ARELLANO UNIVERSITY

SCHOOL OF LAW

OUTCOMES-BASED TEACHING-LEARNING PROGRAM

1st Term, Academic Year 2017-2018

COURSE TITLE Human Rights Law

COURSE CODE HURL 000
CREDIT UNITS 2
SCHEDULE 2 HOURS per week
COURSE PRE-REQUISITE Constitutional Law 2
PROFESSOR Atty. Irene D. Valones
EMAIL ADDRESS attyirenedvalones@yahoo.com

Course Description This 2-unit course is a branch of public law which deals
with the body of laws, rules, procedures, and institutions
designed to respect, promote and protect human rights at the
national, regional and international level.

Organization This course will be taught in a Socratic Method of Learning

and an interactive lecture format. Students are responsible
for reading the assigned materials before coming to class
and should be prepared to discuss it, and answer questions
about it. Supreme Court Cases assignment, international
human rights instruments will be added as the class
progresses.

Classroom Rules A student with four (4) absences shall be dropped from the
course and will get a failing grade. No use of cellphones
during class. No coaching during recitation. Submission of
Assessment Tasks within the prescribed deadlines.
Observance of ethical rules on research while doing the
writing tasks.

Schools Programs Courses

Intended Learning Outcomes
The Arellano University
School of Law affirms its role
to develop individuals to
become committed advocates
of the law making them
responsive to the global
community and able to
provide specialized legal
services.
Thus, it is expected that
students will be able to
manifest the following:
Intended Learning Outcomes
The Arellano University
School of Law aims to be
the leading exponent of a
learner-centered approach to
legal education that
integrates values towards an
enhanced legal profession.
It is expected that students
of law will be able to
demonstrate the following:
Intended Learning Outcomes
Human Rights Law focuses
on the basics of human
rights, its development and
the remedies that are
available when such rights
are violated.
At the end of the semester,
the students are expected to
acquire the following:

1. Body of knowledge, 1. Have the proper 1. Exhibit a competitive

Research and Creative
Skills. Acquire adequate
knowledge in the field of
Law and related disciplines
and apply them in various
academic researches and
perspective and better
understanding of laws and
policies, rules and
regulations both national
and international. Exhibit a
competitive level of
level of knowledge, skills
and understanding of human
rights, international
instruments, approaches,
remedies and preventive
mechanisms aimed at

Page 1 of 9
 ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
creative endeavors.
2. Critical Skills,
Effective Problem
Solving. To progressively
engage in theories and
facts, in the light of reason,
towards solving theoretical
and practical problems.
3. Leadership Skills to
Work Alone and in
Teams. To exhibit a work
ethic anchored on honesty,
responsibility,
accountability and hone
leadership skills to lead
and work with others.
4. Communicate
Effectively. To articulate
ideas and express positions
as steeped on the value of
truth, guided by faith and
reason.
5. Social Awareness and
Global Perspective. To
demonstrate awareness and
understanding of relevant
social issues and respond to
the needs of the global
community through
concrete social action.
6. Ethical Action and
Moral Character. To
exhibit highest standards of
integrity in both personal
behavior and professional
decorum.
SCHOOL OF LAW
knowledge in the different
fields of law.
2. Demonstrate and
appreciate the
significance of law and
understanding its issues
and phenomena to
everyday life thus
contributing knowledge
of the law to theorizing,
decision-making and
research.
3. Be at the forefront of
advocacy, specialized
legal education and
research, responsive and
attuned to the times, and
contributing to the
efficient, speedy and
honest dispensation and
administration of justice.
4. Effective articulation
of ideas derived from the
field of law imbibed with
and guided by ethical
values.
5. Be globally-oriented,
harnessing state-of-the-art
technologies and
methodologies.
6. Be the leading
exponent of a learner-
centered approach to legal
education that integrates
values and ethics to
provide quality holistic
education.
addressing human rights
violations and abuses.
2. Improve their
intellectual prowess and
vision on human rights
issues to become
important components of
discourses and debates at
the national and global
arena, an inspirational tool
and moral force in peace
processes.
3. Gain new ideas and
practices to stimulate
popular involvement in
the enforcement of human
rights laws to ensure that
human beings both
individually and
collectively are able to
realize their self-worth
and humanity.
4. Maintain and build
upon positive innovations
in theory and practice for
the progress and stability
of the nation through
political communication.
5. It is of great importance
for students who, after law
school, may find
themselves involved in
community development
and occupy elective or
appointive positions
which are tasked to
legislate or enforce local
developmental issues.
6. Work ethics and
standards must be coupled
with respect for the rule of
law and the dignity of
persons in the national and
local level. ,
Page 2 of 9
 ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF LAW

I. INTRODUCTION
i. Definition of Human Rights
Constitutional Provisions
United Nations Definition

ii. Theories of Sources of Human Rights

Religious or Theological Approach
Natural Law Theory
Historical Theory
Functional or Sociological Approach
Positivist Theory
Marxist Theory
Theory Based on Equality and Respect
Theory Based on Justice
Theory Based on the Dignity of Man
Utilitarian Theory

iii. Classification of Human Rights

iv. Characteristics of Human Rights
v. First, Second, Third and Fourth Generation of Human Rights
vi. Development of Human Rights (International and Domestic Paradigm)

Magna Carta of Human Rights, American Bill of Rights, and French

Declaration of Rights of Man and the Citizen
EDSA People Power I, II, and III

vii. Overview of the Commission on Human Rights [CHR] (Mandate, Powers, and
Functions

CASES:
Cario vs Commission on Human Rights - G.R. No. 96681, December 2, 1991
Simon vs Commission on Human Rights - G.R. No. 100150, January 5, 1994
EPZA vs Commission on Human Rights - G.R. No. 101476, April 14, 1992
PBM Emp. Org v PBM Co., Inc., 51 SCRA 189 (1973)
Baldoza v Dimaano, 71 SCRA 152 (1976)
David v Arroyo, 489 SCRA 160 (2006)
Southern Hemisphere Engagement Network, Inc. v Anti-Terrorism Council, 632
SCRA 146 (2010)
Ocampo vs Enriquez, Marcos, et al - GR No. 22593, November 8, 2016
Government of HK vs Olalia, GR No. 153875, April 19, 2007

PANEL DISCUSSION, DEBATE & OPEN FORUM

Marcos Burial Case (Presentation of the Group on the Concurring and
Dissenting Opinions) of the Justices
Critical Analysis on whether there is a Historical Revisionism

ASSESSMENT TASKS: Graded Recitation every meeting

Group Written Output to be submitted via email in word doc format
on or before midnight of August 31, 2017

Page 3 of 9
 ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF LAW

II. SOURCES OF HUMAN RIGHTS

International Agreements Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission

International Customary Law Intl Criminal Tribunal of Afghanistan
Jus cogens
Obligatio Ergo omnes
Actio Popularis
Incorporation Clause
Judicial decisions and teaching

READINGS: North Sea Continental Shelf: West Germany vs Denmark/West Germany

vs Netherlands ICJ 20 February 1969
International Court of Justice

III. STATE RESPONSIBILITY

A. International State Responsibility
i. International Bodies that Protect and Promote Human Rights
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Human Rights Committee (CCPR), the Committee against Torture (CAT), the
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW),
the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), the
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), the Committee
on Enforced Disappearances (CED), the Committee on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights (CESCR), and the Committee on the Rights of the Child
(CRC).
Distinguished UNCHR from United Nations Human Rights Committee, or
United Nations Human Rights Council.
United Nations Economic and Social Council

ii. Human Rights Council Complaint Procedure

iii. United Nations New Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights UN Human
Rights Council Resolution 17/4 Human rights and Transnational Corporations and
other business enterprises
iv. Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action Adopted by the World Conference on
Human Rights in Vienna on 25 June 1993
v. International Criminal Court [ICC] (Mandate, Structure, Jurisdiction and Admissibility)
Rome Statute
vi. Sub-Commission of Experts and Rapporteurs

B. Domestic State Responsibility

i. State as guarantor of Human Rights
ii. Human Rights and the Rule of Law
iii. Role of the Judiciary
iv. Violations by State actors
v. Violations by private individuals
vi. State liability for HR violations committed by :non-State actors

Page 4 of 9
 ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF LAW

vii. Derivative State responsibility for complicity

viii. Prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures
ix. Command Responsibility: Yamashita Standard

CASES
People v Andre Marti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991)
Waterhouse Drug v NLRC, GR 113271 (16 Oct 1997)
Zulueta v CA, 253 SCRA 699
Gamboa v Chan, 677 SCRA 385 (2012)
Rule of Procedure on Environmental Cases, Rule 7, Part III, A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC
Oposa v Factoran, Jr 224 SCRA 792 (1993)
Laguna Lake Devt Authority v CA 7 Dec 1995, GR 120865-71
MMDA v Concerned Residents of Manila Bay 18 Dec 2008, GR 171947-48
In Re Yamashita, 327 US 1 (1946)
David v Arroyo, 489 SCRA 160 (2006)

PANEL DISCUSSION & OPEN FORUM

Sharing of current International Human Rights Issues by the students
Discussion on the human rights situation in the Philippines
PNP Oplan Double Barrel and Double Barrel Reloaded

ASSESSMENT TASKS:

Reflection Paper on the Current Human Rights Situation in the Philippines

(not more than 3,000 words) to be submitted on the midnight of September
30, 2017
Graded Recitation every meeting

IV. CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS

i. Definition and Nature of Civil and Political Rights
ii. International Convention on Civil and Political Rights
iii. Right to Life, Liberty and Security
Death Penalty
Legal and Ethical Considerations on Euthanasia
Difference between assisted dying and euthanasia
Abortion
Prohibition Against Slavery and Involuntary Servitude
Involuntary Servitude
Torture, Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment
Arbitrary Arrest and Detention

iv. Rights of the Accused

CASES
People of the Philippines v.s Leo Echegaray, [G.R. No. 117472. June 25, 1996]
Imbong vs Ochoa, et al GR No. 204819, April 8, 2014
Basa vs Workmens Compensation Commission and Republic of the Philippines,
GR No L-43098, March 30, 1981
Biscarra vs Workmens Compensation Commission, GR No. L-43425, January
22, 1980
Page 5 of 9
 ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF LAW

People vs Casio, GR No. 211465, December 31, 2014

People vs Cuizon, 256 SCRA 320
Valmonte vs de Villa, 178 SCRA 211
People vs Bolanos, 211 SCRA 262
People vs Bason, 219 SCRA 404
People vs Ramos, 122 SCRA 312
Beltran vs Samson, 33 Phil 570
Guanzon vs del Villla
Ramirez vs Court of Appeals
Ople vs Ruben Torres, 293 SCRA 141
Marcos vs Manglapus
Villavicencio vs Lukban, 39 Phil 778
Mejoff vs Director of Prisons, 490 Phil 70
Ebralinag vs Division Superintendent School of Cebu, 219 SCA 256
German vs Baangani, 135 SCRA 514
Eastern Broadcasting vs Dans, 137 SCRA 628
Burgos v Chief of Staff, 133 SCRA 802
Sanidad vs. COMELEC, 181 SCRA 529
Ayer Production vs Judge Capulong, 160 SCRA 861
Valmonte vs Belmonte, 170 SCRA 256
Francisco Chaves vs PCGG, 299 SCRA 244
Victoriano vs Elizalde Rope Workers Union, 59 SCRA 54

OPEN FORUM

Religious Freedom and Freedom of Expression

Standards of Review: Clear and Present Danger Test, Dangerous Tendency Test,
Balancing of Interest Test
Levels of Scrutiny: Rational Basis Test, Intermediate Scrutiny Test, Strict Scrutiny Test
Facial Challenge: Overbreadth Doctine, Void for Vagueness Doctrine

Sharing of current International Human Rights Issues by the students

ASSESSMENT TASKS: Graded Recitation

V. ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN THE PROMOTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

i. Writ of Amparo
ii. Writ of Habeas Corpus
iii. Writ of Kalikasan
iv. Writ of Habeas Data

VI. ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND CULTURAL RIGHTS

i. Economic, Social and Cultural Council (ECOSOCC)

CASES
Knights of Rizal vs DMCI, GR No. 213948, April 25, 2017
Manila Prince Hotel vs GSIS, GR No. 122156, February 3, 1997
Magdalena State Inc., vs Kapisanan ng mga Manggagawa
Gold City Integrated Post Service vs NLRC, 245 SCRA 627
SSS vs Court of Appeals, 175 SCRA 686
PBM Employees vs PBM Steel, 51 SCRA 189

READINGS Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education, August 3, 2017

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Page 6 of 9
 ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF LAW

OPEN FORUM

Sharing of current International Human Rights Issues by the students

Right to Education and Development of Human Personality
State Compliance with the Covenant
Participation in Cultural Life and Benefits of Scientific Progress

ASSESSMENT TASKS: Graded Recitation

Reaction Paper on the Relevance and Feasibility of the Universal

Access to Quality Tertiary Education of 2017 (not more than 3,000
words) to be submitted on or before midnight of October 20, 2017

VII. SOLIDARITY RIGHTS

i. Justiceability of the solidarity right to a healthy environment
ii. Writ of Kalikasan
iii. 1972 Stockholm Conference
iv. 1972 World Heritage Convention
v. 1985 Vienna Convention
vi. 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that deplete the Ozone Layer
vii. 1989 Basel Convention on the Control of Transnational Boundary Movements of
Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal
viii. 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity
ix. Paris Agreement

CASES

Gamboa vs Chan, 677 SCRA 385

Oposa vs Factoran, 224 SCRA 792
Laguna Lake Devt Authority v CA 7 Dec 1995, GR 120865-71
MMDA vs Concerned Residents of Manila Bay, GR No. 171947-48, December 18, 2008

OPEN FORUM

Sharing of current International environmental law Issues by the students

ASSESSMENT TASKS: Graded Recitation

VIII. Human Rights Situation of Vulnerable Sector

i. Rights of Children and Youth
ii. Juvenile Justice
iii. Elderly Sector
iv. People With Disability (PWD)
v. Mentally Disabled Persons
vi. Prisoners/Detainees
vii. Migrant Workers
viii. Laborers
ix. Household Helpers
x. Refugees
xi. Stateless Persons
xii. LGBT Rights
xiii. Indigenous Communities

Page 7 of 9
 ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF LAW

CASES Republic vs Cagandahan, 565 SCRA 72

Ang Ladlad vs COMELEC, GR No. 109582, April 8, 2010
Cruz vs Secretary, GR No. 135385, December 6, 2000

RA 9344 Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act

RA 7610 Anti-Child Abuse Law
RA 9321 Elimination of the Worst Form of Child Labor
RA 9975 Anti-Child Pornography
RA 1064 Expanded Anti-Trafficking in Persons especially Women and Children
CEDAW
RA 9262 Anti Violence Against Women and their Children Act of 2004
RA 8972 Solo Parents Act
International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of Migrant Workers and
Members of their Families
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Convention on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
RA 8371 Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA)
Senior Citizens
CyberCrime

OPEN FORUM

Sharing of current International human rights issues by the students

ASSESSMENT TASKS Graded Recitation

Reaction Paper on the proposed legalization by Congress of the

Same Sex Marriage in the Philippines (not more than 3,000 words)
to be submitted on the midnight of November 10, 2017

IX. RIGHT AGAINST TORTURE AND ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE

i. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment and
Punishment
ii. RA 9745 Anti Torture Act of 2009
iii. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
iv. Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Amparo

CASES
Secretary of National Defense vs Manalo, 568 SCRA 1
Razon vs Tagtiis, 606 SCRA 598 (2009), 612 SCRA 685 (2010)
Rubrico vs MAcapagal Arroyo, 613 SCRA 233 (2010)
Boac vs CAdapan, 649 SCRA 618
Rodriguez vs Macapagal Arroyo, 662 SCRA 312 (2011)
Navia vs Pardico, 673 SCRA 618 (2012)
Canlas vs Napico Homeowners Association, 554 SCRA 208 (2008)

X. INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW

i. Restriction and Limittaions: Derogation
ii. Components, Application, Origin, and Fundamental Rules on IHL

Page 8 of 9
 ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF LAW

XI. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

XII. UNITED NATIONS (Purpose, Principal Organs, Offices, Agencies, Programmes and
Subsidiary Bodies
XIII. CURRENT ISSUES (Climate Change, International Migration, Refugee Crisis (Syrian
refugees, etc) Urban Violence, Emergent and Recurrent Diseases, Internet Freedom,
International Disaster Relief and Recovery Assistance, etc)

XIV. MONITORING SYSTEMS

i. Charter Based Mechanism
ii. Treaty-Based Mechanism
iii. Complaint Procedure, State Reports, Special Procedure, NGO, NHRI Reports
iv. RA 10368 Human Rights Reparation and Recognition Act of 2013

XV. THE ROAD AHEAD

OPEN FORUM
Sharing of current International human rights issues by the students
ASSESSMENT TASKS Graded Recitation

Course Reference: Coquia and Petralba

Grading System:
Class Standing (Recitations and Written Output (one group report and 3 individual writing
tasks) - 30%
Midterm Examination 30%
Final Exam 40%
TOTAL 100%

To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity

Nelson Mandela
South African civil rights activist

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere

Martin Luther King
African-American civil rights activist

Page 9 of 9