Professional Documents
Culture Documents
666680, 2008
1. Equations of Motion in the Lagrangian Coordinates. A long list of publications on the theory of
nonlinear hydroelasticity can be found in [1].
The following notation is needed to formulate the model of a hydroelastic structure, which was rst proposed
in [2] to describe waves on the surface of a liquid covered by an ice layer.
Let an ideal incompressible uid at the time t occupy a domain t in the Euclidean space of points x =
(x1 , x2 , x3 ) R3 . In turn, the shell thickness is assumed to be small, and its mid-surface coincides with the boundary
of the ow domain as geometric positions of points.
We consider the Lagrangian variables = (1 , 2 , 3 ) determining the positions of material particles. Actually,
the coordinate is a label of a material particle chosen more or less arbitrarily.
We assume that the points occupy a certain domain R3 with a smooth boundary . Then, the
positions of the uid points are characterized by the vector eld of displacements x(t, ) ( ), and the positions
of the shell particles are characterized by the eld of displacements y(t, ) ( ).
In the initial-boundary problems, it is convenient to consider as the positions of material points at the
time t = 0. In this case, we have 0 = and 0 = . Thus, the boundary of the ow domain and the shell admit
two presentations:
x
t : x = x(t, ), yt : y = y(t, ) for .
y
During the joint motion in the general case, the uid may separate from the shell; hence, the surfaces x t and t
may fail to coincide. This eect is called the partial lling of the cavity by the uid. In the present paper, the
y
eect is ignored, and further considerations are limited to the case with x t = t . The shell, however, may slip
with respect to the ideal incompressible uid, which means that x(t, ) = y(t, ) for .
Let us recall the basic facts from the theory of surfaces. If the surface locally admits parametrization
= (q ) = (q1 , q2 ), then the normal vector n and the elementary surface area have the following form in the
coordinates (q1 , q2 ):
Lavrentev Institute of Hydrodynamics, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090;
plotnikov@hydro.nsc.ru; kuznetsov i@hydro.nsc.ru. Translated from Prikladnaya Mekhanika i Tekhnicheskaya
Fizika, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 174191, JulyAugust, 2008. Original article submitted July 30, 2007; revision sub-
mitted October 3, 2007.
666 0021-8944/08/4904-0666
c 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
1
n((
q )) = q1 (
q ) q2 (q ), d = g0 dq, g0 = q1 (q ) q2 (q ).
g0
If, at each time t, the moving surface yt admits parametrization
Y (t, q ) = y(t, (q )),
then the vector of the outward normal to yt
and the elementary area are described by the formulas
1
q ))) = y q1 Y (t, q) q2 Y (t, q ),
(t, y(t, ( dyt = gty dq,
gt
(1)
gty = q1 Y (t, q ) q2 Y (t, q ).
The components of the metric tensor gij (1 i and j 2) and the components of the second quadratic form Lij
(1 i and j 2) are given by the equalities
Y1 Y2
gij = (Yi , Yj ), Lij = (, qi Yj ), Yi = qi Y , = .
|Y1 Y2 |
The doubled mean curvature H is calculated by the formula
H = g ij Lij , (2)
ij 1
where g = (gij ) .
y
Similar formulas describe the surface x
t , which coincides with t as the geometric set of points.
The motion of a nonlinear hydroelastic structure is characterized by the velocity elds
v(t, ) = t x(t, ) for , u(t, ) = t y(t, ) for ,
where v is the velocity of the uid particle and u is the velocity of the shell particle in the Lagrangian coordinates i
(i = 1, 2, 3). In addition, the motion is characterized by the density distributions in the corresponding components.
Without losing generality, we assume that the uid density equals unity. The shell bounding the uid is
compressible; therefore, it is necessary to use the formula for the density distribution in the shell. Let the density
distribution in the shell at the initial time in the Lagrangian coordinates be dened by the function 0 (). This
means that the mass of an arbitrary part of the shell A is determined by the equality
0 () d.
A
667
Let us put forward the following hypotheses.
1. Equations that describe the nonlinear hydroelastic structure form a dynamic system with a conguration
space (x(t, ), y(t, )) L2 ()3 L2 ()3 for t (0, T ).
2. The Lagrangian for the uid has the form
1
Lf = |t x(t, )|2 d.
2
3. The Lagrangian for the shell has the form
1
Le = |t y(t, )|2 d W (yt ),
2
where W (yt ) is the stored (potential) elastic energy of the shell, which is dened in the form of a surface integral
y 1
W (t ) = W ( gty , |H|) dyt ; (4)
2
y
t
the vector of the mean curvature H = H and the unit vector of the outward normal are described by Eqs. (1)
and (2); dyt is the elementary surface area. This model of the shell is used in the nonlinear theory of elastic shells
(see [3]). It should be noted that the functional W (yt ) depends on the choice of the Lagrangian coordinates and
changes its form if the independent variables are replaced. Thus, presentation (4) depends on the choice of the
coordinate (this issue requires careful consideration in each particular case). In the linear theory of elasticity, this
problem does not arise, because the Lagrangian coordinates in this theory are chosen uniquely as the positions of
particles in a certain unloaded state. It is of interest to consider the case where the functional of the stored energy
is a geometric invariant and does not depend on parametrization chosen. In the class of functionals of the form (4),
there exists only one geometrically invariant representative with a nontrivial dependence on the external curvature,
namely, the so-called Willmore functional (see [4]):
1
W (yt ) = |H|2 dyt .
2
y
t
The role of the Willmore functional in the elasticity theory was noted, e.g., in [3].
4. To derive the equations of motion, we need to describe all constraints imposed on the mechanical system
of motion. It is further assumed that there are two natural constrains. The rst constraint is the principle of uid
incompressibility, which is written as the equation
det D x(t, ) 1 for , (5)
where D x is the Jacobi matrix of the mapping x(t, ). The second constraint reects the coincidence of the
uid surface and elastic shell as subsets of the Euclidean space in the course of their motion:
y
x
t = t . (6)
2. Configuration Manifold . Let us consider the hydroelastic structure as a dynamic system in a linear
space consisting of innitely dierentiable vector elds (x(), y()), where x : R3 and y : R3 . We assume
that has a Hilbertian structure L2 ()3 L2 ()3 . Under these assumptions, constraints (5) and (6) determine an
innite-dimensional conguration manifold . Having an induced metrics L2 ()3 L2 ()3 , the space is not
complete, and all further considerations have a formal character. The following lemma oers a description of the
tangential space to at the point (x, y) .
Lemma 1. The tangential space to the manifold at the point (x, y) consists of all vector elds [x(), y()],
x: R3 and y: R3 , satisfying the equalities
div (M 1 x) = 0 for ; (7)
1
L() = (p(()) + C)(y()) for .
()
Proof. Let h C0 () and div h = 0. We choose (x, y) Tan(x,y) in the following form: x() =
M ()h() and y() = 0. Hence, Eq. (12) takes the form
N () (M ()h()) d = 0.
As div k = 0, we have
(M k) ((M )1 p) d = p()k n d, (16)
To simplify the integrand of the second term in the left side of this equality, we nd the relation between the vectors
n() and (x()). Let X = X( q ) = x((q )). We recall that
q ))) = q1 X(
(x(( q ) q2 X(q )/ g x (q ), g x (q ) = |q1 X(q) q2 X(q )|.
Then,
3
qi X(
q) = qi k (q ) k x((q )),
k=1
Note that
(M )1 = 2 x 3 x; 3 x 1 x; 1 x 2 x .
670
Hence, we obtain
M (q1 X(
q ) q2 X(q )) = (q1 (q ) q2 (q )),
which yields the relation between the vectors n() and (x()):
g0 (q )
M ((
q )) (x((q ))) = n((q )) .
g x (q )
In this equality, we replace parametrization q (q), where the dieomorphism : Q Q satises the identity
((q )) = ((q )). As a result, we obtain the relation
g0 ((q))
(M ((
q ))) (x ((q ))) = n(((q ))) .
g x ((q ))
Multiplying both sides of this relation in a scalar manner by k , we obtain
g0 ((q ))
(M ) k (x ) = k(((q ))) n(((q ))) .
g x ((q ))
The second integral in the left side of Eq. (17) can be presented as an integral with respect to the parameter q:
((M ) k ) (x )() d
g0 ((q ))
= k(((
q ))) n(((q ))) g0 (q ) ((q )) dq. (18)
g x ((q ))
Q
We apply the replacement of the variables q r = (q ) in the integrand in the right side of this equality. In the
q ) takes the form (r ) = 1 (r ). As d is a geometric invariant, we obtain
new variables, the function (
d = g0 ( q ) dq = G0 (r ) dr, G0 (r ) = |r1 (r ) r2 (r )|.
From here and from Eq. (18), we nd that
(M ) k (x ) () d
g0 (r )
= k((r )) n((r )) G0 (r )((1 (r ))) dr . (19)
g x (r )
Q
Replacing r by
q in Eq. (19), we write Eq. (17) in the following form:
G0 (q )
1
k(
q ) n(
q ) g0 (
q ) p(q ) + (( (
q ))) dq = 0.
g x (q )
Q
y y y
y
As is a closed surface, we have
qi (Hqi qi H) dy = 0.
y
Hence,
1
W (y ) = g H + H 2 + R H dy ,
2
y
where R is the scalar curvature of the surface y satisfying the GaussCodacci equation
Lij Lij = H 2 + R.
4. Lagrangian Principle. Governing Equations of the Hydroelastic Structure. Now we can
derive equations of motion of the hydroelastic structure in the Lagrangian variables. For simplicity, we consider
the case where the stored energy of the shell is dened by the Willmore functional. The governing equations of the
hydroelastic structure with constraints can be derived with the use of the Lagrangian variational principle
Lf N (x) + Le L(y) = 0 (23)
for all smooth functions (x, y). Here the linear functionals N and L are dened by the equalities
N (x) = N (t, ) x(t, ) d, L(y) = L(t, ) y(t, ) d
(N and L are the constraints). Using Lemma 2 and the expressions Lf , Le , and W in explicit form, we write
Eq. (23) as
t2 x(t, ) + (M 1 ) p(t, ) x d
1 gy
t
t2 y(t, (
q )) + gty H + 2
H +R H (t, y(t, (q )))
2 g0
Q
gty
(p(t, (t, (
q ))) + C(t)) (t, y(t, (q ))) y g0 dq = 0.
g0
Within the framework of Hypotheses 14 (see Sec. 1), the equation in variations (23) is equivalent to the
following boundary-value problem of the dynamics of the hydroelastic structure.
Problem A. We have to nd time-dependent dieomorphisms x(t, ): t R3 and y(t, ):
y
t R3 , a function p(t, ): R, a function C(t), and a family of dieomorphisms (t, ): satisfying the
following equations:
x(t, (t, )) = y(t, ) for ; (24a)
(t, x(t, (t, ))) t x(t, (t, )) = (t, y(t, )) t y(t, ) for ; (24b)
The vector of the normal to ST is denoted by = (x, t), as in the Lagrangian coordinates. We use v(x, t) =
t x(t, (x, t)) to denote the uid velocity and u(y, t) = t y(t, (y, t)) to denote the membrane velocity. Let the
material surface ST of the domain occupied by the uid be dened by the equation F (x, t) = 0. Hence, the uid
velocity satises the kinematic condition
t F (x, t) + v x F (x, t) = 0 for F (x, t) = 0.
In the Eulerian formulation, it makes no sense to distinguish between x and y; hence, in what follows, we
use u(x, t) instead of u(y, t). Then, Eq. (24b) is written in the form
v(x, t) (x, t) = u(x, t) (x, t) for (x, t) ST .
As x F = 0 and v = u , we obtain the second kinematic condition
t F (x, t) + u x F (x, t) = 0 for F (x, t) = 0.
In the new notation, system (24c) is written in the form of the classical system of the Euler equations for the
dynamics of an ideal uid
t v + v x v + x p = 0, divx v = 0 for (x, t) QT .
Equation (24d) for u acquires the form
t u + u x u + (gtx H + (H 2 /2 + R)H) = (p + C(t)) for F (x, t) = 0.
Let us derive the transport equation for density. For this purpose, we involve several auxiliary facts of
dierential geometry. If
x(t + , ) = x(t, ) + u(x(t, ), t) + O( 2 ),
then the rst variation of the surface area is written as
d x
g (t + , ) = tr {S(x, t)Dx u(x, t) S(x, t)} gtx ,
d =0
where S(x, t) = I (x, t) (x, t). Using the notation
divxt u = tr {S(x, t)Dx u(x, t) S(x, t)}, (25)
we obtain
t (x, t) + u(x, t) x (x, t) = t (t, )
g0 x g0
= x t g (t, ) = divxt u = divxt u,
gt gtx
which yields the transport equation for density
t (x, t) + u(x, t) x (x, t) + divxt u = 0.
As a result, we obtain the following problem equivalent to Problem A.
Problem B. We have to nd a curvilinear cylinder QT with the side boundary ST , vector elds v: QT R3 ,
u: ST R3 , and functions p: QT R and : ST R satisfying the following equations and boundary conditions:
674
t v + v x v + x p = 0, divx v = 0 for (x, t) QT ,
(26a)
t u + u x u + (gtx H + (H 2 /2 + R)H = (p + C(t)) for F (x, t) = 0;
(x, 0) = 0 (x), x .
The presence of the potential mass forces
f (x) = x (x)
does not exert any signicant eect on the form of the equations. In this case, the Lagrangians Lf and Le have the
form
1
Lf = |t x(t, )|2 d (x(t, )) d,
2
1
Le = 2
|t y(t, )| d W (yt ) (y(t, )) d.
2
Hence, in the Eulerian formulation (26), Eqs. (26a) are replaced by the equations
t v + v x v + x p + x = 0, divx v = 0 for (x, t) QT ,
t u + u x u + (gtx H + (H 2 /2 + R)H + x = (p + C(t)) for (x, t) ST .
6. Two-Dimensional Motion. In the case of two spatial variables, the equations of motion become much
simpler. With allowance for applications to the problem of surface waves in a pool covered by an elastic lm,
we assume that the domain t occupied by the uid has the form t = {x = x1i + x2j, x2 < (x1 , t)}, where
= (x1 , t) is a function periodic with respect to the variable x1 . The surface t = {x, x2 = (x1 , t)} is unknown
and is determined in the course of solving the problem.
By virtue of the assumed absence of separation of the shell from the free surface of the uid [in the plane
(i, j)], the free surface of the shell admits parametrization
t = {y: y = r(t, s), s R},
where the displacement vector r(t, s) is a periodic function of the Lagrangian variable s.
We consider auxiliary vectors a and b and new functions and :
sr b = sa ,
a = , = |sr |, = |sa |.
|sr| |sa|
Obviously, a b = a sa = b sb = 0. We can readily conclude that
sb = aa sb = a sa b = a .
In this notation, we have
gty (s) = (t, s), = 1 s 1 sr = 1 sa = b,
H |H|
=
.
675
Let t = {y = r(t, s), 0 s 2}. Let us recall that r(t, s) is a periodic function of the variable s. Without
losing generality, we assume that the following condition is satised.
Condition 1. At the initial time, the curve 0 is a straight line:
r(0, s) = si, 0 s 2.
The density 0 is already subjected to the condition of a uniform distribution of matter in the shell at the
initial time: 0 = 1. Under these conditions, the law of conservation of mass (24e) means that
1 1
(t, s) = = . (27)
|sr(t, s)| (t, s)
Let us consider the Lagrangian function Le for the membrane
Le = Ke W (t ) Ep ,
where Ke is the kinetic energy, W (t ) is the stored elastic energy, and Ep is the potential of energy due to gravity.
The kinetic energy of the elastic membrane is determined by the equality
2
1 2 1 2 1
Ke = (t, s)|tr | dt = (t, s)|tr | (t, s) ds = |tr |2 ds.
2 2 2
t t 0
The function E(, ) = W (, ) is subjected to the condition of convexity with respect to the variable .
For the gravity eld g = gj acting in the plane (i, j) [g = y (y ) and (y ) = gy2 ], we calculate the
potential of energy due to gravity
2 2
Ep = (t, s)(r (t, s)) dt = (t, s)(r (t, s))(t, s) ds = (r(t, s)) ds.
t 0 0
We can easily see that the variations of the functionals Ke and Ep are determined by the equalities
2 2
Ep = g j r ds, Ke = t2r r ds.
0 0
Calculating the variation of the functional of the stored elastic energy is a more dicult problem and requires
special consideration. For brevity, the sign of the dependence on t is omitted.
We express and via new unknowns k and q:
= q, = qk.
Note that q = |sr |2 and k = |sa |2 /|sr |2 . The expression for the integral functional of elastic energy takes the
form
2
1
W (t ) = F (q, k) ds,
2
0
where F (q, k) = W q, k q. Then, to nd the variation
2 2
1 1
W (t ) = F (q, k) ds = q F q + k F k ds
2 2
0 0
|sa |2 |sa |2 1 2k
k = = 2 sr s r + 2 sa s a = sr s r
|sr |2 |sr |4 |sr |2 q
1
2 2k k a
+ sa s a = a s r + 2 b s s r (a, s r )
q q q q q
1 a
2k k k
= a s r + 2 b s s r 2 b s (a, s r )
q q q q q
1 2k
2k k
= a s r + 2 b s s r a s r
q q q q
1
4k k
= a s r + 2 b s s r ,
q q q
where
1 1 sr
a = s r a a s r, sa = qk b, a = .
q q q
It follows that
1
2 2
2k 1 k
F (k, q) ds = q q F k F a s k F b s r ds.
2 q q q
0 0
As sb = qk a, this equality can be written in the form
1
2 2
k 1 k
F (k, q) ds = q q F k F a s k F b s r ds.
2 q q q
0 0
Let us return to the variables and in the right side of this equality. If we introduce a new function E = E(, )
as
E(, ) = F (2 , 2 /2 ) W (, /),
then the expressions at the vectors a and b are turned to
k 2 1 1
q q F k F = q F 3 k F = E(, ), q F = E(, ).
q 2 2 2
Finally, we obtain
2
1
W (t ) = s Ua (s V )b r ds,
0
U = (W (, /)), V = (W (, /)),
sr b = sa ,
a = , = |sr|, = |sa|, = {(1 , 2 ) R2 : 2 0}.
|sr| |sa|
We write Eqs. (28) in the Eulerian coordinates. Note, as the function r(t, s) for a xed t is a 2-periodic
function, we can present the vectors a and b with the use of a new unknown function, which is the angle of
deformation (t, s):
a = cos i + sin j, b = sin i + cos j;
thereby, s = = |sa|.
We use S to denote the arc abscissa on the curve t . Then, we have
t = {y: y = x(t, S) r(t, s(S, t))}.
As |S x(t, S)| = 1, then S is a Eulerian variable. Hence, the expressions for velocity u = u(x, t), density = (x, t),
and angle of deformation = (S, t) of the elastic membrane have the form
u(x, t) = tr(t, s) ,
x=
x(t,S) s=s(S,t)
(x, t) = (t, s) ,
x=
x(t,S) s=s(S,t)
678
(S, t) = (t, s) .
s=s(S,t)
Note that the parametrization s = s(S, t) was chosen with the aim of satisfying the equality
1
S = s .
S=const s=const
In what follows, we use f instead of S f to shorten the recording. Hence, we have
1 s V
s Ua b = (Ps Qn ) ,
where P (, ) = 1 E(1/, /) and Q(, ) = 2 E(1/, /); 1 and 2 denote dierentiation with respect to the
rst and second arguments, respectively.
Similar to derivation of the equations for Problem B, we obtain the following equations. The equation of
motion for the membrane in the Eulerian coordinates acquires the form
t u + u x u ) (Ps Qn ) + gj = (p(x, t) + C(t))n, x = x(t, S). (29a)
The function satises the law of conservation of mass
t + u x + divt u = 0 for x = x(t, S). (29b)
The pressure p and the uid velocity v = v (x, t) satisfy the equations
tv + v xv + x p + gj = 0, divx v = 0,
where t (0, T ); x belongs to a curvilinear half-plane bounded by the curve x = x(t, S). Then, the constraint
equation (absence of separation) has the form
u n = v n, x = x(t, S).
7. Steady-State Problem. Let us assume that the sought functions in the Eulerian coordinates are
independent of t. As u n = v n = 0 and x = x(S) on the free boundary, the membrane velocity can be dened as
a product of the tangential vector and an unknown scalar function u = u(S):
u x(S) = u(S)s(S).
Then, the law of conservation of mass (29b) acquires the form
(u) (S) = 0, (30a)
where (S) = x(S).
In turn, Eq. (29a) takes the form
u(us ) (Ps Qn ) + gj = (p(x(S), t) + C(t))n.
With allowance that n = s and s = n, Eq. (29a) is written in projections as
uu P Q + g sin = 0; (30b)
(S)u(S)2 (S) + (P ((S), (S)) (S)) (Q((S), (S))) + (S)g cos (S) = p(x(S)) + C (31b)
[S is the arc length and (S) is the curvature]. Resolving the algebraic system (31a) with respect to the quantities
and u and substituting them into Eq. (31b), we can obtain one dynamic condition relating the boundary curvature
to the pressure p.
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant No. 07-01-00309) and
Program of Integration Fundamental Research of the Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Grant
No. 2.1).
REFERENCES
1. M. A. Ilgamov. Introduction into Nonlinear Hydroelasticity [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1991).
2. J. F. Toland, Heavy hydroelastic travelling waves, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A, 463, 23712397 (2007).
3. G. Friesecke, R. James, and S. Muller, A theorem on geometric rigidity and the derivation of nonlinear plate
theory from three dimensional elasticity, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 35, No. 11, 14611506 (2002).
4. T. Willmore, Total Curvature in Riemannian Geometry, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1982).
5. I. Ivanova-Karatopraklieva, P. E. Markov, and I. Kh. Sabitov, Bending of surfaces. III, Fundam. Prikl. Mat.,
12, 356 (2006).
6. R. Capovilla and J. Guven, Stresses in lipid membranes, J. Phys. A, 35, 62336247 (2002).
7. S. S. Antman, Nonlinear Problems of Elasticity, Springer-Verlag, New York (1995).
680