This case involves a dispute over the death benefits of Santiago Carino. Santiago had two marriages: the first to Susan Nicdao was void due to lack of a marriage license, and the second to Susan Yee was bigamous as the first marriage had not been annulled. The Supreme Court ruled that Susan Nicdao was entitled to half of the death benefits under Article 147 as she cohabited with Santiago in good faith under a void marriage. The other half would go to Santiago's children from Susan Nicdao through intestate succession.
Original Description:
Persons digest: Property Regimes of Unions Without Mariage
This case involves a dispute over the death benefits of Santiago Carino. Santiago had two marriages: the first to Susan Nicdao was void due to lack of a marriage license, and the second to Susan Yee was bigamous as the first marriage had not been annulled. The Supreme Court ruled that Susan Nicdao was entitled to half of the death benefits under Article 147 as she cohabited with Santiago in good faith under a void marriage. The other half would go to Santiago's children from Susan Nicdao through intestate succession.
This case involves a dispute over the death benefits of Santiago Carino. Santiago had two marriages: the first to Susan Nicdao was void due to lack of a marriage license, and the second to Susan Yee was bigamous as the first marriage had not been annulled. The Supreme Court ruled that Susan Nicdao was entitled to half of the death benefits under Article 147 as she cohabited with Santiago in good faith under a void marriage. The other half would go to Santiago's children from Susan Nicdao through intestate succession.
1. Who gets the death benefits Petition: Certiorari of a decision of the CA Petitioner: Susan Nicdao Carino Ruling: Respondent: Susan Yee Carino 1. Susan Nicdao gets the death benefits as Ponente: J. Ynares-Santiago their cohabitation is under Art 147, Date: Feb, 2, 2001 which entitles her to one-half of the benefits (being in good faith), and the Facts: other-half will go to Santiagos children SP04 Santiago Carino died and who gets under Susan Nicdao by intestate his death benefits (AFP Mutual succession to the legal heirs. Benefit Association Inc, NAPOLCOM, Commutation, Pag-Ibig, PCCUI) is the Ratio Decidendi: subject of the controversy. Second marriage is covered under Art First Marriage: With Susan Nicdao on 148 of the FC, which refers to the June 20, 1969, had two children but property regime of bigamous marriages. marriage is void ab initio due to the (Having been solemnized during the lack of marriage license. subsistence of the first marriage then Second Marriage: With Susan Yee presumed to be valid) started cohabiting 1982 but only got o Under Art 148 only the marriage on Nov 10, 1992 no children. properties acquired by the Marriage is also void due to lack of parties through their actual joint judicial decree declaring the first contribution shall belong to the marriage with Susan Nicdao void (Art co-ownership. 40 FC) thus, making his second o Hence, wages and salaries marriage bigamous. earned by each party belong to Main issue: who gets his death him/her exclusively. benefits o Unless she can prove she CA sided with Susan Yee as she proved contributed in obtaining these Santiagos first marriage was void due benefits she has no share. to lack of marriage license. First marriage with Susan Nicdao is covered under Art 147 as they were Pertinent laws/provisions: together under a void marriage. Art 147 FC: When a man and a o Under Art 147, wages and woman who are capacitated to marry salaries earned by either party each other, live exclusively with each during cohabitation shall be other as husband and wife without the owned by the parties in equal benefit of marriage or under a void shares and will e divided marriagetheir wages and salaries equally between them, even if shall be owned by them in equal shares only one party earned the wages and the property acquired by both of and the other did not contribute them through their work or industry thereto. (She was in good faith) shall be governed by the rules on co- o Art 147 creates a co-ownership ownership. xxxxx thus entitling her to half. Art 148 FC: Only the properties One-half will go to Susan Nicdao while acquired by both of the parties through other half will go to Santiagos legal their actual joint contribution of money, heirs, which are his children with her. property, or industry shall be owned by them in common in proportion to their Principles: Property Regimes of Unions respective contributions.. Without Mariage
(Issues in Business Ethics 8) Peter Ulrich (Auth.), Peter Ulrich, Charles Sarasin (Eds.)-Facing Public Interest_ the Ethical Challenge to Business Policy and Corporate Communications-Springer Netherla(1)