You are on page 1of 2

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

OFFICE OF CITY PROSECUTOR


MANILA

Capty Hook
Complainant,

-versus- I.S. No. 23579


For: Adultery

Tinker Ball-Hook and Peter Pan De Sal


Respondents.

x-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x

COMPLAINT-AFFIDAVIT

I, Capty Hook, of legal age, married and a resident of 2230 Herrera St.
Sta. Cruz, Manila, under oath, declare that:

1. On March 20, 2013, Tinker Ball-Hook, the respondent, and I got


married.
2. On 31 March 2013, I saw the respondents Tinker and Peter Pan
De Sal in Starbucks Tomas Morato, eating together. Having doubts of my
wifes fidelity, I decided to investigate. I left the establishment, stayed in my
car and saw them leaving the establishment after Peter gave Tinker a kiss on
the cheek.
3. On May 25, 2013, I saw credit card receipts in my wife's bag
which shows jewelry, a tennis bracelet, bought from Tiffany and Co by Peter
with his Mastercard. I also saw the same jewelry referred in the receipt in a
box beside my wifes suitcase inside the closet. A copy of the credit card
receipts is hereto attached as Annex A.
4. When I opened my wifes suitcase, I saw a used roundtrip plane
ticket for MNL-Hongkong-MNL. The tickets were issued under the names
of respondents, for the period of April 18-19, 2013. A copy of the roundtrip
plane tickets is hereto attached as Annex B.
5. Upon further investigation, I also found receipts showing that
respondents had stayed together in one suite at the Marco Polo Hotel. Their
stay together at a hotel has also persuaded me that they have already had
carnal knowledge of one another. A copy of the receipts showing proof of
their stay at the Marco Polo Hotel is hereto attached as Annex C.

1
6. In addition, it is most unlikely that Mr. Peter Pan De Sal had not
been aware of my wifes current status as a married woman seeing as this
affair has been going on for more than half of the year. They have been
meeting together discreetly as well as leaving on trips together abroad and
meeting with another at hotels.
7. Based on the foregoing facts, I have logical reason to believe
that the respondents have committed the crime of adultery punishable under
Art. 333 of the Revised Penal Code. There is adultery when a married
woman, such as my wife, had sexual intercourse with a man, such as Mr.
Peter Pan De Sal, not her husband. The paramour is also liable, if he is
aware of her status as a married woman, under the same law.
8. I am executing this sworn statement for the purpose of charging
my wife and her paramour with violating Art. 333 of the Revised Penal Code
which penalizes the crime of adultery.

City of Manila, Philippines. November 25, 2013.

Capty Hook
Complainant

SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me, the undersigned


prosecutor, this 25th day of November, 2013 in the City of Manila,
Philippines. I hereby certify that I have personally examined the above-
named affiant and that I am satisfied that the foregoing statements were
given by him voluntarily and of his own free will.

Atty. Rogge E. Salazar


City Prosecutor

You might also like