Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COURSE OUTLINE
Case: Alita vs. CA, G.R. No. 78517, February 27, 1989
Issuances:
1. DAR AO 13, S. 1990 Rules and Procedures Governing Exemptions of Lands
under Sec. 10 of RA 6657
2. DAR AO 4, S. 2003 2003 Rules on Exemption of Lands under Sec. 3c, RA 6657
and DOJ Opinion 44 s. 1990
Cases:
1. Milestone Farms, Inc., v. Office of the President, G.R. No. 182332. February
23, 2011
2. Luz Farms v. Sec. of Agrarian Reform, GR No. 86889, December 4, 1990
Cases:
1. Central Mindanao University v. DARAB, G.R. No. 100091. October 22, 1992
2. DAR v. DECS, G.R. No. 158228. March 23, 2004
3. Province of Camarines Sur v. CA, G.R. No. 103125 May 17, 1993
Cases:
1. Just Compensation as discussed in Association of Small Landowners in the
Philippines v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, GR. No. 78742, July 14, 1989
2. Land Bank of the Phils. v. Natividad, G.R. No. 127198. May 16, 2005
3. Land Bank of the Phils. vs. CA, GR No. 118712, Oct. 6, 1995
4. Lubrica v. Land Bank of the Phils., G.R. No. 170220. November 20, 2006
Issuance: Preliminary Determination of Just Compensation per Rule XIX of the 2009
DARAB Rules of Procedure
Case: Land Bank of the Phils. v. Palmares, G.R. No. 192890, June 17, 2013
3. Indefeasibility of Titles
Cases:
1. Caballes v. DAR, GR No. 78214, December 5, 1988
2. Gabriel v. Pangilinan, G.R. No. L-27797. August 26, 1974
Cases:
1. CREBA v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, G.R. No. 183409. June 18, 2010
2. Ros v. DAR, G.R. No. 132477. August 31, 2005
Issuances:
1. MC 54, s. 1993 from the Office of the President Prescribing the
Guidelines governing Sec. 20 of RA 7160 Authorizing Cities And
Municipalities to Reclassify Agricultural Lands to Non-Agricultural Uses
2. DAR AO 1-02 The 2002 Comprehensive Rules on Land Conversion
Case: Fortich v. Corona, GR. No. 131457, April 24, 1998 Decision, Opinion and
Resolution of the Motion for Reconsideration with the Decision of the Office of the
President (OP) on the Sumilao Case
Cases:
1. Bernas vs. CA, 225 SCRA 119 - Consent of the lawful possessor creates
tenancy;
2. Castillo vs. CA, 205 SCRA 229 - A hollow block maker or piggery/poultry
owner cannot claim tenancy on land which is not devoted to agricultural
production;
3. Tiongson vs. CA, 214 SCRA 197 - Tenancy is created by the consent of the true
and lawful landholder through lawful means and not by imposition or
usurpation;
4. Matienzo vs. Servidad, 107 SCRA 276 (1981). There is no tenancy because of
the absence sharing arrangement with an overseer;
5. Caballes vs. DAR, 168 SCRA 254 (1988). Agricultural production is not
present. Respondent is only a caretaker who cannot qualify to be a tenant;
Note: Latag vs. Banog, 16 SCRA 88, the SC considered a caretaker as a tenant.
6. Teodoro vs. Macaraeg, 27 SCRA 7 (1969). Where there is sharing of the
produce or rental payment tenancy exist.
5. Right of Redemption
1. Spouses Eligio P. Mallari et al. vs. Ignacio Arcega, et al. [G.R. No. 106615.
March 20, 2002]
Cases:
1. Land Bank of the Phils. v. CA, GR No. 128557, December 29, 1999
2. Land Bank of the Phils. v. Celada, G.R. No. 164876. January 23, 2006
3. Land Bank of the Phils. v. Heirs of Eleuterio Cruz, G.R. No. 175175, September
29, 2008
4. Land Bank of the Phils. v. Martinez, G.R. No. 169008. August 14, 2007
Cases:
1. DAR v. Paramount Holdings Equities, Inc., G.R. No. 176838, June 13, 2013
2. Del Monte Phils. Inc. Employees Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Cooperative
(DEARBC) v. Sangunay, G.R. No. 180013, January 31, 2011
Part Fourteen Individual Presentation and Submission of Case Digests and Draft
Decisions