MM
4 _prorems!“5)
We have already stated that « protein is a linear chain, built from 20
amino acids. (A few rared’s occur occasionally, but we will not discuss
them.) ‘The chain contains of the order of 100-200 amino acid
Of particular
interest are the globular proteins, which act, for instance, as enzynes
(catalyse), These proteins, in the proper solvent, fold into the final
protein, as sketched in Fig. 1.1.
PRIMARY
Mprgsttaglly Te
| —
TeRTiany
‘STRUCTURE
Fig. 141 The Linear polypeptide chain (primary sequence)
folds into the final tertiary structur
In this chapter we will describe the building blocks of proteins and make sone
remarks about protein structure.
Lebninger,
Vol'kenshtein, Chapter 5.
Stryer, Part 1.
4H, Neurath, The Proteins, Acadenic Pret
E, Schulz and K. H. Schirmer, Princtples of Protein Structur:
Springer, New York, 1979.
Chapters 3-7.
» mlti-volume,12
4.1 Amino Acids, the Building Blocks
‘The building blocks from which proteins are constructed are the amino
acids. To a physicist, such complex organic molecules are often #
nightmare. We suggest forgetting at the beginning that they are organic
molecules and simply consider them building blocks with specified propertis
‘As they are used over and over again, their properteis become fantliar and
they lose their intimidating character.
All amino acids are built around a carbon atom. Two of the four ligand
positions (valences) connect the amino acid to the other building blocks in
the chain, one (the “eidechain") produces the characteristic features of a
particular amino acid, and the fourth carries a hydrogs
atom. The general
structure thus ts
shown in Fig. 2. Ris the residve that determines the
R cooH carboxyl
Characteristic . ~~ :
i Nw
residue (side chain) OK Links
a ogee
Figs 4.2 General structure of an amino acid.
nino (Nip)
Amportant specific properties of the amino acid. ‘The individual building
blocks in a protein are linked together by peptide bonds. ‘The bond has
covalent character and is so strong that it is practically never broken by
thermal effect:
In the formation of peptide bonds, water is elminated and a
bond is formed: COvH.
-HNH + -CO-NH- + H)0, The resulting polypeptide chain
thus looks as indicated in Fig. |-3. In consists of a backbone and two3
te
+HyN—C, {Ctl oe backbone
eet
fe
peptide bond
Fig. {.3 A polypeptide chain is formed from individual
amino acids through peptide bonds.
radicals per amino acid residue. The backbone is non-specific; the entire
specificity is in the radicals, In addition to the components shown, proteins
contain two endgroups
the terminal carboxyl C0) denoted by -C
the terminal amino wij denoted by -N
The twenty common amino acide are given in Table }.1.M4
Table {.1
Properti¢
of protein building blocks. The length (L) 1s for the eide chain
only. The molecular weight is for the entire amino acid - eubtract 17.9 to
obtain molecular weight of residue. ‘The polarity indicates whether the amino
acid is nonpolar (NP) or polar with a net positive, negative, or neutral
charge at pH = 6.
case ee =
Seecie 1. a
nino city al Ge rata BER) ET
pines Ho pte a
pe Gag et age ceo ttyl
:
Aowise AN OS 0 CRO x
a a ee) >
coe oh mak eee ¢
Frei pater tue WG
3
omens cw 0 - ceed
gia leat si cieatietittts ¢
files eee ue cg ees oe eg
bmn ME ass ow oS z
tee uv mas L
bee us sags Son Og
baie ES WS 0 &® ESEE™ Ff
poo. Wig tg Ee 3
Roo 6 ie [oS ?
sme oe gS §
ihe RIB =
‘Tryptophan TR 204 081 NP nam @) Ww
"
tome rh ao ge wD x
Perea vag Cie iereag eet 3
c1s
The side chains are shown schematically in Fig. \.4-
Tr Met 1
Ne on $8
s Se On pS cr G,
, .
cys Se tw Asn on
od neg be S
Oba : a
Ce oN .
yt We asp ow
eng ta ore
Fig. 1.4 (After Schulz and Schirmer) ‘The 20 standard amino acid side chains.
For proline part of the main chain is inserted. All other side chains are
shown as they emerge from the C,-atom in the main chain. The residue names
are given as three-letter symbofs. Atom naues are those given in the IUPAC-
US recommendations of 1969. The main chain in Pro is indicated by solidly
drawn bonds. All C,atons are black.In general, one classed; the amino acide into four groups:
I, Amino acids with nonpolar (hydrophobic) radicals. ‘These amino acids
are less soluble in water than the polar amino acids.
II, Amino acide with uncharged polar radicals. ‘The polar R groups of
these amino acids can hydrogen-bond with water and they are thus more
soluble in water than those of group I.
IIL, Amino acids with negatively charged (acidic) R groups. The menbers
of this class possess a negative charge at pH 6-7.
IV. Amino acids with positively charged (basic) R groups. ‘The basic
amino acids have a positive charge at pH 7. Histidine is a borderline
case; at pl 7, only about 10% have a positive charge; at pil 6, the
percentage 1s about 50.
‘An excellent discussion of the properties of each amino acid can be found in
Schulz and Schirmer,
ALL amino acids can exist in two different forms, related to
by a mirror reflection (Fig. 1.5)+
coon COOK
4,<@ NHS WN CMs
4 4
D-Ala L-Ala
Fig. \.5 D and L forms of alanine,a7
D and L stand for dextro (right) and levulo (left). The two forms rotate the
polarization of light in different directions. In nature, only the Lramtno
acids are biologically active. In the laboratory, both forms can be produced.
Sone expetinents, probably wrong, provide food for speculation. Did the L
doninance come about by accident or through a deeper cause? Neutrinos and
beta particles emitted in the weak interaction have a handedness. Could this
be the agent to produce predominantly left-handed amino acids? Could one of
the two forms be energetically favored? (6)
In describing a sequence, the various amino acids are designated either
by a three-letter or by a one-letter abbreviation. The sbbreviations are
Listed in Table 1.1.
‘The Primary Sequ
Proteins consist of about 100 to 1000 amino acids bound together to fora
a polypeptide chain, Investigation of the primary sequence already reveals
fascinating features. Consider for instance the primaty sequence of
cytochrome c, an electron transport enzyme. (R. E. Dickerson, Scientific
‘Averican, April 1972; reprinted in The Chemical Basis of Life). The primary
sequence of this protein has been determined in @ large number of cases.
Table \.2 gives part of the sequence for these. (The complete table can be
found in Dickerson or in M. 0, Dayhoff, Atlas of Protein Sequence and
Structure.)
. For a review see L. Keazthelyi, “Origin of the Asymmetry of Biomolecules
and Weak Interaction". Origins of Life 8, 299-340 (1977).1-8
Table 1.2 Partial Sequence of Cytochrome
.
°
2
a
Orzssseres
OLzs4ser189
O1zsesered
123456709
sede en
SEDISEIt ze
wie
OKT To -Vo@TRT Es
SENG RCRUL CY.
ERCRR DEVORE
DYER GK ET FltaRkece
ov
Pll leet
SSS SSE Ee
We notice that this sedvondtranger atin hs chang verq URE in the course of
fungi, plante,
about 109 years. Cyt ¢ 1s essentially the same in bacteria,
they are occupied
dnvartant,
some positions are
In particular,
and in humans.
by exactly the came amino acid in every sequence. A mutation in such a
position is lethal.
The differences between any
The table can be used to draw a family tree.
differ by one
for instance,
Man and rhesus monkey,
two chains are counted.
‘The difference table then provides us with a family tree. Table and
residue,
fam{ly tree are shown on the next page, in Fig. 1.6.
3m the following section, we will diecuss briefly a few simple proteins,
to make the general discussion somewhat more specific.14
ec
Tibr
27,
hei
latin
Som ma
Fig 1.6
THE FAMELy raze OF THE CYTOCHROMES C
‘The species differences shown in the table above left lead to a tree of family relatedness, Note that
these ts no ascending hierarchy. From the viewpoint of a yeast (if had one, and therein lies a real
if anthropocentric distinction), a moth, a man, and a bullfrog are equally far away, Note also how
Provincial is the view that we usually take of the living kingdom. The differences between fungi
fre greater than those between insects and vertebrates.
Trem Dickerson 21.3. Some Typical Proteins
Proteins perform an amazing number of functions and we only mention a
major subdivision here between structural and functional proteins. Structural
Proteins are more uniform and use repeated units, as in a mass-produced
building. Functional proteins are tailor-made for a specific job, such as
storing energy or matter (oxygen) or catalyzing a particular reaction. The
basic building blocks are the sane, but they are used differently. Moreover,
Ron-protein subunits are sometimes tncorporated into functional proteins. The
non-polypeptide part is called the prosthelic group, the protein without it
apoprotein, As shown in Fig. (.1, a protein first folds into a secondary and
then into a tertiary structure. The geometry of the amino acids permit only a
small number of secondary structures. Of these, two are most often used in
nature, the alpha helix and the antiparallel beta pleated sheet. Their basic
structures are shown in Fig. 1.7,
Ankigamailel
B pleatea sheet
Fig. \.7 Alpha helix and antiparallel beta pleated sheet.=n
Globular proteins are largely built from pieces of alpha helices,
interrupted by groups that permit bending and twisting, and from beta pleated
sheets. Structural proteins also use both units, but in a periodic
arrangement. We sketch in the following some examples that we will use again
in later discussions.
4
over and over again. In heme proteins, nature us
3.1. Heme Proteins. When nature discovers a good trick, it is used
@ particular organic
molecule, the heme group, embeds it into different proteins (“globins"), and
with the protein modifies the properties of the heme group so that the entire
system performs a given task. A heme protein thus looks schematically as
sketched in Fig. (.
Before discussing the heme group and some heme proteins
in more detail, we list in Table /.3 a number of heme proteins with their
functions.
globin
OPT EO
Fig. (.8 A cross section through a heme protein.
Weinberg 2003Finally, learn something about the history of science,or at a minimum the history of your own branch of science. The least important reason for this is that the history may actually be of some use to you in your own scientific work. For instance, now and then scientists are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified models of science that have been proposed by philosophers from Francis Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper. The best antidote to the philosophy of