You are on page 1of 19

Diversity

‹ Multipath propagation

‹ Diversity principle

‹ Space diversity

‹ Polarization diversity

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Diversity / Multi Path Propagation

‹ signals especially in cities consists of the direct wave and a lot of reflections

‹ the reflections differ in amplitude, phase and polarization

‹ summarized signal level varies a lot within short distances

Rx1

Rx2

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Diversity / Principle

‹ unsymmetrical situation of downlink and uplink :


uplink (mobile) : limited power, small antenna
downlink (BTS) : high power, high antenna gain

‹ Consequence : Diversity
† the diversity concept bases on the idea to have two independent signals
available at the base station (two Rx antennas)
† considering both signals results in avoiding nulls and improving the average
signal level (diversity gain)

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Diversity / Principle

‹ Example for Combining

Diversity with two antennas Combined Signal

20
20
10
10
Sig n al L evel [d B ]

Signal level [dB]


0
0 Rx 2 1
-10
-10 1 Rx 1
-20
-20
-30
-30
-40
-40
Time
Time

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Diversity / Principle

Selection
SelectionCombining
Combining Maximal
MaximalRatio
RatioCombining
Combining

Amplitude
+ Phase
Logic
α

‹ Switching between the two ‹ Both signals are permanently


signals and selecting the added with equalized amplitudes
better one and phase regarding
‹ reachable diversity gain : maximum signal/noise ratio
3 - 4 dB ‹ reachable diversity gain :
6 - 7 dB 5

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Diversity / Space Diversity

‹ space diversity uses two vertical polarized Rx


antennas (Rxa and Rxb) with a horizontal
spacing of 12-15 λ

‹ Omni base station


- 3 omni antennas
- Tx antenna on a higher level
> to achieve an ideal omni pattern
3m
> to reach the required isolation
between Rx and Tx (>30 dB) 3m

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Diversity / Space Diversity

‹ Sector base station


- 3 directional antennas per
sector
- all antennas at the same
level due to better isolation
compared to omnis

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Diversity / Space Diversity

‹ good diversity performance,


but big spacing required Without Duplexer
‹ expensive support structures
‹ duplexers reduces the number
of antennas but not the
applied spacing
‹ raising problems to receive
permissions from the land
lords to install antenna
systems

With Duplexer

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Diversity / H/V Polarization Diversity

‹ polarization diversity uses two antennas Without Duplexer


of orthogonal polarization
‹ horizontal and vertical radiating
elements are combined in a common
radome
‹ interlocked dipoles, same size of a
single antenna

Disadvantages :
‹ good diversity performance only in cities
‹ horizontal polarization cannot be used
for Tx

With Duplexer

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Diversity / X Polarization Diversity

‹ instead of horizontal and vertical Without Duplexer


polarization the dipoles are slanted
+/- 45°
‹ identical situation for both
terminations
‹ equivalent diversity results
compared to space diversity either in
cities or in rural areas
‹ both terminations are suitable for Rx
and Tx

‹ Xpol is the technology for future


systems !!
With Duplexer
10

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Diversity / X Polarization Diversity

‹ instead of 9 resp. 6 antennas per base


station, only 3 Xpol antennas are
required
‹ extremely reduced size
‹ due to exellent isolation (> 30 dB for any
possible port combination), mounting on
a single pole mast with minimum
spacing
‹ specific 3-panel brackets available

11

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Xpol Design

‹ antenna construction

‹ polarization orthogonality

‹ cross polar ratio

‹ diversity performance

12

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Xpol Design / Construction

‹ 100% symmetrical 65° half power beam width 90°


construction

‹ 90° beam width


rotating the single dipole +/-
45° ⇒ X shape

‹ 65° beam width


rotating the pair of dipole +/-
45° ⇒ rhomb shape

739 622 13

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Xpol Design / Voltage Simulation

‹ 3D-simulation of an original
65° dipole for 800/900 MHz

Voltage (e-plane)

14

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Xpol Design / Orthogonality

‹ uncorrelation of the two


signals is achieved by
orthogonal polarizations
(90° angle in between)
‹ slanted polarization can
be separated into a
vertical and a horizontal
component
‹ equal amplitudes of V and
H results in a polarization
angle of 45° and
consequently in
orthogonal polarization
‹ measurements in the far
field

15

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Xpol Design / Orthogonality

‹ Orthogonality is indicated by identical vertical and horizontal components of the


slanted polarization

16

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Xpol Design / Cross Polar Ratio

‹ Ratio between the co-polar and the cross-polar signal (opposite compared to
identical polarization)
‹ Measure for the uncorrelation between two signals

CPR

17

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Xpol Design / Cross Polar Ratio

‹ CPR is important not only in main direction but within the whole sector
‹ recommended values : main direction > 20 dB / sector +/-60° > 10 dB
‹ Kathrein antennas provide much better values !

18

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01
Xpol Design / Diversity Performance

‹ Equal
vertical and
horizontal components

⇒ orthogonal polarizations

⇒ high cross polar ratio

⇒ excellent diversity performance

19

©Kathrein/Scholz 12/01

You might also like