You are on page 1of 5

Emancipation as a Family-Hindering Concept

The relation between females and their life priorities define the demographic

situation in the world. Therefore, womens emancipation shapes populations and

influences globalization tendencies. In this essay, the reference to the gender power is

made. Specifically, it is argued that the progress of urban development and the increase

of career opportunities contribute to the idea that women tend to prefer professional

development over the traditional family perspectives. The controversy of the topic

relates to different positions. Thus, some individuals are persuaded that occupational

realization primarily concerns men and comes as the secondary choice for women. The

others, in particular, the representatives of feminism and emancipation movements,

stand for the idea that every female is free to select her own life path. The relevance of

the issue is expressed in the fact that the concept of gender non-equality serves as a

source of discriminatory behavior arousal. Mainly, the history of female emancipation

states that women tend to be underestimated by the male-ruling community and suffer

because of low realization at work. From the other side, the supporters of anti-feminism

movements argue that professional engagement destroys the values of maternity and

family care. Nevertheless, the demography reports reveal that the current demography

situation follows the pattern of normal society growth development. Moreover, in some

countries, the birth rates even supersede the expected results (Goldman par. 8). With

this in mind, one can state that current social institutions discriminate female rights and

hinder the quality of professional elaboration through providing low access to work

excellence.
The discussed problem relates to two critical factors. First, the marginalization of

female work rights creates a tendency of human inequality, which damages the

harmony between sexes. Thus, according to the worldwide statistics, the contemporary

century increased the number of gay marriages. According to the expert opinion, one of

the many reasons for seeking a life partner among the same-sex individuals is the

disappointment with female non-realization. Specifically, many women, who feel

discriminated by males, tend to adopt a negative attitude towards men, which evokes

attachment to lesbian tendencies. Additionally, many men, who are disappointed with

the fact that women neglect family values, are likely to get involved in gay relationships

(Basu par. 12). The second issue, which is relevant in female inequality, refers to the

idea that discriminatory attitudes to the opportunities of women hamper the progress in

all spheres of social development. For instance, underestimation of females in the

political life stimulates the development of biased laws and inequality regulations of

female labor. Furthermore, the lack of female access to scientific development hinders

the release of multiple discoveries and improvements, which might have been

potentially offered by women (Sandberg par. 13). Conclusively, the prevention of

womens career elaboration damages both the material world and the major institutions

of social relations.

The point of female marginalization at work is often exposed to refutation. The

prejudiced attitude towards womens career development is stimulated by the

customary persuasion, according to which females, who seek professional excellence,

disregard family life and maternity ideals. The experts often motivate the fact by the

comparison of the demographic statistic data. Thus, due to the official records, the rates
of birth, which existed to the middle of the 20 th century, revealed that the families with

more than five children prevailed in every country of the world. Moreover, the specialists

claim that a variety of states, in particular, the countries with the developed agricultural

infrastructures, recalled the existence of the couples, which gave birth to more than

twelve children. In comparison to the analyzed demographic rates, the contemporary

birth numbers have drastically decreased. Moreover, the number of childless families

increases with every year. Despite the statistical divergence, it should be noted that the

modern world suffers from over-population. Mainly, in some countries, such as China,

the situation with the excessive birth rates is so critical that special taxes were imposed

on the couples, which gave birth to more than one child. Therefore, the decreased

maternity involvement does not damage the demographic picture of the world but rather

balances the spreading of human population throughout the world. Moreover, the

problem of low family devotion may be resolved not only through the discrimination of

female work but also through providing optimal social opportunities for women, who

seek professional engagement even if they have maternity obligations.

Conclusively, the analyzed tendency of female emancipation reveals that the

striving of females to build careers is quite natural and should not be hindered,

according to family involvement prejudices. Thus, the demographic situation proves that

occupational engagement does not destroy inhabitance tendencies in the world.

Therefore, the claim, due to which working females threaten the future of the planet, is

condemned. Moreover, the study reveals that the prevention of womens discrimination

is vital since it destroys the foundation of heterogeneous relationships as well as

hampers political, economy, and social progress. The improvement of the situation may
be suggested through the establishment of the special female development institutions,

which might regulate the pace of occupational involvement of women as well as balance

it with their family life and maternal obligations.

Works Cited
Basu, Tanya. Gays and Lesbians Have Different Reasons to Get Married, Study Says. 8

Jul. 2015. Web. 5 Feb. 2016. <http://time.com/3946541/same-sex-gay-lesbian-

marriage/>.

Goldman, Emma. The Tragedy of Womans Emancipation. 12 Oct. 2012. Web. 5 Feb.

2016.

<http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/goldman/aando/emancipation.ht

ml>.

Sandberg, Sheryl. Why I Want Women to Lean In. 7 Mar. 2013. Web. 5 Feb. 2016.

<http://ideas.time.com/2013/03/07/why-i-want-women-to-lean-in/>.

You might also like