DAMODARAM SANJIVAYYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

5th Intra Moot Court Competition, 2017

Clarifications

1. Who is Sir Gregor Clegane?

2. What is the relationship between Sandor Clegane and Theon Greyjoy?
3. What is the relationship between Sandor Clegane and Gregor Clegane?
4. What are the professions of Sandor Clegane and Gregor Clegane?
5. On what grounds was Gregor Clegane convicted?
6. Do the aborgines come under the definition of Scheduled Tribes under Article 342 of
the Constitution of India?
7. What is the meaning of real interest stated in Para 6?
8. What was the procedure for business of Little Birdies? Did they buy land from the
aborgines and then sell it to their client, or did they act as a broker in the case of sale of
land from the aborgines to other prospective buyers?
9. Whether it should be Section 302 read with Section 34 instead of Section 302 read with
Section 32 in Para 12?
10. Whether CCTV cameras were installed on the roads, as Para 8 explains the incident as
if someone had witnessed it whereas Para 14 states that there was no eye witnesses.
11. Whether Mr. Varys intentionally facilitated the sale of property from Mr. Theon
Greyjoy to a customer or he himself bought the property from Mr. Varys?

Response to Clarifications

Question No. 1 to 4:
Answer: Mr. Sandor Clegane and Mr. Gregor Clegane are brothers by blood and very
infamous guns-for-hire of their country. They have been accused of several hired killings in
the past but have never been convicted prior to the present matter.
With respect to their relationship with Mr. Theon, the information provided in the factual
matrix is enough in itself.

Question No. 5:
Answer: The information provided in the factual matrix is enough in itself.

Question No. 6:
Answer: No, the aborigines do not fall under the purview of Article 342 of the Constitution
of Westeros.

Page 1 of 2
DAMODARAM SANJIVAYYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

5th Intra Moot Court Competition, 2017

Question No. 7:
Answer: The question is self-explanatory and does not warrant any explanation.

Question No. 8:
Answer: Little Birdies Pvt. Ltd. used to pay the whole of the price of the property to the
seller but never executed any sale deed. They then used to negotiate with the prospective
buyer and a sale deed was only executed between the buyer and the seller. However, rather
than taking any brokerage, they used to decide the selling price and enjoy the difference as
profit.

Question No. 9:
Answer: There is a typographical mistake. It should be Section 302 read with Section 34.

Question No. 10:

Answer: The incident took place in broad daylight but there were no eye-witnesses that came
forward in the Trial Court.

Question No. 11:

Answer: Kindly refer to the answer of Question No. 8.

Page 2 of 2