Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning Outcomes
While all of the Core Values of FYW apply to all ICC1 assignments, this assignment in particular is
designed to create a greater self-awareness of your writing process (Core Value I) and how it relates
(or not) to published accounts (Core Value II) of writing and the writing process by two popular,
prolific writers.
Readings
What Writing Is by Stephen King (PDF on Blackboard)
o King, Stephen. "What Writing Is." On Writing. Simon and Schuster, 2000. Print.
Chapter One of The Writing Life by Annie Dillard (PDF on Blackboard)
o Dillard, Annie. Chapter One. The Writing Life. Harper Perennial, 2013. Print.
2
Project Components
1. Summary + Critical Engagement Assignment (guidelines below)
a. Each reading summary should be one paragraph of approximately 200 words
for each reading; use APA for bibliographic information.
2. Writing Process Analysis Essay drafts + feedback + revisions (guidelines below)
3. Reflection (separate guidelines in Blackboard)
The Summary + Critical Engagement Assignment helps you achieve multiple goals in
service of the Core Values, including
Synthesizing ideas to understand them and place them in conversation with each
other;
Discovering your own ideas about a topic and connecting your ideas to those of
published writers.
The ultimate goal of the critical engagement assignments is to allow you to develop your
ideas on a topic and participate in a written conversation (in the form of your essay) on that
topic. To do so, though, you need to identify the other speakers and conversations that will
inform (but not drive) your own essay.
3
1. Contextual Introductions
For each reading, list the following:
2. Summaries
In paragraph form, explain each texts main purpose, key points, and most important
evidence for the key points. Summaries must be accurate, thorough, and concise.
About 200 words each. Include bibliographic information at the top of each
summary using APA format. Rely on your notes from class for summary writing
advice.
3. Critical synthesis/dialogic
For this part of the assignment you are putting the articles/authors in a
conversation with each other and yourself in order to compare your ideas on writing
and the writing process. To do this, you will be using a Dialogic Matrix, which is
included in your Critical Engagement packet.
Write so that someone who is not necessarily familiar with these articles or
authors can understand and follow it.
4
Quote and paraphrase correctly (so you can reuse part of this for your essay).
5
Your pre-writing and work in class have prepared you to write about your own writing process
metaphor. As weve discussed in class and seen in the readings, writing is [both physical and
cognitive.] In this essay, you will be both describing and analyzing your current writing process
through metaphor as a way to better understand and possibly improve it.
The first part of your essay should discuss the readings that we have done for the assignment,
namely the short pieces by Stephen King and Annie Dillard. Describe Kings and Dillards ideas,
using at least one quote each and being sure to thoroughly and accurately explain what each author
is trying to say and why they are trying to say it. Give each author their own full paragraph of
summary and analysis.
The second part of your essay is where you talk about your own writing process metaphor. In this
part you should refer to your typical writing process when assigned an essay in high school (since
you probably havent written an essay in college yet). Begin with what you think, plan, or do when
the teacher assigns the essay and then follow through with as many details as possible until handing
in the final draft, explaining each step through one overarching metaphor. Be sure to include all the
details and examplesdo not worry about someone judging your poor writing habits. As you
know from our discussions in class, all writers have different processes and all writers can improve.
This is about self-awareness and recognizing the productive and unproductive parts of your process
by exploring that process through some other kind of imagery. This section should be one or two
paragraphs. The more detailed you are, the better your paper will be.
Finally, once you have introduced the ideas of King, Dillard, and yourself, it is time to put those ideas
into conversation with each other or synthesize them. How do you recognize yourself in these
published accounts? Alternatively, how do you differ from the accounts? How are they similar or
different from each other? How do the readings help you to understand your processor your
feelings about writingin new ways? This section should be at least one paragraph, and can make a
good conclusion to the paper.