INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL

International Journal of Mechanical OF MECHANICAL

Engineering ENGINEERING
and Technology AND
(IJMET), ISSN 0976
TECHNOLOGY
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) (IJMET)
Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME

ISSN 0976 6340 (Print)

ISSN 0976 6359 (Online)
IJMET
Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), pp. 387-396
IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijmet.html IAEME
Journal Impact Factor (2012): 3.8071 (Calculated by GISI)
www.jifactor.com

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF SOLAR AIR HEATER

USING POROUS MEDIUM

Ajay Kumar Kapardar *; Dr. R. P. Sharma **

* Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, India
E-mail: ajaykapardar@gmail.com
**Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, India
E-mail: rpsbit123@gmail.com

ABSTRACT
The experimental study of single pass solar air heater with different porous media has been
conducted. The experiments were conducted by changing the parameter that influences the
thermal efficiency of the collector. The efficiency of solar air heater has been examined by
changing the mass flow rate and using different types of porous media. Porous media
provided large area for the heat transfer and therefore have high heat transfer co-efficient.
Their use as absorbers enhances heat transfer from the absorber to the air stream. In the
present study it has been found that efficiency of solar air heater using steel wool as a
porous medium is higher than glass wool (porous media) as well as conventional air heater
also.
Key word: Porous medium, solar air heater, thermal efficiency, mass flow rate

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Solar energy collector is a special type of heat exchanger that transforms solar radiation
energy into internal energy of the transport medium. The simplest method to utilize solar
energy for heating applications is to convert it into thermal energy by using solar
collectors. Basically, there are two types of flat-plate solar heating collectors; water
heating collectors and air heating collectors. The pace of development of air heating
collector is slow compared to water heating collector mainly due to lower thermal
efficiency. Solar air heaters are considered to be compact and less complicated as
compared to solar water heaters. These are also free from corrosion and freezing problems.
Solar air heater can be fabricated using cheaper as well as lesser amount of material and is
simpler to use than solar water heater. Solar air collectors are widely used for low
moderate temperature applications like space heating, crop drying, timber seasoning and
other industrial applications. Conventional solar air collectors have poor thermal efficiency
principally due to high heat loses and low convective heat transfer coefficient between the
absorber plate and flowing air stream. Many researches have attempted to improve the

387
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME

thermal performance of conventional solar air collectors by employing various design and
flow arrangements.
Wao etal.[1] used the sine wave absorber in place of plane absorber plate and numerically
studied the natural convection inside the channel between cover and the sine wave
absorber by single pass flat plate solar air collector. Garg etal.[2]used an absorber with fin
attached in order to improve the thermal performance of single pass solar air collector.
Yeh[3] studied the effect of parallel barriers on the collector efficiency of single pass flat
plate solar collector. Sodha etal.[4] presented the performance of solar air heater with
matrix. Ahmad etal.[5] investigate the effect of absorber matrix, mass flow rates and solar
energy flux on a packed bed single pass solar air collector. Metwally etal.[6]
experimentally investigate the thermal performance of corrugated duct solar air collector.
Dhiman and Tiwari [7] studied performance of a two channel suspended flat-plate solar air
heater. Sahu and Bhugoria [8] reported the augmentation of heat transfer coefficient by
using transverse ribs on absorber plate of solar air collector. Karwa etal.[9] presented the
performance of solar air heaters having integral chamfered rib roughness on absorber plate.
Mohamad [10] analyzed the performance of counter flow solar air heater with a porous
matrix. Naphon etal.[11] applied the mathematical models for predicting heat transfer
characteristics and performance of various configuration of flat-plate solar air collector.
The thermal performance of a packed bed double pass solar air heater was presented by
Ramadan etal. [12]. Sopain.K. [13] carried out the simulation study and the thermal
performance of double pass solar heater with and without porous media. The use of porous
packing material for improving the performance of solar air collector has been proposed by
many investigators including Kolb etal. [14]. Varshney and Saini [15] & Thakur etal. [16]
investigated this kind of arrangement for single pass solar collectors. Paisarn Niphan [17]
has presented the mathematical model for predicting the heat transfer characteristics, the
performance, and heat generation of double-pass solar air heater with longitudinal fins. It
was found that the thermal efficiency increases with increasing the height and number of
fins. Ramani etal. [18] has developed a mathematical model for predicting the thermal
performance of a double pass solar air collector with porous media and reveals that thermal
efficiency of double pass solar collector with porous media is 20-25% higher.

2.0 POROUS MEDIA

A porous medium (or a porous material) is a material containing pores (voids). The
skeletal portion of the material is often called the "matrix" or "frame". The pores are
typically filled with a fluid (liquid or gas). The skeletal material is usually a solid, but
structures like foams are often also usefully analyzed using concept of porous media. A
porous medium is most often characterized by its porosity. Other properties of the medium
(e.g., permeability, tensile strength, electrical conductivity) can sometimes be derived from
the respective properties of its constituents (solid matrix and fluid) and the media porosity
and pores structure, but such a derivation is usually complex. Even the concept of porosity
is only straightforward for a poro-elastic medium. Often both the solid matrix and the pore
network (also known as the pore space) are continuous, so as to form two interpenetrating
continua such as in a sponge. However, there is also a concept of closed porosity and
effective porosity, i.e., the pore space accessible to flow.
The concept of porous media is used in many areas of applied science and engineering:
filtration, mechanics (acoustics, geomechanics, soil mechanics, rock mechanics),
engineering (petroleum engineering, bio-remediation, construction engineering),

388
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME

geosciences (hydrogeology, petroleum geology, geophysics), biology and biophysics,

material science, etc. Fluid flow through porous media is a subject of most common
interest and has emerged a separate field of study. The study of more general behaviour of
porous media involving deformation of the solid frame is called poromechanics.

3.0 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

The experimental setup is shown in figure.1 for the estimation of mass flow rate and
efficiency of the flat plate air heater under varying conditions.

Solar air heater

Thermometer

Manometer

Figure1: Working model of the flat plate single pass solar air heater.
The frame of the solar collector was cuboidal in shape and made of plywood of 10mm
thickness. The internal dimension was 1m0.5m0.15m. The top surface of the collector
was left open for glass cover. Aluminium channels were nailed onto the top of the frame to
secure the glass cover. The inlet was a 10 cm hole drilled on the side surface near the
bottom. For the outlet section 3 holes each of 1 inch diameter were drilled on the adjacent
surface near top. Angle of the stand was set at angle of 28.A glazed glass sheet measuring
1.02m x 0.52m x 5mm was used as the single glass cover for the apparatus. The
characteristics of the glass were: Reflectivity 0.1, Transmittivity 0.88. A thermocol sheet
measuring 0.9m x 0.5m x 2.5cm was secured to the bottom surface of the wooden frame by
nails and glue. It was used to minimize heat loss from the absorber to the surroundings.
Multiple aluminium sheets were used to cover the entire floor area of the collector. To
increase absorptivity of heat the aluminium sheets were painted black.3 pipes of diameter 1
inch were attached to the outlet holes in the collector frame. The three parallel pipes fed a
larger outlet pipe of 1.5 inch diameter through T joint couplers. The outlet section was
insulated with foam wherever possible to minimize or eliminate heat exchange with the
surroundings. To measure the different flow rates achieved while conducting the
experiment, an orifice section from an existing pipe (from scrap) was sawed off and
attached to the end of the outlet section via a 1.5 x 1 reducer. The orifice was of 8mm
diameter and the pipe diameter was of 1. There were two holes on either side of the
orifice which were attached to a U-tube manometer for flow measurement. The outlet from
the orifice led directly to the DC fan creating an induced draught. Glass wool and steel
wool were used as porous medium for experiment.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME

Glass Wool
Glass wool (UK) or fiberglass insulation (US) is an insulating material made from
fiberglass, arranged into a texture similar to wool. Glass wool is produced in rolls or in
slabs, with different thermal and mechanical properties.

Steel wool
Steel wool, also known as wire wool, is a bundle of strands of very fine soft steel
filaments, used in finishing and repairing work to polish wood or metal objects, for
cleaning household cookware and light painting. Steel wool is made from low-carbon steel
(low enough to be close to plain iron).
U-tube manometer was used to measure the differential pressure between two sections in
terms of difference of height of liquid column in both limbs of the manometer. In this case
the two different limbs were connected to either side of the orifice for flow measurement.
The liquid used was coloured water (blue). The manometer also had a graduated scale
(1mm Least Count) for measuring the difference in liquid levels.

Q = CAc
2g(P P )

Where C = 
( )


Where:

Q = volumetric flow rate (at any cross section)

Cd = coefficient of discharge

C = orifice flow coefficient

d1= diameter of the pipe, m

P1 = fluid upstream pressure

P2 = fluid downstream pressure

= fluid density

Following are the experimental graphs, which are plotted after calculation.

390
 International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME

EXPERIMENTAL DATA FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THE FLAT PLATE AIR

HEATER UNDER VARYING CONDITIONS
WITHOUT POROUS MEDIA (15TH MARCH)

Performance of Solar Collector without porous media on Thursday (15th Mar. 2012)

Mass flow rate

Solar Radiation
of

T (Outlet -

p (in mm of

Density (kg/cu.

Volume flow
Ambient) (deg

rate (litr./min.)
Time (11:15
a.m. - 01:15

Temperature

Temperature
I (W/sq. m)
p.m.)

Efficiency
(in kg/hr.)

(percent)
Intensity

Ambient

(deg. C)

(deg C)

Metre)
Outlet

H2O)
C)
12:06
970 27 55 28 1.5 1.062293 16.56 1.055494 1.69266
p.m.
12:14
962 27 56.5 29.5 1.5 1.057457 16.62 1.054496 1.796468
p.m.
12:36
955 29 54.5 25.5 2.5 1.063915 21.36 1.363513 2.022663
p.m.
12:48
951 29.5 55 25.5 2.5 1.062293 21.42 1.365259 2.033771
p.m.
01:00
935 30 54.5 24.5 2.5 1.063915 21.36 1.363513 1.984912
p.m.
01:05
930 30.5 54 23.5 3 1.065541 23.4 1.49602 2.100148
p.m.
01:15
900 31 54 23 3.5 1.065541 25.26 1.614935 2.292808
p.m.

Mass Flow Rate vs. Temp.

40
Mass Flow Rate vs. Efficiency difference
Mass
Temp. difference

Mass Flow Rate vs. Efficiency 30 Flow

Rate
E Poly. (Mass Flow Rate vs. Efficiency) vs.
20
f 2.5 Temp.
f differe
2 10
i nce
c 1.5
e 1 0
n 0.5 0 1 2
c 0 Mass Flow Rate
y
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Mass Flow rate
Fig. 2

391
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME

WITH STEEL WOOL AS POROUS MEDIA (20TH MARCH)

PACKING DENSITY 400 GRAMS IN 0.075 CUBIC METER OF
COLLECTOR SPACE
Performance of Solar Collector with steel as porous media (20th Mar. 2012)

Solar Radiation I

Ambient Temp.

Density (kg/cu.

Mass flow rate

Ambient) (deg

Vol. flow rate

Outlet Temp.

T (Outlet
a.m. 01:40
Time (11:10

m)(average)
p (in mm of
Intensity of

(litr./min.)

Efficiency
(W/sq. m)

(in kg/hr.)

(percent)
(deg. C)

(deg C)

H2O)
p.m.)

C)
11:10
965 25 69 44 1.5 1.018807 16.92 1.03429 2.619970
a.m.
11:30
968 25 68 43 1.5 1.021795 16.92 1.03732 2.559976
a.m.
11:45
962 26 66.5 40.5 2 1.026309 19.57 1.20509 2.818563
a.m.
12:05
973 27 66 39 2.5 1.027823 20.46 1.26175 2.809665
p.m.
12:20
970 28 64.5 36.5 3 1.032391 22.44 1.39001 2.905808
p.m.
12:40
969 28 64 36 3.5 1.033923 24.3 1.50746 3.111372
p.m.
01:00
965 29 63 34 4 1.037 26.1 1.62394 3.178701
p.m.

Mass Flow Rate vs. Mass Flow Rate vs. Temp. difference
50
Efficiency
Temp. difference

3.5 40
E Mass Flow
3 Rate vs. Temp.
f 30
f 2.5 Mass difference
i 2 Flow 20
c 1.5 Rate vs. Poly. (Mass
10
e 1 Efficien Flow Rate vs.
n cy Temp.
0.5 0
c difference)
0 1 2
y 0
0 1 2 Mass Flow Rate
Mass Flow rate
Fig. 3

392
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME

WITH GLASS WOOL AS POROUS MEDIA (26 MARCH)

PACKING DENSITY 578 GRAMS IN 0.075 CUBIC METER OF COLLECTOR
SPACE

Performance of Solar Collector with glass wool porous media (26th Mar. 2012)

Outlet Temp. (deg

Mass flow rate (in

p (in mm of H2O)
Ambient) (deg C)
Time (10.00 a.m.

Solar Radiation I
Avg.Intensity of

Ambient Temp.

Density (kg/cu.

Vol. flow rate

12.00 p.m.)

T (Outlet

m)(average)

(litr./min.)

Efficiency
(W/sq. m)

(percent)
(deg. C)

kg/hr.)
C)
10.30
960 28 60 32 1.5 1.046343 16.92 1.062247 1.967123
am
10.45
960 27.5 59.5 32 1.5 1.047916 16.92 1.063844 1.970082
am
11.00
960 28.5 60 31.5 2 1.046343 19.57 1.228615 2.239663
am
11.15
960 28.5 59 30.5 2.5 1.049494 20.46 1.288359 2.274013
am
11.30
960 28.5 59.5 31 3 1.047916 22.44 1.410914 2.531153
am
11.45
960 29 59 30 3.5 1.049494 24.3 1.530162 2.656532
am
12.00
960 29 58.5 29.5 4 1.051077 26.1 1.645987 2.809988
pm

Mass Flow Rate vs. Efficiency Mass Flow Rate vs. Temp.
50
difference

40
Temp. difference

E3.5
f 3 30 Mass
f2.5 Mass Flow Flow Rate
i 2 Rate vs. 20 vs. Temp.
c Efficiency
1.5 differenc
e 10
e
n 1
c0.5 0
y 0 0 1 2
0 1 2 Mass Flow Rate
Mass Flow rate

Fig.4

393
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The useful gain by the solar collector to solar radiation with measured values of
fluid inlet (Ti) and outlet temperature (To) and the fluid mass flow rate (m) is given
as follows
Qu = mCP (To- Ti)
Where CP is the specific heat of the fluid. The density of the outlet air which was
varying with the outlet temperature and ranged from 1-1.1kg/m3 was assumed
constant at 1.05 kg/m3.
The efficiency of the collector is given by

=


where Ac is the area of the collector, S is the solar radiation incident on the
collector.
The air was heated up relatively quickly with time. However the maximum
temperature achieved was 55-56oC. The heat retentiveness of the collector was
relatively poor as compared to the collector having porous media. Inconsistencies
and undulations in the curves of mass flow rate vs temperature differences occurred
due to the low mass flow rate obtained. However it was generally observed that the
efficiency increased with the increasing mass flow of air and the temperature
difference between inlet and outlet was inversely proportional to the mass flow rate
although the nature of the curve was not determined over the small range of mass
flow. The methods of conducting the experiment for both porous and non-porous
media were almost same. The outlet temperatures obtained for steel wool as heat
transfer media were higher (max 690C) than those for glass wool (max 620C). The
efficiency curves were also of a similar nature.
However, the heat retentivity of the collector with glass wool was observed to be
better than the corresponding characteristic for steel wool although comparative
tables for similar times of exposure without sunlight are not tabulated. It means that
when the collector is used at night, utilizing the stored solar energy, the collector
having glass wool would supply warmer air for longer time than steel wool or
without porous media.
The comparative graphs for the performances of the 3 designs are as shown:
From fig.5 efficiency of the collector is strongly dependent on mass flow rate. The
collector efficiencies increase with flow rate. Efficiency increase is about 39.29% at
mass flow rate of (0.9-1.6) kg/hr when steel wool was used as porous media where
efficiency increased by 32.25 at same conditions when glass wool was used with
respect to the conventional solar air collector.

394
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME

From fig.6 by using porous media that is steel wool highest temperature was noted
i.e 690C when steel wool was used as porous media as compared to 620C when
glass wool was used.

Fig. 5

Fig. 6
CONCLUSION

Performances curves of single pass solar air collector with steel wool and glass wool was
used as porous media and conventional solar air collector have been obtained. These
include the effects of mass flow rate and solar radiation on efficiency of solar collector.
The efficiency of the collector is strongly dependent on the flow rate. It increases with flow
rate. The solar collector with porous media as steel wool has efficiency about 26% more
than the conventional one whereas it is about 10% more when glass wool is used.

REFERENCES

1. Wao, Wenfeng et. al., (2000), Numerical study on natural convection inside the
channel between the flat-plate cover and sine-wave absorber of a cross-corrugated solar air
heater. Energy Conversion and Management 41, pp.145151.
2. Garg, H.P. et al., (1989), Performance studies on finned air heater. Energy14 (2),
pp.8792.

395
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976
6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6359(Online) Volume 3, Issue 2, May-August (2012), IAEME

3. Yeh, H.M., (2000), Effect of collector aspect ratio on the collector efficiency of
upward type baffled solar air heater. Energy Conversion and Management 41, pp.971
981.
4. Sodha, M.S., Bansal, N.K., Singh, D., (1982). Analysis of a non porous double-
flow solar air heater. Applied Energy 12 (4), pp.251258.
5. Ahmad A., Saini J.S., Solanki S.C., (1995). Studies on the performance of packed
bed solar air heaters. Ph. D. Thesis, department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering,
IIT Roorkee.
6. Metwally et al., (1997). Performance of advanced corrugated-duct solar air
collector compared with five conventional designs. Renewable Energy 10 (4), pp.519
537.
7. Dhiman, N.K., Tiwari, G.N., (1984). Performance of a two channel suspended flat
plate solar air heater. Energy Conversion and Management 24 (4), pp.269274.
8. Sahu, M.M., Bhagoria, J.L., (2005). Augmentation of heat transfer coefficient by
90 broken transverse ribs on absorber plate of solar air collector. Renewable Energy 30,
pp.20572073.
9. Karwa et al., (2001). Thermo-hydraulic performance of solar air heaters having
integral chamfered ribs roughness on absorber plate. Energy 26, pp.161176.
10. Mohamad, A.A., (1997). High efficiency solar air heater. Solar Energy 60 (2),
pp.7176.
11. Naphon, P.etal, (2003). Theoretical study on heat transfer characteristics and
performance of the flat-plate solar air heaters. International Communications in Heat and
Mass Transfer 30 (8), pp.11251136.
12. Ramadan, M.R.I. et al., (2007).Thermal performance of a packed bed double pass
solar air heater. Energy 32, pp.15241535.
13. Sopain, K., (2000). Performance of a double pass photovoltaic thermal solar
collector suitable for solar drying systems. Energy Conversion and Management 41,
pp.353365.
14. Kolb, A. et al, (1999). Experimental studies on solar air collector with metal
matrix absorber. Solar Energy 65 (2), pp.9198.
15. Varshney, L. et al, (1998). Heat transfer and friction factor correlations for
rectangular solar air heater duct packed with wire mesh screen matrices. Solar Energy 62
(4), pp. 255262.
16. Thakur, N.S. et al., (2003). Heat transfer and friction factor correlations for packed
bed solar air heater for a low porosity system. Solar Energy 74, pp.319329.
17. Naphon.P., (2004). On the performance and entropy generation of the double-pass
solar air heater with longitudinal fins. Renewable Energy 30 (2005) pp.13451357.
18. Ramani.B.M. et al., (2010). Performance of a double pass solar air collector.
Solar Energy 84 (2010) pp.1929-1937

396