Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Medieval Academy of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Speculum.
http://www.jstor.org
THE Victorianssaid much and assumed more about the English nation in the
Middle Ages. They felt that it existed under the Anglo-Saxons,deplored its
suppressionunder the alien heel of the Normans, rejoiced that Norman and
Englishmanwereweldedtogetherin oppositionto John,commendedthe wisdom
ofEdward I who gave thenationParliamentas its organofexpression,and finally
acclaimed the emergenceof the Englishnation in substantiallyits modernform
out of the fierycrucibleof the Hundred Years' War.
The modernreactionagainst the assumptionsof nineteenth-century scholar-
ship has underminedthe beliefin the existenceof any sortof nationalismin the
Middle Ages. Recent authoritieshold that threeforcespreventedthe develop-
mentof truenationalfeelingin the earlyMiddle Ages. The claim ofthe universal
Churchon man's higherloyaltiespreventedthemfrombeingattachedto his own
country.The universallanguage,Latin, preventedthe stimulusto national feel-
ing that comes froma patrioticnational literature.Poor communicationsand
limited circulationpreventedthe common man frombecomingaware of his
nation,much less attached to it. His limitedhorizoncombinedwith feudaland
manorialloyaltiesto produceprovincialismratherthan nationalism.2
These assumptionsof universalismof the one hand, and localismon the other
appear contradictory. They are, moreover,only partiallytrue. The Churchwas
indeed universal,but even churchmenthoughtof themselvesas Frenchmenor
Englishmen.As the Middle Ages wore on, men came to be dominatedless by
1 Based on a paper read beforea sessionofthe AmericanHistoricalAssociation,December,1946,at
534
in so doing,increaseditsscopeandintensity. Indeed,oneoftherootsofthefeel-
ingofcommunity was theold royalencroachment in local government. By de-
velopingthecommonlaw and by extending thejurisdiction oftheking'scourt
untilit includedall freemen,the royaladministration turnedtheloyaltyoflocal
peopleawayfromtheirfeudaland manorialgroups,and attachedthemto the
community ofthecounty,whichwas capableofrepresentation in centralassem-
blies.The participationoflocalmenas jurorsat thecentralcourt,and as repre-
sentativesinParliament notonlybroadened theviewpoint andloyalties ofa very
important and influentialclass but enlargedthe populus thatparticipated in
government and,as thecommunity oftherealm,sharedresponsibility withthe
kingforthepreservation ofthekingdom.22 The secondroyalpolicythataffected
thedevelopment ofnationalism wasthepracticeofobtaining militaryservicefor
thedefense of therealmfromlargegroupsof menwhohadno feudalobligation
tofight. Thisineffectbroadened the feeling
ofresponsibility fortherealmandits
defense.Commonservicein warfare made menawarethattheywerepartof
something largerthantheirlocalcommunity, and stimulated emotional attach-
mentto the kingand the country. The propagandaused to encourageservice
appealedto men'sloyaltyto thecommunity, andat thesametime,strengthened
it.
The rightand dutyofall freemento possessand use armsto helptheking
defendthe kingdomantedatedand survivedthe conquest,and had been re-
affirmedand usedjust oftenenoughto keeptheidea alive.23 Untilthereignof
EdwardI, however, Englishkingshad reliedprimarily on thefeudalhostsup-
plemented by foreign mercenaries.The unpopularity of foreigners,particularly
mercenaries,madeit inadvisableto use alientroopsin theWelshand Scottish
campaigns, whichwereveryclosetohome,andmilitary problems oforganization,
and terrain
discipline madeit impossibleto relywhollyonfeudalcavalryin these
areas. ThoughbothEdwardI and his son dependedheavilyon a reorganized
feudalarray,EdwardI revolutionized theEnglisharmyby theintroduction of
largenumbers ofpaid nativetroopsunderprofessional commanders.24 He was at
oncefacedwithtwoseriousproblems - finding nativessuitablyequippedand
trainedto serveas infantryor cavalryand persuading or forcingthemto serve.
The naturalsourceofheavycavalrywas theknightly feudalclass.At firstthe
earlsand the greatestbaronswereadverseto servingforpay. The customof
securingtheserviceofunitsofprofessional soldiersby indentureswas notfully
developeduntilthereignofEdwardIII. In theperiodunderconsideration, com-
manders, knightsand men-at-arms wererecruited fromthelesserbaronageand
22 See J. E. A. The Constitutional
Jolliffe, Historyof MedievalEngland (Londou~ 1937), ch. iv. F. M.
Powicke, 'England and Europe in the ThirteenthCentury,' Harvard Tercentenary Publications:
Independence,Convergence, and Borrowing(Cambridge,1937), pp. 135-150.
23 Stubbs,Charters, pp. 183-184,276, 840, 355, 363-365. F. M. Stenton,AngloSaxon England (Ox-
ford,1943), pp. 287-288. A. E. Prince,'The Armyand Navy,' in The EnglishGovernment at Work,
1327-1336 (ed. J. F. Willard and W. A. Morris,Cambridge,1940), I, 346-347.
24 Morris,WelshWars,pp. 35-109; Prince,'Armyand Navy,' pp. 348-349.
29 Morris, Welsh Wars, ch. ii. Prince, 'Army and Navy,' passim. Poole, Obligations, pp. 86-88,
49-52. 30 Stubbs, Charters, pp. 183-184.
31 Stubbs, Charters,pp. 468-469; Parl. Writs,i, 888, no. 24.
32 Lettersto sheriffs, Parl. Writs,ii, part ii, appendix,94-95, no. 8. 8 August,1315. Cf. ii, part ii,
668, no. 60; ii, part ii, 735-737, no. 22. In 1310, the statutewas interpretedconventionallyas an in-
strumentto preserveorder.Ibid., ii, part ii, appendix,28, no. 28. Prince, 'Armyand Navy,' pp.
355-356.
33 Prince,'Armyand Navy,' 355-364; A. M. Noyes, The MilitaryObligation in MediaevalEngland
(Columbus,1930). There are many commissionsin Parl. Writs.
34 Parl. Writs,i, 318, no. 3; 320, no. 16; 272-275,nos. 1-6; 368-369,nos. 8-10, 12; 372-373, no. 23;
40 Parl. Writs,ii, part ii, 464-466, nos. 43-45; 157, no. 22; 468-469, nos. 53-54; 473-475, nos. 3-
no. 17.
66 Parl. Writs,i, 396, no. 37; ii, part ii, 670, no. 99; 679, no. 149.
67 Stubbs, Charters, p. 480. Parl. Writs,ii, part ii, 476, no. 12; 478, nos. 14-16; 756, no. 13; 760, no.
25. In 1322,manymagnateswererequestedto reinforcetheirmen-at-armsin theirhouseholds'ultra
familiamvestramconsuetam'and to spend the winterin one of theirmanorsnear York because of
the threatofScotch invasion.Ibid., ii, part ii, 612, no. 55. Because of the Frenchthreatin 1324,the
Statute of Winchesterwas applied again to service against a foreignenemy,and requestsforlarge
contingentswere made of the towns. Ibid., ii, i, 668, no. 60; 670, no. 99; 679, no. 149. Paymentof
clericalsubsidieswas sometimesmade contingenton theactual occurrenceofthe invasion.Parl. Writs
ii, part ii, 63, no. 72. 68 E.g., Stubbs, Charters, p. 97.
69 Stubbs, Constitutional History,ia, 141. Parl. Writs,u, part ii, 513, nos. 47-48; i, 265, no. 1; 302,
no. 1; ii, part ii, 411, no. 45; i, 327, nos. 8-9, ia, part ii, 466, nos. 46-47; i, 244, no. 1. In 1297, theking
describedhis troopsas coming'Les uns par priere,les autres par somounsedu Roy.' Rymer,Foedera
i, part ii, 872. The constableand the marshalseem to have maintainedthat a requestto servedid not
obligatethemto performtheirmilitaryfunctions.
70 Parl. Writs,i, 224, no. 5; 275, no. 7.
n Supra, n. 62, and Parl. Writs,i, 224, no. 5; ia, part ii, 381, no. 1; 461, no. 32.
72 Parl. Writs,i, 896, no. 37; ia, part ii, 668, nos. 11-12.
75 Parl. Writs,i, 327, nos. 8-9; n, part ii, 476, no. 12. In 1295, the barons were remindedthat the
somelegal technicality.Parl. Writs,i, 396, no. 37; ii, part ii, 123, no. 79. Langtoft,Chronicle,ii, 268-
272; Heminburgh,Chronicle, ii, 116 ff.For lay oppositionto papal interference, see Parl. Writs,i, 20,
no. 3; 102-104, nos. 49-43.
77Stubbs, Charters, p. 480. 7 Parl. Writs,ii, part ii, 122, no. 75.
7 Parl. Writs,ii, part ii, 259, no. 78; 280, no. 63.
80 E.g., Part. Writs,ii, part ii, 281, no. 70.
81 Supra, p. 538 f. Parl. Writs,i, 326, no. 6; 370-371. nos. 14-15.
82 Parl. Writs,ii, part ii, 470-472, nos. 55, 56-59, 60-64.
83The commissions frequentlycontainedthe same prefacesas the feudaland othersummons.E.g.,
Parl. Writs,ii, part ii, 381-383, nos. 1-6.
84 Parl. Writs,ii, part ii, 667-668, nos. 60-95; 658, no. 118.
85 Orderedpublished1 March, 1322.Parl. Writs,ii, part ii, appendix,195-196,nos. 179-184. Orders