Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Performance based design with seismic protection devices such as viscous dampers
have fundamentally altered the landscape of earthquake engineering and design.
Structures designed and built without such devices typically use a code-prescribed
design that implies extensive structural damage, loss of operation, and likely
replacement at design-level earthquake. In contrast, performance based design
incorporating earthquake protection devices leads to a combination of best
engineering practice and reducing life-cycle costs. These devices are robust, cost-
effective, and have a proven exceptional performance record in past earthquakes. In
most cases, initial cost of their utilization is neutralized by reduction in cost of other
structural members. The long-term performance is the key parameter used for
evaluation. Structures properly designed with these devices will likely only require
minimum post-earthquake inspection and can be fully operational within hours of a
seismic event. When utilized for critical structures, such performance reduces the
need for use of natural resources by eliminating post-earthquake repair or
reconstruction and thus improving the community resiliency. Example cases are
presented.
INTRODUCTION
Fluid viscous dampers (FVDs) were originally developed as shock absorbers for
the defense and aerospace industries. In re-cent years, they have been used
extensively for seismic application for both new and retrofit construction. During
seismic events, the devices become active and the seismic input energy is used to heat
the fluid and is thusly dissipated. Subsequent to installation, the dampers require
minimal maintenance. They have been shown to possess stable and dependable
properties for design earthquakes.
FVDs consist of a cylinder and a stainless steel piston. The cylinder is filled with
incompressible silicone fluid. The damper is activated by the flow of silicone fluid
between chambers at opposite ends of the unit, through small orifices. Figure 2 shows
the damper cross section.
Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015
ATC & SEI 2015 586
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by New York University on 02/19/16. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
EEL MOM
STE MENT FRAM
ME APPLIC
CATION
Ovverview. Provisions of
o ASCE/SE EI 7-10 (AS SCE 2010) were used tto design a
new
w steel frammed multi-sto g in the Los Angeles arrea. The steeel members
ory building
werre sized usin
ng conventio onal code dessign proceduures. Dampeers were sized to control
the story driftss. The dam mpers were placed
p only at the grouund floor w with pinned
coluumn bases where
w the maximum
m veelocity is exxpected to occcur. A paraallel design
wass carried outt using the co
onventional design methhodology. Thhis model was designed
folllowing the conventional code proced dure for bothh strength annd drift.
The four-sttory commerrcial buildin ng is 18.5 m tall and haas a total flooor space of
8,000 m2. The seismic masss of the buiilding was aapproximately 9 MN. A Architectural
ren
ndering of thee building iss presented in
n Figure 3. FFor the dampped model, tthe bases of
all columns were
w modeled d as pinnedd. For conveentional dessign model, the fixity,
ovided by th
pro he grade beaams, was assumed at tthe base of all columns. Figure 4
deppicts the matthematical model
m of the building.
b Sixxteen nonlinnear FVDs wwere used.
Fiigure 3. Architectu
ural renditio
on Figu
ure 4. M
Mathematiccal model
Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015
ATC & SEI 2015 587
con
nventional model.
m FVDss provide succh control fo
for the dampped model. T The damped
model has smaaller base shear and floo
or acceleratioons; see Figgure 5; becauuse it has a
lon
nger period and
a larger efffective damp
ping ratio.
100 3
.
2
50
Roof acceleration, g
1
Cs %g
0 0
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by New York University on 02/19/16. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Cs,
-1
-50
-2
-100 -3
0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25
Time, sec Time, sec
Figure 6 shows
s the snap
s shot ofo the convventional annd damped models at
max ximum defo ormation fo or a spectraally-matchedd event. Booth models meet their
perrformance goal
g of life safety. How wever, the damped moodel meets the higher
essentially elasstic performaance goal; th
he columns oof the dampeer model rem main elastic
d, as listed in
and n Table 1, the plastic rotaations are sm
maller for thee damped m
model.
Conv
ventional dessign Model w
with damperss
Fig
gure 6. MC
CE plastic h
hinge rotatioons
Tab
ble 1. Maximum MCE
M plastiic hinge rotaations, % raadian
Co onventionall Damped
Beam
B 1.7 1.3
Co
olumn 2.6 --
Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015
ATC & SEI 2015 588
Figure 7 presents the damper hysteresis loop and the components of seismic
energy computed from analysis. In the absence of dampers, yielding in ductile beam
members would substitute for such energy dissipation.
2,000 3,000
Input
Inherent
1,000
Axial force, kN
Damper
2,000
Energy, kJ
0
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by New York University on 02/19/16. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
1,000
-1,000
-2,000
-
-120 -60 0 60 120
0 5 10 15 20 25
Axial displacement, mm Time, sec
Damper limit states are governed by a few elements. The dampers bottoms out,
once the piston motion reaches its available stroke. This is the stroke limit and results
in transition from viscous damper to a steel brace with stiffness equal to that of the
cylinder wall. The force limit states in compression and tension are governed by the
buckling capacity of the driver brace and the tensile capacity of the piston rod,
respectively. Figure 9 presents the proposed limit-state model for viscous dampers.
Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015
ATC & SEI 2015 589
Nonlinerar Noninea
ar C&
Linear
CO
OLLAPSE ANALYSIS
A OF BUILD
DINGS WIT
TH DAMPE
ERS
Ground Motio ons The input historries used inn analysis w were based on the two
commponents off the 22 far-filed (measu ured 10 km or more froom fault ruppture) NGA
PEE ER (2009b)) records. These
T 44 reecords have been identtified by FE EMA P695
(FE
EMA 2009) for collapse evaluation analysis.
a Thee selected 222 records coorrespond to
a reelatively larg
ge sample off strong reco
orded motionns that are cconsistent wiith the code
(ASSCE/SEI 7) and are stru ucture-type and site-hazzard indepenndent. For aanalysis, the
44 records weree normalized d to remove the record-tto-record varriation in inttensity.
SRRF Connectio on. Steell SRFs with h reduced beeam sectionss (RBSs) aree one of the
prequalified co onnections fo or seismic ap pplications aand were useed in this annalysis. The
connstitutive po ost-yield relation for th he RBS plaastic hinges developed by Lignos
(20
008) was useed in this su ubject study. Those authhors used exxperimental ddata from a
database of 42 RBS connecctions tested d in laboratoories using reegression annalysis; they
idenntified the plastic hing ge propertiees as a funnction of flaange slendeerness, web
slennderness, laateral bracinng, and yield strength of beams. T The momennt-rotational
deffinitions, thee multilinearr moment-rotation constiitutive relatiion for the R RBS plastic
hin
nges was thu us defined. FEMA
F 350 (FEMA 20000) recommeends the inttroduction a
red
duction in th he flexural stiffness to account fo r the effectt of the redduced beam
flan
nges. Such reduction
r wiill result in an
a increase in the storyy drifts by 3% % to 7% in
typical applicattions. FEMA A 350 also recommends
r s increasing story drifts by 10% to
acccount conserrvatively fo or this effecct. This appproach was used to sccale up the
commputed inelaastic drifts:
Moodel Propertties and IDAA Program OpenSees ((PEER 20099a) was usedd to conduct
the nonlinear analyses
a described in th
his paper. Peertinent moddel propertiees are listed
herre.
Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015
ATC & SEI 2015 590
For collapse analysis, the normalized records are then scaled upward or
downward to obtain data points for the nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis (IDA)
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by New York University on 02/19/16. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
To illustrate the concepts described in this paper, design and analysis of a group
of archetypes with viscous damping was conducted. Fifteen archetypes are currently
under consideration. The basic geometry and distribution of dampers for these models
are summarized in Table 3. The selected building models will be regular in plan and
elevation with a dominant first mode response. The period of tall buildings is limited
to approximately 5 sec to ensure sufficient energy is present in the input histories.
The investigations for all but the 20- and 30-story structures have been completed.
The frames were designed using the code provisions and special requirements for
SMRFs. The ASCE 7 maximum period used to compute base shear period is used for
evaluation. A typical 5-story archetype is shown in Figure 10.
Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015
ATC & SEI 2015 591
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by New York University on 02/19/16. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Figu
ure 10. Five-story
F arrchetype B11
NALYSIS RESULTS
AN R
The analysiis results forr the five-stoory archetyppes are preseented in Figgure 11. For
the pushover curves,
c the solid and .dashed
. linees corresponnd to the cases where
dammper are exccluded and included,
i resspectively, iin analysis. As long as the damper
doees not botto om out, the plots are identical.
i Onnce the dam mper bottom ms, there is
signnificant incrrease in stiffn
fness and strength since a stiff bracee (cylinder wwall) is now
addded to the system. After A the damper
d faills, the dam mped pushoover curve
asy
ymptotically approachess the undam mmed case. The dotted line corressponds to a
biliinear approx ximation ussed to com mpute the yyield and ultimate driffts and the
corrresponding ductility (cc). The comp puted system m ductility w
was 8.0 and rresulted in a
SSF F of 1.34.
Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015
ATC & SEI 2015 592
For the IDA A plots, the solid and daashed red linnes correspoond to the M MCE (SMT)
andd the median n collapse caapacity (SCT T), respectively. Note thhat the additiion of small
dammper factor ofo safety sign ncreases collaapse marginn. For the fraagility plots,
nificantly in
the 44 collapsee data are sttatiscally org ganized andd a lognormaal curve is ffilled to the
data (dashed lin nes in the fiigures). The plot was thhen rotated tto corresponnd to a total
unccertainty of 0.55 (solid line) per FEMA P695 . Finally thee curve wass shifted to
acccount for thee effect of thhe SSF (dark k solid liness in the figurres). The proobability of
collapse at MC w then be computed. T
CE intensity was The probability of collappse at MCE
level was reducced by a facttor of approx ximately 4 wwhen an addiitional dampper factor of
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by New York University on 02/19/16. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
fety of 30% is
safe i included. The
T probabiility of the d amper reachhing its limitt state at the
MCCE intensity can then bee computed from the daamper fragillity plots. Note that the
pro
obability of damper
d reacching a limitt state is siggnificantly reeduced whenn a damper
facttor of safety
y of 30% is inncluded in design.
d
Tab
ble 4. Collapse fra
agility data
M
MCE probabbility
Daamper
Arch.
A SCTT SMT CMR SSF ACMR P P/F Collappse
cap
pacity
B1 1.24 0.82 1.51 1.34 2.20 P
Pass 8.0% 22%
B2 1.81 0.82 2.25 1.34 3.10 P
Pass 2.0% 10%
Static pushover
p curvves
Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015
ATC & SEI 2015 593
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by New York University on 02/19/16. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Static pushover
p curvves
Fraagility plots
Figure 11. Analysiss results
ONCLUSIONS
CO
Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015
ATC & SEI 2015 594
REFERENCES
ASCE (2005), ASCE 7-05: Minimum design load for buildings and other
structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA
FEMA (2000), FEMA 350: Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel
Moment Frame Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Washington DC.
Liel, A.B.., and Deierlein G.G., (2008), Assessing The Collapse Risk Of Californias
Existing Reinforced Concrete Frame, Structures: Metrics For Seismic Safety
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by New York University on 02/19/16. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015