Professional Documents
Culture Documents
School: Jefferson County Public Schools Louisville, KY Grade Level: 2nd Grade
Subject Area: Science
2. Is there a timeline provided for the length of time to be spent on the unit or lessons?
a. Yes, there are time suggestions for each of the 4 cycles. Within the cycles, certain
instructional units are to be completed, however, there is not a day-by-day or week-by-
week time frame for each unit or lesson.
5. What types of assessment are going to be used and how often will student be assessed?
a. The only type of assessment suggested is summative assessment at the end of each unit.
Students are required, however, to be able to use vocabulary words in their speech and
writing. According to the schedule, students will be formally assessed at least at the end
of each quarter. The curriculum map could be interpreted to mean that students should be
assessed after each key focus topic is taught. These may be chapter tests, while the
summative tests cover all of the chapters in the unit.
8. Taking all of this into consideration, please rate the curriculum map on a scale of 1 to 5.
(1 being poor, 5 being exemplary) Provide a thorough explanation for your scoring citing the
strengths and areas of improvement. Provide specific recommendations to the areas of
improvement. This should be a minimum of two fully developed paragraphs.
Overall, I would give this curriculum map a 3. The positives of this curriculum map include
organization, clear expectations concerning standards, and cross-curricular connections. This curriculum
map was well organized. It contained a guide to reading the map at the beginning. It also color-coded the
various sections of standards that were being met. It was easy to find the information needed such as the
main topics, resources, instructional notes, standards, and assessments. The map clearly stated its
standards. It also stated them in a way that explained what the student should do by using I can
statements. Finally, the map made a point to connect what was being taught in science with literacy
standards. It is helpful for teachers to already have these connections made for them.
Some negatives of this map were that lack of resources, failure to state guiding questions, and
lack of detail concerning instruction. This map only had the bare resources that would be needed to teach
in the classroom such as the textbook and a few supplementary books. It would be helpful to have
resources for additional activities, games, tests, experiments, and books. The map did not have guiding
questions for the units, so they had to be found on the original website. It would be beneficial to have
these questions within the map so that they correspond with the varying units. The section on instruction
had a lack of detail. While it listed vocabulary words, it did not include a list of activities to go with each
lesson. Also it did not include a more specific time frame for each unit and/or concept to be taught. A
general time frame of quarters is not useful when planning out day-by-day lessons.