You are on page 1of 3

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

San Beda College of Law


Atty. Gallant D. Soriano, MNSA

SYLLABUS - Part I
(School Year 2016-2017)

st st
1 Week 1 Week - Jan. 09, 2017

CHAP. 1 - INTRODUCTION CHAP. 3 POWERS & FUNCTIONS OF


ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES
A. Definition of Administrative Law
A. Powers, Functions (Defined)
B. Origin and Development of
Administrative Law B. Sources of Powers

C. Criticisms and Advantages of C. Scope of Powers


Administrative Law
D. Classification of Powers
CASES:

01) Luzon Dev. Bank v. Asso. of LDBE, 249 CASES:


SCRA 162;
02) Iron & Steel Authority v. CA, 249 SCRA 12) Makati Stock Exchange v. SEC, 14 SCRA
620
538
13) Taule v. Santos, 200 SCRA 512
03) Solid Homes v. Payawal, 177 SCRA 72
14) Solid Homes v. Payawal, 177 SCRA 72
04) Christian Gen. Assembly v. Ignacio, 597
SCRA 266
05) Dadubo v. CSC, 223 SCRA 747
06) Lianga Bay v. Enage, G.R. No. L-30637, 2
nd
Week
July 16, 1987
CHAP. 4 INVESTIGATORY POWERS

st
A. Basic Concepts:
1 Week
1. Investigatory Power;
CHAP. 2 NATURE & ORGANIZATION 2. Judicial Function
OF ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES 3. Judicial Discretion
4. Test of Judicial Function
A. Basic Concepts
B. Purposes of Grant of Investigatory Power
B. Types of Administrative Bodies
C. Scope and Extent of Investigative Power
C. Organization of Administrative Bodies:
CASES:
1. Creation 15) Carino v. CHR, 204 SCRA 483
2. Reorganization 16) Villaluz v. Zaldivar, 15 SCRA 710
3. Abolition 17) Ruiz v. Drilon, 209 SCRA 695
4. Deactivation 18) Sec. of Justice v. Lantion, 332 SCRA
160
CASES: 19) Pefianco v. Moral, 322 SCRA 439
20) Camara v. Mun. Court, 387 US 523
07) Larin v. Executive Secretary, 280 SCRA 21) Salazar v. Achacoso, 183 SCRA 145
713 22) Catura v. CIR, 37 SCRA 303
08) Dario v. Mison, 176 SCRA 84 23) Evangelista v. Jarencio, 69 SCRA 99
09) Buklod ng Kaw. EIIB v. Zamora, G.R. 24) Office Court Admin. v. Canque, 588
No. 142801, July 10, 2001 SCRA 226
10) Bagaoisan v. NTA, GR No. 152845, 25) Carmelo v. Ramos, 116 Phil. 1152
Aug. 5, 2003 26) Masangcay v. Comelec, 6 SCRA 27
11) Domingo v. Zamora, G.R. No. 142283. 27) Bedol v. Comelec, 606 SCRA 554
Feb. 6, 2003 28) Gaoiran v. Alcala, 444 SCRA 428
29) Ang Tibay v. CIR, 60 Phil. 635

1
rd
3 Week
CASES:

CHAP. 5 RULE-MAKING POWER 46) Pres. Anti-Dollar Salting Task Force v.


CA, 171 SCRA 348
A. Basic Concepts 47) Cojuangco v. PCGG, 190 SCRA 226
48) Santiago Jr. v. Bautista, 32 SCRA 188
1. Rule-making power (Defined) 49) Smart Comm. v. NTC, G.R. No.
2. Rules & Regulations (Defined) 151908. Aug. 12, 2003
3. Rationale, Necessity, Nature of Grant 50) Guerzon v. CA, 164 SCRA 182
4. Judicial Discretion 51) Antipolo Realty v. NHA, 153 SCRA 399
5. Test of Judicial Function)

B. Non-Delegation of Powers

1. Permissibility of Delegation 5
th
Week
2. Validity of Delegation
3. Validity of Exercise
CHAP. 7 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
C. Rules and Regulations with Penal
Sanctions
A. Basic Concepts
1. General Rule, Rationale, Exception
2. Requisites for Validity 1. Rules of Procedure
2. Basis of Formulation
CASES: 3. Power to Issue Rules of Procedure)

30) KMU v. Garcia, 239 SCRA 38 B. Characteristics of Administrative Proceedings


31) PASEI v. Torres, 212 SCRA 298
32) Santiago v. Comelec, 270 SCRA 106
33) U.S. v. Ang Tang Ho, 43 Phil. 1 C. Hierarchy of Evidentiary Rules
34) Ynot v. IAC, 148 SCRA 659
35) DAR v. Sutton, G.R. No. 162070, Oct.
19, 2005 D. Administrative Due Process
36) Sol. Gen. v. MMA, 204 SCRA 837
37) BOIE-Takeda v. Dela Serna, 228 SCRA
329 CASES:
38) United BFHA v. BF Homes, 310 SCRA
304 52) Bantolino v. Coca-Cola, GR No. 153660,
39) Lupangco v. CA, 160 SCRA 848 June 10, 200
40) People v. Que Po Lay, 94 Phil. 640 53) First Lepanto v. CA, 237 SCRA 519
41) Tanada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446 54) Villa v. Lazaro, 189 SCRA 34
42) People v. Maceren, 79 SCRA 450 55) Paterok v. Bureau of Customs, 193
43) US v. Panlilio, 28 PHIL. 608 SCRA 132
44) People v. Santos, 63 Phil. 300 56) Lumiqued v. Exevea, G.R. No. 117565,
45).SEC. v. LPG Refillers, G.R. No. 159149, Nov. 18, 1997
June 26, 2006 57) Casimiro v. Tandog, G.R. No. 146137,
June 8, 2005
58) Lozano v. Delos Santos, 274 SCRA 452
th 59) Globe Telecom v. NTC, G.R. No.
4 Week
143964, July 26, 2004

CHAP. 6 ADJUDICATORY POWER

A. Basic Concepts
th
6 Week
1. Quasi-judicial power (Defined)
2. Elements of Adjudicatory Power
CHAP. 8 JUDICIAL REVIEW OF
B. Principles & Jurisprudence on ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
Adjudicatory Power
A. Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction
C. Steps to the Exercise of Adjudicatory
Power 1. Meaning, Function, Application, Rationale
2. Principles & Jurisprudence on Primary
D. Classification of Adjudicatory Power Jurisdiction

2
B. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies

1. Meaning, Function, Application, Rationale


2. Principles & Jurisprudence on Primary
Jurisdiction

C. Exceptions to the Exhaustion Doctrine

1. Principles & Jurisprudence on Exceptions

D. Questions Open to Review

E. Ripeness for Review

CASES:

60) Villaflor v. CA, 280 SCRA 297


61) Commissioner v. Navarro, 77 SCRA 264
62) Centeno v. Centeno, 343 SCRA 153
63) Nuesa v. CA, G.R. No. 132048, March
6, 2002
64) Regional Dir. v. CA, G.R. No. 110193
Jan. 27, 1994
65) Laguna CATV v. Maraan, G.R. No.
139492, Nov. 19, 2002
66) Corpus v. Cuaderno, 4 SCRA 749
67) Madrigal v. Lecaroz, 91 SCRA 20
68) Cabada v. Alunan, 260 SCRA 838
69) Datiles and Co. v. Sucaldito, 186 SCRA
704
70) NFA v. CA, 253 SCRA 470
71) Gravador v. Mamigo, 20 SCRA 742
72) Almine v. CA, 177 SCRA 796
73) Smart Communications v. NTC, 408
SCRA 678
74) UP Board of Regents v. Rasul, 200
SCRA 685
75) Arrow Transportation Corp. v. BOT, 63
SCRA 193
76) Tan v. Veterans Backpay Commission,
105 Phil. 377

You might also like