Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gabrielle Allen
Professor Pleydell
8 October 2017
The mental illness subject attracted my attention initially because I was curious to see the
what researchers had discovered, not only for the patients, but for myself. As a person who has
suffered from several mental illnesses, I am significantly interested in the topic because I do not
want people to experience what I did. The constant task of popping pills that ultimately do not
give you the results one is looking for is entirely frustrating. This led me to research more in
depth on alternative options that may at first seem unconventional, but eventually rewarding. My
research introduced me to some new and exciting procedures known as electro therapy,
ketamine, repetitive trans-cranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and many more
approaches that may be extremely beneficial to a patient. These new treatments raise a lot of
concern because the involve the functions of the brain, its triggers, and a patients moodiness.
However, the main reason why many are anxious about the new designed attacks are because of
the issue of self-stigma. Not only do patients have to battle their mind disorder, but they also
have to carry the burden of self-stigma. Self-stigma is when one feels stereotyped by the outside
world. It is an internal feeling of shame that they connect to their disorder. The increasing
numbers of adults and children stressed with their own self-stigma is threatening the
advancement of mental health. Therefore, this internal battle, that many with mental illness
experience, raises the question as to whether these new treatments ultimately are reducing or
Allen, 2
enhancing the self-stigma of mental illnesses? Furthermore, are they preventing mind disorders
hinder to the process of attempting to cure a mental illness. Casado thinks it is impossible for
scientists to operate around this weighty factor. Ava T. Casado, a member of the Department of
Psychology at Yale University, elaborates on the self-stigma factor in her academic journal
titled, Reducing the Stigma of Mental Illness: Current Approaches and Future Directions. She
opens her piece by urging the importance of recognizing the stigma behind mental health,
Addressing the conceptual challenges in mental illness stigma research can help to improve
interventions and better serve persons suffering from psychological distress (Casado 306).
Casado boldly proclaims that any new treatment will not be successful unless it confronts the
issue of self-stigma as well. She supports her argument by providing three steps to practice,
which include education, protest, and contact. However, Casado implores the significance of
contact and states that it is the effective towards the reduction of stigma. The first step,
stereotypes and gives valid information on a certain mental illness and its stigma. The next step
is protest which is usually a visual presentation with a strong message and a list of consequences
if the demands are not met. Casado cosigns with protests because they invite a large portion of
people to participate, while the others get informed. On the other hand, some researchers have
viewed the practice of protest to aggravate stigma of mental illnesses. Therefore, Casado urges
the final step of contact because it has proven to be the most productive in its efforts to reduce
mental illness and its stigma. Contact implies having a real interaction with someone with a
Allen, 3
mental illness. The interaction allows the person to feel discomfort with their stereotypes,
eventually causing them view mental illnesses in a different light. Casado three-step plan is an
example of how mental illnesses are being examined today, which contradicts many other
approaches who are more focused on how they will be viewed tomorrow.
On a separate note, non-standard procedures are being researched and performed in order
to exterminate mental illnesses and its stigma from suffering patients. Scholars, Basant Pradhan,
Jessica Kluewer DAmico, Ramkrishna Makani and Tapan Parikh, discuss these new treatments
Alternative Approaches. The researchers introduce their argument by first raising attention
toward the limitations of Psychopharmacology, which is effects of drugs on the mind. They
express that a drug can only do so much for these patients, that is why they have welcomed some
more unusual approaches. Pradhan, DAmico, Makani, and Parikh suggest that an illness, such as
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), can be better controlled by ketamine. Ketamine is famous
for being a party drug, in other words, it is an abused recreational substance. Despite its bad
reputation, the authors propose another use for ketamine. The process of ketamine begins with a
certain dosage, depending on ones body weight. Once the ketamine has entered ones system, its
job is to increase the release of two amino acids: glutamate and aspartate. These internal acids
rearrange the trauma memory structure, causing a disruption. This technique is still being
Researchers are tirelessly examining the impending future of mental health, including
Roland Brian Bchter and Melanie Messer. Bchter is a member of the Institute for Quality and
Efficacy in Health Care, while Messer is a participant in the Faculty for Health Sciences, Health
Allen, 4
Services Research and Nursing Science. These two investigate the success of several
interventions against self-stigma through a series of trials. The two states, Future studies should
development (Bchter 1). Bchter and Messer clearly state that forthcoming studies must
involve deeper inquiries in order to receive active results. Therefore, they conducted randomized
controlled trials, in which they tested patients with any mental illness to see if they had social,
institutional, or self-stigma. The results were poor, meaning a significant amount of people
proved to be dealing with some version of stigma. In reaction to this, the researchers built an
outline of the actions that need to be taken to avoid stigma, while also presenting a scenario of
where this world is headed if these steps are not taken immediately. Bchter and Messer divided
the outline into the inputs, outputs, and outcomes. Beginning with the inputs, the researchers
urge mental health services, community services, and even peers to start being intervention
providers. This implies that these organizations must be a financial resource to continue research
on more beneficial interventions. The outputs list including educating the community with facts,
rather than poisoning stereotypes. As well as offering cognitive behavioral therapies and training
programs to the general public, but specifically to those affected by a mental illness. The
investigators close their outline with an array of short and long-term outcomes that change the
way this world views mental illnesses, while also providing new treatments that will ultimately
distinguish mind disorders. The outcomes are sectioned into personal, social, treatment related,
and life achievement. The personal addresses the patient itself, by saying that they will contain a
more positive identity, while also feel more empowered and maintain strong social skills. On a
social level, a more open society will be created, welcoming support groups and many social
interactions that will benefit the any with or affected by a mental illness. Treatment related will
Allen, 5
be able to provide more recovery options for patients, along with a healthy quality of life. Lastly,
life achievement will entail employment, housing, finances, and community activism. In order to
move forward, the investigators propose that all researchers establish a stable hypothetical base
for the development of interventions and examine their constituents. Bchter and Messer
demand more of researchers and the public in order to eradicate mental illnesses and its stigma.
scholars and researchers. There are some who solely want to focus on the present approaches, by
merely making simple steps to follow in order to change the way mental illnesses are viewed. On
the other hand, there are advocators who desire take more unconventional methods that could
change the future of mental illnesses forever. In the future, people with mental illnesses should
no longer feel shame or be stereotyped by outside influences. The embarrassment that mental
health patients face cause them to experience great suffering and occasionally leads to suicide. It
is possible that we could reach a future where everyone is deemed as unwell, which
automatically forces every man, woman, and child to suffer from self-stigma. With that said, it is
each and every one of our duties to educate our self and take action on the taxing issue of mental
Works Cited
Bchter, Robert B, and Melanie Messer. Interventions for Reducing Self-Stigma in People with
trials. Http://Web.a.ebscohost.com/Ehost/Pdfviewer/Pdfviewer?Vid=2&Sid=d13426d3-
Casados, Ava T. Reducing the Stigma of Mental Illness: Current Approaches and Future
Directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, vol. 24, no. 3, 2017, pp. 306
323., doi:10.1111/cpsp.12206.
Ferreira, Mandy. 7 Unusual New Treatments for Your Depression. Prevention, 4 Apr. 2017,
www.prevention.com/health/7-unusual-new-treatments-for-your-depression/slide/4.
Alternative Approaches. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, vol. 17, no. 1, Oct. 2015,