Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jennifer Dean
INTRODUCTION
INSTRUCTION MODELS AND THEORIES 2
What type of instruction is most effective for student success? In the world of education, there
are many different instructional approaches, theories and models. With all the different
approaches constantly being introduced, analyzed and used, it can be difficult to identify which
approach work best for different students and purposes. Some of these models and theories
include, direct instruction, interactive instruction, constructivism and project based learning
(PBL). What exactly are these approaches? Which are most effective for students?
DIRECT INSTRUCTION
According to Kanfrush (2014), Direct Instruction has long been hailed as a viable method for
Cobern, Schuster, Adams, Applegate, Skjold, Undreiu & Gobert (2010) completed an
experiment to discover if direct instruction was effective in teaching students sight words. Their
research concluded that there was an increase in the number of sight words identified using the
direct instruction model. Therefore, there is much research to prove that direct instruction does
work for certain types of instruction and with different types of students, but what is direct
instruction exactly?
Direct instruction is basically explicit instruction. Humphrey & Feez (2016) explains that The
term direct instruction now tends to be used more generally to refer to instructional patterns that
can be interpreted as visible pedagogy (p.208). Ultimately, direct instruction refers to the
explicitly teaching students a specific skill, strategy or anything in which the teacher is leading
the learning. In this type of settings, students are being explicitly taught. There is usually little
interaction with each other. Although it is explicit instruction, it can be done in a step by step
process. For example, in a math lesson, a teacher using the direct instruction model might give
INSTRUCTION MODELS AND THEORIES 3
students a math problem that they solve with the teach in a step by step direct instruction model.
INTERACTIVE INSTRUCTION
Interactive instruction is different than direct instruction but can also be very similar. In fact,
writing processes (Wolbers, Dostal, Graham, Chicak, Kilpatrick & Saulsburry, 2015, p.386).
Additionally, in the example above, the teacher gave the class a math problem. The teacher then
showed the students how to solve the math problem using direct instruction and going step by
step. However, this example could easily have been an interactive model of direct and interactive
instruction. Instead of teaching the students the step by step process, the teacher could have had
the students copy and interact with each step of the solution. Interactive instruction is strategic
like direct instruction, but it gives students the chance to actually interact with the material and
The direct instruction and interactive instructional model both have positive results. Wolbers et
al., explains that students who learned using the instructional model increased dramatically in the
area of writing (2015). Therefore, both models are effective. However, when looking closely at
the results of the researchers for both models, the interactive model allows students the
opportunity to also grow their communication, collaboration and social skills while learning the
direct instruction. The author of this paper sees a strong value in the direct instructional model
because the research shows that it does work. Furthermore, there is no doubt that direct
instruction is absolutely necessary. However, the author of this paper argues that direct
instruction can be more interactive, and therefore, more effective. The strategic instruction in the
INSTRUCTION MODELS AND THEORIES 4
interactive model increases more than just knowledge, but also other skills needed to be
successful in life.
CONSTRUCTIVISM
which posits that students learn by actively constructing their own knowledge (p.12). This does
not mean that students are never taught, but that they are given the chance to interact with
material and come to their own conclusions. Schcolnik (2016) continues to explain that Two
(p.13). What this basically means is that constructivism is about people learning through their
experiences, prior knowledge and interaction. However, there is a cognitive (mind) and a social
(interaction) piece to this theory. Some theorists focus more on the mind and others focus more
on the social.
INSTRUCTION MODELS AND THEORIES 5
The author of this paper believes that a mix of the two is best. It is important for people to use
their cognition and also interact with others while using their cognition. The chart below gives a
good example of the difference between a constructivist classroom and a instructivist classroom.
Students can still be explicitly taught, but the door is more open. Students are actively engaging
with the materials and are able to ask their own questions and inquire. Instead of the teacher
being the leader, the students are leading their own learning using their own cognition and social
interaction. In order for the constructivist model to be successful, the teacher must be the
Project Based Learning (PBL) is similar to a constructivist approach. Students use their own
cognition and inquiry to solve problems, create projects, and demonstrate their knowledge in a
variety of ways. Rivero (2017), explains that project based learning is a way to not only teach
students but engage students. Rivero (2017) explains that the purpose of PBL is to engage
students and give them opportunities to work collaboratively and solve problems. This type of
INSTRUCTION MODELS AND THEORIES 6
learning is very similar to the interactive approach in which students are interacting with the
materials/content. It is also very similar to the constructivist model because students are using
their cognition and collaboration to demonstrate their knowledge and create their own learning.
CONCLUSION
In education, there is always research being done and new and improved models/theories being
thrown at educators. Ultimately, most of the models and theories are very effective. What all of
these have is common is the understanding of differentiation and gradual release. There is no
doubt that direct instruction is needed. Students cannot always learn through the constructivist
model, or project based learning. They have to actually be taught specific strategies or
information at some point. However, the constructivist, interactive and PBL model/theory is
essential to the ultimate success. Students do not learn all the skills they need through direct
instruction. There must be a balance. Direct instruction is the beginning. The gradual release
allows students to take on more responsibility, interact with the content/material and then work
independently. It is a process, a destination and journey to learning that includes many different
RESOURCES
Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Applegate, B., Skjold, B., Undreiu, A., & Gobert, J. D.
Humphrey, S., & Feez, S. (2016). Direct instruction fit for purpose: applying a metalinguistic
toolkit to enhance creative writing in the early secondary years. Australian Journal Of Language
Kanfush, P. M. (2014). Dishing Direct Instruction: Teachers and Parents Tell All!. Qualitative
Report, 19
4-7.
Schcolnik, M., Kol, S., & Abarbanel, J. (2016). Constructivism in Theory and in Practice.
Wolbers, K. A., Dostal, H. M., Graham, S., Cihak, D., Kilpatrick, J. R., & Saulsburry, R. (2015).
The writing performance of elementary students receiving strategic and interactive writing
doi:10.1093/deafed/env022