ-
cients exhibited by many high-performance concretes. ential shrinkage before release also contributes to the signifi-
If HPC is implemented in design such that span lengths are cant differences between measured camber and predicted
increased, there is a completely different effect. Every com- values using measured parameters. Large temperature differ-
ponent of camber or deflection, no matter what the source, is entials within the member and between the member and the
magnified as an increase in the square, cube, or fourth power external environment should also be avoided to aid in pre-
of the span length. For instance, increasing the span length by venting cracking before release of the prestressing forces. This
25%, say from 30.5 to 38.1 m (100125 ft), increases the is often difficult though since high cementitious contents and
magnitude of each component of camber or deflection by 56, accelerated steam curing is required to meet release strengths
95, or 144% (depending on whether the term is related to the in a timely manner.
square, cube, or fourth power of the span length). While the The designer should be aware that the behavior of HPC
increased stiffness and reduced creep of many HPCs will offset bridges has been reported to be two to four times more sen-
this increase to a small extent, it is clear that the sensitivity of sitive to variations in material properties and other design pa-
beams with very high span-to-depth ratios is greatly magnified. rameters (i.e., prestress losses) than conventional concrete
Other changes in design as a result of using PC are not con- bridges. To date, an accurate estimation of prestress losses and
sidered with respect to this discussion on span length. deflection behavior is more difficult than for conventional con-
624 / JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2001
additional placement and curing concerns associated with the (AASHTO). (1996). Standard specifications for highway bridges,
use of HPC. This preparation will often result in improved Washington, D.C.
communication between all parties, avoid construction delays, American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1992a). Prediction of creep, shrink-
and reduce the potential for disputes. age, and temperature effects in concrete structures. ACI 209R-92, De-
troit.
Other Considerations Related to HPC Members American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1992b). State-of-the-art report on
high strength concrete. ACI 363R-92, Detroit.
For the implementation of HPC and larger-diameter pre- American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1998). Guide to quality control and
stressing steel, larger prestressing capacity is required. Precast testing of high-strength concrete. ACI 363.2R-98, Detroit.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1999). Building code requirements
beds should also be compatible with larger prestressing re- for reinforced concrete. ACI 318-99, Detroit.
quirements. Special fixtures or spacers may also be required Barr, P., Fekete, E., Eberhard, J., Stanton, B., Khaleghi, B., and Hsieh, J.
to prestress larger strands on traditional prestressing strand- (2000). High performance concrete in Washington State SR 18/SR
spacing grids. 516 Overcrossing: Interim report on girder monitoring. FHwA Rep.
Special considerations may be required for the handling, No. FHwA-RD-00-070, Federal Highway Administration, Washington,
transporting, and erection of HPC members. Often, HPC mem- D.C.
Barrios, A. O., Burns, N. H., and Carrasquillo, R. L. (1996). Behavior
bers are longer and heavier than traditional conventional con- of high strength concrete pretensioned girders during transfer of pre-
crete members. This may result in lateral stability concerns stressing forces. Res. Rep. No. 580-1, Ctr. for Transp. Res., The Uni-
during handling and/or erection and require handling and lift- versity of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex. (in press).
ing equipment with larger capacity. Bazant, Z. P., and Panula, L. (1980). Creep and shrinkage characteri-
zation for analyzing prestressed concrete structures. PCI J., 15(3), 87
CONCLUSION 122.
Berke, N. S., Dallaire, M. P., and Hicks, M. C. (1992). Plastic, me-
As designers, contractors, and producers become more fa- chanical, corrosion, and chemical resistance properties of silica fume
miliar with its production and property performance, HPC is (microsilica) concretes. Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Fly Ash, Silica Fume,
Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, V. M. Malhotra, ed., Amer-
becoming more widely utilized. Strength levels that were ican Concrete Institute, Detroit, 11251149.
thought to be impossible to attain 15 years ago are now com- Branson, D. E., and Christiason, M. L. (1971). Time-dependent concrete
monplace. Today, high-performance concrete is being consid- properties related to designStrength and elastic properties, creep, and
ered for use in a wide variety of applications including high- shrinkage. Creep, shrinkage, and temperature effects in concrete
way structures. With the use of HPC come concerns related to structures, ACI Spec. Publ. No. SP-27, American Concrete Institute,
concrete properties, mix design performance, QC/QA, the ap- Detroit.
Branson, D. E., and Kripanarayanan, K. M. (1971). Loss of prestress,
plicability of current code requirements and construction prac- camber, and deflection of non-composite and composite prestressed
tices, and the predictability of short- and long-term perfor- concrete structures. PCI J., 16(5), 2252.
mance. For designers and practitioners to embrace and Buckner, C. D. (1994). An analysis of transfer and development lengths
implement the use of HPC, it is important to understand the for prestressed concrete structures. Publ. No. FHwA-RD-94-049, Fed-
inherent differences and similarities between HPC and con- eral Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
ventional concrete when applying this innovative material to Burg, R. C., and Fiorato, A. E. (1999). High-strength concrete in mas-
sive foundation elements. PCA Res. and Devel. Bull. No. RD 117,
highway structures. Today, many have referred to HPC as an Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Ill.
engineered material that can be formulated for a specific ap- Byle, K. A., Burns, N. H., and Carrasquillo, R. L. (1998). Time-depen-
plication through the use of numerous available admixtures. dent deformation behavior of prestressed high performance concrete
With this comes a broader performance range in terms of ma- bridge beams. Res. Rep. No. 580-6, Ctr. for Transp. Res., The Uni-
terial and mechanical property performance. Clearly, as with versity of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex. (in press).
any engineered material, the more one understands about the Carlton, M., and Carrasquillo, R L. (1997). Quality control of high
performance concrete for highway bridges. Res. Rep. No. 580-3, Ctr.
performance characteristics of the material up front, the more for Transp. Res., The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex. (in
effectively the material can be applied and predicted by the press).
designer or practitioner. Castrodale, R. W., Kreger, M. E., and Burns, N. H. (1988). A study of
pretensioned high-strength concrete girders in highway bridgesDe-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS sign considerations. Res. Rep. No. 381-4F, Ctr. for Transp. Res., Uni-
versity of Texas at Austin, Tex.
The writers would like to acknowledge the joint sponsors of the Texas Cetin, A., and Carrasquillo, R. L. (1997). Effect of accelerated heat
High-Performance Concrete Bridge Projects, the Federal Highway Ad- curing and mix characteristics on the heat development and mechanical
ministration, and the Texas Department of Transportation for their support properties of high performance concrete. Res. Rep. No. 580-4, Ctr. for
and encouragement. Transp. Res., The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex. (in press).
Chan, S., Feng, N., and Tsang, K. (2000). Mechanical properties of high-
BIBLIOGRAPHY strength concrete incorporating carrier fludifying agent. ACI Mat. J.,
97(2), 108114.
Ahmad, S. H., and Shah, S. P. (1985). Structural properties of high- Comite Euro-International du Beton-Federation International de la Pre-
strength concrete and its implications for precast prestressed concrete. contrainte (CEB-FIP). (1991). CEB-FIP model code 1990. Final
PCI J., 30(6), 92119. Draft, Paris.