You are on page 1of 92

Chapter I

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study


The National Achievement Test (NAT) is an examination

given annually to assess the competency of both public and

private school students. The students knowledge and skills

are tested in the subjects of Mathematics, English, Science,

Filipino, and HEKASI for grade school and Mathematics,

English, Science, Filipino, and Araling Panlipunan for high

school. The test is administered by the Department of

Education's National Education Testing and Research Center

(NETRC). The results are intended to guide the Department of

Education in its efforts towards the improvement of the

quality of education in public schools and to provide

appropriate intervention for the students. A score of 75%

and up indicates mastery of the subject and 50% to less than

75%, near mastery; while a score of below 50% indicates low

mastery.
The NAT results guide decision makers in formulating

policies relative to progression and promotion of students,

especially in the public school system. These will also

determine the deficiencies of students that need further

intervention. According to DepEd Secretary Brother Armin A.

Luistro, NAT is just a part of the report card of DepEd and


the whole education system. Results of this indicator will

help them formulate appropriate interventions that aimed

improvement of the education system. (Philippine Star,

January 07, 2010)


Calls for educational reforms to address the needs of

students are frequent. Their focus has been primarily on the

content -- what students should learn, context -- the

circumstances students should be learning in, and outcomes

-- the knowledge and skills students should acquire.

Important changes have come about as educational reform

efforts focused on the needs of students.


The researcher believes that the profile of the

students and school climate conditions greatly affect the

students performance in the National Achievement Test.

Students may not only provide a rigid classroom instruction

but the school must provide them a good physical

environment, physical facilities that is free from risks and

a well-sounded classroom instructions.


Researchers will examine relationships between several

variables and students performance. For students

demographic profile those are age, gender, birth order,

monthly income of the family, parents educational

attainment, and average grade for the last school year

attended. Secondly, the researcher will also examine the

school climate condition that will carefully examine the


school physical facilities, instructional focus and physical

environment. Unfortunately, accompanying the calls for

reform in school systems is an underlying assumption that

the leadership needed to execute these changes will somehow

emerge.
The information will be useful to practitioners

attempting to implement an educational innovation or a

system wide change at the school or secondary level. In

addition, this information may be useful for professional

development. The information might also be useful for the

evaluation of school climate condition that may affect the

students performance. This also helps administrators to

carefully examine school rules and policies on executing the

designed curriculum for each learning area. In addition,

this may help the secondary schools in the Division of

Calapan City to focus also in the school climate conditions.

Finally, this paper attempts to raise awareness to internal

and external stakeholders who wanted to promote educational

transformation.
Education literature has often pointed to the

importance of student support services in promoting

learning. This is usually true in the field of basic

education. Unlike in the traditional education delivery,

learners tested in national achievement must be given enough

attention by teachers, stakeholders and the principal


itself. Low rating result in NAT is often blamed to the

basic education services that were given to them and to the

ability of the teachers.


This is true in the eight (8) public secondary schools

in the Division of Calapan City who could not achieve the

75% passing rate in the consecutive NAT test results for

school for numerous years that the NAT was implemented.


While there are lots of interventions to meet the

national academic standard, best practices to improve NAT

performance of second year students in the public secondary

schools in the Division of Calapan City, there are

comprehensive student support system developed and

implemented in Calapan City Division.


More importantly, the National Achievement Test is not

just a test for students but also for the principal

leadership skills that promotes a positive school climate

condition that can affect the students academic

performance. According to the Second Regional Comparative

and Explanatory Study (SERCE), in order to promote learning

among students it is essential to provide a welcoming and

warm environment based on mutual respect. In this line,

there is a need to evaluate the level of profile of the

students and school climate condition to assess the needs of

the students.
The purpose of this study is to identify the students

profile in terms of age, gender, family income, parents


educational attainment, and grades for the last school year

attended. It also needs to identify the school climate

condition that provides school to understand the working

condition and leadership, instructional focus and physical

environment.
It will also investigate students perspective,

questions concerning the school climate condition in

response to the result of their National Achievement Test.


The ultimate goal of this research is to aid the Public

Secondary Schools in the Division of Calapan City for the

improvement of students services academic program that

would result to the increase of NAT against national

standard.

Statement of the Problem


This study aimed to determine the Factors Related

toStudents Performance in the National Achievement Test in

the Public Secondary Schools in the Division of Calapan

City.
Specifically, it sought to answer the following

questions:
1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of:
1.1 age
1.2 gender
1.3 parents educational attainment
1.3.1 mother
1.3.2 father
1.4 monthly income of the family
1.5 average rating for the last school year

attended?
2. What is the extent of the school climate conditions as

perceived by student respondents in terms of:


2.1 school facilities
2.2 instructional focus
2.3 physical environment?

3. What is the level of performance of students in the

National Achievement Test in the public secondary schools

in the Division of Calapan City in:


3.1 English
3.2 Math
3.3 Science
3.4 AP
3.5 Filipino
4. Is there a significant relationship between the profile

of the respondents and students achievement in NAT in

terms of:
4.1 age
4.2 gender
4.3 parents educational attainment
4.3.1 mother
4.3.2 father
4.4 monthly income of the family
4.5 average rating for the last school year

attended?
5. Is there a significant relationship between the school

climate conditions and students performance in NAT as

perceived by the student respondents in terms of:

5.1 school facilities


5.2 instructional focus
5.3 physical environment?
6. Is there a significant difference in the school climate

conditions as perceived by student respondents in terms

of:
6.1 school facilities
6.2 instructional focus
6.3 physical environment?

Hypotheses of the Study


1. There is no significant relationship between the

profile of the respondents and students achievement in

NAT in terms of:


1.1 age
1.2 gender
1.3 parents educational attainment
1.3.1 mother
1.3.2 father
1.4 monthly Income of the family
1.5 average rating for the last school year

attended?

2. There is no significant relationship between the school

climate conditions and students performance in NAT in terms

of:
2.1 school facilities
2.2 instructional focus
2.3 physical environment?
3. There is no significant difference in the school

climate conditions as perceived by student respondents in

terms of:
3.1 school facilities
3.2 instructional focus
3.3 physical environment?

Significance of the Study


Findings of this study provided vital information

regarding the factors affecting the students performance in

the National Achievement Test (NAT) in terms of students

profile and school climate condition.


The findings of this study will benefit the following:
Superintendent. It may help the superintendent to identify

the needs of the school and to plan for the support system
that the school leaders need to prioritize when it comes to

students performance. It can also identify the critical

gaps and weaknesses of the nine public secondary schools in

the division when it comes to students learning and school

climate conditions.
Principal. The result of this study may also serve as

framework for various programs and strategies to be employed

on the school improvement planning. School climate condition

assessment may use as data inputs on the reality check

matters of school academic performance. Thus, appropriate

programs and thrusts may be formulated and provided with

appropriate budget for the improvement of the students

performance. It is also possible to have a rigid monitoring

of monthly result of students mean percentage score (MPS)

in their chapter test to be posted using graphical

representation to easily identify the competencies that

needs enough attention in classroom instruction. With the

help of graphs, the principal can help and assist teachers

in uplifting the performance of the students.


Teachers. The result of this finding is of value to

teachers because it will provide an overview of the needs

analysis of the school. They may be guided from the level of

assistance the school and the principal may need and may

help them to work cooperatively in order for them to attain

success in the national achievement test. By means of


carefully recorded grades of the student, the teacher and

principal can work collaboratively to identify the

competencies the students had mastered, not mastered and

needs mastery. With this, teachers can be guided to the

lesson that he needs to give more emphasis for students.


Students. The improvement of school climate condition

will be beneficial for the students. A favorable school

climate condition may serve as students motivation in

improving their academic performance. The motivating factors

that will start from the initiative of the school principal

may help the students to be more enthusiastic in learning

process.
Future researchers. This study will help to encourage

future researchers to conduct the most vital part of the

school progress in terms of academic. The study may propel

them to go into related area or they may study further

school academic achievement for other perspective. This may

also provide data bases for further innovation of this

research study.

Scope and Limitations of the Study


This study answered the factors related to students

performance in the national achievement test given last

school year 2010-2011 in the eight (8) public secondary

schools in the Division of Calapan City.


The major task of this research is to answer the

specific questions presented in the statement of the

problem. This is limited to its complete reliance on the

self-made questionnaire of the researcher as the primary

instrument for answering the factors related to students

performance in National Achievement Test in terms of

students profile and school climate condition.


The result of this study will be limited on the

perception of 276 student respondents from the eight (8)

public secondary schools in the Division of Calapan City

namely; Bucayao National High School, Canubing National High

School, Ceriaco A. Abes National High School, Community

Vocational High School, Managpi National High School,

Mamerta G. Tolentino National High School, Nag-Iba National

High School and Pedro V. Panaligan National High School.


Jose J. Leido Jr. Memorial National High School will

not be included in the study because it dominates the number

of student respondents in this study for, it is the biggest

public high school in the Division of Calapan City.

Definition of Terms
To facilitate better understanding of this research,

the following terms were defined conceptually and

operationally:
Age refers to the respondents age in the public secondary

schools in the Division of Calapan City.


Average rating refers to the average rating obtained by

the student respondents in the last school year attended.


Instructional Focus refers to the classroom instruction

offered and teachers competence in the delivery of

instruction.
Monthly Income refers to the income or financial status of

student respondents family that may affect performance in

school.
Parents Educational Attainment refers to the educational

status of parents both father and mother of student

respondents.
Physical Environment refers to the condition of school

building and its surrounding area, any biological or

chemical agent that is detrimental to health and physical

conditions, such as temperature, noise and lighting.

(Source: www. Wikipedia.org)


School Climate Condition refers to the health of the

learning environment that it is a multi-dimensional

influences to many individuals such as students, parents,

school personnel, and the community(source:

www.wikipedia.org)
School Facilities refer to the availabilities of

classrooms and laboratory and other buildings in school for

effective classroom instruction.

Theoretical Framework
A theory without facts becomes fantasy, uncontrolled

imagination, a reverie. Based on these requirements, several

theories are presented.


This study can be associated to Social systems model

theory (Waller, 1932) according to him every institution is

a system of social interaction; it is organized whole

comprising of interacting personalities bound together in an

organic relationship.
Further, the school is characterized by an

interdependence of parts, a clearly defined population, and

differentiation from its environment, a complex network of

social relationships, and its own unique culture. The model

suggests that a school consists of a number of important

elements or subsystems that affect the organizational

behavior.
Also this can also be patterned to Social systems

(Scott, 2003) consist of independent parts, characteristics

and activities that contribute to form the whole. The school

consists of a number of important elements or subsystems

that affect organizational behavior. The individual or

members of an organization have their own individual needs,

beliefs and cognitive perceptions of their environment and

job. Further, the social systems model gives a dynamic view

of the school, with the feedback mechanisms and elements

providing the action of the components.


This study is also linked with invitational theory

(Myers and Monson, 1992). The main tenant of invitational

theory is to revitalize schools and to encourage students to

want to go to school. According to the advocates of the

theory, there are five factors that affect the appeal of

schools; people, places, policies, programs, and processes.


Invitational theory claims that these five factors make

schools more socially appealing and safe.


To create a more positive learning environment, school

administrators must provide programs which are attractive

for the students and teachers. Programs, policies,

curriculum supervision, human resource management, school

climate condition must provide a positive impact for

teachers and learners in order for them to uplift the school

academic standards. A democratic leadership with an open

system to stakeholders can create an increased performance.


Furthermore, research from Sternberg (2000) which is

Theory of Mental Self-Government emphasized that students'

learning and thinking styles (which are usually ignored),

together with their ability levels, play an important role

in student performance. The Theory of Mental Self-Government

refers to an inventory of different thinking styles that

gives an indication of people's preference of thinking

patterns.
Where the Triarchic Theory focuses on the ability

itself, the theory of Mental Self-Government refers to


different thinking styles which constitutes preference in

the use of abilities.


According to the Theory of Intellectual Abilities,

three kinds of intellectual abilities exist, namely

analytical, creative and practical abilities. Measures of

abilities tend to focus mainly on analytical abilities,

whereas all the three types of abilities need to be regarded

as equally important.
Research done by Sternberg showed: The more we teach

and assess students based on a broader set of abilities, the

more racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse our

achievers will be.


From Wikipedia (2011) Theory of relative weight of

Nature and Nurture is a basis of this study about gender

influences of pupils on their academic achievement. The

biological differences between males and females - sexual

differences - account for a relatively small part of the

actual differences between men and women.


Most of these differences are matters not of sex but of

gender which, unlike sex, is socially formed and cultivated.

Differences of gender, however, are used to justify

inequalities between the sexes and the appropriation by

males of the major part of power, leisure, time and

property.

CONCEPTUAL MODEL
Student Performance in the National
Achievement Test (NAT):

English
Math
Science
AP
IV Filipino IV DV
1. Profile of the Respondents
1.1 age 2. School Climate Conditions
1.2 gender
1.3 monthly income of the family
2.1 School Facilities
1.4 educational attainment of
2.3 Instructional Focus
parents Figure 1
1.4.1
2.4 Physical Environment?
father 1 showed the hypothesized relationship between
Figure
1.4.2 mother
1.5 Average of
profile gradethe
for therespondents
last and school climate condition to
school year attended
the students performance in the National Achievement Test.
The dependent variable consists of the students

performance in the National Achievement Test in five

learning areas such as English, Science, Math, Filipino and

Araling Panlipunan.
The independent variables such as profile of the

respondents which comprises the age, gender, birth order,

monthly income of the family, parents educational

attainment, and average grade for the last school year

attended and the next independent variable consists of

school climate condition comprises of school facilities,

instructional focus and school physical environment.


The arrows from the two independent variables show the

hypothesized relationship between them. The respondents of

the study are third year students in the nine public

secondary schools in the Division of Calapan City.


The two-tailed arrow in the independent variable which

is the school climate conditions will be used to test the

hypothesized difference among each variable such as school

facilities, instructional focus and physical environment.

Chapter II
RELATED LITERATURE AND RELATED STUDIES
This chapter presented the reading surveyed on and

database documents which are significant research materials

in this study. The purpose is shown that the content of the

subject matter in this study are supported by the

authorities.
Local Related Literature
From the interview of Bulatlat Magazine dated June 2006

to the Chairman of Alliance of Concerned Teachers (ACT), Mr.

Jerry Tinio said that public school students do poorly in

diagnostic and achievement tests. Last June 2002, the

overall performance score of Grade IV pupils who took the

national diagnostic test (NDT) was 39.99%, while the first

year high school students had a lower 28.04 percent.


The national achievement test (NAT) given last March

2010 delivered slightly better results, with the fourth

graders garnering a 43.55%, while the first year high school

students earned a 36.13%. Despite the slight improvement,


the scores are still way below the 75% passing rate, Tinio

said.
From the article of of Dr. LeopoldoSichon (2006)in his

article entitled Our Schools, Our Teachers, our Students vs.

the National Achievement Test concluded that the plight of

the school and students is somewhat murky; the goal of

having 75 percent and above mastery levels in academic

performance in the National Achievement Test does not seem

to be in cognizant of the teaching and learning environment

that we have. Of course, we do not discount the fact that

DepEd is doing what it perceives to be the best- programs

and initiatives had been conceptualized and implemented to

answer the pressing need for quality education. Somehow we

are doing the best we can to bridge the gap between what we

have and what we want for our students. Yet, the effort

seems futile due to the fact that we still have to reckon

with real problems that confront us the system. These

problems are more dominant than achieving higher academic

performance alone and we could not just blind ourselves from

the fact that when basic needs are not met, all other needs

will be just be meaningless.


He said that the teachers need greater empowerment.

More than just salary increases, educators need the morale

boost by knowing that they belong to a truthfully dignified

organization whose philosophical foundation, visions and


mission statement are in congruence with its built-in

processes and mechanisms. We need local leaders who can

charter our educational direction through open channels of

communication and can guide us through well-planned, needs-

based and competency-based programs that will hone teachers

managerial skills. These teachers will in return become

self-managing, self-governing and self-sustaining and

without further ado, can mutually exchange expertise with

peers both conceptual and technical.


He also said that we need to realize also the

disparities between our schools, their locations as well as

the diverse clienteles that we serve. Students from rural

areas are different from those in the urban areas.

Demographic characteristics such as family background,

economic status, school distance, family background, etc.

should be considered in formulating the testing materials

intended to measure students academic performance. There

and then in his perspective, that we can truly measure the

quality of teaching instruction done in our schools.


Lastly, he added that everything will ever be a never-

ending cycle, unless the government can come up with a plan

that will finally address these problems especially graft

and corruption.
From the issue of De Guzman (2002) entitled

Restructured Basic Education Curriculum stated that


whether in high school or in the elementary level,

curriculum must be balanced, articulate, sequential,

integrative and continuous. The issue of too overcrowded

curriculum was answered by the implementation of the 2002

Restructured Basic Education Curriculum which offshoot to

restructuring the learning areas, integration of values

education and related skills within the learning areas,

greater emphasis on the learning areas and integrative

strategies in teaching, increased time task allocation in

major learning areas such as English, Math, Science,

Filipino and Makabayan.


Experts agree that there is no perfect formula for the

solution of problems especially when they involve human

feats. Learners are diverse and the tendency of educators to

adopt a one-size-fits-all type of teaching is said to be

contributory to low performance of students. Curriculum must

be flexible and must allow teachers to freely innovate as

necessity and propriety dictate.


From the manual, School Based Teachers Program (2002)

in the article Woes of a Teacher declared that the

effectiveness of teachers in delivering the right and proper

instruction is another question that must be considered if

we are to delve seriously into the root causes of our

students academic performance. Salary issues had been

answered by the government although some of the


recommendations regarding teachers benefits was shelved due

to lack of government funds. Strategies for reforms in

reference to teachers pay were implemented as well as

reforms in the processes of promotion. Teachers were

encouraged to sustain professional upgrading and

development. Principals were tasked to revitalize the

school-based instruction program where teachers were taught

effective managerial and instructional skills through the

SBTP (School Based Teachers Program).


He added that if salary issues were somehow met, look

then at the actual classroom teaching scenario. Imagine the

nightmarish teaching condition where a teacher has to teach

60 to 70 students in a class with only a piece of Manila

paper as her instructional material. This is happening and a

clear manifestation that the problem of teachers

effectiveness is also surrounded by so many intertwining

factors aside from salary. Salary alone cannot guarantee

effective teaching when the daily travails of teachers show

work overload beyond human capacity.


From the DepEd report (2010) declared that technology

has brought us sophisticated learning tools but textbooks

remain to be the most valuable learning reference of

teachers and students in the classrooms. However, despite

government initiatives to solve the yearly textbook

problems, observation shows that textbooks are always


lacking and some of them are found to be erroneous. In

answer to this, DepEd reported a more stringent evaluation

process it did since 2005 in textbook procurement project.

Their evaluation on the textbooks focuses on determining the

completeness and sufficiency of development of the learning

competencies, accuracy and up-to-datedness of contents,

determining the appropriateness of the materials to society,

to target users and to culture and on the language used to

ensure that these are grammatically correct and appropriate

to the level of the students. Improvement on this aspect is

still not fully realized for we know that students still do

not have enough textbooks to meet the demands of their

studies. The Internet has become an effective substitute to

information getting, however, since access to Internet is

still limited in many areas of the country, this does not

solve the problem yet.


As mentioned by Meinardus (2003) entitled Our

Students: the Family Level Factors mentioned that only some

of the internal and external environments affecting the

quality of education we deliver. He also said that do not

forget the economic situation in our country, the income

that sustains the family, the family structure in itself and

many others. Experts agree that the educational condition

attributed to the family is beyond all doubt or discussion,


as there is an ever-increasing awareness of the importance

of the parents role in the progress and educational

development of their children. Researchers consider family

background the most important factor in determining the

academic performance attained by the student; among these

factors of greatest influence are socio economic status and

the educational environment in the family. With regard to

social class, relevant research tells us that ones results

and expectations for the future are better when one belongs

to the social ladder. A student who expects to become a

doctor like his parents someday shall perform most likely

well than a student who has no clear vision of the future

because he/she knows very well that his or her parents could

not afford to send him/her to school. Also, influence of the

family educational climate is defined by the amount and the

style of help that children receive from the family; this is

determined by elements of the family context, like the

dynamics of communication and affective relationships,

attitudes towards values, expectations, etc. Along these

same lines, it is also reported that parental expectations

have a notable influence on academic results. It is also

noted that there are indirect relationships between

performance and the students perception of how much

importance his or her parents assign to study at home.


What do we expect about NAT results then after

considering all these factors? As mentioned by Meinardus

(2003), 95 per cent of all elementary students attend public

schools, therefore the educational crisis in the Philippines

is basically a crisis of public education. The wealthy can

easily send their offspring to private schools, many of

which offer first-class education to the privileged class of

pupils.

Foreign Related Literature


Lent (2000) in his toolkit entitled Improving Academic

Achievement stated that students achievement in basic

education has become an index of childs future in this

highly competitive world. For him, academic achievement has

been one of the most important goals of the educational

process. It is also a major goal, which every individual is

expected to perform in all cultures. Academic achievement is

a key mechanism through which adolescents learn about their

talents, abilities and competencies which are an important

part of developing career aspirations academic achievement

and career aspirations in adolescence are often correlated.


Crow and Crow (2009), defined Academic achievement as

the extent to which a learner is profiting from instructions

in a given area of learning i.e., achievement is reflected

by the extent to which skill or knowledge has been imparted

to him.
Marzano (2005) reviewed in his article entitled Factors

influencing Academic achievement that the factors like

parents education, parental occupation, type of family,

family size, ordinal position and even gender and age of the

child are found to have their impact on the academic

achievement of every student. He stated that the effect of

family environment on students achievement suggest that

several characteristics of family life are relevant.


Cromwell (2006) from his text titles Study habit:

Students Role- A question pointed out that the efficient

and effective way of learning depends upon the study habits

of the students. Study habits are important they influence

the academic achievement of students. So parents and

teachers must help in improving the study habits of

students. Some investigators have sought to determine what

study habits are characteristically used by students when

left to work by themselves with little or no direction.

Teachers in schools should become facilitators of learning.

The finite treasure within every learner should be

discovered and nurtured for the purpose of improving

learning effective study skills have to be taught. Study

skills involve reference, reading listening, study habits

and strategies. Learning improves with planning of where,

when and how much to study. Positive attitude, proper


physical condition and balanced emotional states are

important factors influencing study habits.


From the book of Singh (2004) entitled Gender and

Academic achievement declared that the performance of every

individual is not equal. There is a lot of variability and

dispersion. The variability cannot be attributed to a single

factor, but it is the outcome of number of factors as

intelligence, study habits, self-concept, creativity,

aptitude interests, socio economic factors, area etc. Along

with these gender of the child is also an influencing factor

on Academic achievement of the child. Singh made a survey of

the study habits of high, middle and low achieving

adolescents in relation to their sex, intelligence and socio

economic status and found that study habits of boys and

girls differed significantly at different levels of academic

achievement.
Vijayalaxmi and Natesan (2002) in their article Socio-

Economic Status: Factors influencing academic achievement

declared that girls had a higher mean academic achievement

compared to boys. However, Kaur and Gill (2003) revealed

that achievement in English and total achievement was

independent of sex, but boys scored higher than girls in

achievement in Punjabi, Mathematics and Science.


Ahmed (2008) reported in his review entitled

Achievement Motivation that the influence of sex on


achievement motivation was found to be statistically non-

significant. He carried out that there are differences among

adolescent boys and girls of various ordinal positions. The

study was over conducted on sample of one hundred and twenty

students belonging to the age group of 13-18 years, studying

in co-educated English medium institutions confined to the

suburbs of Mumbai city.

Local Related Studies


From the study of Galih, (2008) entitled Extent of

Principal Role and School Structure in Students

Achievement mentioned that the principal is central to the

extent of stakeholders involvement, the relationships among

the principals leadership, student achievement, and school

effectiveness are more indirect, both in this study and in

the literature.
He also found that the principals leadership has

strong direct effect on in-school processes and only

indirect effects on outcomes. The study also found that

principals have a key role in the success of schools

generally and, especially, in student outcomes. This result

is consistent with the later study of he cited from

Leithwood and Jantzi which shows that effective leaders have

a powerful indirect impact on student achievement and school

effectiveness.
He also cited the study of Heck et al. noted that

Principals do not affect individual students directly as

teachers do through classroom instruction, but that

activities of the Principal directed at school-level

performance have trickle-down effects on teachers and

students.
This is also consistent with the findings of Gali that

the principals leadership has a direct effect on school

conditions such as school goals, planning, structure,

climate, and work conditions which in turn show a direct

effect on classroom conditions such as instruction,

policies, and procedures.


Masi (2008) in his study entitled Relationship of

leadership style, school climate, and the organizational

commitment of teachers in the Seventh-day Adventist

secondary schools in the Philippines explored the

relationship of principals leadership style, the school

climate, and the organizational commitment of teachers in

Seventh-day Adventist secondary schools in the Philippines.


Major findings in this study lead to the following

conclusions: The principals leadership style, school

climate, and the organizational commitment of teachers are

interrelated. Teachers perceive higher commitment under a

leadership characterized by high consideration, regardless

of the level of initiating structure. Teachers


organizational commitment is positively related to climate

openness characterized by supportive principal behavior and

teacher engagement, intimacy, and low levels of teacher

frustration. Furthermore, considerate leadership behavior is

positively related to climate openness. Predictive models of

organizational commitment, accounting for approximately 25%

of the variance, include marital status, consideration

leadership behavior, and aspects of school climate. Although

the theoretical concept of leadership quadrants was upheld

in the study, it appears that leadership behaviors,

particularly the consideration dimension, are more useful in

relationship to the areas of school climate and

organizational commitment.
Major implications are that school principals should

seek to practice considerate leadership behavior and create

an open school climate. School boards and accrediting

agencies should include leadership, school climate, and

teacher commitment surveys as an integral part of school

program evaluation. It may be of value to conduct additional

studies to examine other theoretical antecedents as well as

expected outcomes of organizational commitment.


San Antonio (2006) in his study entitled Effective

Participatory School Administration, Leadership, and School

Climate Management: Does It Affect The Trust Levels of

Stakeholders? reported on his study that the effectiveness


of participatory school administration, leadership and

management (PSALM) as perceived by 282 stakeholders in one

school division in the Philippines. In his study, he also

examined the correlation between the indicators of PSALM

effectiveness and the trust levels of the stakeholders. The

results indicate that the stakeholders found the

implementation of PSALM through advisory school councils to

be effective. The effectiveness of implementing ASC

(Advisory School Council) as perceived by the respondents

reinforces the finding that their levels of thrust were also

high.

Indeed, many factors affect the fostering of thrust in

the school. However, this study has shown that, to some

degree, the adequacy of time for ASC business, the

satisfaction with the composition of the ASC, the

appreciation for the usefulness of committees, the sharing

of information, the perceived influence on teaching and

learning, and the overall satisfaction with the operation of

the ASC significantly related to the trust levels among the

stakeholders.

It is therefore suggested that school leaders wishing

to enhance the levels of trust among the stakeholders in

their schools should endeavor to achieve a balanced

representation in the school council, utilize committees


appropriately, share more information with other

stakeholders, provide adequate time for doing ASC business,

and focus on teaching and learning to make the overall

functioning of ASC highly effective.

Benito (2009) in her the study titled Analysis of the

Performance in Trigonometry of the First Year College

Students of Divine Word College of Viganstated that subject

difficulties exist because of its complexity in using

symbols and in computations. Hence student finds it as a

difficult subject it not properly taught. It exists too

because they forget previously learned concepts and skills

that are needed for the new skills to be learned. So, a

student cannot comprehend higher level of mathematics if one

did not understand yesterdays principles and skills

learned.
With these difficulties, students always have a

negative connotation of the subject matter. These negative

attitudes includes: fear of the subject, anxiety in learning

the subject, meaningless of the subject and its abstraction.

These lead to inability of students to comprehend the

subject which further led to low performance in mathematics.

The low performance is true not only of high school

students. In the National Elementary Achievement Tests

(NEAT), administered to sixth graders from 1993 to 1999,


science and mathematics ranked the lowest or second lowest

among elementary school academic subjects.


According to the study of Soriano (2008) Teacher-

Related Factors Of Sophomore Students Achievement In

Mathematics In Three (3) National High Schools In Maragondon

District educational researchers have investigated many

factors considered to affect student learning. At the heart

of this line of inquiry is the core belief that teachers

make a difference. Indeed, teacher plays an important role

in the intellectual development of the students, using

various assessments and teaching styles to improve students

performance in school subjects.

School subjects performance is determined by giving an

achievement test. The results of which are used to determine

their achievement level, strengths and weaknesses in each

subject area.

Foreign Related Studies


Cash (2008) from the study entitled Improving Student

Achievement and School Facilities in a Time of Limited

Funding pointed out that school building condition,

attendance, and academic achievement in New York City, found

building conditions to be a predictor of student attendance

and student achievement on standardized tests. These results

were reported after controlling for other possible factors,

including socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and teacher


quality. (Duran-Narucki, 2008) That poorer building

condition negatively impacts student attendance and that

coming to school is necessary to learning are both logical

arguments that continue to be supported by research.


The National Summit on School Design (NSSD) reported

eight recommendations for school design excellence. These

included designs to support a variety of learning styles,

and the creation of healthy, comfortable, and flexible

learning spaces. These recommendations have several

implications for changes in the learning environment (NSSD,

2005). While the cumulative effect of the school facilitys

condition has been related to student outcomes, further

research has been done to pinpoint several specific factors

that contribute to this overall phenomenon. These specific

factors include lighting, building cleanliness, health and

safety, painting, and student and teacher morale


From the dissertation of Akbari (2004) titled Teacher

Characteristics as Predictors of Students Academic

Achievement declared that there has been a substantial

theoretical and practical shift of emphasis, mostly in

mainstream education, towards acknowledging that teachers

are among the principal components of any pedagogical

program. In the past ten years, a burgeoning research base

has increasingly shown that teachers are among the most

important players influencing student achievement, holding


the key to sealing the gaps in students achievement

outcomes. Sanders (1998), for example, states that the

single largest factor affecting academic growth of

populations of students is differences in effectiveness of

individual classroom teachers. He also believed that the

more can be done to improve education by improving the

effectiveness of teachers than by any other single factor.

Along the same lines, Alexander (2005) argues that few

educators, economists, or politicians would argue with the

contention that all things being equal, highly qualified

teachers produce greater student achievement than

comparatively less qualified teachers.


From the thesis of Steenson (2006) titled The School

Size and Its Relationship to Student Outcomes and School

Climate: A Review and Analysis of Eight South Carolina

State-wide explained what size should a school be to

optimize learning and teaching -- while striving for cost

efficiency in operation. At least in South Carolina, after

numerous studies, the answer is yet to be found. While on

the surface it first appears that, with rare exception,

smaller schools dont produce better results and cost more

to operate, closer observation reveals that the issue is

much more complex. In South Carolina smaller middle schools

appear to produce better student outcomes. And, at the


elementary and high school levels, even where bigger appears

better, there is evidence that results can vary

significantly depending upon the children served. Further,

poverty has such a dramatic effect on school outcomes in

South Carolina that possible influences of other variables

such as school size are possibly masked. Based on the

studies to date the only logical conclusion that can be

reached is that finding the ideal school size is at least

elusive, and possibly so complex that an absolute ideal

does not exist. However, the findings from the South

Carolina studies supply sufficiently intriguing data to

suggest further study of school size is warranted.


Sanders and Harvey (2002) in their study entitled

Beyond the School Walls: A Case Study of Principal

Leadership for School- Community Collaboration described how

one urban elementary school in a high-reform district and

state has been able to develop strong connections with

community businesses and organizations as part of its

program of school, family, and community partnerships.


The case study identifies four factors that allowed the

school to build successful bridges to its community. These

factors are (1) the schools commitment to learning; (2) the

principals support and vision for community involvement;

(3) the schools receptivity and openness to community

involvement; and (4) the schools willingness to engage in


two-way communication with potential community partners

about their level and kind of involvement. The concluding

section of the paper discusses the implications of the

studys findings for school, district, and state educational

leaders.
The literature and studies reviewed by the researcher

will help to understand the interconnection of variables

that may affect to the students performance in the national

achievement test. These literatures will help explain the

research - after all, literature review will show what other

researchers have done. The review aims to show why the

research needs to be carried out, how to choose certain

methodologies or theories to work with and how the present

study adds to the research already carried out.


Chapter III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents the methodology of the researcher

employed by the researcher in analyzing and interpreting the

data pertaining to the variables of this study.

Research Design
The researcher used the descriptive-correlational

method of research that seeks the relationships which exist

between different factors of students performance in the

national achievement test in the public secondary schools in

the division of Calapan City.


The researcher also used the comparative method of

research that aims to make comparisons among different

variables in school climate conditions such as physical

facilities, instructional focus and physical environment.


Descriptive research involves the description,

recording, analysis and interpretation of the present

nature, composition or process of phenomenon. It involves

some types of comparison or contrasts and may attempt to

discover a cause and effect relationship that exists between

non-violated variables.
Correlational studies are designed to estimate the

extent of which the different variables are related to each

other in the population of interest. The distinguishing

characteristic is the effort to estimate the relationship as

distinguished from simple description.


Research Locale
This study was conducted in the eight (8) public

secondary schools in the Division of Calapan City namely;

Bucayao National High School located at Bucayao, Calapan

City, Canubing National High School at Canubing, Ceriaco A.

Abes National High School at Mahal Na Pangalan, Community

Vocational High School at Masipit, Mamerta G. Tolentino

National High School at Parang, Managpi National High School

at Managpi, Nag-Iba National High School at Nag Iba I and

Pedro V. Panaligan National High School at Comunal.

Respondents of the Study


The respondents of this study were the 276 third year

students for school year 2011-2012 from public high schools

in Calapan City.
The table shows the distribution of the respondents of

the study:

Table A.Respondents of the study from eight (8) public high


schools at Calapan City Division.

TOTAL NUMBER OF
HIGH SCHOOL THIRD YEAR RESPONDENTS
STUDENTS
Managpi National
146 45
High School
Mamerta G.
Tolentino National 115 36
High School
Bucayao NHS 95 30
COMMUNITY
102 32
VOCATIONAL HS
Ceriaco A. Abes
82 25
MNHS
Pedro V. Panaligan 118 37
MNHS
Canubing NHS 152 47
Nag-Iba NHS 78 24
TOTAL 888 276

Sampling Procedure
The respondents were taken from the total population

using stratified random sampling at 5% error of tolerance.

The sample size was determined with the use of Slovins

formula:

Where: n = sample population


N = total number of population
e2 = Error
Formula: n = N
1 + Ne2
n = N
1 + Ne2
n = 888
1 + 888 (.05)2
n = 276

The sample population of each school is computed using

the stratified proportional sampling.

Research Instrument
The main instrument used in this study was the

constructed questionnaire by the researcher. The

questionnaire was divided into two parts; the respondents

profile and the school climate condition.


The first part of the questionnaire asked questions

pertaining to the students profile such as age, gender,

birth ordinal position, monthly income of the family,

parents educational attainment, and average grade for the

last school year attended.


On its second part, respondents asked about their

school climate condition which comprises the school

facilities, instructional focus and physical environment of

the school.
The scale used is as follows:
1 - Poor/ Pre-Basic
2 - Fair/ Basic
3 - Good/ Approaching to Proficiency
4 - Satisfactory/ Proficient
5 - Excellent/ Above Advanced

Reliability of the Instrument


To test the reliability of the instrument, the test

retest procedure was used. Ten student respondents who were

not included in the study were given the test-retest. After

10 days, the questionnaires were given again to the same

respondents. The reliability was computed using Pearsons r.

Table B. Results of test-retest

Variable R-value Description


School Facilities 0.95 Very high
reliability
Instructional Focus 0.92 Very high
reliability
Physical 0.90 Very high
Environment reliability

Data Gathering Procedure


After finding out the reliability of the research

instrument, the researcher requested permission to conduct

the study through request letter and asked approval from the

Schools Division Superintendent and the eight (8) public


secondary school principals in the Division of Calapan City

through letter.
After the approval of the request, the researcher

personally administered the set of questionnaires to the

student-respondents. The assistance of the teachers was

requested to assist the researchers in administering the

instrument to ensure the full cooperation of the

respondents. Direction for answering the test was explicitly

stated to guide the respondents in answering the test. The

researcher saw to it that all instruments was returned

completely.
After the retrieval of the questionnaire, the

researcher tabulated and processed the data manually.

Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed and the

results were interpreted. Data matrix was based on dummy

tables to organize, summarize, and analyze the data how

variables differ with each other.

Scoring and Quantification of Data


A 5-point numerical scale with their description was

employed as shown below:


Table C. Numerical Scale.

Numerical Scale Statistical Limit Verbal Description


5 4.21 5 Excellent
4 3.41 4.20 Satisfactory
3 2.61 3.40 Good
2 1.81 2.60 Fair
1 1.00 1.80 Poor

Statistical Treatment of Data


The data gathered from the questionnaire were analyzed

and interpreted using descriptive statistics such as

Weighted Mean, Pearsons r, and Chi Square and ANOVA was

used to describe the variables of the stud


The following formula was used in this study:
1. Mean
X = x / n
Where:
x is the sum of all the sample observations
n is the number of sample observations
x is the mean

The formula for mean was used in computation of mean

scores of students performance in school climate conditions

and students profile.


2. Pearsons r:

r = nxy ( x)(y)
[n(x2) (x)2] [ n (y2) (y)2]

Where:
r is the Pearsons Product Moment Correlation
n is the number of scores
x is the first variable
y is the second variable
is the sum of scores or the variable
x2 is the summation of squared variable x
y2 is the summation of squared variable y
This formula was used to test the relationship between

the students performance in NAT in terms of age, monthly

income, average grade and the school climate conditions in

terms of school facilities, instructional focus and physical

environment.
3. Chi-square test statistic
X2 = (O-E2
E

Where:
X2 is the chi-square statistic,
O is the observed frequency
is the symbol for summation differences of cumulative
E is the expected frequency
This formula was used to test the relationship between

the students academic performance and respondents profile

in terms of gender, parents educational attainment to the

academic performance of the student respondents.


4. One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is the statistical

procedure that was used to test mean differences between

among three variables by comparing variability between

groups to variability within groups.

TSS = Total sum of square

SSb= sum of squares of each group

SSw = sum of squares within groups

dfb = degrees of freedom between groups

dfw = degrees of freedom within groups

k = number of samples

n = total of all scores

N = total number of samples

Xi = sum of squares in each group

X = individual value in all the groups

TSS = X2 (X)2
(X1)2 (X2)2 (X)2
SSb = +
n1 n2 N

SSw = TSS SSb

dfb = k 1

dfw = k (n-1)

The formula was used to determine the difference among

the school facilities, instructional focus and physical

environment.
Chapter IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents the discussion of the data

gathered by the researcher. These are analyzed and

interpreted below.

1. Profile of the Respondents


1.1. Age
As shown on the table, age ranging from 14 to 15

dominates the number of respondents, which is 86.59 percent

of the respondents of the study. This is attributed to the

fact that the right age for third year level is this range.
On the other hand, as shown in the same table, it could

also be noted that only one or 0.36% falls under the age

bracket of 20 and above. This might be because the

respondents dropped from school for 2-3 beyond the age

required in in Grade I.
Considering the age bracket ranging from 12-13, the

table also reveals that only one falls under it which simply

means that the respondent enrolled to Grade I, one year

ahead of the required age.


Table 1.1 Frequency and percentage distribution of
respondents as to age

Age Frequency Percentage


12-13 1 0.36
14-15 239 86.59
16-17 31 11.23
18-19 4 1.45
20 and above 1 0.36
TOTAL 276 100

1.2 Gender

Table 1.2 reveals that female respondents are

outnumbered males by 58. This might be attributed to the

fact that there are really more females than males. Based on

the Philippine Demographic Profile (2011) record from

www.indexmundi.com/philippines, as to age structure of male

and female from 15-65 years old and over, there were 32 980

772 males while female has 33 568 847.

Table 1.2 Frequency and percentage distribution of respondents as to gender

Gender Frequency Percentage


Male 109 39.49
Female 167 60.51
Total 276 100

1.3 Parents educational attainment


1.3.1 Mother

As could be gleaned in Table 1.3.1, it could be noted

that 97 or 35.14% of the mothers of the respondents are

graduates of high school and only 26 or 9.42 % of them did

not finish grade school. This means that mothers of the


respondents could assist their children in making

assignments and projects at home. Since, all of them have

entered schooling they knew how to read and write.

The table also shows that there are only two mother who

are doctoral degree holder.

It is also revealed in the table that all mother

respondents have attended schooling.

Table 1.3.1 Frequency and percentage distribution of


Respondents as to mothers educational attainment
Mothers Educational
Frequency Percentage
Attainment
Did not finish grade
26 9.42
school
Graduated from Grade
42 15.22
school
Did not finish high
44 15.94
school
Graduated from High
97 35.14
School
Some College
26 9.42
education
7.61
Technical Vocational 21
Bachelors Degree
14 5.07
Masters Degree
4 1.45
Doctorate Degree
2 0.72
TOTAL
276 100

1.3.2 Father
Table 1.3.2 presents the frequency and percentage

distribution of respondents as to fathers educational

attainment.

It could be noted in table 1.3.2 that the highest

frequency of 88 or 31.88% is obtained by those who graduated

from high school and the lowest which is 35 or 12.68%

representing those who did not finish grade school. There

were also fathers who gained higher education such as

college, technical-vocational, bachelors degree and

masters degree. This supports that the fathers of the

respondents have the capability of assisting their children

in doing their homework and projects.

Table 1.3.2 Frequency and Percentage distribution of Respondents as to fathers


educational attainment

Fathers Educational
Frequency Percentage
Attainment
Did not finish grade
35 12.68
school
Graduated from Grade
50 18.12
school
Did not finish high
40 14.49
school
31.88
Graduated from High
88
School
Some College
education 23 8.33

Technical-Vocational
23 8.33
Bachelors Degree
15 5.44
Masters Degree
2 0.725
Doctorate Degree
0 0
TOTAL
276 100

1.4 Monthly Income of the family

Table 1.4 reveals that most of the respondents came

from low-income family as indicated by the frequency of 226

or 81.88% an income of Php 10,000.00 and below.

As also shown in the same table, there are only 5 of

the respondents or 1.81% have an income of Php 50,000.00 and

above. This reveals that most of the parents might have

unfixed income just like engaging in buy and sell of farm

commodities, which are seasonal; employed as laborer in

construction and farm works and others. Very few have fixed

income like those who are government employee with minimum

salaries.
Table 1.4 Frequency and percentage distribution of respondents monthly income of the
family

Monthly Income of Frequency Percentage


the family
50,001 and above 5 1.81
40,001- 50,0000 4 1.45
30,001 40,000 3 1.09
20,001 30,000 8 2.89
10,001 20,000 30 13.77
10,000 and below 226 81.88
TOTAL 276 100

1.5 Average Rating

Table 1.5 shows the frequency and percentage

distribution of respondents as to average rating for the

last school year attended.

As presented in the data, there are 124 respondents or

44.93% who garnered 80-84 final average rating. While, there

are 21 or 7.61% who gained 90 and above average for the last

school year attended. This may attributed that half of them

are average students and the rest belongs to upper ten

percent of their class when it comes to academic

performance.

Table 1.5 Frequency and percentage distribution of


Respondents as to average rating for the last school year
attended

Average Grade Frequency Percentage


90 and above 21 7.61
85 - 89 105 38.04
80 - 84 124 44.93
75 - 79 26 9.42
75 and below 0 0
TOTAL 276 100

2. School Climate Conditions

2.1 School Facilities

It could be noted in table 2.1 that items 1,2, and 5,

which states that classroom size is appropriate for the

number of students, that the school has a well-equipped

laboratory and the school has an adequate canteen

facilities which has means of 4.11, 3.18 and 3.82 described

as satisfactory. Of these 3 items, item 1 gets the highest

mean score of 4.11 which pertains to the classroom size that

is appropriate for the number of students. This suggests

that the classroom size of the respondents followed the

standard measurement of 7 meters x 9 meters. This was

according to the Department of Education (DepEd) Order

No.17, series 2012 stated that a 7x9 classroom dimension

shall be adopted for public elementary and secondary

schools.

Library though rated also as satisfactory needs more

reference materials for different subjects from year 1 to 4

to be used the respondents.

Items 3 and 4 which refer to laboratory and modern

equipment or technology for teaching which has the mean

scores of 3.07 and 3.38 respectively suggest that there is


an inadequate facilities and equipment for teaching and

learning process.

Table 2.1 Mean Extent of Students Academic Performance on


School Climate Conditions in terms school facilities as
perceived by the student- respondents

Items Mean Rank Description

1.Has classroom size appropriate


4.11 1 Satisfactory
for the number of students

2. Has a well-equipped library


3.68 3 Satisfactory
3. Has a well-equipped laboratory
3.07 5 Good
4. Has updated technology in
teaching 3.38 4 Good

5.Has an adequate canteen


facilities and services 3.82 2 Satisfactory

Overall mean 3.62


Satisfactory

2.2 Instructional Focus

Table 2.2 presents the mean extent of students

academic performance on school climate conditions in terms

of instructional focus in the eight (8) public secondary

schools in the Division of Calapan City.

The table shows that item number 4 which pertains to

teacher uses buddy system and groupings were implemented

almost to all schools. It is indicated with the mean score

of 4.51 and can be attributed to the common teaching


strategies used by the teachers among the eight (8) schools

in the division.

On the other hand, item 1 teacher has varied

instructional materials or visual aids falls in the last

rank which has 4.31 mean score. The result suggests that the

use of varied instructional materials or visual aids in

teaching affects the level of students performance in the

National Achievement Test (NAT).

The table indicates that in all items under the level

of students academic performance in terms of instructional

focus, the student-respondents describe the instructional

level as excellent in all aspects with an overall mean of

4.39 percent.

Results imply that for the students to have improved

academic performance, the teacher should employ varied

instructional materials or visual aids.

Table 2.2 Mean Extent of Students Academic Performance on


School Climate Conditions in terms Instructional Focus as
perceived by the student- respondents

Items Mean Rank Description

1. Teacher has varied


instructional materials or 4.31 5 Excellent
visual aids

2. Teacher motivates the learners 4.38 3 Excellent


3. Teacher provides varied
learning activities 4.40 2 Excellent

4. Teacher uses buddy system and


groupings 4.51 1 Excellent

5. Teacher discusses all learning


competencies 4.33 4 Excellent

Overall Mean 4.39


Excellent

2.3 Physical Environment

Table 2.3 presents the mean extent of students

academic performance on school climate conditions in terms

of physical environment in the eight (8) public secondary

schools in the Division of Calapan City.

Item number 5, school is clean and safe, ranked first

among the variables. The mean score of 4.10 described as

satisfactory suggests that each school observes cleanliness

and school safety that ensure continuous progress of

students academic performance.

While item number 1, school is free from noise falls to

its last rank as shown by the mean score of 3.68 and also

describe as satisfactory.

Considering the 3.92 as overall mean score for physical

environment described as satisfactory, it implies that


physical environment also has an impact to students

academic performance.

Results imply that physical environment is also an

important factor in improving students academic performance

as one of the measures for attainment of passing rate in the

National Achievement Test. Environment should therefore

conducive to learning.

Table 2.3 Mean Extent of Students Academic Performance on


School Climate Conditions in terms of Physical Environment
as perceived by the student- respondents

Items Mean Rank Description

1. School location is free


3.68 5 Satisfactory
from noise

2. School location is
3.86 4 Satisfactory
accessible
3. School is away from
destructive establishments 4.08 2 Satisfactory

4. School buildings have good


structure 3.89 3 Satisfactory

5. School is clean and safe


4.10 1 Satisfactory
Overall mean 3.92 Satisfactory

3.Students Academic Performance

3.1 English
Table 3.1 shows the frequency and percentage

distribution of the level of students performance in

English. As indicated in the table, there are 97.83 percent

that comprised the 270 students who got the grade of 74 and

below which is described as poor. Based on the NETRC

description of NAT results ranging from 74 below describes

as pre-basic which means that the students performance in

English is below the basic knowledge to be acquired. It may

be attributed to inadequate facilities of school, lack of

reading materials and reference materials. It could also be

related to some factors like parent or family factor,

wherein parents are educationally equipped but not mindful

about the education of their children. We could also

attribute this to the lack of interest in reading classes

and poor study habit.

On the other hand, only one student got a 91 and above

score for 0.36 percent. This suggests that the respondent is

interested in English, with a good study habit and loves

reading.

Table 3.1 Level of Students Academic Performance in English

Items Frequency Percentage Description


91 and above 1 0.36 Above
Advanced
86 - 90 0 0 Proficient
81 - 85 4 1.45 Approaching
proficiency
75 - 80 1 0.36 Basic
74 and below 270 97.83 Pre-basic
Total 276 100

3.2 Mathematics

Table 3.2 presents the NAT academic performance of

respondents in Mathematics. There are 273 students or 98.91

per cent which comprises the pre-basic performance or below

the basic knowledge acquired of the respondents or best

described as poor. This could be attributed to the lack of

interest of student-respondents in solving Mathematical

equation and poor study habit when it comes to number. Also,

peer pressure could also be a reason in low performances of

students in numbers and the phobia of dealing with numbers.

Results imply that performance in Math which described

as poor could be credited to the lack of interest of

student-respondents and poor study habit.

Table 3.2 Level of Academic Performance in Mathematics

Items Frequency Percentage Description


91 and above 0 0 Above
Advanced
86 - 90 1 0.36 Proficient
81 - 85 2 0.72 Approaching
proficiency
75 - 80 0 0 Basic
74 and below 273 98.91 Pre-basic
Total 276 100
3.3 Science

Table 3.3 shows frequency and percentage distribution

of the level of students academic performance in Science.

From the table, we could also gleaned that almost 98.19

per cent or 271 students belong to the pre-basic skills of

students in Science or with a verbal description as poor;

the results may be attributed that most schools has an

inadequate laboratory facilities or equipment and modern

technology in teaching.

Results revealed that poor study habits and lack of

interest of students could be a reason for their low

performance in Science measured by NAT.

Table 3.3 Level of Students Academic Performance in Science

Items Frequency Percentage Description


91 and above 0 0 Above Advanced
86 - 90 0 0 Proficient
81 - 85 0 0 Approaching
proficiency
75 - 80 5 1.81 Basic
74 and below 271 98.19 Pre-basic
Total 276 100

3.4 Araling Panlipunan

As presented in table 3.4 there are 94.57 percent or

261 students who garnered the 74 below percentage score in


NAT or belongs to the pre-basic skills of students in

Araling Panlipunan which best described as poor.

Considering the results, this may be attributed to the

lack of reference materials of students to refer with during

their homework making. Some of the families were not

accessible to current events because most of the respondents

are living in far-flung areas, availability of news dailies

and television newscast is not available. Also this could be

related to their lack of interest and poor study habit.

Table 3.4 Level of Students Academic Performance in Araling


Panlipunan

Items Frequency Percentage Description


91 and above 0 0 Above advanced
86 - 90 2 0.72 proficient
81 - 85 2 0.72 Approaching
proficiency
75 - 80 11 3.99 Basic
74 and below 261 94.57 Pre-basic
Total 276 100

3.5 Filipino

Table 3.5 presents the level of academic performance of

students in Filipino.

As gleaned from table 3.5, 71.74 percent or 198

students belongs to pre-basic or 74 below percentage score

in AP NAT result. This could be attributed to the poor

reading habit and lack of interest in dealing with the


subject. This might be because the students are so reluctant

in answering the test for the reason that the language was

easily understood but not analyzed well by student-

respondents.

Unlike other subjects presented, Filipino gained more

above advanced students; there were 7 students or 2.54

percent among the respondents who garnered 91 and above

percentage score that may be attributed to a good reading

habit and careful analysis of the respondents in answering

the reading comprehension examinations. Results imply that a

poor reading habit could affect the NAT performance in

Filipino.

Students academic performance in five subjects tested

such as English, Math, Science, Araling Panlipunan and

Filipino in National Achievement Test is best summarized and

described as poor due to the lack of interest and poor study

habits. Teachers observed that students are not mindful in

answering the tests because it does not affect their

academic performance as indicated in their report cards.

The results is inconformity with the result of the

study of Cromwell (2006) entitled Study habit: Students

Role which pointed out that the efficient and effective way

of learning depends upon the study habits of the students.

Study habits are important as they influence the academic


achievement of students. So parents and teachers must help

in improving the study habits of students. Some

investigators have sought to determine what study habits are

characteristically used by students when left to work by

themselves with little or no direction. Teachers in schools

should become facilitators of learning. The finite treasure

within every learner should be discovered and nurtured for

the purpose of improving learning effective study skills

have to be taught. Study skills involve reference, reading

listening, study habits and strategies. Learning improves

with planning of where, when and how much to study. Positive

attitude, proper physical condition and balanced emotional

states are important factors influencing study habit.

Table 3.5 Level of Students Academic Performance in


Filipino

Items Frequency Percentage Description


91 above 7 2.54 Above Advanced
86 - 90 8 2.90 Proficient
81 - 85 24 8.70 Approaching
proficiency
75 - 80 39 14.13 Basic
74 below 198 71.74 Pre-basic
Total 276 100

4.Correlation of the respondents age and the level of


students performance in NAT

4.1 Age
Table 4.1 reveals insignificant relationship between

the respondents age and the level of students performance

in NAT in five learning areas such as English, Math,

Science, Araling Panlipunan and Filipino having a computed

r-value of -0.0308, -0.034, -0.082, -0,053 and -0.034

respectively which are lesser than the critical r-value of

0.138. This suggests that the null hypothesis stating that

there is no significant relationship between the students

academic performance in NAT in terms of age is accepted

which means that age does not affect the level of

performance of students in the National Achievement Test.


Table 4.1 Correlation of the respondents age and the level
of students performance in the National Achievement Test

Variables Computed r-value Result


Age vs. English -0.0308 Not significant
Age vs. Math -0.034 Not significant
Age vs. Science -0.082 Not significant
Age vs. AP -0.053 Not significant
Age vs. Filipino -0.034 Not Significant
Critical r- value: 0.138

4.2 Gender

Table 4.2 reveals insignificant relationship between

the respondents age and the level of students performance

in NAT in five learning areas such as English, Math,

Science, Araling Panlipunan and Filipino having a computed

r-value of 0.34, 0.19, 1.14, 1.62, and 2.33 respectively

which are lesser than the critical x 2-value of 5.99. This


suggests that the null hypothesis stating that there is no

significant relationship between the students academic

performance in NAT in terms of gender is accepted which

means that gender does not affect the level of performance

of students in the National Achievement Test.

Table 4.2 Correlation of the respondents gender and the level of students performance
in the National Achievement Test

Variables X2 computed Result


Gender vs. English 0.34 Not significant
Gender vs. Math 0.19 Not significant
Gender vs. Science 1.14 Not significant
Gender vs. AP 1.62 Not significant
Gender vs. Filipino 2.33 Not significant
X2crit = 5.99
df = 2
= 5%
4.3 Parents Educational Attainment

4.3.1 Mother, 4.3.2 Father

Table 4.3 reveals insignificant relationship between

the respondents parents educational attainment and the

level of students performance in NAT in five learning areas

such as English, Math, Science, Araling Panlipunan and

Filipino having a computed X2-value of 3.10, 2.11, 4.88,

4.82, and 9.69 for mother and 4.93, 1.97, 2.23, 1.90 and

6.62 respectively which are lesser than the critical x 2-

value of 5.99. This means that parent's educational

attainment affects the level of performance of students-

respondents in NAT in Araling Panlipunan which could be

attributed to the language used by the parents where they


could express themselves freely using the mother tongue.

This means that the null hypothesis stating that there is no

significant relationship between the students academic

performance in NAT in Araling Panlipunan in terms of parents

educational attainment is rejected.


On the other hand, the null hypothesis stating that

there is no significant relationship between the students

academic performance in NAT in terms of parents educational

attainment in subjects English, Math, Science, and Araling

Panlipunan is accepted which means that parents educational

attainment of both mother and father do not affect the level

of performance of students in the National Achievement Test.


The result may be related to the study of Meinardus

(2003) entitled Our Students: the Family Level Factors

mentioned that the family educational climate is defined by

the amount and the style of help that children receive from

the family; this is determined by elements of the family

context, like the dynamics of communication and affective

relationships, attitudes towards values, expectations, etc.


Table 4.3 Correlation of the respondents parents
educational attainment both mother and father and the level
of students performance in the National Achievement Test

Variables X2 Result Variables X2 Result


computed computed
Mothers Fathers
Educational Not Educational Not
3.10 4.93
attainment significant attainment significant
vs. English vs. English
Mothers 2.11 Not Fathers 1.97 Not
Educational significant Educational significant
attainment attainment
vs. Math vs. Math
Mothers Fathers
Educational Not Educational Not
4.88 2.23
attainment significant attainment significant
vs. Science vs. Science
Mothers Fathers
Educational Not Educational Not
4.82 1.90
attainment significant attainment significant
vs. AP vs. AP
Mothers Fathers
Educational Educational
attainment 9.69 Significant attainment 6.62 Significant
vs. vs.
Filipino Filipino
X2crit = 5.99
df = 2
= 5%

4.4 Monthly Income of the family


Table 4.4 reveals insignificant relationship between

the respondents monthly income and the level of students

performance in NAT in five learning areas such as English,

Math, Science, Araling Panlipunan and Filipino having a

computed r-value of -0.007, -0.001, 0.014, -0,054 and -0.083

respectively which are lesser than the critical r-value of

0.138. This suggests that the null hypothesis stating that

there is no significant relationship between the students

academic performance in NAT in terms of monthly income is

accepted which means that monthly income of the family does

not affect the level of performance of students in the

National Achievement Test.

Table 4.4 Correlation of the respondents monthly income of the family and the level of
students performance in the National Achievement Test

Variables Computed r-value Result


Monthly Income vs. -0.007 Not significant
English
Monthly Income vs. -0.001 Not significant
Math
Monthly Income vs. 0.014 Not significant
Science
Monthly Income vs. -0.054 Not significant
AP
Monthly Income vs. -0.083 Not Significant
Filipino
Critical r- value: 0.138

4.5 Average rating for School Year 2010-2011


Table 4.5 reveals insignificant relationship between

the respondents average rating for school year 2010-2011 and

the level of students performance in NAT in five learning

areas such as English, Math, Science, Araling Panlipunan and

Filipino having a computed r-value of 0.045, 0.010, 0.045,

-0,001 and -0.006 respectively which are lesser than the

critical r-value of 0.138. This suggests that the null

hypothesis stating that there is no significant relationship

between the students academic performance in NAT in terms

of monthly income is accepted which means that average

rating for SY 2010-2011 does not affect the level of

performance of students in the National Achievement Test.

Table 4.5 Correlation of the respondents average rating for school year 2010-2011 and
the level of students performance in the National Achievement Test

Variables Computed r-value Result


Average rating vs.
0.045 Not significant
English
Average Rating vs.
0.010 Not significant
Math
Average rating vs.
0.045 Not significant
Science
Average rating vs.
-0.001 Not significant
AP
Average rating vs.
-0.006 Not Significant
Filipino
Critical r-value: 0.138

5.Correlation of the school climate conditions in terms of


school facilities

5.1 School Facilities

Table 6.1 presents the summary table between the school

climate conditions in terms of school facilities to their

NAT results in English, Math, Science, Filipino and Araling

Panlipunan using Pearsons r.


In item number 5.1 school facilities shows significant

relationship in students academic performance in NAT with

their Science, Filipino and Araling Panlipunan subjects

which means that the null hypothesis stating that there is

no significant relationship between the students academic

performance in school climate conditions in terms of school

facilities is rejected. This may be attributed to the

unavailability of school facilities and access to new

technology in teaching when it comes to ICT and Science.

Lack of interest and poor study habit could be a reason for

a low performance in Science achievement test.


Results imply that school facilities do affect the

level of performance of students in Science, Araling

Panlipunan and Filipino.

Table 5.1 Correlation of the school climate conditions in terms of school facilities, and
the level of students performance in the National Achievement Test
Variables Computed r-value Result
School facilities
0.123 Not significant
vs. English
School facilities
0.051 Not significant
vs. Math
School facilities
0.188 Significant
vs. Science
School facilities
0.260 Significant
vs. AP
School facilities
0.260 Significant
vs. Filipino
Critical r-value: 0.138

5.2 Instructional Focus


Table 5.2 reveals insignificant relationship between

the respondents instructional focus and the level of

students performance in NAT in five learning areas such as

English, Math, Science, Araling Panlipunan and Filipino

having a computed r-value of 0.123, 0.051, 0.188, 0.260 and

0.260 respectively which are lesser than the critical r-

value of 0.138. This suggests that the null hypothesis

stating that there is no significant relationship between

the students academic performance in NAT in terms of

instructional focus is accepted which means that

instructional focus does not affect the level of performance

of students in the National Achievement Test.


This may be attributed to the continuous trainings for

teachers in the mastery of the delivery of instructions.

Table 5.2 Correlation of the school climate conditions in terms of instructional focus and
the level of students performance in the National Achievement Test

Variables Computed r-value Result


Instructional Focus
0.020 Not significant
vs. English
Instructional Focus 0.010 Not significant
vs. Math
Instructional Focus
0.29 Not significant
vs. Science
Instructional Focus
0.101 Not significant
vs. AP
Instructional Focus
0.082 Not significant
vs. Filipino
Critical r-value: 0.138

5.3 Physical Environment

Table 5.3 presents the summary table between the school

climate conditions in terms of physical environment to their

NAT results in English, Math, Science, Filipino and Araling

Panlipunan using Pearsons r.


Results revealed that a null hypothesis stating that

there is no significant relationship between students

academic performance in NAT and physical environment has

significant relationship which means that hypothesis is

rejected; with the 0.176 r-value that exceeds with the

critical r-value of 0.138.


On the other hand, the table also reveals insignificant

relationship between the respondents physical environment

and the level of students performance in NAT in four

learning areas such as English, Math, Science, and Araling

Panlipunan having a computed r-value of 0.016, -0.028,

0.099, and 0.121 respectively which are lesser than the

critical r-value of 0.138. This suggests that the null

hypothesis stating that there is no significant relationship

between the students academic performance in NAT in terms

of physical environment is accepted which means that


physical environment does not affect the level of

performance of students in the National Achievement Test in

four learning areas such as English, Math, Science and

Araling Panlipunan.
Results suggest that physical environment does affect

the students performance in Filipino.

Table 5.3 Correlation of the school climate conditions in terms of physical environment
and the level of students performance in the National Achievement Test

Variables Computed r-value Result


Physical Environment
0.016 Not significant
vs. English
Physical Environment
-0.028 Not significant
vs. Math
Physical Environment
0.099 Not significant
vs. Science
Physical Environment
0.121 Not significant
vs. AP
Physical Environment
0.176 Significant
vs. Filipino
Critical r-value: 0.138

6.Difference among School Climate Conditions in terms of


school facilities, instructional focus and physical
environment

Table 6 presents the summary table on one-Way analysis

of variance in the extent of difference between the school

climate in terms of school facilities, instructional focus

and physical environment.

Since the computed f-value exceeded the critical value

of 3.01 using the degrees of freedom 2 and 825 at 0.05 level

of significance. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is a significant difference on the students


performance in NAT in the public secondary schools in the

division of Calapan City.

Results imply that adequacy of school facilities

affects the results of their NAT performance in each school.

While in instructional focus, though they described it

excellent, there is significant difference when it comes to

classroom instructions per school. This may be attributed

varied instructional materials employ and also they differ

from the physical environment.

Table 6 Summary table on One-Way Analysis of Variance in the


extent of difference between the school climate conditions as perceived by student
respondents in terms of physical facilities, instructional focus and physical environment

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F F crit Result
1031.94 88.6381
Between Groups 2063.891 2 6 7 3.007
11.6422
Within Groups 9604.837 825 3 significant

Total 11668.73 827

Chapter V
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the summary of the most important

findings of this research, conclusions arising from the

findings, conclusions arising from the findings and proposed

possible recommendations.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

1. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of student-


respondents in terms:

1.1 Age

The age ranging from 14 to 15 dominates the number of

respondents, with 239 respondents, age ranging from 12-13

has only 1, age ranging from 16-17 has 31 respondents, age

ranging from 18-19 has 4 respondents and ages ranging from

20 and above has only 1 respondent also.

1.2 Gender

There are 109 male respondents and 167 female which

comprise the 39.49% and 60.51% respectively.

1.3 Parents Educational Attainment


1.3.1 Mothers educational attainment

There are 26 mothers who did not finish grade

school, 42 graduated from grade school, 44 did not finish

high school, 97, graduated from high school, 26 mothers

avail some college education, 21 has attained technical-

vocational, 14 finished bachelors degree, 4 masters

degree and 2 has a doctorate degree. This comprises the

276 respondents according to their mothers educational

attainment.

1.3.2 Fathers educational attainment

For fathers educational attainment, there are 35

fathers who did not finish grade school, 50 finishes

grade school, 40 did not finish high school, 88 fathers

finished high school, 23 of them avail some college

education, same with technical vocational that has 23

respondents, 15 with a bachelors degree and two of them

has a masters degree.

1.4 Monthly Income of the Family

There are 226 respondents who has a family income of 10

000 below, others with 50 000 and above has 5

respondents, 40,000-49 000 has 4, 29 000 30 000 has 3

and from 19 000 to 20 000 has 38 respondents.

1.5 Average rating for school year 2010-2011


There are 124 respondents who got 80-84 average

rating, 105 with 85-89 average, 26 got 75-79 and 21

respondents got 90 above average grade for school year

2010-2011.

2. Mean Extent of Students Academic Performance on School


Climate Conditions in terms of:

2.1 School Facilities

The mean extent of students academic performance on

School Climate Conditions in terms of school facilities

has described satisfactory level as perceived by the

respondents with 3.62 mean percentage score.

Item no.1 which classroom has appropriate size for the

number of students has 4.11 mean score, item number 2

that pertains to a well-equipped library and laboratory

has a mean of 3.68 and 3.07 respectively, while item 4

has 3.38 mean that discuss the technology used in

teaching and 3.82 mean score for adequate canteen

facilities and services.

2.2 Instructional Focus

With an overall mean of 3.92 for instructional focus

that has a verbal description of satisfactory. .


Items 1-5 that pertains to school location that is

free of noise, accessible, away from destructive

establishments, good building structure and clean and

safe has a mean scores of 3.68, 3.86, 4.08, 3.89, and

4.10 which also has a verbal description of satisfactory.

3. Level of Students Academic Performance in NAT


3.1 English

There are 97.83 percent that comprises the 270

students; students fall in excellent got only 0.36

percent or only 1 respondent attained the 91 above score

and 0.36 percent also for the student who got 75-80

percent and 4 out of 276 students or 1.45 percent

garnered 81 85 percent.

3.2 Mathematics

There were 273 students or 98.91 per cent. There are

only 2 respondents who got 81-85 average grades and only

1 obtained 86-90.

3.3 Science

It is indicated that almost 98.19 percent or 271

students comprises the 74 below average grade, and five

got 86-90 average grade.

3.4 Araling Panlipunan


There are 94.57 percent or 261 students garnered the

74 below percentage score in NAT. 11 respondents who got

75-80 percentage score, 2 of them got 81-85 and 2 for 86-

90 average rating for AP.

3.5 Filipino

The data presents 71.74 per cent or 198 students

garnered 74 below percentage score; while there were 39

or 14.13 percent got 75-80 percent; 7 students or 2.54

percent among the respondents got 91 and above average;

there are 8 students or 2.90 percent got 86-90, and 24 or

8.70 got 81-85 percentage score.

4. Correlation of the respondents age, monthly income of


the family, average rating and the level of students
performance in the National Achievement Test

4.1 Age
Data presents the summary between the relationship

of the student-respondents age to their NAT results in

English, Math, Science, Filipino and Araling Panlipunan

with a critical r-value of -0.308,-0.034,-0.082,-0.053

and -0.034 respectively which is lesser than the critical

r-value of 0.138.
4.2 Gender

The data presents insignificant relationship

between the respondents age and the level of students


performance in NAT in five learning areas such as

English, Math, Science, Araling Panlipunan and Filipino

having a computed r-value of 0.34, 0.19, 1.14, 1.62, and

2.33 respectively which are lesser than the critical x 2-

value of 5.99.

4.3 Parents educational attainment

Data presents insignificant relationship between the

respondents parents educational attainment and the level

of students performance in NAT in five learning areas

such as English, Math, Science, Araling Panlipunan and

Filipino having a computed X2-value of 3.10, 2.11, 4.88,

4.82, and 9.69 for mother and 4.93, 1.97, 2.23, 1.90 and

6.62 respectively which are lesser than the critical x 2-

value of 5.99.

4.4 Monthly Income of the Family

Data presents insignificant relationship between

the respondents monthly income and the level of students

performance in NAT in five learning areas such as

English, Math, Science, Araling Panlipunan and Filipino

having a computed r-value of -0.007, -0.001, 0.014,


-0,054 and -0.083 respectively which are lesser than the

critical r-value of 0.138.

4.5 Average rating for School Year 2010-2011

Data shows the insignificant relationship between

the respondents average rating for school year 2010-2011

and the level of students performance in NAT in five

learning areas such as English, Math, Science, Araling

Panlipunan and Filipino having a computed r-value of

0.045, 0.010, 0.045, -0,001 and -0.006 respectively which

are lesser than the critical r-value of 0.138.

5. Correlation of the school climate conditions in terms


of school facilities, instructional focus and physical
environment and the level of students performance in
the National Achievement Test

5.1 School facilities

The data presents the correlation between the school

climate conditions such as school facilities to their NAT

performance in English, Math, Science, Filipino and

Araling Panlipunan with a critical r-value of 0.123,

0.051, 0.188, 0.260 and 0.260 which only exceeds in

Filipino in the critical r-value of 0.138.


5.2 Instructional Focus

The data presents the correlation between the school

climate conditions such as school facilities to their NAT

performance in English, Math, Science, Filipino and

Araling Panlipunan with a critical r-value of 0.020,

0.010, 0.29, 0.101 and 0.082 which is lesser than in the

critical r-value of 0.138.

5.3 Physical Environment

The data presents the correlation between the school

climate conditions such as physical environment to their

NAT performance in English, Math, Science, Filipino and

Araling Panlipunan with a critical r-value of 0.016,

-0.028, 0.099, 0.121 and 0.176 which exceeds than in the

critical r-value of 0.138.


6.Significant difference in the school climate conditions as
perceived by student respondents in terms of physical
facilities, instructional focus and physical environment

Results present the significant difference between the

school climate conditions and students achievement in NAT

as perceived by student respondents in terms of school

facilities, instructional focus and physical environment.

Since the computed f-value exceeded the critical value

of 3.01 using the degrees of freedom 2 and 825 at 0.05 level


of significance. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is a significant difference on the students

performance in NAT in the public secondary schools in the

Division of Calapan City.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of the study, the following

conclusions are formulated:

1. Age of the respondents is appropriate for third year


level; the female outnumbered the male; parents have
entered school; they have a low-family income and
the respondents got a passing grade for school year
2010-2011, as a second year students.

2. School facilities and learning environment needs


enhancement and teacher gives emphasis in the
delivery of classroom instruction.
3. Level of performance in National Achievement Test
for school year 2010-2011 is best described as pre-
basic or below 74 percent.

4. Profile of the students in terms of age, gender,


monthly income of the family does not affect the
students performance in NAT.

5. The school climate conditions in terms of school


facilities and physical environment affect the
students performance in NAT.

6. The school climate conditions differ from school to


school.

RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Poor study habits and lack of interest of the

students should be worked out by the teachers and

school heads by providing different activities of

their interest that will help them to be developed

academically.
2. The faculty members should acquaint the students in

taking the NAT.


3. The competencies taught by the teachers should

coincide with the competencies given in the National

Achievement Test by having an item analysis of test

results.
4. Competencies should be mastered by students through

rigid classroom instruction; the teachers should

give more emphasis in the conduct of review.


5. Instructional materials or visual aids and review

materials should be improved for them to master

different skill in five learning areas such as

English, Math, Science, Araling Panlipunan and

Filipino.
6. School heads should identify the needs and

assessment of the school that will help to improve

NAT performance by carrying out a well-planned work

plans.
7. Seminars and trainings should be provided for

teachers to update on the new trends of teaching and

learning.
8. Adopt-a-school programs and Brigada Eskwela should

be given emphasis by the administrators to be of

help in improving the school environment.


9. Instructional materials as well as NAT review

materials should be procured to help students in

review.
10. The NAT result should be included to their report

card in order for them to become mindful in

answering the test.


BIBLIOGRAPHY

A. Books

Allen, T. Building Partnership: Lessons from the Specialist


Schools Achievement Programme (SSAP). School Leadership and
Management,2001.

Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of


behavioral change a Psychological Review,2003

Christian, K.; Morrison, F. J.; & Bryant, F. B. (1998).


Predicting kindergarten academic skills: Interactions among
child care, maternal education, and family literacy
environments. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(3),
501521.

De Guzman, A (2002) School-Based Management in Philippine


Basic and Higher Education , Center for Educational Research
and Development, University of Santo Tomas, Phil.

Epstein, J. (2001). School, family, and community


partnerships. Boulder: Westview Press.

Louis, K., Leithwood, K., et al, Learning from leadership:


Investigating the links to improved student learning. New
York, NY: The Wallace Foundation, 2010.

Meinardus, R (2003)The Crisis of Public Education in the


Philippines Business World Internet Edition: June 30, 2003

Morada, C (2010) Textbook Procurement Process Stringent -


DepEd December 2010

B. Periodicals and Journals


DepEd slates National Achievement Test in March- The
Philippine Star, Updated January 07, 2010

Kimiyasu Ishizuka and Yomiuri Shimbun; Achievement test


should track academic ability April 10, 2007

Leadership. What it is and how it influences pupil learning.


London, UK: National College for School Leadership.

Sichon, Leopoldo F. PhD , Our Schools, Our Teachers, our


Students vs. the National Achievement Test 2010

Trina Federis, et al, Two-shift Classroom Scheme Does Not


Solve Education Crisis Bulatlat Magazine, June 4-10, 2006

Dimmock, C. & Hattie, J. School principals self-efficacy


and its measurement in a context of restructuring.School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2006.

Henderson, A. T. &Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of


evidence: The impact of school, family, and community
connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest
Educational Development Laboratory.

C. Internet Sites

Human Capital Theory Retrieved at


http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O88-Humancapitaltheory.html

Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins,
D. (2006). Successful school

McCormick, M. J. Self-efficacy and leadership


effectiveness: Applying social systems theory to
leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 2001.

Moreno, G. (2002) "How to solve the text book problem"


http://blog.bayanihanbooks.org/how-to-solve-our-textbook-
problems.html

Public Schools Students NAT Scores Up (Sept. 2009)


http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?
articleId=502796&publicationSubCategoryId=473*
"Woes of A Teacher" Retrieved at.
http://www.squidoo.com/educ8/Woes of a teacher

http://www.oppapers.com/essays/Teacher-Related-Factors-Of-
Sophomore-Students-Achievement/571440

http://cnx.org/content/m23100/latest/

http://www.tesl-
ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume13/ej52/ej52a2/

http://www.ncef.org/pubs/size_outcomes.pdf

QUESTIONNAIRE
Directions: Please read carefully each item. Do not leave
any item unanswered. Place a () checkmark on
the blank corresponding to your answer for
needed data with choices.

Part I: Students Demographic Profile

Name: ________________ ____________________ _______________

Last Name First Name Middle Name


Age: __________
Gender: ________ Male _______ Female
Monthly Income of the Family: ________________
Parents educational attainment:
Father Mother
__Did Not Finish Grade School ___Did Not Finish Grade School
__Graduated from Grade School ___Graduated from Grade School

__Did Not Finish High School ___Did Not Finish High School

__Graduated from High School ___Graduated from High School

__Some College Education ___Some College Education

__Technical/ Vocational ___Technical/ Vocational

__Bachelor's Degree ___Bachelor's Degree

__Master's Degree ___Master's Degree

__Doctorate Degree ___Doctorate Degree

General Average for the last school year attended:_________

II. INSTRUCTION: The following are the factors related to


the students performance in the National Achievement Test
in terms of school climate conditions.

Please indicate the level of your agreement or disagreement


to the following statement. . Please check () on the
appropriate box.
Range Description

5 - Excellent

4 - Satisfactory

3 - Good

2 - Fair

1 - Poor

A. School Facilities 5 4 3 2 1

1. Has classroom size appropriate for the


number of students

2. Has a well-equipped library

3. Has a well-equipped laboratory

4. Has updated technology in teaching

5.Has an adequate canteen facilities and


services
B. Instructional Focus 5 4 3 2 1

1. Teacher has varied instructional


materials or visual aids

2. Teacher motivates the learners

3. Teacher provides varied learning


activities

4. Teacher uses buddy system and


groupings

5. Teacher discusses all learning


competencies

C. Physical Environment 5 4 3 2 1

1. School location is free from noise

2. School location is accessible

3. School is away from destructive


establishments

4. School buildings has a good structure

5. School is clean and safe


Mean Extent of Students Academic Performance on School
Climate Conditions in terms school facilities as perceived
by the student- respondents

Items Mean Rank Description

1.Has classroom size


appropriate for the number 4.11 1 Satisfactory
of students

2. Has a well-equipped
library 3.68 3 Satisfactory

3. Has a well-equipped
laboratory 3.07 5 Good

4. Has updated technology in


teaching 3.38 4 Good

5.Has an adequate canteen


facilities and services 3.82 2 Satisfactory

Overall mean 3.62


Satisfactory
Mean Extent of Students Academic Performance on School
Climate Conditions in terms Instructional Focus as perceived
by the student- respondents

Items Mean Rank Description

6. Teacher has varied


instructional materials or 4.31 5 Excellent
visual aids

7. Teacher motivates the learners


4.38 3 Excellent
8. Teacher provides varied
learning activities 4.40 2 Excellent

9. Teacher uses buddy system and


groupings 4.51 1 Excellent

10. Teacher discusses all


learning competencies 4.33 4 Excellent

Overall Mean 4.39


Excellent

Mean Extent of Students Academic Performance on School


Climate Conditions in terms of Physical Environment as
perceived by the student- respondents

Items Mean Rank Description


11. School location is free
3.68 5 Satisfactory
from noise

12. School location is


3.86 4 Satisfactory
accessible
13. School is away from
destructive establishments 4.08 2 Satisfactory

14. School buildings have


good structure 3.89 3 Satisfactory

15. School is clean and safe


4.10 1 Satisfactory
Overall mean 3.92 Satisfactory

CURRICULUM VITAE

Name: JASMIN G. RAYOS


Age: 31
Date of Birth: JULY 23, 1980
Place of Birth: CALAPAN CITY, ORIENTAL MINDORO
Civil Status: MARRIED
Sex: FEMALE
Religion: IGLESIA NI CRISTO
Nationality: FILIPINO

WORK EXPERIENCE

November 2005 present Teacher I


Division of Calapan City
Bucayao National High School
EDUCATION
Mindoro State College of Agriculture and
Technology (MinSCAT)
Alcate, Victoria, Oriental Mindoro
Master of Ars in Education
Major in Educational Management
2009-2012

Divine Word College of Calapan


Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro
Bachelor of Secondary Education
1997- 1999, 2003-2005

Good Shepherd Academy


Victoria, Oriental Mindoro
Secondary Education
1993- 1999

Poblacion I Elementary School


Poblacion I, Victoria, Oriental Mindoro
Elementary Education
1987-1993

EXAMINATION TAKEN

LICENSURE EXAMINATION FOR TEACHERS (LET)


Manila, August 2005

You might also like