Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The maximum bending moment, M* and shear force, V* acting on the slab is determined using
matrix analysis with the assistance of Microsoft Excel. During the analysis, the slab width is taken to
be 1m width between axis 2 and 3. The calculated matrix analysis is then compared with the figures
obtained from Spacegass software. The table below summarizes the loadings calculated before
which is used during matrix analysis.
3.0000
Superimposed Live Load (kN/m)
1.0000
Superimposed Dead Load (kN/m)
3.8400
Slab self-weight (kN/m)
10.3080
Ultimate Limit State Load (kN/m)
6.9400
Service Limit State Load (kN/m)
27000.0000
Elastic Modulus of Slab,E (MPa)
0.0003
Second Moment of Slab,I (m4)
Assumption:
Slab will carry its self-weight, superimposed live load and superimposed dead load
Cantilever length = 0.1m
Secondary beam act as roller, cut in mid-span act as fixed support
Only half span of the slabs is considered for analysis during hand calculation as the structure is
symmetrical.
EI/L^3
Element Length (m) (kN/m)
AB 0.1000 9.2160
BC 2.2667 0.0008
CD 2.2667 0.0008
DE 2.2667 0.0008
EF 2.4000 0.0007
FG 2.4000 0.0007
GH 2.4000 0.0007
Total length 14.1000
For hand calculation, the matrix analysis is done in Microsoft Excel as per describe in the step taken
above. The screenshot of the spreadsheet for steps taken can be found in Appendix XX
The shear force diagram and bending moment diagram are shown below in Figure xx and Figure xx
20.0000
15.0000
10.0000
5.0000
0.0000
0.0000 5.0000 10.0000 15.0000 20.0000 25.0000 30.0000
-5.0000
-10.0000
-15.0000
-20.0000
6.0000
4.0000
2.0000
0.0000
0.0000 5.0000 10.0000 15.0000 20.0000 25.0000 30.0000
-2.0000
-4.0000
-6.0000
Spacegass result
Based on table XX, it is found that both method agrees with each other with minor decimal error due
to rounding off.
Where
= Capacity Factor
The effective section modulus is calculated based on the type of section: compact, non-compact or
slender section. To determine which type of section it belongs, the section slenderness is determine
by evaluating the plasticity limit, yield limit and deformation limit based on the criteria in Table 5.2,
AS 4100. It is assumed that the type of section for our beam is compact section where section
slenderness, s < plasticity slenderness, sp .
The equation used to calculate the compact section are as followed:
= min[, 1.5]
Where
The yield stress, Fy has been determined earlier from BHP table based on the type of beam (universal
beam) and its dimension (530UB82.0).
The beam design is assumed to have no full lateral restraint as a conservative approach.
For member capacity of segment without full lateral restraint, the calculation is done in accordance
to section 5.6, AS4100. Since the segment of our beam has constant cross section, the nominal
member capacity (Mb) is calculated as follows:
=
Where
Where
Moa = reference buckling moment
The reference buckling moment, Moa is determined as follows:
2 2
[( 2 ) [ + ( 2 )]
Where
E, G = Elastic moduli
Iy, J, and Iw = section constants
le = effective length (m)
The effective length of a beam depends on the restraint condition in each end whether it has
fully restraint (connections: beam to column), laterally restraint (secondary beam comes
into primary), partially restraint or unrestrained. This will determine the relevant factors and
the length of segment in a beam. The restraint condition at each end is taken to be FF with
no lateral restraint on both end.
The effective length (le) of a segment or sub-segment is determined as follows:
=
where
kt = twist restraint factor
kl = load height factor
kr = lateral rotation restraint factor
l = segment length (m)
There are two design requirement for portal frame: Determine the rafter size and column size.
The value of M* and N* has been calculated earlier using spacegass, the critical load case will be
used to test against the member for rafter and column. There are several assumptions made to ease
the calculation process and they are as followed:
The primary beam size used after primary beam calculation is 460UB67.1 and this is used to check
against the design action M* and serviceability where the vertical deflection < total length/250.
The deflection limit is as followed: 30.4/250=121.6mm
Where
G = dead load
W= wind load
Q = live load
After checking using spacegass, it is found that the beam size of 460UB67.1 pass the strength check
but failed the deflection check, therefore the size of the beam is revised to 460UB82.1 to meet both
criteria.
Results Summary
Table XX: Results summary for rafter checking
Column design
The column is tested against the design action of N* and M* calculated earlier.
The maximum positive and negative bending moment is taken from matrix analysis for continuous
slab, the value is shown in the table below:
Table XX Maximum positive and negative bending moment for composite slab
Bending Moment, M* kNm
Positive 5.6002
Negative 4.0848
Sheeting properties
fsy.sh = 550MPa
hr = 55m
ysh= 12.8mm
Hr = 210kPa
= 0.5
After several iteration in excel for all models, the metal sheeting with thickness of 0.75mm is chosen
for our composite slab design. The properties of condeck hp panel is obtained from Figure xx
= capacity factor
ysh = height at which the sheeting tensile force acts above the bottom of the slab
In this equation, all parameters are predetermined except the tensile force in the sheeting. There
are 3 possibilities for Tsh at failure
a) The sheeting yield: = . flexural failure
b) The concrete crush: = ( ) flexural failure
c) The sheeting slips: = ( ) longitudinal slip failure
Where
Hr = mechanical resistance
= coefficient of friction
After calculation using excel, the critical tensile failure is sheeting slip failure. The positive bending
moment capacity is then calculated using equation xx and it is found that Mu(+ve) = 33.28kNm which
meets the criteria of Mu > M*.
Where
= capacity factor
The calculation process are as followed for obtaining negative moment capacity:
Discussion
The calculated negative bending moment, Mu(-ve) and positive bending moment, Mu(-ve) is
higher than the design bending moment, M* which indicate that our design is safe for
ultimate limit state of composite slab. All calculation in this section can be found in
Appendix 9.1 and Appendix 9.2. In the following section 9.3, serviceability check is
conducted for composite slab.
( )
= 3 4 [ ]
.
Where
= 1.05 for a two-way flat slab with drop panels, which extend at least L/6 in each
direction on each side of a support centre-line and have an overall depth not less
than 1.3D, where D is the slab thickness beyond the drops
Fdef = load per metre, including allowance for shrinkage and creep
= (1.0 + kcs)g + (s + kcs 1)q = [2 1.2 ( )] 0.8
Methodology
Based on Table 2.3.2 in AS 3600 /Lef is found to be 1/250 (suitable for all type of member,
deflection considered: total deflection, and deflection limitation is for span)
= 1.05 for a two-way flat slab with drop panels, which extend at least L/6 in each
direction on each side of a support centre-line and have an overall depth not less
than 1.3D, where D is the slab thickness beyond the drops
K4 = the deflection constant, which may be taken as
Fdef = load per metre, including allowance for shrinkage and creep
= (1.0 + kcs)g + (s + kcs 1)q = [2 1.2 ( )] 0.8