Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and should be a c-number, and These relations are equivalent to the Bogoliubov trans-
formation for the wave function
V
J (m20 M 2 ) + (3) (t)
k = k as as
k k k , (12)
is a source term that can be an operator. where as
k denotes the asymptotic value of the mode k ,
Formal solution of (2) can be presented in a form of as in out
k = k , k .
the Yang-Feldman equation
Lagrangian (1) corresponds to the Hamiltonian
Z x0
(x) = (t) (x) d4 y i[(t) (x), (t) (y)]J(y),
Z
(4) 1 2 1 1
t
H= d3 x + ()2 + m20 2 + V . (13)
2 2 2
where the first term describes an asymptotic field defined
at x0 = t which satisfies the free field equation of motion Substituting (8) into the above results in a quite compli-
cated expression for the Hamiltonian which can be sim-
0 = ( 2 + M 2 )(t) . (5) plified by choosing the Bogoliubov coefficients of the form
In case that does not have a vev, the (t) can be de- in 1 in 1
|k |2 = k
+ , |k |2 = k , Arg(k k ) = Arg in
k
composed into modes 2k 2 2k 2
(14)
d3 k ikx (t) (t) 3
Z
where
(t) (t) (t)
(x) = e k ak + k ak (6)
(2)3
in in 2 2 in 2
k |k | + k |k | , in in 2 2 in 2
k (k ) + k (k ) . (15)
fulfilling harmonic oscillator equation
(t) (t)
Then the Hamiltonian with diagonalized kinetic terms
0 = k + k2 k (7) reads
R d3 k
with k |k|, k k 2 + M 2 and obeys the inner prod- H = (2) 3 k
(t) (t)
ak ak + 12 (2)3 3 (k = 0) + (16)
(t) (t)
uct 2 relation: k , k = 1.
+ d3 x 12 (m20 M 2 )2 + V ,
R
From (4) also the relation between two asymptotic
fields defined at different times x0 = t and x0 = tin can which indicates that the operator
be derived
(t) (t)
(t) in
Z t Nk (t) ak ak (17)
(x) = (x) d4 y i[in (x), in (y)]J(y), (8)
tin
really plays the role of the occupation number. This is
in
where we denoted (x) (tin )
(x). Evaluating the in- because in the system which has a potential energy par-
(t)
(t) (t)
ticle number N would be described classically as
ner product of the above equation with k : , k ,
we can obtain the Bogoliubov transformation for annihi- H Veff V0
lation operators [14] N= , (18)
E
t
where H is the total Hamiltonian, Veff an effective po-
Z
(t) in in
ak = k ain
k +k ak d4 y i[k ain
k +k ak , (y)]J(y), tential, V0 a zero-point energy and E is an one-particle
tin
(9) energy. Therefore particle number is just the kinetic en-
where ergy of the system divided by the one-particle energy.
Substituting (9) into (17) and using (14), (15), we can
(t) (t)
k = k (t, tin ) (k , ink = k (t, tin ) (k , in
k ), k ) finally obtain the expression for the occupation operator
(10) in terms of the interacting fields as
and the normalization condition reads
1 +
Nk (t) + Nk (t)
|k |2 |k |2 = 1. (11) Nk (t) = (19)
2
3 in in
k and k are constrained by the relation:
2 We use the following definition of the inner product:
(A, B) i(A B A B). |in 2 in 2 2
k | |k | = k .
3
in
0 0in , we just have to replace hi in (25) to (30)
obtain the proper expression for the occupation number.
Physical mass of is determined by the relation:
To obtain numerical results for some specific models to remove the infinite part of the mass correction.
we follow the procedure described in Section II. We are
especially interested in time-evolution of particle number
density for each considered species: A. Two scalar system
d3 k hNk i
Z
n(t) = , (26) At first we apply our formalism to the simple theory
(2)3 V
consisting of two scalar fields
where V is the volume of the system, and in time- 1 1 1 1 1
dependence of the background (inflaton). We consider L= ()2 + ()2 m2 2 m2 2 g 2 2 2 .
2 2 2 2 4
a time range and starting from the initial state we solve (32)
equations of motion for all the species and calculate their We assume that it is the field
that has time-varying vev
number density. Then we move to a slightly later time
and plays the role of inflaton, 0in 0in = h(t)i, while
and repeat the procedure taking into account the back- is another scalar field with vanishing vev that can be,
reaction of previously produced states on the evolution of for instance. a mediator field between the inflaton and
the background (given by the induced potential coming the Standard Model. We also assume m m . The
from non-zero energy density) and all the species. details of the calculation in this system can be found in
Before we present numerical results for specific mod- Appendix B.
els, let us focus on a subtlety in calculation of the particle Asymptotically, when quantum effects can be ne-
glected, we can choose a vacuum solution for (32) of the
form
4 The zero point term can be regarded as the volume of the system hi = 0 cos(m (t t0 )), (33)
because
Z Z where 0 denotes the initial amplitude of the oscillations,
(2)3 3 (k = 0) = d3 xeikx |k=0 = d3 x = V. (20) hi(t = t0 ) = 0 . When this trajectory crosses the non-
p
Therefore, we can also find distribution operators:
adiabatic area for : |hi| < m |0 |/g, the mass of
+
becomes very small and kinetic energy of the background
Nk 1
n+
k = V = k
1
+ k2 V1 k k 1,
V k k
(21) field is transferred to the field . This results in the
creation of particles with the distribution [5]
Nk 1 1
n
k = V = i V k k V k k + 1. (22)
2
gmk |
nk = e 0| , (34)
4
where k is a momentum of a particle. Once particles scalar field domination phase this means that gv > 3H,
are produced and trajectory of hi goes away from the
for matter domination: gv > 32 H, while for radiation
non-adiabatic region, the energy density of particles
domination: gv > 2H.
can be represented as Following [15] and the analytical method of estimating
the number density of producing particles in the expand-
d3 k
Z
g|hi| nk , (35) ing universe presented there for which
(2)3
3/2
which corresponds to the linear potential acting on hi 5 1
n(j) (1)
n 3
j1
, (38)
describing the backreaction effects. Then trajectory of 2 j 5/2
hi goes back towards the origin and particles can be
produced again both due to the oscillatory behaviour of where j denotes the number of oscillations, we can see
hi and backreaction. the agreement with our results. If we take j 10 as in
(10)
In the Figure 1 we show an example of the numerical the Figure 1 and n 1 106 , we can see that the
(j)
results for the Lagrangian (32). According to [5] the first oscillation phase indeed finishes when 12 m2 hj i2
production of particles results in the number density (j)
ghj in .
(gm h(0)i)3/2
n(1)
4 109 , (36)
(2)3 Im t
10-5
10-9
n(t)
10-21
0. 2.104 4.104 6.104 The distribution of the produced states is not thermal
but, assuming that the whole energy is transferred to the
t
light states which interact with each other and with other
n (t) n (t) particles not present in the simplified Lagrangian, we can
naively estimate the maximal reheating temperature as
FIG. 1: Time evolution of number density of produced states 30 1/4
for g = 0.1, m = 0.001M , (t = 0) = M , (t = 0) = 0 in TRmax
R
, (39)
two scalar system. Scale M 0.04MP L , where MP L denotes g 2
the Planck mass MP L 1.22 1019 GeV, is chosen to be close
to the unification scale and allows us to stay in agreement where R is energy density of the relativistic particles (in
with the observational data. our case or and ) and g describes the number of rel-
ativistic degrees of freedom (g O(102 )). In our system
the coupling is big enough to describe energy density as
In our considerations we neglect the expansion of the = mn and without contradicting our assumptions we
universe which is valid assuming that the mean time the can choose the masses as in Table I. Final estimation of
trajectory spends in the non-adiabatic region is smaller TRmax is also presented in Table I.
than the Hubble time, see Figure 2. This means that:
1 2
< , (37) B. System with the additional light sector
gv 3H(w + 1)
where H is a Hubble parameter and w = p is a barotropic Usually when describing preheating light fields not
parameter describing the content of the universe. For the coupled directly to the inflaton are neglected. But it
5
n(t)
n 3.96 102 GeV3 and n 8.2 109 GeV3 .
m [GeV] [GeV4 ] TRmax [GeV] 10-18
||
field.
We can describe such a situation by extending (32) 0.4
with n light or massless fields n (m m , m ) that
0.2
are not coupled to the background at the tree-level
0.0
0. 1.104 2.104 3.104 4.104 5.104
L = 21 ()2 + 12 ()2 12 m2 2 12 m2 2 14 g 2 2 2
t
+ n 12 (n )2 n 12 m2 n2 n 14 y 2 2 n2 . (40)
P P P
n=1 n=2 n=5 n=7 n=10
be produced so efficiently is the strong coupling between Thus, once or n are produced at the same time they
and that enhances the back-reaction effects. also generate s effective mass 5 which results in par-
We would expect that most of the energy would be ticle production area becoming narrower. This leads to
transferred to n fields as they are very light and the
process is energetically favourable. But we can prove
that the more light species we include, the larger the
final value of |hi| becomes and, in other words, the less 5 These mass correction terms describe a square of plasma fre-
energy from the background goes to the light fields, see quency discovered by I.Langmuir and L.Tonks in the 1920s which
Figure 4. is a critical value for which the wave of can enter Xs plasma
6
10-3
TABLE II: Energy densities and upper limits on reheating
temperature (both in GeV) for two choices of and mass.
10-4
Mass of is set to m = 5 1014 GeV. Number densities for
each state correspond to the results from Figure 3, meaning
n (t)
that n 1.82 109 GeV3 and n 9.91 106 GeV3 . 10-5
n (t)
produced through indirect coupling to the background 10-9
prevent the production of particles directly coupled to
the background, . 10-10
It is interesting to investigate the impact of both cou-
plings - g that couples to and the background hi 10-11
and y that couples additional fields n to , on the fea- 0. 2. 104 4. 104 6. 104
tures of preheating. Varying the coupling y for fixed g t
leads to the conclusion that the initial stage of preheat-
10-5
ing does not depend on y coupling for and states.
It only influences the final abundance of produced and 10-7
states - the bigger y is, the smaller number density of n (t)
these states we observe, see Figure 5. For the impact of 10-9
y is quite opposite - both initial and final stages of pro-
duction are strongly influenced by the value of y. This 10-11
time the bigger y is, the larger number density of we
observe which also results in more effective energy trans- 10-13
0. 2.104 4.104 6.104
fer to the background as y coupling drops, see Figure 6.
t
Also, for choices of parameters resulting in n n we
y=0.1 y=0.2 y=0.5
can observe quenching of the energy transfer from the
background. y=0.7 y=1
Our study may seem similar to the process of instant
preheating [16, 17], where the system of three fields - FIG. 5: Time evolution of number density of produced states
background , interacting with the background and , and for g = 0.1, n = 1, m = 0.001M , (t = 0) = M ,
some other field not coupled to , is considered. In- (t = 0) = 0 and different values of y coupling. Values y = 0.7
stant preheating relies on the fact that particles pro- and y = 1 correspond to quenching of parametric resonance.
duced within one-time oscillation of decay immediately
to before the next oscillation of . So states can be
or not, because
(+) also produced even though there is no direct interaction
d3 p hNk i
Z
between and . In our work the mechanism of pro-
(2)3 2Xp V duction is different - due to the quantum corrections, not
nX
is proportional to M if X particles are massive enough (nX the decay, and quenching of the preheating comes from
X
is Xs number density). Moreover, if one considers the massless a plasma gas effect here rather than the rapid decay.
thermal equilibrium distribution with the temperature T :
1 1
(+)
hNXp i = 2 p/T Table II presents TRmax and energy densities for each
V e 1
state for the considered model under assumption that
(factor 2 corresponds to the degrees of freedom for momentum = H or = H, H being the Higgs field playing the
k and k particles), it corresponds to the thermal mass of the role of the mediator or the light field. We can see that
form:
Z
d3 p 1 1
!
T2 additional light sector that quenches preheating rises TR
3
hXp pX i . lowering the number density of particles at the same
(2) V 2Xp 6
time.
7
1.0 10-3
10-5
0.8
10-7
n(t)
0.6
||
10-9
0.4 10-11
10-13
0.2
0. 1.104 2.104 3.104
0.0 t
0. 1.104 2.104 3.104 4.104 5.104
n (new) n (old)
t
n (new) n (old)
y=0.1 y=0.2 y=0.5
1.0
y=0.7 y=1
0.8
FIG. 6: Envelope of the time evolution the background hi for 0.6
||
g = 0.1, n = 1, m = 0.001M , (t = 0) = M , (t = 0) = 0
and different values of y coupling. For y = 0.7 and y = 1 we 0.4
can observe the quenching of the preheating.
0.2
0.0
0. 1.104 2.104 3.104
IV. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY t
new old
In our previous work [14] we presented a formalism
for describing particle production in a time-dependent
FIG. 7: Comparison between time evolution of number den-
background. It turned out it possesses one drawback -
sity of produced states (upper ) and the background hi
there exists a secularity in the number density of mass- (lower ) obtained with a new and old methods for g = 1,
less states that can be a product of approximating the m = 0.001M , (t = 0) = M , (t = 0) = 0. New denotes
fields by their asymptotic values. In this paper we have the interacting theory described here and old - asymptotic
developed more accurate description by expressing the approximation presented in [14].
number operator in terms of interacting fields. Figure 7
compares the two methods for the Lagrangian (32). The
new method avoids artificial secularity caused by time in-
tegral of the interaction effects with the Green functions
not work well and this indicates that preheating might
seen before. The old method seems to overestimate the
be quenched if there are many degrees of freedom of light
production at the late stage because it includes inverse
fields which are connected to the background indirectly.
decay processes, whereas the new one takes into account
mass correction terms. However, the results with secu-
larity are still applicable at the early stages of particle This work has been supported by the Polish NCN grant
production process. DEC-2012/04/A/ST2/00099, OC was also supported by
As the application of the new method in this paper the doctoral scholarship number 2016/20/T/ST2/00175.
we investigated the role of additional light fields coupled SE is partially supported by the Heising-Simons Funda-
indirectly to the background during resonant particle tion grant No 2015-109. OC thanks Bonn Bethe Centre
production processes such as preheating. In particular, Theory Group for hospitality during the completion of
we considered models with a scalar field interacting this paper.
with the background hi through its mass term and
with n light fields n . In order to describe particle
production in the system, at first we defined number
operator in terms of interacting fields and then we Appendix A: Particle production in free fields
theory with time-varying mass terms
solved numerically their equations of motion. In case of
a few additional light fields, their production can be also
resonant through the quantum correction to their mass Let us consider a real free scalar field with the time-
term and their final amount can be sizeable. However, dependent mass term:
many degrees of freedom of these extra light fields can
prevent s and also n s resonant particle production. 1 1
As a result, energy transfer from the background does L= ()2 m2 (t)2 . (44)
2 2
8
The solution of the equation of motion can be decom- with the coefficients satisfying
posed into
in 1 in 1
Z
d3 k ikx |k |2 = k
+ , |k |2 = k , Arg(k k ) = Arg in
k .
(x) = e k ak +
a (45) 2k 2 2k 2
k k
(2)3 (59)
Then the occupation number can be expressed as
where k = k (x0 ) is a time-dependent wave function
which satisfies k 1
Nk (t) = h0|Nk |0i = |k |2 = . (60)
p 2k 2
0 = k + k2 k (k k 2 + m2 ), (46) Appendix B: Two scalar system
- details of the calculation
and ak , ak are annihilation and creation operators. The
vacuum state |0i is defined by the relation ak |0i = 0 and In the system described by the Lagrangian 1, we have a
the commutation relations background field hi and two quantum fields: hi,
. The set of differential equations for distributions reads
[(t, x), (t, x0 )] = i(x x0 ), (47)
0
[(t, x), (t, x )] = [(t, x), (t, x )] = 0, 0
(48) 0 = hi + M2 hi (61)
[ak , ak0 ] 3
= (2) (k k ), 0
(49)
hk k i = hk k i + hk k i (62)
[ak , ak0 ] = [ak , ak0 ] =0 (50)
hk k i = hk k i k 2
hk k i (63)
give an inner product relation of the form: (k , k ) = 1.
hk k i = k 2
(hk k i + hk k i) (64)
Using (45) we can represent the Hamiltonian as
Z hk k i = h k k i + hk k i (65)
1 2 1 1
H = d3 x + ()2 + m2 2 (51) h k i = h k i 2 h k i
k k k k (66)
2 2 2
h k k i = 2
k (h k k i + hk k i) (67)
d3 k 1 h
Z
= 3
k (t) ak ak + ak ak
(2) 2 where the source terms are absent because of our choice
i
+k (t)ak ak + k (t)ak ak , (52) of physical masses
d3 p
Z
1 1 1
where M2 = m2 + g 2 h p i ,(68)
2 (2)3 V p 2p
k (t) |k (t)|2 + k2 (t)|k (t)|2 , (53) 1
M2 = m2 + g 2 hi2
k (t) 2k (t) + k2 (t)2k (t). (54) 2
d3 p
Z
1 2 1 1
In order to diagonalize the Hamiltonian + g h p i . (69)
2 (2)3 V p 2p
d3 k 1
Z
H = k (t) a
a + a a
k k (55) In order to obtain the above formulae, we applied an
k k
(2)3 2 approximation
d3 k
Z
1 3 3
= k (t) ak ka + (2) (k = 0) (56) hp1 p2 p3 p4 i = hp1 p2 ihp3 p4 i + O(g 2 ) (70)
(2)3 2
[1] L. Kofman, A. Linde, A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. [2] L. Kofman, A. Linde, A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D 56
73 (1994) [hep-th/9405187]. (1997) [hep-ph/9704452].
9
[3] J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D A. Mazumdar, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 27
42 (1990) 2491. [hep-th/1001.2600].
[4] A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51 [13] M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser and
(1990) 172 [Yad. Fiz. 51 (1990) 273]. J. Karouby, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2014) 1530003 [hep-
[5] L. Kofman et al., JHEP 05 (2004) hep-th/0403001. ph/1410.3808].
[6] T. Kobayashi, S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) [14] S. Enomoto, O. Fuksinska, Z. Lalak, JHEP 03 (2015)
[astro-ph.CO/1003.0076]. [hep-ph/1412.7442].
[7] T. Matsuda, JCAP 1204 (2012) [hep-ph/1204.0303]. [15] K. Enqvist, D. G. Figueroa and R. N. Lerner, JCAP
[8] K. Kohri, T. Matsuda, JCAP 1502 (2015) 1301, 040 (2013) [astro-ph.CO/1211.5028 ].
[astro-ph.CO/1405.6769]. [16] G. Felder, L. Kofman, and A. Linde, Phys Rev D 59
[9] K. Enqvist, M. Sloth, Nucl. Phys. B 626 (2002) (1999) 123523 [hep-ph/9812289].
[hep-ph/0109214]. [17] S. Tsujikawa, B. Bassett, and F. Viniegra JHEP 19
[10] D. Lyth, D. Wands, Phys. Lett. B 524 (2002) (2000) [hep-ph/0006354].
[hep-ph/0110002]. [18] B. Garbrecht, T. Prokopec and M. G. Schmidt, Eur.
[11] T. Moroi, T. Takahashi, Phys. Lett. B 522 (2001) Phys. J. C 38, 135 (2004) [hep-th/0211219].
[hep-ph/0110096].
[12] R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F. Y. Cyr-Racine and