Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2005 Institute of Food Technologists Vol. 70, Nr. 9, 2005JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE C523
Further reproduction without permission is prohibited Published on Web 11/15/2005
Quality of lobster treated with STP . . .
trogen at temperatures between 55 C to 57 C using a 30-foot ples for texture analysis were thawed and steamed in the same
freezing tunnel (Modular Tunnel Freezer, model nr KFT36-10M; manner as samples for chemical and sensory analyses. After re-
BOC Gases, Murray Hill, N.J., U.S.A.). Frozen lobsters were placed heating, tails were cut in half as duplicates per lobster, and length
into covered storage totes for transport to the Univ. of Maines Dept. and width (mm) were measured for each tail section using Mitu-
of Food Science and Human Nutrition where they were held at toyo Digimatic calipers (model nr CD-6BS; Mitutoyo Corp., Ka-
15 C frozen storage until needed for analyses. Lobster tail and claw wasaki, Japan). Lobster tail placement was perpendicular to the
meat quality attributes were determined after 0, 2, 4, and 6 mo of blade edge to cut across muscle fibers. The Instron scale load was
storage. 0.5 kN, crosshead speed 500 mm/min, platen separation 50.1 mm,
and sample rate 20.0 points/s. Maximum displacement (peak load)
Chemical analyses was measured in mm/cm, and force (load) was measured in kN per
Chemical analyses were performed on lobster samples at pound. The peak load or breaking point of the sample was calculat-
months 0, 2, 4, and 6. Lobsters were thawed at 4 C for 24 h and ed in kN/mm.
steamed for 20 min in a stainless-steel colander over 1.9 L of boil-
C: Food Chemistry & Toxicology
ing water in a 7.7-L stainless-steel cooking pot, covered with tin- Colorimetric analysis
foil. Tail and claw meat samples were removed by hand, lightly Colorimetric analysis was performed on tail meat to coincide with
rinsed with potable water, and homogenized using a hand-pow- sensory analysis at months 2 and 6 using a Hunter LabScan II
ered food processor (Culinare RocketChef; Best Direct, Pacoima, (Hunter Associates Laboratory, Reston, Va., U.S.A.). Standard back-
Calif., U.S.A.). Homogenized claw and tail meat samples were an- ground and calibration tiles were used: white tile (CIE illuminant
alyzed in duplicate for lipid oxidation, salt-soluble protein, and D65 10 observer, 1971) and black tile (no company specification).
moisture content. An optical aperture of 3 cm was used. L, a, and b values were re-
corded as averages of 3 readings per sample, and chroma and hue
Determination of lipid oxidation values were calculated.
Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) test results were performed according
to a modified method of Tarladgis and others (1960) and Rhee and Sensory analysis
Watts (1966) to determine thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances An affective sensory test was conducted to determine consumer
(TBARS) reported as g malonaldehyde/g of tail or claw meat over acceptability of frozen lobster upon reheating at months 2 and 6.
time. During TBA testing, the lowest detected amount of malonal- The lobsters were removed from frozen storage and placed at re-
dehyde was 0.2 g/g. frigerated temperatures (4 C) for 24 h before evaluation. Lobsters
were steamed for approximately 20 min. Tail meat was removed
Determination of protein from the shell, lightly rinsed to remove tomale, dried, and weighed.
Ten grams of lobster muscle were homogenized with 90 mL of Lobster claws were not evaluated during sensory testing. The tail
5% saline solution for 30 s, and the homogenate was centrifuged at meat was cut vertically in half and then cut into 6 horizontal propor-
12000 g for 20 min at 4 C. Salt-soluble protein concentration was tionate sections. Each panelist received 1 tail section per treat-
measured by the Lowry procedure (Lowry and others 1951) to de- ment on small plates labeled with 3-digit randomized codes pre-
termine mg/g salt-soluble protein content in claw and tail samples sented in random order. Butter (sweet cream, unsalted butter;
over time. Hannaford, Scarborough, Maine, U.S.A.) was provided. Thirty pan-
elists (older than age 18 years) were recruited for this study from
Determination of moisture the Univ. of Maine community. Volunteers were allowed to partic-
Lobster claw and tail meat were analyzed for total moisture us- ipate after signing an informed consent form. Panelists were seated
ing the standard AOAC procedure (1998). in booths with fluorescent lighting at the Consumer Testing Center
located at the Univ. of Maine Dept. of Food Science and Human
Determination of cook loss and yield Nutrition. Sensory panelists evaluated sample attributes of exterior
Cook loss, the percentage of weight (moisture) loss resulting and interior meat color, flavor, texture, and overall acceptability
from the initial cook step of each lobster before freezing, was calcu- using a 9-point hedonic scale (1 = dislike extremely to 9 = like ex-
lated as: tremely). Data from the computerized sensory ballots were collect-
ed by the SIMS 2000 program for Windows.
% Cook loss: initial (raw) wt (g) cooked wt (g) 100
initial (raw) wt (g) Statistical analyses
Chemical and physical data were analyzed using Systat version
9.0 (Systat Software, Inc. 1998). One-way analysis of variance (ANO-
Meat yield was based upon the percentage of lobster tail meat VA) was used to detect statistical differences (P 0.05) among STP
removed from each cooked lobster: and control treatments at a specific frozen storage month. Signifi-
cant differences (P 0.05) between means were analyzed using the
% Yield (based on cooked weight): Tukey HSD post hoc test. A multi-way ANOVA was used to evaluate
cooked tail wt (removed from shell) (g) 100
differences of the potential effects of treatment over frozen storage
whole cooked wt (g)
time, and the Tukey HSD Multiple Comparisons were used to de-
termine significant differences (P 0.05) of treatment means
Texture analysis
exture across time. Lobster tail and claw data were analyzed separately.
Tail meat firmness was assessed to determine shear force need- Pearson correlation matrix analyses were performed on chemical,
ed to penetrate through tail meat samples. A metal shear cell was physical, and sensory data using Systat version 9.0.
custom-designed with a beveled edge for an Instron (model nr Sensory data on lobster tails were analyzed using SAS 6.12 (SAS
4466 with a Series IX Automated Materials Testing System 7.5; In- Inst. 1989) (P 0.05) with Duncans long-range multiple post hoc
stron, Inc., Canton, Mass., U.S.A.) to mimic the human bite. Sam- test.
C524 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCEVol. 70, Nr. 9, 2005 URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org
Quality of lobster treated with STP . . .
Results and Discussion treatments were detected at months 0, 2, and 4 in tail meat. At
months 2 and 4, control lobster tails were lower in salt soluble pro-
TBARS tein levels than the STP-treated samples. Control and 0.3% STP-
TBARS ANOVA results for lobster tail and claw meat suggest an treated lobster claw meat had consistently higher salt-soluble pro-
increasing trend of malonaldehyde concentration for all treatments tein levels than 0.1% STP-treated claw meat throughout storage
over frozen storage time as illustrated by Figure 1. At month 6, con- time. However, salt-soluble protein differences in claw meat were
trol tail TBARS levels were higher than STP-treated tails, and 0.1% not found to be significant among treatments.
STP-treated claws were significantly (P 0.05) lower in malonalde- Multi-way ANOVA results indicated significant treatment,
hyde concentration than both control and 0.3% STP-treated claw month, and treatment/month interaction effects on salt-soluble
meat. Overall, tail and claw meat malonaldehyde concentrations protein levels in lobster tail meat. Lobster tail meat treated with
remained low and did not exceed 2.0 g/g. STP had significantly (P 0.05) higher Lowry values at months 2
Multi-way ANOVA analyses detected significant effects of time and 4, than storage months 0 and 6. For claw meat, all 3 treatments
and treatment/month interactions on TBARS levels in lobster tail had significantly (P 0.05) higher Lowry values at months 2 and 4
Figure 1Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) Figure 2Salt-soluble protein means of lobster tail and claw
means of lobster tail and claw meat over frozen storage meat over frozen storage time. Significance P 0.05.
time. Significance P 0.05. Means are an average of Means are an average of duplicate samples based on ho-
duplicate samples based on homogenate of 8 tails and 16 mogenate of 8 tails and 16 claws. Means within evalua-
claws. Means within evaluation period not sharing a com- tion period not sharing a common letter are significantly
mon letter are significantly different. different.
URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org Vol. 70, Nr. 9, 2005JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE C525
Quality of lobster treated with STP . . .
(1990) noted detrimental quality changes in frozen Jonah crabs (P 0.05) increased tail meat yield. The cook loss and yield find-
occurred first in leg meat compared with body meat. In this study, ings are similar to the results found by Froning and Sackett (1985)
the yellowing of claw meat observed at month 4 of frozen storage when they injected turkey breast muscle with salt and various
may also correspond to the decrease in moisture levels in control types of phosphates. The presence of salt and phosphates signif-
lobster claws after month 2. Pearson correlation matrix results for icantly reduced expressible moisture and cook loss, but did not
lobster suggest a strong positive relationship between moisture significantly affect shear values.
levels and panelists ratings of flavor (r = 0.92), texture (r = 0.89),
and overall acceptability (r = 0.94) at month 6. Textur
exturee
Texture analysis was conducted to determine a correlation be-
Cook loss and yield tween sensory and physical tail texture data over storage time. Peak
Weight data were collected to determine whether STP treat- force was measured to determine the force needed to shear tail
ments had any influence on decreasing cook loss and increasing meat samples.
tail yield. Weight measurements included initial (precooked) and Texture ANOVA results revealed significant (P 0.05) differenc-
C: Food Chemistry & Toxicology
whole cooked lobster weight before freezing, and the weight of es in peak force at month 0 ( Figure 6). Control samples had a signif-
cooked tail meat removed from the shell upon thawing and reheat- icantly higher maximum displacement mean than 0.1% and 0.3%
ing lobster before conducting analyses. STP-treated tails. No significant differences were detected at stor-
Cook loss results revealed significant (P 0.05) differences be- age months 2, 4, and 6. Some tail samples did not remain intact upon
tween 0.3%-STP treated lobsters and the other 2 treatments. The re-steaming, and the tail muscle appeared disintegrated in the
0.3% STP-treated lobsters had a 5% lower cook loss than the 0.1% shell. These lobster meat samples were not feasible for texture
STP and control samples, as illustrated by Figure 4. The 0.3% and analyses. Therefore, unequal sample sizes were a problem for con-
0.1% STP-treated lobsters had a significantly (P 0.05) higher tail ducting texture analyses due to mushy tail meat sample ob-
meat yield, based on whole cooked lobster weight. STP-treated tails served across treatments.
had a 0.7% to 0.8% higher meat yield than control samples, as shown Significant (P 0.05) differences in peak force were detected at
in Figure 5. month 0 only. Control tail meat had a significantly higher peak force
The results indicated that injecting 0.3% STP into lobster signif- than STP-injected lobster, an indication that control tails had a
icantly decreased cook loss by 5%, and STP treatments significantly tougher or chewier texture at month 0 than STP-treated tails. Pear-
Figure 3Mean percentage of total moisture in lobster tail Figure 4Mean percentage of lobster tail meat cook loss
and claw meat over frozen storage time. Significance P after initial cooking. Significance P 0.05. Each value is
0.05. Means are an average of duplicate samples based the mean of 57 lobster tails taken from random periods
on homogenate of 8 tails and 16 claws. Means within evalu- of frozen storage. Means within evaluation period not shar-
ation period not sharing a common letter are significantly ing a common letter are significantly different.
different.
Figure 5Mean percentage of lobster tail meat yield based Figure 6Mean peak force of lobster tail results at month
on whole cooked weight. Significance P 0.05. Each value 0. Significance P 0.05. Means are an average of 14 tails
is the mean of 57 lobster tails taken from random periods for control, 18 tails for 0.1% STP, and 18 tails for 0.3%
of frozen storage. Means within evaluation period not shar- STP. Means within evaluation period not sharing a com-
ing a common letter are significantly different. mon letter are significantly different.
C526 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCEVol. 70, Nr. 9, 2005 URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org
Quality of lobster treated with STP . . .
son correlation matrix results indicated a moderately strong nega- characteristics suggested structural weakening of muscle fibers due
tive relationship between texture values and panelists ratings for to physiological changes during the molt process. Similar decreases
texture (r = 0.83) and overall acceptability (r = 0.82) at month 2. in protein concentration possibly occur in soft-shell lobsters. Future
Random occurrences of mushy tail texture were observed across work could investigate the injection of antifreeze proteins to post-
treatments upon reheating samples before conducting analyses. It molt lobsters before processing. The additional proteins may in-
is worth noting that STP-treated lobster tails had a slightly lower crease lobster protein concentrations, while providing cryoprotec-
incidence of mushy tail meat throughout frozen storage, but the tive benefits and possibly extending lobster quality during frozen
differences in the mean lobster tail samples used for Instron testing storage. Results appear promising that antifreeze proteins, when
were not significantly (P 0.05) different. Mushiness in lobster added to meat before freezing, reduce the size of ice crystal forma-
meat has also been reported with fresh cooked soft shell lobsters tion at low concentrations, and also inhibit ice recrystallization
from personal communications with the Maine Lobster Promotion (Payne and others 1993).
Board. This textural problem has been noted in previous cryogenic
lobster testing at the Univ. of Maine, but the cause is not known. Sensory
URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org Vol. 70, Nr. 9, 2005JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE C527
Quality of lobster treated with STP . . .
ceptable and not noticeable to sensory panelists. STP-treated lob- cedures on yield and quality of Dungeness crab meat. J Food Sci 56(3):65764.
Dyer WJ, Horne DC. 1953. Yellow discoloration in frozen lobster meat. Halifax,
ster tails were rated higher for interior and exterior meat color than N.S.: Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Atlantic Experimental Station.
control samples. Pearson correlation matrix results indicated a mod- Foegeding EA, Lanier TC, Hultin HO. 1996. Characteristics of edible muscle tis-
sues. In: Fennema O, editor. Food chemistry. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.
erate negative relationship between b values and sensory panel- p 9289.
ists ratings for exterior meat color (r = 0.75) and between hue and Froning GW, Sackett B. 1985. Effect of salt and phosphates during tumbling of
turkey breast muscle on meat characteristics. Poultry Sci 64:132833.
panelists ratings for overall acceptability (r = 0.70) at month 6. Getchell JS, Highlands ME. 1957. Processing lobster and lobster meat for freez-
ing and storage. Univ. of Maine, Orono, Maine: Maine Agricultural Experi-
Conclusions ment Station Bull. 558.
Henry LK, Boyd LC, Green DP. 1995. Cryoprotectants improve physical and chem-
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with
loss, and extend more desirable texture, color, and flavor attributes the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:26575.
Marshall GA, Moody MW, Hackney CR, Godber JS. 1987. Effect of blanch time on
in frozen lobster products. Results suggest that the effects of STP the development of mushiness in ice-stored crawfish meat packed with adher-
on lobster quality attributes appear more advantageous during the ing hepatopancreas. J Food Sci 52(6):15045.
Mizuta S, Kobayashi Y, Yoshinaka R. 2001. Chemical and histological character-
latter storage months, an indication that seafood processors may ization of raw muscle from soft and hard crabs of snow crab (Chionoecetes
benefit from this technology if they intend to hold frozen product opilio). J Food Sci 66(2):23841.
Payne SR, Sandford D, Harris A, Young OA. 1994. The effects of antifreeze pro-
for 6 mo. teins on chilled and frozen meat. Meat Sci 37:42938.
Rebach S, Stribling J, Wilber M. 1990. Frozen storage quality changes in whole
Acknowledgments Jonah crabs. J Food Qual 13:2038.
Regenstein JM, Stamm JR. 1979. A comparison of the water holding capacity of
Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station External Publi- pre- and post-rigor chicken, trout, and lobster muscle in the presence of poly-
cation nr 2810. We thank Dana Rice for providing lobsters for this phosphates and divalent cations. J Food Biochem 3:2238.
Rhee K, Watts B. 1966. Evaluation of lipid oxidation in plant tissues. J Food Sci
study and Cranberry Point Seafood Co. for allowing us the use of 31:6648.
their processing equipment and facility. Thanks are also extended Rippen TE, Sutton HC, Lacey PF, Lane RM, Fisher RA, Dupaul WD. 1996. Function-
al, microbial, and sensory changes in ice-stored sea scallops (Placopecten
to Icebrand Foods Co. for their donation of lobsters and use of magellanicus) treated with sodium tripolyphosphate. J Muscle Foods 7:93108.
equipment for preliminary studies. SAS Inst. 1989. SAS/STAT users guide. Version 6. 4th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Inst.
Sims GG, Dewar AB, Zemlyak F. 1975. The effect of sodium tripolyphosphate on
frozen canned lobster meat. Halifax, N.S.: Halifax Inspection Laboratory; Tech-
References nical Services Section, Fisheries and Marine Service Environment. p 114.
Ablett RF, Gould SP. 1992. Subcellular membrane integrity of atlantic cod (Gadus Slattery SL, Dionysius DA, Smith RAD, Deeth HC. 1989. Mushiness in the blue
morhua) myotomal tissue: effects of frozen storage. J Food Sci 57(3):7969. swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus (L). Food Aust 41:698703.
[AOAC] Assn. of Official Analytical Chemists. 1998. Official methods of analysis. Systat Version 9. 1998. Systat Software, Inc. Richmond, Calif.
17th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC. Tarladgis B, Watts B, Younathan M, Dugan L. 1960. A distillation method for the
Bayer RC, Bushway AA, Work TM, inventors; Univ. of Maine, assignee. 1999 Dec quantitative determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. JAOCS 37:448.
14. Method and solution for improving frozen seafood quality. U.S. patent Work TM, Bushway AA, Work RW, Pelletier RC. 1997. The effect of cryogenic freez-
6,001,396. ing on the quality of soft and hard shell lobsters (Homarus americanus). J
Chang CC, Regenstein JM. 1997. Textural changes and functional properties of Aquatic Food Product Technol 6:5363.
cod mince proteins as affected by kidney tissue and cryoprotectants. J Food Sci Woyewoda AD, Bligh EG. 1986. Effect of phosphate blends on stability of cod
62(2):299304. fillets in frozen storage. J Food Sci 51(4):9325.
Crapo CA, Crawford DL. 1991. Influence of polyphosphate soak and cooking pro-
C528 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCEVol. 70, Nr. 9, 2005 URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org