You are on page 1of 2

Ace Santiago:

ARTICLE 1793 - Obligation of partner who receives share of partnership credit

Distinction between Article 1793 and 1792:

Article 1793 Article 1792

Applies to any partner applies to managing partner
(manger or not) only

refers to two credits: credit in

refers only to credit in favor
favor of the partnership and in
of partnership
favor of the managing partner

A partner is obliged to bring to the partnership capital what he has received even though he may have
given receipt for his share only when,

1. A partner has received in whole or in part, his share of the partnership credit

2. The other partners have not collected their shares

3. The partnership debtor has become insolvent

Collection during the existence of partnership the rule applies because the fiduciary relationship
still exist
Collection after the dissolution of the partnership:

Case: Pang Lim and Benito Galvez Vs. Lo Seng


Lo Seng and Pang Lim were partners under the name of Lo Seng and Co. running a distillery in the Province
of Bulacan. The land on which the distillery is located as well as the buildings and improvements is the
property of Lo Yao who resides in Hongkong.

Pang Lim sold all his interest in the distillery to his partner Lo Seng, thus placing the latter in the position
of sole owner, after which Lo Yao executed and acknowledged before a notary public a deed purporting to
convey to Pang Lim and Benito Galvez, the entire distillery plant including the land.

Thereafter Pang Lim and Benito Galvez demanded possession from Lo Seng by filing an action of unlawful
detainer, but the latter refused to yield.


Whether or not Pang Lim and Benito Galvez, considering prior partnership of Pang Lim and Lo Seng, can
deprive Lo Seng of the lease.


No. The Supreme Court held that the bad faith of the plaintiffs in seeking to deprive the defendant of this
lease is strikingly revealed in the circumstance that prior to the acquisition of this property Pang Lim
had been partner with Lo Seng and Benito Galvez an employee. Both therefore had been in relations
of confidence with Lo Seng and in that position had acquired knowledge of the possibilities of the
property and possibly an experience which would have enabled them, in case they had acquired
possession, to exploit the distillery with profit. On account of his status as partner in the firm of Lo Seng
and Co., Pang Lim knew that the original lease had been extended for fifteen years; and he knew the
extent of valuable improvements that had been made thereon.

1 of 2
Above all other persons in business relations, partners are required to exhibit towards each other the
highest degree of good faith. In fact the relation between partners is essentially fiduciary, each being
considered in law, as he is in fact, the confidential agent of the other. It is therefore accepted as
fundamental in equity jurisprudence that one partner cannot, to the detriment of another, apply
exclusively to his own benefit the results of the knowledge and information gained in the character of

- We may infer from the case that although the partnership was dissolved, a partner
cannot detriment his former partner by gaining benefit from the dissolved partnership.

2 of 2