Razel L.

Fernandez MAED-I
Midterm Exam in Adv. Educ Stat

Table 1: Test the Significant Relationship between Age and Monthly Income of Teachers

Paired Differences
95% Confidence Interval of the
Std. Error Difference
Mean Std. Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Pair 1 age - income -30969.300 8219.607 2599.268 -36849.252 -25089.348 -11.915 9 .000

Table 1 shows the significant relationship between the age and monthly income of teachers.
The mean of age minus income equals -30969.30. 95% confidence interval of this difference:
From -36436.59 to -25502.01. The two-tailed P value is less than 0.0001. By conventional
criteria, this difference is considered to be extremely statistically significant.

Table 2: Test the Improvement of Students Performance in College Algebra

Paired Differences
95% Confidence Interval of
Std. Std. Error the Difference Sig.
Mean Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df (2-tailed)
Pair 1 PretestScore - -7.700 8.111 2.565 -13.502 -1.898 -3.002 9 .015
PosttestScore

Table 2 shows the improvement of students performance in College Algebra. The mean of
Pre-Test Scores minus Post-Test Scores equals -7.70. 95% confidence interval of this
difference: From -13.50 to -1.89(-1.90). The two-tailed P value equals 0.0149(0.15). By
conventional criteria, this difference is considered to be statistically significant.

Table 3: Test the Significant Difference of Students Performance in Physics between

Traditional Method and Computer-Assisted Learning

Paired Differences
95% Confidence Interval of
Std. Std. Error the Difference Sig.
Mean Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df (2-tailed)
Pair 1 TraditionalMethod - -4.800 6.233 1.971 -9.258 -.342 -2.435 9 .038
CompAssistedLearning

Table 3 shows the significant difference of students performance in Physics between

Traditional Method and Computer-Assisted Learning. The mean of Traditional Method
minus Computer-Assisted equals -4.80. 95% confidence interval of this difference: From
-9.26 to -0.34. The two-tailed P value equals 0.0376. By conventional criteria, this difference
is considered to be statistically significant.

Table 4: Test of Significant Difference between Conventional Classroom Procedure and

Programmed Materials in Mathematics
Paired Differences
95% Confidence Interval of
Std. Std. Error the Difference Sig.
Mean Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df (2-tailed)
Pair 1 ConventionalClassroom -10.250 14.489 5.123 -22.363 1.863 -2.001 7 .086
Procedure -
ProgrammedMaterials

Table 4 shows the significant difference between conventional classroom procedures and
programmed materials in Mathematics. The mean of Conventional Classroom Proc minus
Programmed Materials equals -10.25. 95% confidence interval of this difference: From
-22.36 to 1.86. The two-tailed P value equals 0.0855. By conventional criteria, this difference
is considered to be not quite statistically significant.

Table 5: Test of Significant Difference among Three Methods of Teaching Mathematics

source df SS MS F P-value
treatments 2 1001.238 500.619 9.5922 0.0015
error 18 939.429 52.190
total 20 1940.667
Table 5 shows the significant difference among three methods of teaching Mathematics. The
f-ratio value is 9.5215. The p-value is .00146. By conventional criteria, the result is
significant at p < .05.