You are on page 1of 1

News

2010 ASCO Annual Meeting


The 45th annual meeting of the Maintenance rituximab recurrence; 5-year recurrence in the harboured the EML4–ALK fusion gene,
American Society of Clincal Maintenance rituximab improves breast was 3·7% for SLNB plus ALND according to findings, reported by
Oncology was held on June 4–8,
2010, in Chicago, IL, USA
progression-free survival (PFS) in versus 2·1% for SLNB alone. “This study Yung-Jue Bang (Seoul, South Korea),
patients with follicular lymphoma does not support the routine use of and colleagues from an expanded
who are responding to first-line ALND in early nodal metastatic breast phase 2 study of the first-in-human
immunochemotherapy, according to cancer”, commented Giuliano. monotherapy trial with the inhibitor.
findings from the PRIMA trial. With a To date, 82 patients have been enrolled
median age of 56 years (range 22–87), Ipilimumab and melanoma in the study (age 51 years [25–78]);
1018 patients were randomly assigned Ipilimumab—a human monoclonal 96% had adenocarcinoma. The overall
to either 2 years of maintenance antibody that blocks T-cell inhibition response rate was 57% (95%CI 46–68)
rituximab or observation. 75% of and potentiates T-cell activity— with a 6-month PFS of 72% (61–83)
patients had previously received significantly improves OS in patients and DCR at 8 weeks of 87%. Median
R-CHOP. 2-year PFS, the primary with pretreated, unresectable, advanced PFS has not yet been reached. The
endpoint, was 82% (95% CI 78–86) for melanoma, according to Steven O’Day most common toxicities included
the treatment group versus 66% (61– (Los Angeles, CA, USA) and colleagues. nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea. An
70) for the observation group (hazard Patients with stage III or IV melanoma estimated 3–5% of patients have this
ratio [HR] 0·50, 95% CI 0·39–0·64). were randomly assigned in a 1:3:1 fusion, but the discussant of this study,
Infections were seen in 22% of the ratio to either ipilimumab plus placebo Martin Edelman (Baltimore, MD,
control group versus 37% of those on (n=137), ipilimumab plus peptide USA), says that the actual numbers
rituximab maintenance; grade 3–4 vaccine gp100 (n=403), or gp100 represented by this percentage should
toxicities were noted in 16% and 22%, plus placebo (n=136). Median OS, the be considered when weighing up the
respectively. primary endpoint, was 10·1 months, importance of the findings.
10·0 months, and 6·4 months in each
Sentinel node trial findings of the three groups, respectively. At EMBRACE trial
Findings from the ACOSOG Z0011 4·5 years the survival curves remain Eribulin mesylate significantly
and NSABP B-32 trials suggest axillary separated, commented O’Day. improves OS in patients with locally
lymph node dissection (ALND) can be Significant differences were also noted recurrent or metastatic breast cancer,
safely omitted in certain subsets of in the disease control rate (DCR) and PFS according to findings reported by
patients with breast cancer. In the B-32 for ipilimumab-treated patients versus Chris Twelves and colleagues (Leeds,
study, David Krag (Burlington, VT, USA) gp100-treated patients. Treatment- UK) from the EMBRACE phase 3 trial.
and colleagues randomly assigned related grade 3–4 toxicities were noted Patients were randomly assigned in
5611 patients to either sentinel node in 22·9%, 17·4%, and 11·4% of patients, a 2:1 ratio to receive either eribulin
biopsy (SLNB) plus ALND or to SLNB respectively, and treatment-related mesylate—a microtubule inhibitor—or
alone, with only those who were deaths were noted in 1–3% of the trial treatment according to the physician’s
node-positive subsequently having an population. Two-thirds of the patients choice (TPC). 762 patients received
ALND. 3989 of the 5611 women had in the ipilimumab groups had immune- treatment. The trial population was
negative nodes. 5-year overall survival related adverse events; those of grade heavily pretreated with a median
(OS) was 96·4% for the SLN plus ALND 1–2 were generally reversible and those of four previous treatments; 73%
group versus 95% and 5-year DFS was of grade 3–4 could be controlled by had previous capecitabine therapy.
89% versus 88·6%, respectively. In the steroids. The discussant of this trial, Median OS, the primary endpoint, was
second study, reported by Armando Vernon Sondak (Tampa, FL, USA), 13·1 months for the eribulin-treated
Giuliano (Santa Monica, CA, USA) noted that only HLA-A*0201+ patients patients versus 10·7 months (HR
and colleagues, patients with one participated, but said that there was 0·81, 95% CI 0·66–0·99). Median PFS
or two SLNs with metastases after no sign that this patient group was was 3·7 months versus 2·3 months
SLNB were randomly assigned to unrepresentative. (0·85, 0·70–1·03). Grade 3–4 asthenia
either ALND (n=445) or to no further and fatigue were noted in 7·6%
treatment (n=446). All patients had a Oral ALK inhibitor in lung cancer of the eribulin-treated group and
lumpectomy and opposing tangential PF-1066 (crizotinib), an oral ATP- neutropenia in 44%. 10% had serious
field irradiation. Median follow-up was competitive inhibitor of the ALK treatment-related adverse events
6·2 years. The study was underpowered, and MET/HGF pathways, showed compared with 7% in the TPC group.
but there were no differences between activity in heavily pretreated patients
groups for OS, DFS, or local-regional with non-small-cell lung cancer who Emma Grainger

616 www.thelancet.com/oncology Vol 11 July 2010

You might also like