You are on page 1of 23

Community and International Nutrition

Maternal Perception of the Onset of Lactation Is a Valid, Public Health


Indicator of Lactogenesis Stage II1
2 3
Donna J. Chapman and Rafael Perez-Escamilla
Department of Nutritional Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269

ABSTRACT Test weighing is the gold standard for documenting lactogenesis stage II. However, this method is
impractical for use in population studies. Maternal perception of the timing of the onset of lactation may be a useful
proxy for lactogenesis stage II. This study seeks to validate maternal perception of the onset of lactation as a
marker of lactogenesis stage II. Women (n 5 60) were recruited after cesarean delivery. Beginning at 24 h
postpartum (pp), the onset of lactation was assessed 3 times daily by both test weighing and maternal perception.
Delayed onset of lactation was dened as follows: 1) milk transfer , 9.2 g/feeding at 60 h pp and 2) maternal
perception _ 72 h pp. Misclassication analyses were conducted. Multivariate logistic regression, bivariate
analyses and Cox survival analyses were used to evaluate the determinants and consequences of delayed onset of
lactation, using both denitions. The sensitivity and specicity of delayed maternal perception as an indicator of
delayed lactogenesis were 71.4 and 79.3%, respectively. Four risk factors for low milk transfer were signicant (P ,
0.05) or nearly signicant (P _ 0.08) predictors of delayed perception of the onset of lactation. The effects of low
milk transfer and delayed maternal perception on breast-feeding duration were similarly modied by intended
breast-feeding duration. The magnitude and directionality of the _ coefcients for the milk transfer and perception
variables were consistent. On the basis of these results, we conclude that maternal perception of the onset of
lactation is a valid public health indicator of lactogenesis stage II. J. Nutr. 130: 29722980, 2000.
KEY WORDS: c breast-feeding c lactogenesis stage II c test weighing c cesarean delivery c lactation jn.nutrition

The measurement of milk transfer by test weighing is con-


sidered to be the gold standard for documenting lactogenesis more than adequate (Chen et al. 1998, Hartmann et al. 1996). .org
stage II (i.e., the initiation of copious secretion of breast milk Maternal perception is admittedly subjective, however, and by
after delivery) (Daly and Hartmann 1995). Unfortunately, test has not been established as a valid marker of lactogenesis
weighing is costly, invasive and impractical to use in popula-tion
studies. Biochemical indices of lactogenesis stage II have been
stage II.
Few researchers have investigated the onset of lactation by
developed (Arthur et al. 1989, Kulski and Hartmann 1981,
Neubauer et al. 1993, Neville 1995). However, these methods collecting data on both maternal perception and milk transfer.
require milk sampling and laboratory analyses, ren-dering them Arthur et al. (1989) studied indicators of lactogenesis inFebruary
impractical for routine clinical assessment or use in large-scale Australian women after vaginal delivery and observed signif-
studies. Reliable, inexpensive and noninvasive alternatives to test icant increases in milk transfer between 24 and 48 h postpar-3,
weighing or biochemical analyses have not been developed. From tum (pp), signaling lactogenesis stage II. These changes in milk
a public health perspective, maternal perception of the timing of transfer coincided with increases in breast milk lactose2017 and
the onset of lactation may be a useful proxy for lactogenesis stage citrate concentrations. The biochemical and milk transfer
II because it describes when women actually feel their breast milk indicators of lactogenesis preceded maternal report that milk
came in. The symp-toms commonly reported to conrm the had come in by at least 11 h. Because maternal perception of
onset of lactation (Chapman and Perez-Escamilla 1999b) (i.e., the onset of lactation occurred later than the phenomenon was
breast fullness, engorgement, leaking) are consistent with the documented by test weighing, Arthur and colleagues con-cluded
physiology of lactogenesis stage II and may indicate a milk that maternal perception of milk arrival is not a viable marker
supply that is of lactogenesis stage II.
We postulate, however, that although women perceive the
onset of lactation later than its occurrence is indicated by
1 Funded by the University of Connecticut Research Foundation, the Con- biochemical or test weighing analyses, this may be a systematic
necticut Family Nutrition Program for Infants, Toddlers and Children and Hartford
Hospital Research Administration. We are grateful to Medela, Incorporated for in phenomenon. Thus, maternal perception may be a useful indicator
kind support. This article is scientic contribution number 1978, Storrs Agricul- of lactogenesis stage II. Maternal perception cannot be used with
tural Experiment Station, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. to the minute accuracy, but it can be used to differentiate women
E-mail: djc@discovernet. net
3
who perceive the onset of lactation to be early (i.e., ,72 h pp) vs.
To whom reprint requests should be addressed. late (i.e., _72 h pp). We hypothe-sized that perception of the onset
E-mail: rperez@canr.cag. uconn.edu.
of lactation (early vs. late) is likely to correspond with the level of
milk transfer (high vs.
0022-3166/00 $3.00 2000 American Society for Nutritional Sciences.
Manuscript received 6 June 2000. Initial review completed 26 July 2000. Revision accepted 6 September 2000.

2972
MATERNAL PERCEPTION OF LACTOGENESIS STAGE II 2973

TABLE 1

Charact
eristics
low). Thus, maternal perception may be used as a valid indi- (Lactina Select, Double Pumping Kit, Medela, McHenry, IL) for 10
cator to examine the determinants and infant feeding conse- 15 min, three times daily after breast-feeding. Using this same time
quences of the timing of lactogenesis. frame, those in the control group held the breast shields of the electric
pump to their breasts, but did not turn on the pump. The onset of
The objective of this study is to substantiate the use of lactation was assessed three times daily by test weighing and
maternal perception of the onset of lactation as a marker of maternal perception. In this analysis, the determinants and conse-
lactogenesis stage II. Specically, this study compares the quences of delayed onset of lactation, as dened by these two indi-
determinants and consequences of delayed onset of lactation cators, are evaluated.
after cesarean delivery, as measured by both test weighing and
maternal perception.
Test weighing
SUBJECTS AND METHODS Procedure. Beginning at ;24 h pp, infants were weighed before and
after three breast-feeding sessions per day to determine milk
Subjects transfer/feeding. The times of these feedings were 0842 6 0102, 1321 6
Healthy breast-feeding women (n 5 60) who gave birth by cesar- 0155 and 1846 6 0102 h. Test weights were obtained in triplicate by
ean delivery at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT were recruited to research staff using an electronic integrated scale tted with an infant
participate in this study between June 1997 and November 1998 as seat and a recording printer (model BP34; Sartorius, Goettin-gen,
described previously (Chapman 1999). Subjects were primarily re- Germany). The manufacturer's stated accuracy for the scale is 60.05 g.
cruited 8 to 24 h after delivery of a healthy singleton; however, three Each printed weight was the average of 20 consecutive measurements.
were recruited prenatally. Final analyses include 57 women because Women were not provided with the results of the test weighing.
two subjects were dropped due to ineffective infant suckling and one Insensible water loss was measured over one 15-min period. Test
was dropped due to poor compliance with study protocol. Baseline weighing continued until the onset of lactation was veried by both test
data were collected on nonparticipants. Between-group baseline char- weights (i.e., sharp increase in milk transfer curve, typically
acteristics (participants vs. nonparticipants) were compared using associated with milk transfer _ 15 g/feeding) and maternal percep-
Student's t test and _2 analyses. Subjects were primarily Caucasian, tion of the onset of lactation.
married and ;31 y old, with some college education. Overall, sub- If subjects were discharged from the hospital before the onset of
jects had baseline characteristics similar to the 111 women who lactation, test weights were obtained by the subject at home, as
declined to participate in the study (Table 1). The only signicant described previously (Dewey et al. 1991, Ferris et al. 1993, Neville et
difference between participants and nonparticipants was that partic- al. 1988, Neubauer et al. 1993). Research staff delivered the same from
ipants intended to breast-feed for 1.5 mo longer than those who model of electronic balance to the subject's home on the date of
declined. This study was approved by the Institutional Review
Boards at the University of Connecticut and Hartford Hospital,
Hartford, CT. quired to demonstrate their ability to use the balance before collect-
discharge. The subject and interested family members received verbal jn.
Study design and written instructions on test weighing procedures and were re-nutrition
Data used in this methodologic evaluation of the perceived onset of ing data. Subjects were requested to weigh their newborns before and .
lactation were obtained from a randomized clinical trial, designed to evaluate after three feeding sessions per day until advised to stop by research org
the effect of breast pumping on the onset of lactation (Chapman 1999). In that staff. Researchers were available by pager and remained in telephone
study, 57 subjects were randomly assigned to either a breast pumping group or contact with the subjects to ensure compliance with the test weighing
a control group. Beginning at 24 h pp, subjects in the pumping group used a protocol.
double electric breast pump Milk transfer curves. Milk transfer data were adjusted for insen-
sible water loss, which was measured individually. For the 12 infants

with missing data for insensible water loss, the mean [1.29 g/(kg z h)]
was used. Milk transfer was then plotted over time to generate
1
n Participants n Nonparticipants P
2
Maternal age, y 60 31.3 6 4.3 111 31.7 6 4.5 0.52
Maternal education level, y 60 15.2 6 2.0 97 15.3 6 2.2 0.73
Primiparous, % 60 42.1 112 44.6 0.48
Ethnicity, %
African American 7 11.7 8 8.5 0.34
Caucasian 44 73.3 80 85.1
Hispanic 4 6.7 5 5.3
Asian 2 3.3 1 1.1
Other 3 4.1 0 0
3
Intended BF duration, mo 60 7.3 6 4.0 82 5.8 6 3.2 0.02
Scheduled deliveries, % 60 56.7 111 62.2 0.48
Anesthesia type
Epidural, % 23 38.3 40 36.4 0.80
Spinal, % 37 61.7 70 63.6
Infant sex, % male 60 56.7 81 55.6 0.90
1-min Apgar score 60 8.1 6 1.1 111 8.3 6 0.9 0.41
5-min Apgar score 60 9.0 6 0.3 111 9.0 6 0.3 0.81
Infant birth weight, kg 60 3.6 6 0.4 111 3.6 6 0.5 0.27
Gestational age, wk 60 39.4 6 1.0 108 39.6 6 1.0 0.13
1 Nonparticipants (n) vary due to missing data.
2 Values are means 6 SD.
3 Breast-feeding.
2974 CHAPMAN AND PEREZ-ESCAMILLA
delayed onset of immediate post-partum period,
individual milk transfer lactation the assessment of maternal delivery is challenging. Our
obesity at the time of approach was to assess three
curves. These curves were
Multivariate logistic indicators of maternal obesity.
tted to the quadratic equation
regression analyses were used Women were classied as
to generate predicted milk
to identify the independent obese if at least two of these
transfer curves for each
effects of the determinants of three indicators were positive:
mother-infant pair. The
delayed onset of lactation. All body mass index at 72 h pp _
coefcients of each individual
statistical analyses were 30 kg/m2, subscapular skinfold
predictive curve were then
conducted using SPSS for thickness at 72 h pp more than
used to predict milk transfer
Windows, Version 8.0 (Norusis the 85th percentile of our
for 24, 30, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h
1992), and were interpreted study data (i.e., .33.7 mm) and
pp.
using P _ 0.05 (two-tailed) as heavy/obese body build on d 1
level of signicance. pp (vs. slim/average body
Maternal perception Dependent variables. Two build). Tricep skinfold mea-
multivariate logistic regression surements were not used
Assessment of maternal mod-els were developed,
perception of the onset of because previous research
differing only in the denition demonstrated that these
lactation began at 24 h pp. To of the dependent variable, i.e.,
evaluate the clinical symptoms measurements are unreliable
the timing of the onset of markers of body fat during
of lactogenesis, subjects were lactation. In the maternal lacta-tion (Brewer et al. 1989).
interviewed regarding breast perception model, the Ethnicity was categorized
symptoms (i.e., breast fullness, perceived timing of the onset of as African American vs. all
swelling, leakage) three times lactation was characterized as other ethnic groups on the
daily, immediately after the early or late (,72 h pp vs. _72 h basis of the previous
test weights were completed. pp), as described previously identication of non-African
Subjects were then asked Has (Chapman and Perez- American ethnicity as a risk
your milk come in yet? If the Escamilla 1999b). factor for delayed onset of
response was positive, the For the milk transfer lactation (Chapman and
subject was then asked, When model, predicted milk transfer Perez-Escamilla 1999b).
did your milk come in?; the at 60 h pp was dened as high Parity was categorized as
response to this question was or low, using the sample mean primiparous vs. multiparous
recorded to the nearest hour. (n 5 57) as a cut-off value (_9.2 and was included in the model
Subjects routinely reported g/feeding vs. ,9.2 g/feeding), as due to documented differences
breast symptom changes described previ-ously in milk transfer (Chapman
before reporting that the onset (Chapman 1999). The time 1999) and per-ception of the
of lactation had occurred. No frame of 60 h pp was chosen onset of lactation among
attempt was made to coach because 55.4% of subjects had primiparae vs. multiparae
subjects on the clinical perceived milk arrival by 72 h (Chapman and Perez-
indicators of lactogenesis. pp, and test weighing had Escamilla 1999b). Because of
Subjects who were discharged frequently been discontinued. the potential for maternal age
before the onset of lactation (n Rather than estab-lishing a milk to affect the timing of the
5 11) were contacted at least transfer denition based on onset of lactation, age was
daily by research staff to predicted curves extending entered as a continuous
determine the timing of beyond the limits of our raw variable.
maternal perception of the data (i.e., at 72 h pp), we chose Early breast-feeding
onset of lactation. to use 60 h pp, the point at factors. Previous research
which 98% of subjects had suggests that early breast-
milk transfer data. The feeding initiation (Sozmen
Follow-up data collection predicted milk transfer curves 1992) and frequent breast-
Follow-up telephone provided a useful estimate of feeding (Salariya et al. 1978,
interviews were conducted to actual milk transfer values. The Sozmen 1992) may hasten the
assess the relationship between overall correlation coefcient onset of lacta-tion. The time of
the timing of the onset of for the actual vs. predicted breast-feeding initiation was
lactation and breast-feeding curves was 0.84. The average categorized as early vs.
duration. Researchers predicted value for milk
contacted subjects ;6 mo pp to transfer at 60 h pp was 94% of
deter-mine the duration of both the corresponding value (_7 feedings) vs. low (,7
exclusive and any breast- derived by averaging raw data. feedings) on the basis of the
feeding. If sub-jects were still Because of these close mean. These
breast-feeding, additional correlations with actual milk late, using the median as a cut-off
follow-up calls were made at transfer data, using predictive
4-mo intervals. Data analysis milk transfer curves was value (i.e., _105 vs. .105 min pp).
was conducted 6 mo after the deemed more objective than
Breast-feeding frequency during the
last subject was enrolled into determining the inection point
the study. At the time of data for each indi-vidual curve. rst 24 h pp was classied as
analysis, 30% of subjects were Independent variables. The
multivariate logistic regression highDownloaded
still breast-feeding, and the
average breast-feeding models included 10 main data were derived by maternal
effects and two two-way recall, obtained between 24 and
duration was 6.3 6 4.8 mo. 36 h
interactions.
Maternal factors. Maternal pp. For the seven subjects with
Model obesity has been associated missing data, breast-feeding
specication: with de-layed perception of the frequency
determinants of onset of lactation (Chapman during the rst 24 h was
and Perez-Escamilla 1999b). obtained from the medical
Because of uid retention in the record. Predicted milk transfer
at 30 h pp was expressed as a Maternal factors. Maternal
continuous variable. from obesity (Hilson et al. 1997, Rut-
Infant/delivery factors. ishauser and Carlin 1992),
education level (Ford and
Birth weight , 3.5 kg has Labbok 1990, Michaelsen et al.
been identied jn 1994, Quarles et al. 1994),
parity (Chapman and Perez-
Escamilla 1999a, Ford and
above the mean (,3.5 kg vs. Labbok 1990), employment
_3.5 kg). Due to the previous status (Chapman and Perez-
identi- Escamilla 1999a, Perez-
. Escamilla et al. 1993), age
as a risk factor for delayed onset (Ford and Labbok 1990,
of lactation (Chapman and Michaelsen et al. 1994,
Perez-Escamilla 1999b). Thus Samuels et al. 1985) and group
birth weight was categorized as assignment (Chapman 1999),
below ornutrition . have all been shown to affect
cation of unscheduled cesarean delivery as a risk of
the duration factor for delayed
breast-feeding.
Maternal obesity, education
onset of lactation (Chapman and Perez-Escamilla 1999b), delivery

type was expressed as scheduled vs. unscheduled.


Study group. Because of the potential for group assignment to
affect the timing of the onset of lactation, study group was classied
as pumping vs. control.
Interaction terms. Parity z study
group was included in the model to test the
hypothesis that the effect of breast
pumping on the onsetFebruary esis that the
onset of lactation occurs later in obese
women as a result
of lactation was modied by
parity. To evaluate our post-hoc
hypoth-of less frequent nursing,
we included the breast-feeding
frequency3,
z maternal obesity interaction term.

Model specication:
determinants of the
duration of any
breast-feeding
Multivariate survival
analyses (Cox model) were
used to identify the
determinants of the duration
of any breast-feeding, after
control-ling for potential
confounders.
Dependent variable. The
duration of any breast-
feeding was assessed during
follow-up telephone
interviews made to subjects
be-tween 2 and 19 mo pp.
One subject was lost to
follow-up; thus the breast-
feeding duration models
include 56 subjects. In total,
four models were evaluated.
For women who were still
breast-feeding when the last
contact was made, the
duration of any breast-
feeding was identied as
right censored in the Cox
regression model.
Independent variables.
Series 1. The rst series
included two models, each
consisting of 10 main effects.
Each model included one
indicator of lactogenesis
stage II, based on either milk
transfer or maternal
perception.
MATERNAL PERCEPTION OF LACTOGENESIS STAGE II 2975

Consequences of delayed onset of lactation

Determinants of the duration of any breast-feeding.


status, age, breast-feeding fre- The sensitivity and
level and parity were quency in rst 24 h pp and use specicity of delayed
of prelacteal feedings). In
(11/14) and 71.4% (10/14),
expressed categorically, as maternal percep-tion of the respectively. For subjects in
addition, a new three-term
described in the determinants
variable was developed to
onset of lactation as an the control group, the
of delayed onset of lactation indicator of delayed
model specications. Maternal combine intended breast- sensitivity and specicity
feeding duration and the onset lactogenesis stage II were of maternal per-ception
employment status at the time 71.4% (20/28) and 79.4%
of lactation. For this variable, were 64.4% (9/14) and
of the last follow-up call was
entered as a three-category
the subgroups planning to (23/29), respectively. The 86.7% (13/15),
breast-feed ,6 mo were positive and negative
(full-time, part-time, not combined. This was done for respectively.
employed out-side of the predictive values were 76.9 Determinants of
the following reasons: 1) the and 74.2%, respectively.
home) dummy variable. strong similarities in breast- delayed onset of lactation.
Maternal age was expressed as feeding duration and small
Within the pumping group, Five variables were
a continuous variable. sample size (n 5 7) of these the sensitivity and identied as signicant
Early infant feeding subgroups in the current study; specicity of delayed risk factors for delayed
practices. Early infant feeding and 2) previous research perception were 78.6%
practices, in-cluding the
onset of lactation (Table 2).
indicating that the onset of Two of these terms (breast-
frequency of breast-feeding in lactation does not affect breast-
the rst 24 h after delivery feeding initi-ation later than
feeding duration among women 105 min pp and parity z
(Salariya et al. 1978, Sozmen planning to breast-feed for ,6
1992), the timing of the onset of mo (Chapman and Perez- study group inter-action)
lactation (Chapman and Perez- Escamilla 1999a). Thus, the were signicant in both the
Escamilla 1999a, Ferris et al. milk transfer and maternal milk transfer and maternal
1987, McCabe 1982, Perez- perception model each contain perception models. Two
Escamilla et al. 1993 and 1996, one three-term variable, based terms (lower milk transfer
Segura-Millan et al. 1994) and on their respective denitions at 30 h and the obesity z
the use of prelacteal feedings of delayed onset of lactation breast-feeding frequency
(Perez-Escamilla et al. 1996, (i.e., intended breast-feeding
Samuels et al. 1985), can affect interaction during the rst
duration , 6 mo vs. early onset 24 h pp) were signicant in
breast-feeding duration. of lactation and planning to
Breast-feeding frequency breast-feed _6 mo vs. late onset
the milk transfer model and
during the rst 24 h pp, milk of lactation and planning to approached signicance in
transfer at 60 h pp and breast-feed _6 mo). the maternal perception
maternal perception of the model. Unscheduled
onset of lactation at 72 h were cesarean delivery was a
categorized as described in the Model signicant risk factor
determinants of delayed onset specication: unique to the maternal
of lactation model. (Only one determinants of the perception model.
term describing the timing of duration of
the onset of lactation was In both models, the
included per model.) Data on exclusive breast- effect of study group on the
the use of prelacteal feedings feeding onset of lactation was
(yes/no) were obtained from Dependent variable. The modied by parity. Low
daily interviews and duration of exclusive breast- milk transfer (Fig. 1A) and
conrmed by medical record feeding was assessed through delayed perception of the
review. follow-up telephone interviews. onset of lactation (Fig. 1B)
Intended breast-feeding At the time of nal data were more likely to occur
duration. Women planning to analyses, all subjects had
breast-feed for ,6 mo are at among primiparae who
discontinued exclusive breast- pumped than among control
risk for early breast-feeding feeding. The duration of
termination (Chapman and primiparae. This
exclusive breast-feeding ranged relationship did not occur
Perez-Escamilla 1999a,
from 0.1 to 6.0 mo, with a
Loughlin et al. 1985). On d 1
mean of 3.0 6 1.7 mo.
among multiparae.
pp, subjects were asked for Similarly, the effect of
how long they planned to Independent variables. The
determinants of the duration of breast-feeding fre-quency
breast-feed, using an open- during the rst 24 h pp on
ended question. Intended exclusive breast-feeding in the
breast-feeding duration was United States have not been the onset of lactation was
entered as a dichotomous well characterized. Therefore, modied by maternal
variable (,6 mo vs. _6 mo). the independent variables used nutritional status. Among
to model the determinants of nonobese women, those who
Series 2. Intended breast-
the duration of any breast-
feeding duration modies the
feeding were also utilized to
breast-fed more frequently had
associa-tion between the onset higher milkDownloaded transfer
model the duration of exclusive
of lactation and actual breast- values (Fig. 2A) and tended to
breast-feeding in our
feeding duration (Chapman perceive the onset of
population. As in the previous
and Perez-Escamilla 1999a).
series of models, a total of four lactation sooner (Fig. 2B) than
In the second series of mod-
multivariate survival analyses their counterparts who breast-fed
els, we attempted to evaluate
models were evaluated. less frequently. This relationship,
this relationship. The two
models in series 2 each however, was not ob-served for
contained nine main effects. R obese women. from
Eight of the main effects were ES As jn.nutrition

identical to those of series 1 UL main effects, neither low


(maternal obesity, education
level, parity, group TS milk transfer nor delayed
assignment, employment perception .org
of the onset of lactation obesity was associated
were identied as risk with signi-cantly longer
factors for by breast-feeding duration in
discontinuing breast- the milk transfer model
feeding. Planning to breast-
feed for ,6 mo (P , 0.05) and approached
and full-time employment signicance in the
(P , 0.05) wereguest maternal perception model
identied as signicant (P , 0.08). Among women
risk factors for early planning to breast-feed for
termination of _6 mo, those with early
breast-feeding in both series perception of the onset of
1 models. Breast-feeding , lactation breast-fed
7on times in the rst 24 h pp signicantly longer than
signicantly increased the their counterparts with a
risk ofFebruary discontinuing
delayed onset of lactation.
breast-feeding in the milk
transfer model (P
, 0.05) and approached
signicance (P , 0.08) in
the per-ception model. In
both models, maternal
obesity tended to3,
5 0.06 0.10). 2017 The three-

term variables used in series 2

(combining

onsethaveapositiveeffectonthe
durationofanybreast-feeding(P
of lactation with intended
breast-feeding duration)
were rst evaluated in a
bivariate model. The
unadjusted breast-feeding
duration values associated
with the three-term
variables dis-played a
signicant dose-response
relationship. Breast-
feeding duration was
longest for those planning
to breast-feed for at least
6 mo and experiencing an
early onset of lactation. It
decreased for their
counterparts experiencing
a delayed onset of
lactation, and was shortest
for those planning to
breast-feed for ,6 mo.
This dose-response effect
was evident when the
onset of lactation was
dened by milk transfer
(P , 0.0001) and by
maternal perception (P ,
0.0001).
In the series 2
multivariate model, three
terms were iden-tied as
signicant risk factors for
early termination of
breast-feeding in both
models (low breast-
feeding frequency on day
1 pp, full time
employment and planning
to breast-feed for ,6 mo)
(Table 3). Maternal
2976 CHAPMAN AND PEREZ-ESCAMILLA

TABLE 2
Multiple logistic regression of the determinants of delayed onset of lactation as dened by milk transfer vs. maternal perception

Milk transfer at 60 h pp
(, vs. _ 9.2 g/feeding) Maternal perception (_ vs. , 72 h pp)
1 2 3
Independent variable (n ) OR (95% CI ) P OR (95% CI) P
Obese (22) 6.14 (1.0137.41) 0.05 1.97 (0.2913.41) 0.49
Nonobese (35) 1.0 1.0
4
First BF _ 105 min pp (28) 7.53 (1.2445.68) 0.03 9.45 (1.1280.01) 0.04
First BF , 105 min pp (29) 1.0 1.0
BF frequency in rst 24 h , 7 (28) 0.31 (0.051.91) 0.21 0.80 (0.134.80) 0.81
BF frequency in rst 24 h _ 7 (29) 1.0 1.0
Wt , 3.5 kg (17) 0.48 (0.102.30) 0.36 6.01 (0.8243.82) 0.08
Wt _ 3.5 kg (40) 1.0 1.0
Caucasian/Hispanic (50) 1.99 (0.2416.44) 0.53 1.20 (0.1014.53) 0.89
African American (7) 1.0 1.0
Unscheduled cesarean (26) 1.12 (0.245.38) 0.88 6.23 (1.0437.28) 0.05
Scheduled cesarean (31) 1.0 1.0
Age in years (57) 0.95 (0.771.16) 0.59 1.25 (0.981.59) 0.08
Primiparous (24) 1.09 (0.177.02) 0.93 5.68 (0.6450.05) 0.12
Multiparous (33) 1.0 1.0
Pumping (28) 0.68 (0.162.94) 0.60 1.80 (0.3110.54) 0.52
Control (29) 1.0 1.0

Downloaded from .jn


Volume at 30 h pp (57) 0.81 (0.680.97) 0.02 0.83 (0.671.02) 0.08
Parity z pumping (57) 35.74 (0.981.3 3 103)5 0.05 1015.21 (4.87211 3 103)5 0.01
5 5
Obese z BF frequency in rst 24 h pp (57) 0.02 (0.000.64) 0.03 0.02 (0.001.22) 0.06
1
n 5 number of subjects.
2
OR, odds ratio for delayed onset of lactation, as dened by low milk transfer and delayed maternal perception, respectively.
3
95% CI, 95% condence interval.
4 BF, breast-feeding; pp, postpartum. nutrition replaced with their respective four-term variables, whereas all other variables were unchanged,
resulting in the identication of the same signicant.
5
The wide condence intervals persisted with the removal of the continuous variables from the model. The interactions were then individually
risk factors as those previously identied in the interactive model. Using the respective four term variables in the multivariate logistic regression org
models, the wide condence intervals were explained by the comparisons between subgroups of primiparae in the parity z pumping interaction and
between obese vs. nonobese women with a high breast-feeding frequency in the obesity z breast-feeding frequency interaction.

gu
on
es
Determinants of the duration of exclusive breast-feeding. magnitude and directionality (_ 5

t
0.66 in the milk transfer
As main effects, neither denition of delayed onset of lacta- model and 0.47 in the maternal perception model). Maternal
tion was a signicant risk factor for shorter duration of exclu- education level , 16 y approached signicance as a risk factor
sive breast-feeding; however, their _ coefcients were nearly for early termination of exclusive breast-feeding in both mod-
identical (0.41 for the milk transfer model, and 0.40 for the els (P 5 0.07).
maternal perception model). Maternal education level , 16 y

17
20
was identied as the only signicant risk factor (P , 0.05) for DISCUSSION
early termination of exclusive breast-feeding in the series 1
maternal perception model, and this was the only term to To our knowledge, this study is unique in its attempt to
approach signicance in the milk transfer model (P 5 0.10). validate maternal perception as a marker of lactogenesis stage
In the bivariate model, the three-term variable combining II after cesarean delivery. Our ndings strongly suggest that
the timing of the onset of lactation with intended breast- maternal perception of the onset of lactation is a valid, public
feeding duration yielded a dose-response relationship for the health indicator of lactogenesis stage II. The determinants of
duration of exclusive breast-feeding. As was observed for the low milk transfer at 60 h pp and delayed perception of the
duration of any breast-feeding, women experiencing early on- onset of lactation are almost identical. Despite the sample size
set of lactation and intending to breast-feed for at least 6 mo limitations of this study, all four variables identied as signif-
had the longest duration of exclusive breast-feeding, followed icant risk factors for low milk transfer were signicant or nearly
by those with late onset of lactation and plans to breast-feed signicant risk factors for delayed maternal perception. The
for at least 6 mo, and those intending to breast-feed for ,6 mo, effects of low milk transfer and delayed maternal perception on
respectively. This relationship was signicant in the milk breast-feeding duration were similarly modied by intended
transfer model (P 5 0.02) and approached signicance in the breast-feeding duration. Thus, regardless of whether delayed
maternal perception model (P 5 0.06). onset of lactation is dened by milk transfer or maternal
In the series 2 multivariate model, the three-term variable perception, the conclusions reached are consistent.
approached signicance in the milk transfer model (P 5 0.13) Our ndings coincide with previous studies assessing ma-
(Table 4). Among women planning to breast-feed for at least ternal perception of the onset of lactation, in combination
6 mo, those with higher milk transfer values at 60 h pp tended with other indicators of lactogenesis. Using biochemical mark-
to breast-feed exclusively for longer than their counterparts ers, Arthur et al. (1989) demonstrated delayed lactogenesis
with lower milk transfer values. The _ coefcients for the among diabetic vs. control subjects. This was supported by a
comparisons of early vs. late onset of lactation among women nearly signicant delay in maternal perception (P , 0.06)
who intended to breast-feed for at least 6 mo were of similar among the four diabetic women who perceived the onset of
MATERNAL PERCEPTION OF LACTOGENESIS STAGE II 2977
appearance. Delayed perceived it earlier. In the
lactogenesis was part why obese women bivariate analyses, the duration
demonstrated among perceive the onset of ofjn
.
primiparae (vs. multiparae) lactation later than slim or any breast-feeding decreased
by both delayed breast average women (Chapman signicantly in a dose-response
fullness and decreased milk and Perez-Escamilla fashion when comparing
subgroups of the intended
volume on d 5. Chen and 1999b) and are less breast-nutrition feeding
colleagues (1998) caution that successful initiating duration/onset of lactation three-

.org by
breast-feeding (Hilson et term variable. This
maternal perception of breast

onguest
fullness may not always be a al. 1997). Possible
explanations include

February 3, 2017
useful indicator of
lactogenesis, especially in decreased ability to
situ-ations in which decreased perceive breast fullness or
breast-feeding frequency may elevated levels of steroid
result in engorgement. hormones/ leptin among
obese women in the early
The determinants of post-partum period
delayed onset of lactation (Chapman and Perez-
that we have identied Escamilla 1999b). This
either conrm previous area requires further
ndings or provide new investigation.
insights. The identication The identication of
of delayed breast-feeding unscheduled cesarean
initiation as a risk factor for delivery as a signicant
delayed onset of lactation risk factor for delayed
supports the ndings of perception of the onset of
Sozmen (1992) and Salariya lactation supports our
et al. (1978). The previous ndings
consistently signicant (Chapman and Perez-
FIGURE 1 Effect of interaction between parity Escamilla 1999b) and the
pumping on the probability of and study group conclusions of Chen et al.
delayed onset of lactation demonstrates that breast (1998) that delivery-
modied by parity [delayed pumping between 24 and 72 related stress has a
onset of lactation dened as h after cesarean delivery negative effect on the
low milk transfer (A) and delays the onset of lactation
delayed maternal perception onset of lactation. The type
among primiparae and of cesarean delivery
(B)].
therefore should be avoided. (scheduled vs. un-
As expected, low milk scheduled), however, did
transfer at 30 h pp predicts not signicantly affect
lactation. In a similar series low milk transfer at 60 h pp
of studies (Ferris et al. 1993, milk transfer. This delay in
and tends to predict delayed perception, despite similar FIGURE 2 Effect of breast-
Neubauer et al. 1993), maternal perception. The feeding frequency during the
milk transfer values, may
maternal perception, breast absence of a stimulatory rst 24 h postpartum on the
be related to maternal
milk intake on d 7 pp and effect of early, frequent exhaustion or the use of
probability of delayed onset of
biochemical markers of breast-feeding in the rst 24 lactation modied by maternal
anesthesia. In this study, obesity [delayed onset of
lactogenesis consistently h pp on the onset of delivery type and lactation dened as low milk
indicated delayed lactation among obese anesthesia type (spinal vs. transfer (A) and as delayed
lactogenesis among control women has not been epidural) were collinear perception (B)].
subjects and those with described previously. This variables; thus the effect of
insulin-dependent diabetes nding may explain in these terms could not be
mellitus, compared with their disentangled.
reference group. Chen et al. The consequences of late
(1998) evaluated four onset of lactation on
indicators of lactogenesis, breast-
including maternal feeding duration were similar,
perception of the onset of regardless of how the
breast fullness. Although this indepen-dent variable was
term differs from our dened. Our data replicate
denition of maternal our previousDownloaded
perception, maternal/fetal nding (Chapman and
stress markers were Perez-Escamilla 1999a) that
associated with delays in among
both breast fullness and women planning to breast-
casein appearance. The feed for at least 6 mo, those
timing of the onset of breast with delayed perception of
fullness was highly the onset of lactation are
more likely to discontinue
correlated with milk volume
breast-feeding sooner than
on d 5 pp and with casein their counterparts whofrom
2978 CHAPMAN AND PEREZ-ESCAMILLA

TABLE 3
Multivariate survival analyses (series 2) of the determinants of the duration of any breastfeeding (BF), using a three-term
independent variable combining breastfeeding intentions with markers of the onset of lactation

Model 1 Likelihood of not BF Model 2 Likelihood of not BF


1 2 3
Independent variable (n) OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Age , 32 y (27) 1.43 (0.683.01) 0.34 1.46 (0.713.00) 0.31
Age _ 32 y (29) 1.0 1.0
Pumping (28) 1.57 (0.733.42) 0.25 1.46 (0.683.17) 0.34
Control (28) 1.0 1.0
Maternal education _ 16 y (30) 1.09 (0.502.38) 0.83 1.15 (0.532.46) 0.72
Maternal education , 16 y (26) 1.0 1.0
Employment status 0.07 0.03
Full time (29) 2.81 (1.077.42) 0.04 3.28 (1.248.72) 0.02
Part time (11) 1.14 (0.353.79) 0.83 1.04 (0.303.57) 0.95
Not employed (16) 1.0 1.0
Nonobese (35) 2.28 (1.025.11) 0.05 2.00 (0.914.41) 0.08
Obese (21) 1.0 1.0
Multiparous (32) 1.12 (0.552.29) 0.76 1.26 (0.612.60) 0.53

Downloaded
Primiparous (24) 1.0 1.0
Prelacteals given: yes (8) 1.23 (0.374.10) 0.73 1.24 (0.384.02) 0.72
Prelacteals given: no (48) 1.0 1.0
4
BF frequency in rst 24 h pp , 7 (27) 2.23 (1.005.00) 0.05 2.20 (1.014.80) 0.05
BF frequency in rst 24 h pp _ 7 (29) 1.0 1.0
Intended BF duration and milk transfer 60 h pp 0.03
, 6 mo, _ or , 9.2 g (14) 4.11 (1.3712.31) 0.01
_ 6 mo, , 9.2 g (20) 1.57 (0.594.18) 0.36

jnfrom .
_ 6 mo, _ 9.2 g (22) 1.0
0.01
Intended BF duration and maternal perception
, 6 mo, _ or , 72 h (14) 4.96 (1.7314.21) 0.003

nut
riti

.
_ 6 mo, _ 72 h pp (20) 2.46 (1.035.86) 0.04
_ 6 mo, , 72 h pp (22) 1.0
1 n, number of subjects.

guestbyorg
2 OR, odds ratio for delayed onset of lactation, as dened by low milk transfer and delayed maternal perception, respectively.
3 95% CI, 95% condence interval.
4 pp, postpartum.
ease of use and high
limited. Women undergoing
degree of correlation with
signicant bivariate dose- cesarean delivery may not the expen-sive and
response relationship was invasive standard of test
replicated for the duration beonFebruary representative of weighing. Women who are
of exclusive breast-feeding MATERNAL PERCEPTION OF LACTOGENESIS STAGE
when milk transfer was a the general population. We
component of the three-
term variable, and have shown TABLE 4
approached signicance previously that womenMultivariate survival analyses (series 2) of the determinants of the duration of
with maternal perception in delivering by unscheduled exclusive breastfeeding (BF), using a three-term independent
the three-term vari-able. cesarean delivery (43% of
With a larger sample size, it variable combining breastfeeding intentions with markers of
the subjects in this study) the onset of lactation
is likely that the latter are more likely to3, have a
would have been delayed perception of the
signicant. onset of lactation than
Five main effects were those2017 delivering
consistently signicant or vaginally with a short stage
nearly signicant risk II labor (Chapman and
factors for short breast- Perez-Escamilla 1999b).
feeding duration. Our data Subjects in the pumping
support previous research group visu-alized the
documenting the negative residual milk after a feeding,
ef-fects of the following: 1) potentially becoming more
planning to breast-feed for , aware of milk production
6 mo (Loughlin et al. 1985, levels than the average post-
McCabe 1982, Perez- partum woman. This could
Escamilla et al. 1993 and have exaggerated the
1997, Quarles et al. 1994); predictive ability of
2) low breast-feeding maternal perception. This
frequency in the early pp does not appear to be the
period (Salariya et al. case because the sensitivity
1978); 3) full-time of maternal perception as an
employment (Samuels et al. indicator of delayed
1985); and 4) the inter- lactogenesis was better
action between the onset of among the pump-ing
lactation and intended subjects, whereas the
breast-feeding duration specicity of maternal
(Chapman and Perez- perception was better among
Escamilla 1999a) on the controls.
duration of any breast- In conclusion, our
feeding. Our nding that ndings strongly suggest
obese women were more that maternal perception of
likely to breast-feed longer the onset of lactation is a
(P 5 0.05 0.10) than their useful public health
nonobese counterparts is in indicator of lactogenesis
contrast to previous stage II. This conclusion is
research (Hilson et al. based on the
1997, Rasmussen 1998, misclassication analyses
Rutishauser and Carlin and the similarities in the
1992). This association deter-minants and
persisted, even after consequences of low milk
removal of the milk transfer transfer and delayed
and maternal perception maternal perception of the
variables from the model. onset of lactation in our
Our ndings suggest that popula-tion. When posing
maternal obesity may not questions on the
necessarily interfere with determinants and conse-
breast-feeding success, if quences of delayed
in-depth breast-feeding lactogenesis, essentially
support is provided through the same conclu-sions
the onset of lacta-tion. would be reached
Because our data were regardless of the denition
obtained from women who of lactogenesis II.
gave birth via cesarean Our ndings suggest
delivery and were enrolled that it is worthwhile for
in a breast pumping study, clinicians to evaluate
the external validity of our maternal perception of the
ndings may be onset of lactation, given its
Model 1 Likelihood of not Model 2 Likelihood of not
exclusively breastfeeding exclusively breastfeeding
1 2 3
Category (n) OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Age , 32 y (27) 0.87 (0.451.68) 0.68 0.95 (0.501.80) 0.87
Age _ 32 y (29) 1.0 1.0
Pumping (28) 0.96 (0.521.75) 0.89 0.89 (0.481.65) 0.70
Control (28) 1.0 1.0
Maternal education _ 16 y (30) 0.53 (0.271.05) 0.07 0.53 (0.271.04) 0.07
Maternal education , 16 y (26) 1.0 1.0
Employment status 0.26 0.15
Full time (29) 1.70 (0.823.55) 0.16 1.86 (0.873.94) 0.11
Part time (11) 1.00 (0.382.66) 0.99 0.95 (0.362.50) 0.91
Not employed (16) 1.0 1.0
Nonobese (35) 1.23 (0.672.27) 0.51 1.11 (0.602.04) 0.74
Obese (21) 1.0 1.0
Multiparous (32) 0.82 (0.411.61) 0.56 0.93 (0.471.84) 0.84
Primiparous (24) 1.0 1.0 jn fromDownloaded

Prelacteals given: yes (8) 0.56 (0.201.58) 0.27 0.66 (0.241.78) 0.41
Prelacteals given: no (48) 1.0 1.0
4
BF frequency in rst 24 h pp 0.77 (0.391.49) 0.43 0.83 (0.431.60) 0.58
,7 (27)
BF frequency in rst 24 h pp 1.0 1.0
_7 (29)
Intended BF duration and milk transfer 60 h pp 0.13
, 6 mo, _ or , 9.2 g (14) 2.07 (0.934.61) 0.08
_ 6 mo, , 9.2 g (20)

..nutrition
1.94 (0.904.19) 0.09
_ 6 mo, _ 9.2 g (22) 1.0
Intended BF duration and maternal perception 0.24
, 6 mo, _ or , 72 h (14) 1.77 (0.833.79) 0.14
_ 6 mo, _ 72 h pp (20) 1.60 (0.783.28) 0.20org
_ 6 mo, , 72 h pp (22) 1.0

by
1
n, number of subjects.

guest
2
OR, odds ratio for delayed onset of lactation, as dened by low milk transfer and delayed maternal perception, respectively.

on
3
95% CI, 95% condence interval.
4
pp, postpartum.

February
attempting to breast-feed do not routinely have access to Aleja Rosario, Jocelyn Cruz, Paula McKernan, Ann-Marie Nocton

3,
and Melissa Wills for their expert assistance with data collection. We
biochemical markers of lactogenesis. Thus, they are likely to thank the staff of Hartford Hospital Women's Health Services for
base their infant feeding decisions on their perception of the

2017
adequacy of their breast milk supply. By asking women when their support of this project.
they perceived the onset of lactation, health care providers
can identify women at risk for poor breast-feeding outcomes in LITERATURE CITED
a cost-effective manner. Women with delayed perception of
Arthur, P., Smith, M. & Hartmann, P. (1989) Milk lactose, citrate and glucose
the onset of lactation may benet from additional breast- as markers of lactogenesis in normal and diabetic women. J. Pediatr. Gas-
feeding support because women planning to breast-feed for at troenterol. Nutr. 90: 488 496.
least 6 mo often do not reach their goal if the onset of Brewer, M., Bates, M. & Vannoy, L. (1989) Postpartum changes in maternal
weight and body fat depots in lactating vs nonlactating women. Am. J. Clin.
lactation is perceived to be late (Chapman and Perez-Esca- Nutr. 49: 259 265.
milla 1999a). Chapman, D. (1999) The Impact of Breast Pumping on the Onset of Lacto-
Our conclusions should not be interpreted to suggest that genesis Stage II following Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
maternal perception should replace milk transfer in all future Doctoral thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT,

Chapman, D. & Perez-Escamilla, R. (1999a) Does delayed perception of the


research studies. On the contrary, we support the use of the onset of lactation shorten breastfeeding duration? J. Hum. Lact. 15: 107111.
most accurate methods for determining the timing of the onset Chapman, D. & Perez-Escamilla, R. (1999b) Identication of risk factors for
of lactation. However, in large-scale studies, in which test delayed onset of lactation. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 99: 450 454.

Chen, D., Nommsen-Rivers, L., Dewey, K. & Lonnerdal, B. (1998) Stress during
weighing or biochemical analyses are prohibitively expensive, labor and delivery and early lactation performance. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68:
maternal perception appears to be a useful indicator of lacto- 335 44.
genesis. Future studies are required in different cultures and Daly, S. & Hartmann, P. (1995) Infant demand and milk supply. Part 2: the

short-term control of milk synthesis in lactating women. J. Hum. Lact. 11:


settings to conclusively validate maternal perception of the 2737.
onset of lactation as a marker of lactogenesis stage II. Dewey, K., Heinig, M., Nommsen, L. & Lonnerdal, B. (1991) Adequacy of
energy intake among breast-fed infants in the DARLING study: relationships
to growth velocity, morbidity, and activity levels. J. Pediatr. 119: 538 547.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Ferris, A. M., McCabe, L. T., Allen, L. H. & Pelto, G. H. (1987) Biological and
sociocultural determinants of successful lactation among women in eastern
The authors gratefully acknowledge their appreciation to all of the Connecticut. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 87: 316 321.
families who generously participated in this study. We are grateful to Ferris, A., Neubauer, S., Bendel, R., Green, K., Ingardia, C. & Reece, E. (1993)
2980 CHAPMAN AND PEREZ-ESCAMILLA
from jn.nutrition.org by guest on February 3, 2017
Perinatal lactation protocol and women during the onset of
outcome in mothers with and lactation and full lactation.
without insulin-dependent Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 48:
diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Clin. 13751386.
Nutr. 58: 43 48. Norusis, M. (1992) SPSS for
Ford, K. & Labbok, M. (1990) Who is Windows. Chicago, IL.
breast-feeding? Implications of Perez-Escamilla, R., Lutter, C.,
associ-ated social and Wickham, C., Phillips, M.,
biomedical variables for research Trevino-Siller, S. & Sanghvi, T.
on the consequences of method (1997) Identication of risk
of infant feeding. Am. J. Clin. factors for short breastfeeding
Nutr. 52: 451 456. duration in Mexico City through
Hartmann, P., Owens, R., Cox, D. & survival analysis. Ecol. Food
Kent, J. (1996) Breast Nutr. 36: 43 64.
development and control of milk Perez-Escamilla, R., Segura-
synthesis. Food Nutr. Bull. 17: Millan, S., Canahuati, J. &
292304.
Allen, H. (1996) Prelac-teal
Hilson, J., Rasmussen, K. &
feeds are negatively
Kjolhede, C. (1997) Maternal
associated with breast-
obesity and breast-feeding
feeding outcomes in Hondu-
success in a rural population of
white women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. ras. J. Nutr. 126: 27652773.
66: 13711378. Perez-Escamilla, R., Segura-
Kulski, J. & Hartmann, P. (1981) Millan, S., Pollitt, E. & Dewey, K.
Changes in human milk (1993)
composition during the initiation Determi-
of lactation. Aust. J. Exp. Biol. nants of lactation performance across
Med. Sci. 59: 101114. Mexico. Soc. Sci. Med. 37: 1069 1078.
Loughlin, H., Clapp-Channing, N., Quarles, A., Williams, P., Hoyle, D., Brimeyer, M. & Williams, A.
Gehlbach, S., Pollard, J. & intention, age, education and
McCutchen, T. (1985) Early the duration and management
termination of breast-feeding: of breastfeeding. Matern.
identifying those at risk. Pediat- Child Nurs. J. 22: 102108.
rics 75: 508 513. Rasmussen, K. (1998) Effects of
McCabe, T. (1982) The Assessment under- and overnutrition on
of Factors That Affect the lactation in laboratory rats. J.
Duration of Lactation of Women Nutr. 128: 390S393S.
Residing in Eastern Connecticut: Rutishauser, I. & Carlin, J. (1992)
A Predictive Model. Doctoral Body mass index and
thesis, University of Connecticut, duration of breast feeding: a
Storrs, CT. survival analysis during the
Michaelsen, K., Larsen, P., Thomsen, rst six months of life. J.
B. & Samuelson, G. (1994) The Epidemiol.
Copen-hagen cohort study on Community Health 46: 559 565.
infant nutrition and growth: Salariya, E., Easton, P. & Cater, J. (1978)
duration of breastfeeding and initiation and frequent feeding. Lancet 2: 11411143.
inuencing factors. Acta Samuels, S., Margen, S. & Schoen, E.
Paediatr. 83: 565571. breast-feeding in a health
Neubauer, S., Ferris, A., Chase, C.,
maintenance organization
Fanelli, J., Thompson, C.,
population. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
Lammi-Keefe, C., Clark, R.,
44: 504 510.
Jensen, R., Bendel, R. & Green,
K. (1993) Delayed lactogenesis Segura-Millan, S., Dewey, K. &
in women with insulin-dependent Pe rez-Escamilla, R. (1994)
diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Clin. Factors associated with
Nutr. 58: 54 60. perceived insufcient milk in
Neville, M. C. (1995) Determinants of a low-income urban
milk volume and population in Mexico.
compositionlacto-genesis in J. Nutr. 124: 202212.
women: a cascade of events Downloaded Sozmen, M. (1992)
revealed by milk composition. In: Effects of early suckling of
Handbook of Milk Composition cesarean-born babies on
(Jensen, R. G., ed.), pp. 8798. lactation. Biol. Neonate 62: 67
Academic Press, Boston, MA. 68.
Neville, M., Keller, R., Seacat, J.,
Lutes, V., Neifert, M., Casey, C.,
Allen, J. & Archer, P. (1988)
Studies in human lactation: milk
volumes in lactating

You might also like