Professional Documents
Culture Documents
If 1 Government
of Canada du Canada
Canadian General Office des normes Reaffirmed
Standards Board gdndrales du Canada
May 1997
~anonalaranaara of Canada
The CANADIAN GENERAL STANDARDS BOARD (CGSB). The STANDARDS COUNCIL O F CANADA is the co-ordinating
under whose auspices this National Standard of Canada has been body of the National Standards System, a federation of
developed is a government agency within Public Works and independent, autonomous organizations working towards the
Government Services Canada. CGSB is engaged in the production further development and improvement of voluntary
of voluntary standards in a wide range of subject areas through the standardization in the national interest.
media of standards committees and !he consensus process. The The principal objectives of the Council are to foster and promote
standards committees are composed of representatives of relevant voluntary standardization as a means of advancing the national
interests including producers, consumers and other users, retailers. economy, benefiting the health, safety and welfare of the public.
governments, educational institutions, technical, professional and assisting and protecting the consumer, facilitating domestic and
trade societies, and research and testing organizations. Any given international trade, and furthering international co-operation in the
standard is developed on the consensus of views expressed by field of standards.
such representatives.
A National Standard of Canada is a standard which has been
CGSB has been accredited by the Standards Council of Canada as approved by the Standards Council of Canada and one which
a national standards-development organization. The standards that reflects a reasonable agreement among the views of a number of
it develops and offers as National Standards of Canada conform to capable individuals whose collective interests provide, to the
the criteria and procedures established for this purpose by the greatest practicable extent, a balance of representation of
Standards Council of Canada. In addition to standards it publishes producers, users, consumers and others with relevant interests, as
as national standards, CGSB produces standards to meet particular may be appropriate to the subject in hand. It normally is a
needs, in response to requests from a variety of sources in both the standard that is capable of making a significant and timely
public and private sectors. Both CGSB standards and CGSB contribution to the national interest.
national standards are developed in conformance with the policies
described in the CGSR Policy Manual for the Development and Approval of a standard as a National Standard of Canada indicates
Maintenance of Standards. that a standard conforms to the criteria and procedures established
by the Standards Council of Canada. Approval does not refer to
CGSB standards are subject to review and revision to ensure that the technical content of the standard: this remains the continuing
they keep abreast of technological progress. Sugsestions for their responsibility of the accredited standards-development
improvement, which are always welcome, should be brought to organization.
the notice of the standards committees concerned. Changes to
standards are issued either as separate amendment sheets or in Those who have a need to apply standards are encouraged to use
new editions of standards. National Standards of Canada whenever practicable. These
standards are subject to periodic review: therefore, users are
An up-to-date listing of CGSB standards, including details on cautioned to obtain the latest edition from the organization
latest issues and amendments, and ordering instructions, is found preparing the standard.
in the CGSB Catalogue, which is published annually and is
available without charge upon request. An electronic version, The responsibility for approving National Standards of Canada
ECAT, is also available. More information is available about rests with the:
CGSB products and services at our Web site - Standards Council of Canada
http://www.pwgsc.gc.cdcgsb. 270 Albert Street
Although the intended primary application of this standard is Suite 200
stated in its Scope, it is important to note that it remains the Ottawa, Ontario
responsibility of the users of the standard to judge its suitability KIP 6N7
for their particular purpose.
The testing and evaluation of a product against this standard may
require the use of materials and/or equipment that could be
hazardous. This document does not purport to address all the
safety aspects associated with its use. Anyone using this standard
has the responsibility to consult the appropriate authorities and to
establish appropriate health and safety practices in conjunction
How to order ccC~>aPublications:
with any applicable regulatory requirements prior to its use.
CGSB neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any b y telephone - (819) 956-0425 or
injury or damage that may occur during or as the result of tests, - 1-800-665-CGSB
wherever performed. (Canada only)
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of by fax - (819) 956-5644
this Canadian standard may be the subject of patent rights. CGSB
shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent by mail - C G S B Sales Centre
rights. Users of this standard are expressly advised that Ottawa, Canada
determination of the validity of any such patent rights are entirely K I A IG6
their own responsibility.
Funher information on CGSB and its services and standards may
be obtained from:
I in person - Place du Portage
Phase 111, 6B 1
1 1 Laurier S m e t
The Manager Hull, Quebec
Strategic Standardization Group by email - ncr.cgsb-ongc@pwgsc.gc.ca
Canadian General Standards Board
Ottawa, Canada on the W e b - http:Nwww.pwgsc.gc.ca/cgsb
KIA 1G6
NATIONAL STANDARD OF CANADA
Reaffirmed
May 1997
Notes:
This Manual is based on Eddy Current Manual Volume I: Test Method published by the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited.
Chalk River Laboratories (Report AECL7523), written by V.S. Cecco, G. Van Drunen and F.L. Sharp.
Publication RC 1433, Innovations in Eddy Current Testing (Document Number RC 1433). complements this manual and is
available through the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Engineering Technologies Division, Nondestructive Testing
Development Branch, Chalk River Laboratories. Telephone (613) 584-3311 ext. 4623.
No pan of this publication may be r e p m d u d in any form without the prior permission of the publisher.
CANADIAN GENERAL STANDARDS BOARD
Acknowlrdg,nrnf is made for ihr fmnslution qf lhis Nnfionul Srandard of Canu& by the Tramlorion Bureau of Publir Works and
Govrmmrn! Srwirrs Cunuda.
CANICGSB-48.14-M86
ADVANCED MANUAL FOR EDDY CURRENT TEST METHOD
TABLE OF CONTENTS
L, -
CHAPTER 1 SCOPE AND INTRODUCTION PAGE
1.1 SCOPE
1.2 EDDY CURRENT TESTING
1.3 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE O F EDDY CURRENT TESTING
1.4 ORGANIZATION OF MANUAL
2.2.1 Introduction
2.2.2 Magnetic Field Around a Coil
2.2.3 Equations Governing Generation of Eddy Currents
2.3 FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES O F EDDY CURRENT FLOW
2.4 SKIN EFFECT
2.4.1 Standard Depth of Penetration
2.4.2 Depth of Penetration in Finite Thickness Samples
2.4.3 Standard Phase Lag
2.4.4 Phase Lag in Finite Thickness Samples
L 2.5
2.6
SUMMARY
WORKED EXAMPLES
2.6.1 Standard Depth of Penetration and Phase Lag
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 BRIDGE CIRCUITS
4.10 SUMMARY
4.1 1 WORKED EXAMPLES
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 SURFACE PROBES
CHARACTERISTIC PARAMETER 69
DEFINITION O F "PHASE" TERMINOLOGY 72
SELECTION O F TEST FREQUENCY 73
PROBE-CABLE RESONANCE 80
SUMMARY 81
WORKED EXAMPLES 82
5.11.1 Effective Probe Diameter 32
5.11.2 Character is tic P a r a m e t e r 82
7.1 INTRODUCTION
7.2 PROBES FOR TUBES AND CYLINDRICAL COMPONENTS
7.3.2 Tubes
7.3.3 Characteristic Frequency for Tubes
7.3.4 Computer Generated Impedance Diagrams
CHOICE O F TEST FREQUENCY
7.4.1 Test Frequency for Solid Cylinders
7.4.2 Test Frequency for Tubes
8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.2 EDDY CURRENT SIGNALS
8.2.1 Defect Signal Characterisitics
8.2.2 Effect of Test Frequency
8.2.3 Calibration Tubes and Simple Defects
8.2.4 Vectorial Addition and Defects a t Baffle Plates
8.2.5 Tube Inspection at Tubesheets
8.2.6 Testing Tubes with Internal Surface Probes
ANOMALOUS EDDY CURRENT SIGNALS
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.2 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY
10.1 NOMENCLATURE
10.2 DEFINITIONS
10.3 ABBREVIATIONS FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING TERMS
10.4 REFERENCES
10.5 INDEX
CANADIAN GENERAL STANDARDS BOARD
ADVANCED MANUAL FOR:
EDDY CURRENT TEST METHOD
-
CHAPTER 1 SCOPE AND INTRODUCTION
1.1 SCOPE
This manual covers t h e principles of t h e eddy c u r r e n t method of nondestructive
testing including relevant electromagnetic theory, instrumentation, testing
techniques and signal analysis.
I t is intended t o act as;
- a source of educational material t o r>ersons who a r e seekine certificatiorl
-
according t o t h e requirements of 4 8 1 ~ ~ - 1 3~ e~r t i f i c a t i G nof ond destructive
Testing Personnel (Eddy Current Method), and
- as a guide and reference t e x t f o r educational organizations and training c e n t r e s
t h a t a r e providing o r planning courses of instruction in Eddy Current Testing.
Note t h a t t h e d e g r e e of scientific detail in this manual is primarily d i r e c t e d towards
Level I1 and Level 111 certification applicants. I t is assumed t h a t t h e reader is familiar
with basic electrical theory and t h e e l e m e n t s of algebra and calculus. Many suitable
textbooks a n d reference manuals a r e available to Level I applicants t o b e used prior
to o r in conjunction with this publication. T h e handbook referenced in itern 5 of
section 10.4 is particularly suited to t h e requirements f o r Level I expertise.
L
1%
. EDDY CURRENT TESTING
Eddy c u r r e n t testing (ET) is a nondestructive test technique based on inducing
electrical c u r r e n t s in t h e material being inspected and observing t h e interaction
between those c u r r e n t s and t h e material. Eddy c u r r e n t s a r e generated by
electromagnetic coils in t h e test probe, and monitored simultaneously by measuring
probe electrical impedance. Since it's a n electrornagnetic induction process, d i r e c t
electrical c o n t a c t with t h e sample is n o t required; however, t h e sample material has
t o b e conductive.
Eddy c u r r e n t testing is a versatile technique. It's mainly used for thin materials; in
thick materials, penetration constraints limit t h e inspected volume t o thin s u r f a c e
layers. In addition t o flaw inspection, ET c a n b e used t o indirectly measure
mechanical and metallurgical characteristics which c o r r e l a t e with e l e c t r i c a l a n d
magnetic properties. Also, g e o m e t r i c e f f e c t s such as thickness, curvature and probe-
to-material spacing influence eddy c u r r e n t flow and c a n b e measured.
T h e large number of potentially significant variables in ET is both a strength a n d a
weakness of t h e technique since effectsof otherwise trivial parameters c a n mask
important information o r b e misinterpreted. Virtually everything t h a t a f f e c t s eddy
current flow or otherwise influence probe impedance has t o b e taken into account t o
obtain reliable results. Thus, credible eddy current testing requires a high level of
operator training and awareness. I
Until recently, eddy current testing was a technology where t h e basic principles were
known only t o researchers, and a l'black box" approach t o inspection was often fol-
lowed. The authors' objective in compiling this manual is t o draw upon research,
laboratory and industrial inspection experience t o bridge t h a t gap and thereby permit
t h e full potential of eddy current testing t o b e realized.
ORGAMZATION OF MANUAL
The presentation moves from theory (including a review of basic electrical concepts)
t o t e s t methods and signal analysis. Simplified derivations of probe response t o test
parameters a r e presented t o develop a basic understanding of eddy current t e s t
principles. Thus, eddy current signals a r e consistently illustrated on impedance plane
diagrams (the display used in modern eddy current t e s t instruments) and t o aid
explanation, t h e parameter "eddy current phase lagu is introduced.
Since probes play a key role in eddy current testing, technical aspects of probe design
a r e introduced with pertinent electrical impedance calculations. While knowledge of
basic electrical circuits is required for a complete understanding of eddy current t e s t
principles, a good technical base for inspection can still be obtained if sections of this
manual requiring such a background a r e skipped.
From an applications point of view, t h e material in this manual provides an inspector
with t h e necessary background t o decide:
1) what probe(s) t o use,
2) what t e s t frequencies a r e suitable,
3) what calibration defects or standards a r e required for signal calibration and/or
simulation,
4) what t e s t s a r e required t o differentiate between significant signals and false
indications,
5) how t o estimate depth of real defects.
To supplement theory, practical examples a r e presented t o develop proficiency in
performing inspections, and t o illustrate how basic principles a r e applied t o diagnose
real signals.
I t rnay b e useful t o review sections 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 before continuing and t o refer
t o these sections a s necessary while reading this manual.
FIGURE 1.1
Misinterpreted Signals
-
CHAPTER 2 EDDY CURRENT FUNDAMENTALS
L
2.1 BASIC EQUIPMENT
Basic eddy current test equipment consists of a n alternating current source
(oscillator), a probe containing a coil connected t o t h e current source, and a
voltmeter which measures t h e voltage change across t h e coil, a s shown in Figure 2.1.
OSCILLATOR VOLTMETER
I
I
cuRR
/ - PROBE
MOVEMENT
"I it T: PLATE
PROBE
CRACK
FIGURE 2.1
Eddy Current Test Equipment
I OSCILLATOR
-0-
OSCILLATOR OSCILLATOR
, co
SENSING
1L
--
FIGURE 2.2
Eddy Current Inspection Systems
The voltmeter measures charges in voltage across t h e coil which result from changes
in the electrical conditions and properties of t h e conducting material tested and/or
changes in relative position between t h e coil and t h e material tested. This voltage
change consists of a n amplitude variation and a phase variation relative t o t h e
current passing through t h e coil. The reason for amplitude and phase changes in this
voltage is discussed in Chapter 3.
(a) S t r a i g h t W i r e (b) S i n g l e T u r n C o i l
C m & Flowing into page
FIGURE 2.3
Magnetic Flux Distribution
Flux density varies linearly with electric current in t h e coil, i.e., if coil current
doubles, flux density doubles everywhere. The total magnetic f lux,@p,contained
within t h e loop is t h e product of B and t h e a r e a of t h e coil. The unit in t h e 51 system
for magnetic flux is t h e weber (Wb).
2.2.3 Equations Governing Generation of Eddy Currents
In any electrical circuit, current flow is governed by Ohm's Law and is equal t o t h e
driving (primary circuit) voltage divided by primary circuit impedance.
The eddy current coil is part of the primary circuit. The current passing through t h e
coil normally varies sinusoidally with time and is given by:
.
current (see Figure 2.4) proportional t o t h e number of turns in t h e coil ( N p and the
current ( I p )
PROBE
(primary
circuit)
FIGURE 2.4
Coil Carrying Alternating Current Adjacent to a Test Sample
which also varies periodically with time. If we bring t h e coil close t o a test sample,
Ohm's Law s t a t e s t h a t if there is a driving voltage ( V , ) and t h e sample's
impedance is finite, current will flow,
where I, ,
is current flowing through t h e sample, V is induced voltage and 2, is
t h e sample's impedance or opposition t o t h e flow of current.
These induced currents a r e known as eddy currents because of their circulatory paths.
According t o Lenz's Law, they, in turn, generate their own magnetic field which
opposes t h e primary field,
and
where 6~ is t h e equilibrium magnetic flux surrounding t h e coil in t h e presence of a
t e s t sample.
The flow of eddy currents results in resistive (Ohmic) losses and a decrease in
magnetic flux. This is reflected as a decrease in probe impedance. In equation form,
and
FIGURE 2.5
Eddy Current and Magnetic Flux Distribution With Depth Into a Conductor
SKIN EFFECT
Eddy currents induced by a changing magnetic field concentrate near t h e surface
adjacent t o t h e excitation coil. The depth of penetration decreases with t e s t
frequency and is a function of electrical conductivity and magnetic permeability of
t h e specimen. This phenomenon is known as t h e skin e f f e c t and is analogous t o t h e
situation in terrestrial heat conduction where daily surface temperature fluctuations
a r e not appreciable below t h e earth's surface. Skin e f f e c t arises as follows: t h e eddy
currents flowing in t h e t e s t object at any depth produce magnetic fields which oppose
t h e primary field, thus reducing net magnetic flux and causing a decrease in current
flow a s depth increases. Alternatively, eddy currents near t h e surface can be viewed
a s shielding t h e coil's magnetic field thereby weakening t h e magnetic field at greater
depths and reducing induced currents.
The equation for flow of induced currents is
which describes t h e exponential decrease in eddy current density with depth, and
FIGURE 2.6
Eddy Current and Magnetic Flux Distribution With Depth in a Thick Plate
The depth at which eddy current density has decreased t o l/e o r 36.8% of t h e surface
density is called t h e standard depth of penetration. The word 'standard' denotes plane
wave electromagnetic field excitation within t h e t e s t sample (conditions which a r e
rarely achieved in practice). The standard depth of penetration is given by
, inches
0 .2 4 .8 .B 1.0
-t
1.
PLATE GEOYETRY 1 1
0 .2 4 .6 .8 1.0
- I
TUBE U ( O ROO GEOMETRY
r0
( r , =O FOR ROO)
(c) ROD (ENCIRCLING COIL. t >S rp)
HGURE 2.7
Eddy Current Distribution With Depth in Various Samples
The sensitivity t o a subsurface d e f e c t depends on t h e eddy current density at t h a t
depth, i t is therefore important t o know t h e effective depth of penetration. The
effective depth of penetration is arbitrarily defined as t h e depth a t which eddy
current density decreases t o 5% of t h e surface density. For large probes and thick d
samples, this depth is about t h r e e standard depths of penetration. Unfortunately, for
most components and practical probe sizes, this depth will b e less than 3 S t h e eddy
currents being attenuated more than predicted by t h e skin depth equation. The e f f e c t
of probe diameter on t h e decrease in eddy current density o r defect sensitivity with
depth is discussed in Section 5.3.1.
2.4.3 Standard Phase Lag
The signal produced by a flaw depends on both amplitude and phase of t h e currents
being obstructed. A small surface defect and large internal defect c a n have a similar
e f f e c t on t h e magnitude of test coil impedance. However, because of t h e increasing
phase lag with depth, t h e r e will be a characteristic difference in t h e test coil
impedance vector. This e f f e c t allows location and extent of a defect to b e
determined.
Phase lag is derived from equation 2.12(c) for infinitely thick material. I t represents
a phase angle lag of x / Gradians between t h e sinusoidal eddy currents at t h e surface
and those below t h e surface. i t is denoted by t h e symbol 8 (beta) and is given by:
radians
or B = x / b x 57 degrees (2.14b)
57"
1
I
I
1 1 4O
1
-p (DEGREES)
p = -g
X
x 5 7 , DEGREES
FIGURE 2.8
Eddy Current Phase Lag Variation With Depth in Thick Samples
When x is equal t o one standard depth of penetration, phase lag is 57" or one radian.
This means t h a t t h e eddy current flowing below t h e surface, a t one standard depth of
L penetration, lag t h e surface currents by 57'. At two standard depths of penetration
they lag t h e surface currents by 114.O. This is illustrated in Figure 2.8.
(a) FLATE
( c ) ROO
-Pa'Pr
-
---
PLATE GEOMETRY
CALCULATED. E O U A T l O N 2 . 1 4 ( b )
1
FIGURE 2.9
Eddy Current Phase Lag in Various Samples
Phase lag can be visualized as a shift in t i m e of t h e sinusoidally varying current
flowing below t h e surface. This was illustrated in Figure 2.5. Phase lag plays a key
role in the analysis of eddy current test signals. I t will b e used throughout t h e manual .-
t o link theory and observations. I t should not b e misinterpreted or confused with t h e
phase angle between voltage and current in AC theory. Both t h e voltage and current
(and magnetic field) have this phase shift or lag with depth.
SUMMARY
=-
1.3
x 57 - 6 4 degrees
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Eddy current testing consists of monitoring t h e flow and distribution of eddy currents
in test material. This is achieved indirectly by monitoring probe impedance during a
test. An understanding of impedance and associated electrical quantities is therefore
imperative for a fundamental appreciation of eddy current behaviour.
The first two sections review t h e electrical quantities important in eddy current
testing. This is followed by presentation of a model of a test coil coupled t o test
material and i t s equivalent electrical circuit. The equivalent circuit approach permits
derivation of simplified impedance diagrams t o show t h e e f f e c t of test and material
parameters on probe impedance in graphical form. Once t h e simple impedance
diagram concepts of this chapter a r e understood, t h e more complex diagrams of
subsequent chapters should present little difficulty.
3.2 IMPEDANCE EQUATIONS AND DEFWITIONS
All information about a sample is obtained through changes in electrical
characteristics of t h e coil/sample combination. Therefore a basic understanding of
electrical quantities is important for eddy current inspection.
RESISTANCE: (symbol: R, units: ohm, R)
Opposition t o t h e flow of electrical current is called resistance. It is
constant for both direct and alternating current. The electrical -
component is called a resistor.
V = IR Ohm's Law (3.1)
where, V is voltage drop across resistor (volt), and
I is current through resistor (ampere)
X L = WL (3.4a)
or = 2 ~ f L (3.4b)
*L
where, f is frequency of alternating current (hertz), and w is angular
frequency (radiansfsecond)
121 (3.6)
and
shift 8 -
phasor rotates counter-clockwise. The reactive cornponent ( V ) , having a phase
90, will be represented along t h e vertical axis.
Current is common t o both voltage components and since V I E , t h e voltage graph of
Figure 3.l(e) can be converted t o a n impedance graph display, a s in Figure 3.1 (f). If
this approach is applied t o eddy current testing, i t is found t h a t any changes in
resistance or inductive reactance will cause a change in the position of t h e end of t h e
vector (point P) which represents t h e total impedance vector.
DIRECT CURRENT
1' "R
V = 1R
ALTERNATING CURRENT
P VL LEADS I r v 90'
( b ) ALTERNATING CURRENT C I R C U I T
I NOUC 1 I VE
REACTANC
WF,
FIGURE 3.1
Representation of D i m t Current and Altanating Current Circuit Parameters
To obtain t h e reactive and resistive components from this graph requires knowledge
of trigonometry.
Reactive component: XL= WL = 121 sin e (3.10)
Resistive component: R = 121 c o s 8 (3.11)
Amplitude of impedance: IZI = dlt2 + xL2
Phase angle: 3 = A r c t a n XL/R (3.7)
The test probe contains a coil which when placed on o r close t o a t e s t sample can b e
considered as t h e primary winding of a transformer. The field c r e a t e d by alternating
current in t h e coil induces eddy currents in t h e test sample which acts as a single
turn secondary winding, N g = 1 Figure 3.2(b). Eddy currents align to produce a
magnetic field which tends t o weaken t h e surrounding n e t magnetic flux 4 p *
according to Lenz's Law. #E
,-------a
I
-- SECONDARY
' V
s RECEIVE COIL
FIGURE 3.2
Model of a Coil with Test Object
There a r e two methods of sensing changes in t h e secondary current, I s .The
"impedance method" of eddy current testing consists of monitoring t h e voltage drop
across t h e primary coil ( v p ' I p Z p ) The impedance is altered by t h e
load of t h e secondary of t h e transformer. Therefore, changes in secondary resistance, Rs ,
,
or inductance L can be measured a s changes in v
P
The "send-receive1' method of eddy current testing uses two coils. Eddy current flow
in t h e sample is altered by defects and these variations a r e detected by monitoring
t h e voltage across a secondary receive coil, see Figure 3.2(c).
( c ) EQUIVALENT SERIES C I R C U I T
FIGURE 3.3
Equivalent Circuits
The equivalent circuit concept can b e used t o obtain simplified impedance diagrams
applicable t o eddy current testing. These diagrams serve as a n introduction t o t h e
more detailed diagrams which include variations caused by t h e skin effect. The
coilfsample circuit model can be transformed into t h e simpler series circuit by t h e
following mathematical manipulations. The load resistance R, can b e transfered
from t h e secondary back t o t h e primary winding b e multiplying i t by t h e turns ratio
squared, ( N / N 1 , Figure 3.3(b).
The total impedance of this parallel circuit can b e evaluated and transformed into a n
equivalent series circuit a s follows:
where z1 = N~R,
and 22 '~XO,
w h e r e Xo- wLo, c o i l inductive reactance in air.
~ N
8
x~0 R
Therefore I
P np2 n P + j x o
which transforms t o
The series circuit in Figure 3.3(c) is therefore fully equivalent t o t h e parallel one of
Figure 3.3(b). Rp can b e considered a s coil wire and cable resistance while Z p - R L + j x p
is t h e total impedance of t h e probefsample combination.
When t h e probe is far from t h e sample (probe in air), R, is very large and by
substituting R , into equation 3.12a results in
RL-0, Xp-Xo and Z p m X 0
The above results can b e obtained by removing component N ~ R , from
Figure 3.3(b), since R a m OD implies an open circuit.
L
One last transformation in t h e equation is required before impedance graphs can be
Co -
obtained. Equation 3.12(a) c a n be simplified by setting
XoG
where G - 1/ N
2
is equivalent circuit conductance.
Substitution in 3.12(a) yields
Normalizirrg with respect t o X o , the coil's inductive reactance when far removed
from the sample (coil in air) results in
FIGURE 3.4
Impedance Graph Display
3.5.2 Correlation Between Coil Impedance and Sample Properties
The e f f e c t of test parameter variations on probe impedance c a n be derived from
equation 3.13. Each paramater is substituted in turn into C o-X ,/N;R,; if a n
increase in t h e parameter results in a n increase in C,, t h e operatlng point (position
on impedance diagram) moves DOWN t h e impedance curve, if Co decrease, t h e
operating point moves UP t h e impedance curve. These correlations a r e useful in
obtaining a qualitative appreciation of t h e e f f e c t of t h e various test parameters. It is
also useful t o know t h a t probe/sample e f f e c t s can b e derived from t h e simple
equivalent parallel circuit where t h e sample is t r e a t e d as a resistor in parallel with
a n inductor (coil). The complete e f f e c t can then b e obtained by adding t h e e f f e c t of
'phase lag', which will be t r e a t e d in l a t e r chapters.
Study of equation 3.13 reveals t h e following:
I. An increase in R E results in a decrease in Co.. Therefore a n increase in
resistance t o eddy current flow moves t h e operatmg point, P, UP t h e impedance
curve (along t h e semi-circle), see Figure 3.5(a).
Therefore, p - c o n s t a n t x RE
Also R , - pn D / t w -
Substituting Lo and R into C o -
c o n s t a n t x D , for constant thickness, t, and coil width, w.
w L ~ / N ~ R results
, in C o - c o n s t a n t x D.
An increase in probe diameter or tube drameter will move t h e operating point
DOWN t h e impedance curve, see Figure 3.5(d).
6. In t h e equivalent circuit derivation perfect coupling was assumed for sake of
simplification. However, it can be shown t h a t when mutual coupling between
coil and sample is decreased, t h e impedance point t r a c e s smaller semi-circles
a s C increases from 0 t o infinity, see Figure 3.5(e).
@
f!L
DSURFACE
PROBE
.L,
DECREASING F I L L FACTOR
OR INCREASING L I F T - O F F
FIGURE 3.5
Simplified Impedance Diagrams
SUMMARY
d
The impedance method of eddy current testing consists of monitoring t h e voltage
drop across a test coil. The impedance has resistive and inductive components; t h e
impedance magnitude is calculated from the equation
1 , ohms
0 = Arctan wL -
R degrees (3.7)
The voltage across t h e t e s t coil is V = IZ where I is t h e current through t h e coil and Z
is t h e impedance.
A sample's resistance t o t h e flow of eddy currents is reflected a s a resistive load and
is equivalent t o a resistance in parallel t o t h e coil inductive reactance. This load
results in a resistive and inductive impedance change in t h e test coil. Coil impedance
can be displayed on normalized impedance diagrams. These a r e two-dimensional plots
with t h e inductive reactance displayed on t h e vertical axis and resistance on t h e
horizontal axis as in Figure 3.6.
NORMAL l ZEO
l NDUCTANCE
REACTANCE
FIGURE 3.6
Impedance Graph Display
With this display we c a n analyze t h e e f f e c t of sample and test parameters on coil
impedance. The equivalent circuit derivation of coil impedance is useful for a
qualitative understanding of t h e e f f e c t of various t e s t parameters. I t is valid only for
non-ferromagnetic material and for t h e condition of no skin depth attenuation o r
phase lag across t h e sample. (Ferromagnetic materials will be covered in Section
9.4).
Note t h a t all t e s t parameters result in a semicircle display as they increase o r
decrease. A resistance increase t o t h e eddy current flow or increase of sample's
electrical resistivity moves t h e operating point UP t h e impedance diagram, i.e.,
increase in coil inductance and a change in coil resistance.
SOLUTION:
a) XL
XL -- 2 nfL
18.8 ohms
-(2 n ) ( S O x lo3) (60 x )
= Arctan Arctan -
18 8 = A r c t a n
15
8 = 51.4 d e g r e e s
Probe Impedance Adjacent t o Sample
PROBLEM: An eddy current test is carried out on brass using a surface probe at 4
50 kHz. Coil resistance in air is 15 ohms and i t s inductance in air is 60
microhenries. Probe impedance with t h e probe on t h e brass sample is
measured as z p = 24.5 ohms and 0 = 35 degrees.
SOLUTION: a) X = Z sine
P P
= 2 4 . 5 sin 3 5 ' - 1 4 . 1 ohms
b) RL = Z c o s e
P R~~
-
= 2 4 . 5 c o a 35' - 1 5 . 0 = 5 . 1 ohms
3.7.3 Voltage - Current Relationship
PROBLEM: For t h e above probe impedance problem calculate voltage drop across
t h e probe if test current is 100 milliamperes.
SOLUTION: Probe impedance 1 2 1 = 24.5 ohms
Ohm's Law states t h a t V = 11'2 I
4.1 INTRODUCTION
All t h e information about a test part is t r a n s m i t t e d t o t h e test coil through t h e
magnetic field surrounding it. T h e impedance eddy current method monitors voltage
drop across t h e primary coil, V p I p Z p ; as coil impedance changes s o will t h e
voltage across t h e coil if current remains reasonably constant. The send-receive eddy
c u r r e n t method monitors voltage developed across a sensing coil (or Hall e f f e c t
d e t e c t o r ) placed close t o t h e excitation coil, see Figure 2.2.
In most inspections, probe impedance (or voltage) changes only slightly as t h e probe
passes a d e f e c t , typically less t h a n 1%. This small change is difficult t o d e t e c t by
measuring absolute impedance or voltage. Special instruments have been developed
incorporating various methods of detecting and amplifying small impedance changes.
T h e main functions of a n eddy current instrument a r e illustrated in t h e block diagram
of Figure 4.1. A sine wave oscillator generates sinusoidal current, at a specified
frequency, t h a t passes through t h e test coils. Since t h e impedance of t w o coils is
never exactly equal, balancing is required t o eliminate t h e voltage difference
between them. Most eddy current instruments achieve this through an AC bridge or
by subtracting a voltage equal t o t h e unbalance voltage. In general they c a n t o l e r a t e
a n impedance mismatch of 5%. O n c e balanced, t h e presence of a d e f e c t in t h e
vicinity of o n e coil c r e a t e s a small unbalanced signal which is then amplified.
r----
1
Q
DsCa METER
TRANSFORMER
FIGURE 4.1
Block Diagram of Eddy Curtent Instrument
Since t h e sinusoidal unbalance voltage signal is too difficult and inefficient t o
analyse, i t is converted t o a direct current (DC) signal retaining t h e amplitude and
phase characteristics of t h e A C signal. This is normally achieved by resolving t h e AC .&
signal into quadrature components and then rectifying them while retaining t h e
appropriate polarity. In general purpose instruments, these signals a r e normally
displayed on X-Y monitors. Simpler instruments, such a s crack detectors, however,
have a meter t o display only t h e change in voltage amplitude. To decrease electrical
instrument noise, filtering is used at t h e signal output; however, this decreases t h e
frequency response and thereby restricts t h e inspection speed.
The most troublesome parameter in eddy current testing is lift-off (probe-to-
specimen spacing). A small change in lift-off c r e a t e s a large output signal. The
various methods used t o decrease this e f f e c t a r e discussed in t h e individual sections
on specific eddy current instruments.
BRIDGE CIRCUITS
FIGURE 4.2
Common Bridge Circuit
If t h e bridge is m a d e up of four impedance arms, having inductive r e a c t a n c e and
resistive components, t h e voltage from R t o A must equal t h e voltage from B t o C in
both amplitude and phase f o r t h e bridge t o b e balanced.
At balance,
and 11Z3 - I ~ Z ~
from which t h e following relationship is obtained:
1 Z3
G' ' Zqs point C is at a higher potential than point A.
The inductive voltage drop across each coil is equalized by controlling the current
passing through t h e coils. This is done by varying potentiometer R2. However, when
t h e test coil inductance differs significantly from reference coil inductance,
potentiometer 1 2 will have t o be rotated t o one extremity. This means less current
passes through one coil making i t less sensitive than t h e other coil. When this occurs, 4
a distorted (unsymmetrical) signal results if a differential probe is used. In addition,
t h e common cable lead carries t h e unbalanced current, resulting in cable noise,
especially if t h e cable is not properly shielded and grounded.
In t h e Figure 4.3 circuit, t h e output voltage for large ( > 10% ) off-null (of f-balance)
conditions is a nonlinear function of t h e change in coil impedance. However, for
defect detection, close to balance, this discrepancy is small.
Bridge Circuit in Crack Detectors
Portable eddy current instruments a r e often used t o inspect for surface defects. A
typical crack detector circuit is shown in Figure 4.4. An oscillator supplies a n
alternating current t o a n AC Bridge, containing a single eddy current probe coil a s
one arm of t h e bridge. A capacitor is connected in parallel with t h e coil so t h e L-C
(inductance-capacitance) circuit is near resonance. When t h e coil is placed on a t e s t
sample, t h e bridge is unbalanced and t h e pointer on t h e meter swings off-scale. The
bridge can be balanced by adjusting potentiometer R .
FIGURE 4.4
Simplified Circuit of Crack Detector
FIGURE 4.5
Parallel L C Circuit
At resonance,
hence 2 -- when R - 0
\ /
X
where Q.- ,qualityfactor.
R
HONEL
LEAD
BRASS
ALUMINIUM
\ STORAGE MONITOR
COPPER
OUTPUT 0SELECTO(I
FREQUENCY
PROBE
CONNECTOR
FIGURE 4.6
Typical Eddy Current Instrument With Storage Mcmitur
Most bridges can tolerate a coil impedance between 10 and 200 ohms. The
BALANCING controls, labelled X and R in some instruments, a r e potentiometers
R~ and ~2 in Figure 4.3. They match coil impedance t o achieve a null when the probe
is in a defect f r e e location on t h e t e s t sample. Some instruments have automatic
balancing.
The bridge output signal amplitude is controlled by t h e GAIN control. In some
instruments i t is labelled a s SENSITIVITY. It controls the amplifier of t h e bridge
output signal, shown in Figure 4.1, and therefore does not a f f e c t current going
through t h e probe. However, some instruments control amplification by varying
current through t h e coils. This is undesirable because i t could cause coil heating, and
when testing ferromagnetic materials t h e magnetization level changes, resulting in
signal distortion and non-repeatable signals.
Following amplification of the bridge unbalance signal, t h e signal is converted t o
direct current signals. Since t h e AC signal has both amplitude and phase i t is
converted into QUADRATURE X and Y components. The quadrature components of
t h e bridge output a r e generated by samplin t h e sinusoidal signal at two positions 90"
f
apart (one-quarter wave) on t h e waveform o r by using electronic multipliers). The
DC voltage values (amplitudes) constitute t h e X and Y quadrature components. If
phase is taken relative t o t h e resistive voltage component, then t h e X quadrature
component i s R (orvR)
~ and t h e Y component, xL(orVL), in equation 3.12(b) or Figure
3.4. We now have a n efficient way of analyzing bridge unbalance signals.
Eddy current instruments do not have a phase reference. To compensate for this, they
have a PHASE SHIFT control (phase-discrimination control). Normal impedance
diagram orientation with inductive reactance displayed vertically (+ Y) and resistive w
horizontally (+ X) can b e obtained experimentally. This is achieved by adjusting t h e
PHASE control until t h e signal from a probe approaching a f e r r i t e sample (high IJ and
very high P ) displays a vertical (+ Y) signal indicating a n increase in probe inductive
reactance, s e e Section 5.5.6 f o r examples. PHASE control can also be used t o
minimize t h e e f f e c t of extraneous signals such as lift-off. The X-Y signal pattern is
rotated until t h e lift-off signal is horizontal (X). Thus any vertical (Y) channel signal
indicates defects, thickness variations, etc., with little e f f e c t from probe wobble.
Coil wire and cable resistance increase linearly with temperature according t o
WITH L I F T - O F F = 0 . 1 mm
PROBE W I T H L I F T - O F F = O mn
METER
OU TPU T
SAMPLE W I T H D E F E C T
/
OSCILLATOR FREQUENCY, -f
fr
FIGURE 4.7
Meter Output with Varying Oxillator Frequency
Crack detectors have a meter output and three basic controls: balance, lift-off, and
sensitivity. BALANCING control is performed by adjusting t h e potentiometer on t h e
adjacent bridge arm, until bridge output is zero (or close t o zero). GAIN control
(sensitivity) adjustment occurs at t h e bridge output. The signal is then rectified and
displayed on a METER. Because the signal is filtered, in addition t o t h e mechnical
inertia of the pointer, t h e frequency response of a meter is very low (less than
10 Hz). LIFT-OFF CONTROL adjusts t h e test frequency (by less than 25%) t o operate
slightly off resonance. In crack detectors t h e t e s t frequency is chosen t o minimize
t h e e f f e c t of probe wobble (lift-off), not t o change the skin depth or phase lag. The
set-up t o compensate for probe wobble c a n be described with t h e help of Figure 4.7.
Frequency is adjusted by trial-and-error t o obtain t h e same output signal on t h e
meter with the probe touching t h e sample and at some specified lift-off (normally
0.1 mm). At this frequency a deep surface d e f e c t will give a different reading on t h e
meter, a s shown in Figure 4.7.
However, t h e meter output is a complex function of signal phase and amplitude, and
cannot b e used t o reliably measure depth of real defects. Nor can they b e used t o
distinguish between real and false indications such a s ferromagnetic inclusions.
Material Sorting and Conductivity Instruments
Material sorting, or conductivity instruments, have a precalibrated meter output and
have a unique way of compensating for lift-off. Instruments for sorting of high
-
resistivity materials (Type 304 stainless steel) use a fixed, high test frequency
normally between 200 and 500 kHz, and those for low resistivity materials (aluminum
alloys), a low test frequency, between 20 and 100 kHz. They incorporate AC bridges
and normally have two coils (one as reference). Coil impedance is in t h e range of 20
t o 100 ohms. They either have bridge balancing o r a zeroing control, t o keep t h e
signal on scale. GAIN CONTROL or sensitivity adjustment occurs at t h e bridge
output. The signal is then rectified and displayed on a METER.
LIFT-OFF compensation is normally pre-set. Figure 4.8 explains how t h e probe-
wobble (lift-off) signal is eliminated. The bridge is purposely unbalanced (by pre-set
internal adjustment)" such t h a t t h e unbalance point, P, is at t h e c e n t r e of curvature
of t h e lift-off impedance locus, AB. The instrument m e t e r reads a voltage
proportional t o t h e distance, PB' or PAt, from t h e chosen unbalance point t o the
impedance curves. The amplitude of this voltage remains constant with probe wobble
but changes significantly for wall thickness (and resistivity) variations. In f a c t any
signal t h a t traces an impedance locus different from lift-off will change meter
output.
PRESET UNBALANCE
AIR
V E S l STANCE
FIGURE 4.8
Unbalanced Bridge Method Showing Selection of Operating Point
7r
EXClTATION COIL RECEIVE COILS
RLARGE
TEST ARTICLE
FIGURE 4.9
Send-Receive Circuit
This makes t h e excitation ma netic flux @ independent of primary coil resistance.
f
The secondary or receive coil s) is c o n n e d d t o a high input impedance amplifier,
hence t h e induced voltagev, is not affected by receive coil resistance. 4
The wire resistance of both t h e excitation and receive coils can change, because of
temperature, without affecting t h e output signals; temperature drift has thus been
eliminated. Temperature independence makes this method useful for measuring
resistivity, wall thickness and spacing between components. It has no significant
advantage over t h e impedance method for d e f e c t detection, except in t h e through-
wall transmission system discussed in Section 5.4.
Hall-Effect Detector
Most send-receive circuits consist of one excitation (or driver) coil and one or more
receive (or pick-up) coils.
However, the induced magnetic flux 0, can be measured with a Hall-ef f e c t detector
rather than by monitoring t h e induced voltage V, across a pick-up coil, s e e Figure
2.2b and 2 . 2 ~ .
FIGURE 5.10
Hall Detector Circuit
FIGURE 4.11
Secondary Voltage Waveform f o r Various Test Conditions
FIGURE 4.12
Voltage Across a Pulsed Eddy Current Pick-Up Cod as a Function of Time
The pulsed eddy current method offers another advantage. The pulsed driving current
produces an inherently wideband frequency spectrum, permitting extraction of more
selective information than can b e determined from t h e test specimen by a single d
I
INSTRUMENT
x? Yy I PROBE
1
.
#b
r
6 o o f 0
X Y x ; y X Y
X-Y RECORER 2-CHANNEL FM TAPE
- CHA#T RECORDER
- RECORDER
FIGURE 4.13
Block Diagram of Eddy Current Monitoring Equipment
X-Y Recorders
Signal analysis for signal discrimination and defect depth estimation is normally done
on X-Y signal patterns. The CRT storage monitors have a frequency response of at
least 1 k H z and therefore do not restrict maximum inspection speed. However, t o
obtain a permanent visual record of t h e signal, i t must b e recorded on X-Y recorders.
The fastest recorders have a speed of response of 8 H z for small signals. This
drastically limits inspection speed if used on-line. I t is therefore only used in t h e
laboratory or t o record playback from t a p e recorders (this is done by recording at t h e
highest tape speed and playing back at t h e lowest, a factor of 8:l for most t a p e
recorder). One solution t o on-line recording of X-Y signals is t o paragraph t h e CUT
display; however, this is not practical for recording many signals.
Another solution is t o use storage monitors with hard copy (paper output) capability.
These exist commercially but require custom-made control units. They have a
frequency response of 1 k H z or higher.
Strip Chart Recorders
Recording X and Y signal components against t i m e is useful in locating d e f e c t s and
determining their length.
Common two channel ink-pen s t r i p chart recorders have a speed response of
approximately 100 Hz. At maximum inspection speed (0.25 m/s) t h e recorded signal
4
will decrease in amplitude and b e slightly distorted.
Ink-ejection strip c h a r t recorders have a speed response of 1 kHz. These recorders
a r e not readily available in North America and use a lot of paper.
Ultraviolet light recorders have a speed response higher than 1 kHz, but require
special paper. These recorders a r e rarely used in eddy current testing.
F M Tape Recorders
Tape recorders allow storage of eddy current signals (on magnetic tape) for
subsequent retrieval. They have a frequency response proportional t o recording speed.
The lowest recording speed is 24 mm/s (15/16 ips) giving a frequency response of
300 Hz, and t h e fastest, 380 mm/s (15 ips), will respond t o 4.8 kHz.
Frequency Response
Eddy current instruments and recording instrumentation have limited frequency
response. This means they require finite t i m e to respond to a n input signal.
Frequency response, sometimes called speed of response, is defined as t h e frequency
a t which t h e output signal falls to 0.707 (-3 dB) of t h e maximum input signal.
A test coil with a n effective sensing width w passing over a localized d e f e c t a t a
speed s will sense t h e point defect for a duration of w/s seconds. This signal is
approximately equal t o one wavelength with a frequency
f - s/w hertz (4.6)
SOLUTION:
(b) I n d u c t i v e Reactance, XL = 2 r f L (3.4b)
= 2 n x 2 5 2 x 1 0 3 x 80 x = 1 2 6 . 5 ohm.
X~
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The goal of this chapter is t o present a practical approach t o eddy current inspections
using surface probes. The emphasis is on t e s t variables such as test frequency, probe
size and type; these a r e normally t h e only variables a n inspector has at his control.
These selections a r e usually determined by skin depth considerations, defect size, and
probe size.
Impedance graphs and t h e Characteristics Parameter a r e included because they a r e
tools t h a t an inspector should not b e without. A thorough understanding of impedance
graphs is essential t o manipulate t e s t conditions t o minimize and/or t o cope with
undesirable test variables. Erroneous conclusions a r e often made by persons who do
not have a working knowledge of impedance graphs.
(8)
D l FFERENTI AL SURFACE PROBE
.
YULT 1 SURFACE CO I L PROBE
F ERROMICNET l C
COYPENSATING
FIELD
FIGURE 5.2
Special Surface Probes
A gap probe, Figure 5.2(b), uses ferromagnetic material t o shape t h e magnetic field.
The field is confined by t h e core causing eddy currents t o flow in circular loops
perpendicular to t h e flux lines.
.4 differential configuration is shown in Figure 5.2k); t h e two coils a r e placed side-
by-side. Both coils have high sensitivity t o localized variations but tend t o cancel out
t h e effect of lift-off, gradual material variations, o r ambient temperature changes.
A lift-off compensating probe is shown in Figure 5.2(d); this probe combines t h e
signals from two coils t o effectively r o t a t e t h e defect signal relative t o t h e lift-off
signal. Therefore, even on Vough" surfaces, shallow defects can b e detected.
EST ARTICLE
(DRIVER COIL)
RECEIVER C O l L
PICK-UP COILS
(WOUND OPPOSING
EACH O T H E R )
(b)
FIGURE 5.3
Send-Receive Probes
Send-Receive Probes
Figure 5.3(a) shows a through-transmission probe arrangement. Current flowing in the
SEND coil produces a magnetic field, part of which is transmitted through t h e t e s t
article. The field is detected by t h e RECEIVER coil, inducing a voltage. There will be
no signal variation from t h e receiver coil when a defect-free test article is moved
anywhere between t h e two coils as long as t h e coil-to-coil spacing remains constant.
Figure 5.3(b) shows a reflection-type probe arrangement. The probe consists of a
large send coil which generates a field, and two small receiver coils wound in
opposite directions, as mirror images t o one another, as shown in Figure 5.3k). With
t h e probe in air, n e t output is zero. However, if one end is placed near a test article,
t h e field differs a t t h e two ends, and a n e t voltage appears across t h e two coils.
L
5.2.2 Directional Properties
Eddy currents are closed loops of induces current circulating in a plane perpendicular
t o t h e direction of magnetic flux. Their normal direction of travel is parallel t o t h e
coil winding and parallel t o the surface. See Figure 5.4.Pancake t y p e surface probes
a r e therefore insensitive t o poor bonding of coatings and flaws parallel to t h e surface
of a sample.
\ *.yiy!Z
I
1 'rCCfZI
LLYINAR CRACK
TEST PLATE
. ;
I
EOOY WRREWT FLOWS PARALLEL TO COIL IIWDIWGS
POOR S E l S l T l V l l V TO LlYlNAllOWS
SURFACE CRACK
FIGURE 5.4
D i r e c t i d Properties of a Surface Probe
When testing for flaws such as cracks, i t is essential t h a t t h e eddy current flow be a t
a large angle (preferably perpendicular) t o t h e crack t o obtain maximum response. If
eddy current flow is parallel t o t h e defect there will be little or no disruption of
currents and hence no coil impedance change.
When testing for flaws parallel t o t h e surface, such a s laminations, a horseshoe
shaped probe (a gap probe with a very large gap) may have reasonable sensitivity.
5.2.2.1 Sensitivity at Centre of a Coil
Probe impedance changes with coil diameter, as will be discussed further in Section
5.5. A simplified derivation of this diameter e f f e c t is derived below, for t h e case of
no skin depth attenuation o r phase lag and long coils. From Faraday4s Law,
The magnetic flux density, 8,is approximately constant across a coil's diameter,
hence
6 - BA
Resistance t o flow of current is proportional t o flow path length and resistivity and
inversely proportional t o cross-sectional area, Ac,
= 2nrp = Znrp
Rs u n i t depth x u n i t width
AE
Rs u r
or I8 u r
since a - I from Lenz's Law, i t follows
6s 8
that 6B a r
Therefore, eddy current flow and its associated magnetic flux a r e proportional t o
radial distance from t h e centre of a coil. Hence no current flows in t h e c e n t r e (r = 0)
and there is no sensitivity t o defects at t h e c e n t r e of a coil.
Probe Inductance
I
The factor governing coupling and induced voltage in test material is t h e magnetic
flux surrounding t h e coil. The total magnetic flux ( $p ) is proportional t o probe
.
inductance (L) and current (I), i.e., @ a L I In most eddy current instruments
excitation current is kept reasonably eonstant (in t h e milliampere range) but probe
inductance could vary by a factor of one thousand. The most important aspect of
inductance is that probe impedance, which is a function of inductance, must be
compatible with t h e instrument and signal cable,
z 1 * and B - Arctan X~ -
R
L = 11 L = 23 L = 45 L = 90 L = 180
R=9 R = 3 R=2 R = 0.9 R = 0.5
N = 136
48 AWG 41 AWG 36 AWG 29 AWG 23 AWG
(0.031 mm) (0.071 mm) (0.13 mm) (0.29 mm) (0.57 mm)
- -
L = 24 L = 49 L = 97 L = 195 L = 390
R = 17 R =8 R=4 R =2 R=1
N = 200
L 49 AWG 43 AWG 37 AWG 31 AWG 25 AWG
(0.028 mm) (0.056 mm) (0.11 mm) (0.23 mm) (0.45 mm)
The self-inductance of a long coil (solonoid) can b e calculated from t h e equation
(5. la)
Lo is self-inductance in henries
where vr is relative permeability of c o r e (normally = 1.0)
A is coil's planar surface area, m i 1 1 imc t r c s
L is coil length, millimetres.
This formula is a good approximation for coils of lengthidiameter ratio greater than
10.
For a short coil, end e f f e c t s will reduce inductance because of lower flux at coil
ends. The N~ term remains since N e n t e r s in N 4p(total number of flux linkages) and
again since 4 itself is proportional t o N. The following approximate equation can b e
used t o calcurate inductance of short coils:
Do Di
where 7 is mean coil radius
+
4 * nm
Most eddy current instruments will operate over a fairly broad range of probe
impedance (and probe inductance) without substantial reduction in signal-to-noise
ratio and signal amplitude. An instrument input impedance of 100 ohms is typical,
although any impedance between 20 and 200 ohtns is generally acceptable, unless test
frequency is too close t o probe-cable resonance; see Section 5.9. Exact probe
inductance calculations a r e therefore not essential. To facilitate impedance
calculations, Table 5.1 has been prepared. This table lists coil inductance and
resistance (with probe away from test material) for various outside diameters and
number of coil turns, keeping both t h e inside diameter and coil length equal t o 0.2
times t h e outside diameter. Wire diameter is chosen t o fill available coil cross-
sectional space. Using this table and t h e knowledge t h a t inductance,
where N is number of turns of wire and 6 is average coil diameter, one can usually
make a reasonable estimate of wire size and number of turns required t o achieve a
particular inductance.
( a ) L I F T -OFF OISTANCE (mm)
FIGURE 5.5
Decrease in Sensitivity with
(a) Lift-off (b) Defect Depth
PARAMETERS AFFECTING SENSITIVITY TO DEFECTS
During eddy c u r r e n t inspection o n e must b e a w a r e of t h e limitations of t h e technique J
a n d should t a k e maximum advantage of its potential. Although sensitivity to d e e p
s u r f a c e d e f e c t s is excellent, sensitivity t o d e e p subsurface d e f e c t s is very poor. A
subsurface d e f e c t only 5 m m f r o m t h e s u r f a c e is considered very d e e p f o r eddy
c u r r e n t test purposes.
At high frequencies the 4 6 term will be small and t h e sensing diameter can be
assumed t o be about equal t o coil diameter, but at low t e s t frequencies t h e rnagnetic
field spread can be significant. In this case it is common t o use ferrite cups t o
contain t h e field. This results in a concentrated field without affecting depth of
penetration.
-
, ,
, 1 m PROBE O l l U E T t R
1.3 m PROBE O l l Y E T E R
I MHz = 0.36 Rm
C
r g 8 ~ ~ o= 1.16
~ ~ mz
C 0
W
I I I I I I I 1 I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 I2 14 16 18 20 22
FIGURE 5.6
Effect of Defect Length
JURFPCE
5UPFACE
75% FRO'.
~~~
I\ ,
/INSIDE
TUBE
ROTATION
SURFACE
GROOVE
\'
>URFACk
OUTSIDE
S U R F A C E SROOVE
1voir
1
L
FIGURE 5.7
Comparing Conventional and Through-Wall Transmission Techniques
The Y-amplitude presentation in Figure 5.7(b) shows d e f e c t signal amplitude does not
change significantly with d e f e c t depth. It is important t o n o t e t h e phase of t h e
signals does not change with d e f e c t d e p t h when using t h e through-transmission
method a s shown in t h e X-Y display.
ART'IC L E
{ AIR
I \
-
wL
WLo
u RES l STANC
I ROC I
FIGURE 5.8
Coil Impedance Display
The resistive component is normalized by subtracting coil wire and cable resistance,
R D C , a n d t h e n d i v i d i n g by wLo ,
,1 . 2
U
p - 700rtl.cm
U
g
w
N
1.0 p - 170
p = 53
P p ' 1.7
0.9
\ FREQUENCY, k H z
0.04
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
NORWLIZED RESISTANCE
N O R W L I Z E D RESISTANCE
rnm
Frequency = 50 kliz
FIGURE 5.13
Impedance Graph-Surface Coil Diameter Effect
l N O U C T l VE INDUCT l VE
REACTANCE REACTANCE
SST
BRASS
f = I00 kHz
Cu
-
R RESISTANCE -
R RESISTANCE
wL0 wL0
(a) (b)
FIGURE 5.14
Probe Response to Variws Test Parameters at Two Frequencies
1 .o
0.9
L I FT -OFF CONSTA
7 = COIL MEAN RAOlU
0.8
0.7
PERMEABILITY
0.6 u = ELECTRICAL
I! I\ I/ I CONDUCT l V l TY I
FIGURE 5.15
Impedance Diagram with Characteristic Parameter, PC
Consider Figure 5.15. The solid lines a r e generated by starting with P C equal t o zero
and increasing t h e value t o infinity (while holding coil t o t e s t article spacing
constant). The dashed lines a r e generated by starting with t h e coil infinitely far
away from t h e t e s t article and bringing t h e coil closer until it contacts (while holding
P C constant). Note t h e similarity between these curves and t h e impedance graphs
shown in preceding sections (the horizontal scale is twice t h e vertical scale).
The usefulness of t h e characteristic p a r a m e t e r is t h a t it provides a modelling
parameter. Conditions of similarity a r e m e t when
Test 1 Test 2
SPECIMEN 0-0
STORAGE
OSCl LLOSCOPE
0 l SPLAY
NOMENCLATURE
\ Rs
V
I
VOLTAGE
- CURRENT
w - ANGULAR FREQUENCY
(W = 2 w f )
Lo PROBE INDUCTANCE
I N AIR
R,, - PROBE W l RE L CABLE
OC RESISTANCE
R, - SRCIMEN AC RSISTANCE
SUBSCRI PTS :
T TOTAL
L -
INDUCTANCE
R .
RESISTANCE
P -
PRIMARY
S -
SECONDARY
FICURE 5.16
Coil Impedance/Voltage Display
T e s t conditions with t h e s a m e P, value have t h e s a m e operating point o n t h e
normalized impedance graph. If, for example, test a r t i c l e resistivity measurements
were required (for checking consistency of alloying e l e m e n t s f o r instance), t h e best
accuracy would b e achieved by operating n e a r t h e k n e e of t h e c u r v e w h e r e t h e r e is
good discrimination against lift-off. (Equation 5.4 does n o t include skin d e p t h e f f e c t s ,
which may b e a n overriding consideration).
To o p e r a t e a t t h e k n e e position in Figure 5.15 a probe diameter and frequency
combination a r e selected such t h a t P c. 5 1 0 . T h e value of P in equation 5.4 is
given in SI units; we c a n use t h e followmg version using more familiar units.
where
-r is t h e mean radius, mrn
f is frequency, H z
p is electrical resistivity , micohm-cent i m e t r e
( v, 1 for nonferromagnetic material)
SUBSURFACE
2 5 9-
INCREASING
VOlO ( A )
SUBSURFACE
VOID ( 8 )
\ L I F T -OFF
\ SUBSURFACE
SUBSURFACE
VOlD ( A )
X - Y DEFECT SIGNALS
SURFACE VOID ( 0 )
CRACK
FIGURE 5.17
Typical Response Signals for Two Types of Defects
subsurface defects. Test frequency is such t h a t 6 equals depth of deepest defect, and
instrument controls a r e selected such t h a t a signal from lift-off is horizontal. Note
t h e difference in signal amplitude and angle relative t o lift-off of subsurface voids A u
and R. This results from skin depth attenuation and phase lag.
For best discrimination between resistivity and other variables t h e operating point on
a n impedance graph should b e considered. Figure 5.12 illustrated t h e e f f e c t of test
frequency on normalized probe impedance. At t h e top of t h e graph the angle,
between lift-off variations and t h e resistivity curve, is small. Moving down t h e curve
t h e angle, separating t h e two variables, increases towards t h e knee with no
appreciable change beyond that. However, small lift-off variations, at t h e bottom of
t h e curve, produce a large impedance change. The best operating point is somewhere
between t h e two extremes, near t h e knee of t h e impedance curve.
FIGURE 5.18
Resistivity Measurement and t h e Impedance Graph
Figure 5.18 shows t h e method of manipulating test conditions t o best deal with lift-
off. Figure 5.18(a) shows t h e resistivity impedance curve with a frequency and probe
selected t o operate near t h e knee. Figure 5.18(b) is a n enlarged section of t h e curve
rotated so lift-off signals a r e approximately horizontal. This is t h e view on an eddy
current instrument monitor.
Next consider temperature effects. First, test article resistivity will be a function of
temperature so test sample and standards should b e at uniform temperature. A
greater potential error is in probe wire resistance, R E . The coil wire resistance is a
part of t h e probe impedance circuit, so variations in temperature which affect coil
resistance will appear as an impedance change. For greatest accuracy, t h e inductive
reactance, X L ,should be large compared t o coil wire resistance; X L / % ~ > 50
is desirable.
Obviously this condition is not easily satisfied at low t e s t frequencies where inductive
reactance is low. One solution is t o use a large diameter probe cupped in ferrite. The
large diameter and ferrite cup will both increase X L / R E .
Another solution is t o use a Send-Receive instrument. Such an instrument has a high
input impedance, sensing only voltage changes in t h e receive coil. Coil wire
resistance is insignificantly small in comparison t o instrument impedance and
therefore has no effect.
Consider next t h e e f f e c t of changes in eddy current path not related t o electrical
resistivity. If t h e t e s t is supposed t o be a measurement of electrical resistivity,
thickness should not influence t h e signal. The skin depth equation must again be used.
Test article thickness should b e equal t o o r greater than three skin depths, t 2 3 8 ,
t 23 x 0 , rum
or
- r 2-22500 , Hz
2
t
where t is thickness, p is resistivity in microhm-centirnetres, and f is frequency
Cracks or voids a r e usually less of a problem. The signal frorn a crack will be very
localized whereas resistivity variations a r e usually more gradual. The best procedure
t o determine if a localized signal is from a change in resistivity is t o rescan with a
smaller probe at higher and lower frequency (at least three times and one third t h e
t e s t frequency). The angle between t h e signals frorn lift-off and resistivity should
vary only slightly whereas t h e angle between lift-off and defect signals will increase
with frequency.
An example of resistivity variations in a zirconium alloy, due t o a change in oxygen
concentration, is shown in Figure 5.19.
TEST ARTICLE WIDTH
( 3 5 cm)
X ,VOLTS
FIGURE 5.19
Eddy Current Signals from a Change in Electrical Resistivity m the
Surface of a Zr-Nb Test Article. Test Frequency = 300 kHz.
which converts to
FIGURE 5.20
Thickness Measurement and the Impedance Graph
An insulating layer will not conduct eddy currents so measurement of its thickness is
essentially a lift-off measurement (provided i t is non-ferromagnetic), i.e. t h e
distance between t h e coil and test article. At high test frequency a small variation in
lift-off produces a large change in probe impedance a s shown in t h e impedance graph
of Figure 5.9.
To minimize t h e signal from variations in t h e base material, t h e test should therefore
be done at t h e highest practical frequency. The maximum frequency would b e limited
by probe-to-instrument impedance matching, cable resonance problems and cable
noise.
R I Y C E O F V I R l I B L E S SHOWN I N C O W P U T O R P L O T S
r~0Yt"c.l .
I0 **I
101
FIGURE 5.21
Computer Simulation of a Multi-Layw Sample
PROBE-CABLE RESONANCE
Probe-cable resonance must b e considered when operating a t high test frequencies
and/or using long signal cables, e.g., frequencies greater than 100 kHz and cables
longer than 30 m. Most general purpose eddy current instruments cannot operate at
or close t o resonance.
Probe-cable resonance can be modelled as shown in figure 4.5. In simple terms,
resonance occurs when inductive reactance of t h e coil equals capacitance reactance
of t h e cable, i.e. when
Transforming this equation and substituting w- 2rr f shows resonance occurs when
frequency is
4.
is proportional t o cable length and f , is proportional t o I/ /F:
Operate a t a t e s t frequency above resonance, such that f is greater than 1. 2 f r 0
However, above resonance t h e sensitivity of all eddy current instruments
decreases rapidly with increasing frequency because capacitive reactance
( X ,=I / w C) decreases, and current short circuits across t h e cable, rather
than passing through t h e coil.
5.10 SUMMARY
Test probes induce eddy currents and also sense t h e distortion of their flow caused by
defects. Surface probes contain a coil mounted with i t s axis perpendicular t o t h e test
specimen. Because i t induces eddy currents t o flow in a circular path i t can be used
t o sense all defects independent of orientation, as long as they have a component
perpendicular t o t h e surface. It cannot b e used t o d e t e c t laminar defects.
For good sensitivity t o short defects, a small probe should be used; probe diameter
should be approximately equal or less than t h e expected length. Sensitivity t o short
subsurface defects decreases drastically with depth, even a 'thint 5 mm sample is
considered very thick for eddy current testing.
The analysis of eddy current signals is t h e most important and unfortunately t h e most
difficult task in a successful inspection. A thorough understanding of impedance
graphs is essential t o manipulate test conditions t o minimize undesirable test
variables. The characteristic parameter for surface probes is used t o locate the
operating point on t h e impedance diagram. I t is given by
SOLUTION:
Characteristic Parameter
PROBLEM: If a n available probe had coil dimensions of 10 mm outer diameter
resistivity measurements of a zirconium alloy ( P
centimetres).
-
and 4 mm inner diameter, determine t h e best frequency for
5 0 ~nicrohrn-
therefore, f = 50 kHz.
(This calculation places no emphasis on skin depth effect, which may
be a n overriding consideration).
-
CHAPTER 6 SURFACE PROBE SIGNAL ANALYSIS
6.1 INTRODUCTION
Manufacturing and preventive maintenance inspection of "flatw components with
surface probes is one of t h e oldest and most important applications of eddy current
testing. Manufacturing inspection of small steel components for defects and hardness
is almost exclusively performed by eddy current methods. For safety reasons and
preventive maintenance (savings on replacement costs and downtime) inspection of
aircraft components for cracks and h e a t t r e a t m e n t effects has been performed since
commercial aircraft first went into service. Eddy current testing is one of t h e most
effective NDT methods for t h e above applications because i t doesn't need couplants,
i t is fast, and 100% volumetric inspection is of ten possible.
This chapter describes how t o maximize signal-to-noise by proper choice of test
frequency and minimizing ttlift-offtt noise. Emphasis is given t o signal analysis and
how t o recognize and discriminate between defect signals and false indications. An
a t t e m p t is made throughout this chapter t o illustrate discussions with real or
simulated eddy current signals.
6.2 EDDY CURRENT SIGNAL CHARACTERISTICS
Defect Signal Amplitude
A defect, which disrupts eddy current flow, changes test coil impedance as t h e coil is
scanned past a defect. This condition is showm pictorially in Figure 6.1 which
portrays eddy currents induced by a surface probe in a defective plate. Eddy currents
flow in closed loops as illustrated in Figure 6.lta). When a defect interferes with t h e
normal path, current is forced t o flow around o r under i t o r is interrupted completely.
The increased distance of t h e distorted path increases t h e resistance to current just
a s a long length of wire has more resistance than a short length,
Eddy currents always t a k e the path of least resistance; if a defect is very deep but
short, current will flow around t h e ends; conversely, if a defect is very long
(compared t o t h e coil diameter) but shallow, t h e current will flow underneath. In
summary, defect length and depth (and width t o some degree) increase resistance t o
eddy current flow and this, in turn, changes coil impedance. (The e f f e c t of defect
size on flow resistance in tube testing is derived in Section 8.2.1).
In terrns of t h e equivalent coil circuit of a resistor in parallel with a n inductor and its
associated semi-circular impedance diagram (Section 3.51, a defect moves t h e
operating point up t h e impedance diagram. Increasing resistance in a test article
changes both probe inductance and resistance.
In t h e preceding discussion t h e defect was considered t o disrupt t h e surface currents
closest t o t h e coil. Consider t h e difference between surface and subsurface defects.
When a surface probe is placed over a deep crack of infinite length, t h e surface
currents must pass underneath t h e defect if they are t o form a closed loop, see
Figure 6.2(a). This is not t h e case with subsurface defects as shown in Figure 6.2(b).
Although t h e void in this picture is not as far from t h e surface as t h e bottom of the
crack, t h e void may not b e detected. Eddy currents concentrate near t h e surface of a
conductor, and therefore, tests a r e more sensitive t o surface defects than internal
defects.
I
EMVCURRENTS
TEST PLATE
TEST PLATE
FIGURE 6.1
Eddy Currents in a Defective Plate
SURFACE C O I L
w
'"-/'7
/
TEST PLATE
,,/
role
U
I
rr
Y
=
=w
-
YI
C
0 =
I a
L
C
w n
rr
-
C Y
YI 0
( a ) EDDY CURRENT FLOW UNDER A CRACK (b) EDDY CURRENT FLOW AROUND A
S U B S U R F A C E role
FIGURE 6.2
Eddy Current Flow in t h e P r e r a m of (a) Surface and (b) Subsurface Defect
Since only 5% of the current flows at depths greater than t h e 3 6 there is no
practical way t o d e t e c t a subsurface defect at this distance from t h e surface. But in
t h e case of a long surface defect 3 6 or greater in equivalent depth, most of t h e
current is flowing under t h e defect. Surface cracks will be detected and depth can be
estimated even if eddy current penetration is a small fraction of t h e defect depth.
Once eddy currents a r e generated in a metal surface, they will follow t h e contour of
a crack because a potential is set-up about t h e crack.
Defect Signal Phase
From t h e above description one cannot predict a d e f e c t signal in detail, only i t s
relative amplitude and direction on t h e impedance diagram. A more complete
explanation requires inclusion of phase lag. Consider t h e cross section of a surface
probe a s shown in Figure 6.3(a). This pictorial view shows t h e distribution of magnetic
field magnitude and phase around a coil as derived by Dodd(2). The solid lines a r e
contours of constant magnetic field strength; t h e dashed lines represent constant
phase. Since t h e magnetic field and induced eddy currents have approximately t h e
same phase, t h e dashed lines will also represent t h e phase ( B ) of t h e eddy currents.
Amplitude drops off exponentially with distance and eddy current flow increasingly
lags in phase (relative t o eddy currents adjacent t o t h e coil) both with depth and with
axial distance from t h e coil. Skin depth e f f e c t occurs in both radial and axial
directions.
Figure 6.3(a) permits an approximate derivation of eddy current signals for the
shallow surface, subsurface and deep surface defects illustrated. One needs t o
establish a reference phase direction as starting point; the LIFT-OFF direction is
convenient and can be defined a s t h e signal resulting from increasing t h e space
between t h e coil and t e s t article, starting from t h e point when t h e space is minimum.
The signal or e f f e c t of defects can be imagined as t h e absence of eddy currents which
were flowing in t h e area before t h e defect existed at this location. As t h e defects
approach t h e coil from positions 0 t o 5 in Figure 6.3(a), the signal on t h e eddy current
storage monitor moves from point 0 t o 5, tracing t h e curves illustrated in Figure
6.3(b). This procedure is reasonably straight forward for shallow surface and
subsurface defects since they a r e localized and only intersect one phase and
amplitude contour a t any given position. For t h e deep defect one has t o divide t h e
defect into sections and determine weighted average values for amplitude and phase
at each position.
The shallow surface defect in Figure 6.3(b) has a large component in t h e lift-off
direction; primarily its approach signal makes i t distinguishable from lift-off. As
defect depth increases, signals r o t a t e clockwise due t o increasing phase angle. The
-
angle indicated in Figure 6.3(b) is not t h e value calculated from the phase lag
equation,
where k? is phase lag (radians), x is distance of defect below t h e surface (mm) and 6 is
skin depth (mm).
SHALLOW D E F E C T
SUBSURFICE DEFECT
DEFECT P O S I T l O N
\
DEEP CEFECT
SUBSURFACE
OCFECI
SHALLOW D E F E C T
LIFT - OFF
FIGURE 6.3
Derivation of Eddy Current Signal Appearance for Three Types of Defects
The foregoing discussion assumes t h a t t h e d e f e c t is a t o t a l barrier t o t h e flow of
current. Although this assumption is valid f o r rnost c r a c k s o r discontinuities, s o m e
c r a c k s a r e partial conductors. Fatigue cracks, f o r m e d when t h e test a r t i c l e is under a
tensile stress, c a n become tightly closed when s t r e s s is released. The result is t h a t
s o m e fraction of eddy currents could b e conducted across t h e c r a c k interface and t h e
magnitude of t h e coil impedance change d u e to t h e d e f e c t will b e less. The phase lag
argurnent is still valid; a d e e p c r a c k will still b e distinguishable from a shallow c r a c k
by t h e shape of t h e eddy current signal, but t h e sensitivity t o such a c r a c k will b e
reduced because of smaller amplitude.
6.3 EFFECT OF MATERIAL VARIATIONS AND DEFECTS IN A FINITE THICKNESS
For each test, one must decide o n t h e test frequency t o use and o n t h e phase setting.
The conventional way of s e t t i n g phase on a n eddy c u r r e n t instrument is t o display t h e
"lift-off" signal horizontally (on t h e X-axis) with t h e impedance point moving from
right-to-left as t h e probe is raised. All material variables will then display a n eddy
current signal at a n angle clockwise to t h e lift-off signal.
LIFT-OFF 1 . 5 mm I
p = 72 p a cm 2.0 mm
pr = 1 .O
L I FT -OFF L I FT 4 F F
FIGURE 6.4
Probe Response t o Various Test P a r a m e t e r s at Three Frequencies
During general inspection for all parameters in a thin plate test frequency is normally
chosen such t h a t 'lift-off' and 'change in p l a t e thickness' signals a r e separated by 90
on t h e impedance plane. This frequency is empirically derived by s e t t i n g ratio
between plate thickness and skin depth equal t o approximately 0.8,
SAMPLE: p = 50 p a cm
*
p, = 1 ' 0 0
CRACK
CRACK 2 mm DEEP NOTCH
2 m DEEP NOTCH
FIGURE 6.6
X-Y Display of Coil Impedance Vector from Calibration Grooves
and a Real Crack. Estimated Depth = 1.3 mm.
FERMlYADlET lC
FERRWIAGIIET I C
NOTCH
2 m DEEP
LIFTOFF
0.5 m DEEP
-
I00 hHZ
2 nm OEEP
FERRO
\c,
' L 0.
0.5 m OEEP
FIGURE 6.7
Coil Impedance/Voltage Display at Three Frequencies
I H
1 VOLT
FIGURE 6.8
X-Y Display of Surface Coil Impedance for Internal Surface Variations
in a 100 m m Diameter Tube
CALIBRATION DEFECTS
Analysis of eddy current signals is, for t h e most part, a comparative technique.
Calibration standards are necessary for comparing signal amplitude and phase (shape) d
of unknown defects t o known calibration defects. Calibration signals a r e also used for
standardizing instrument settings, i.e., sensitivity and phase rotation.
Existing national specifications and standards only supply broad guidelines in choice
of t e s t parameters. They cannot b e used t o establish reliable ET procedures for most
inspections. Figure 6.9 shows a calibration plate proposed by t h e authors for general
application. The e f f e c t of t h e following can b e established using this plate:
1. Varying Electrical Resistivity
2. Varying Thickness
3. Surface Geometry (Curvature)
4. Defect Length for Constant Depth
5. Defect Depth for Constant Length
6. increasing-subsurface Defect ~ k for
e Constant Defect Depth
7. Increasing Distance of Subsurface Defects from t h e Surface with Constant
Defect Size
8. Varying Thickness of a Non-conducting Layer (lift-off)
9. Varying Thickness of a Conducting Layer
1 0. Ferromagnetic Inclusions
I I I I 1 I I
on ~CoNoucrlNc
FIGURE 6.9
Calibration Standard
More than one calibration plate would be required t o cover a complete range of
materials. A group of three would normally suffice, comprising base materials:
aluminum alloy, p-4
P -74 uR. cm.
a.
cm; bronze, p = 2 5 W .
cm ;and Type 316 stainless steel,
Figure 6.10(a) illustrates eddy current signals obtained with a n absolute surface probe
from some of t h e calibration block defects. Figure 6.10(b) illustrates signals fro:n t h e
s a m e defects using a differential surface probe, similar t o t h a t in Figure 5.2(c).
0 . 5 mm DEEP
4 mm DEEP 4 mm DEEP
LIFT-OFF L I FT -OFF
SURFACE DEFECTS
0 . 7 mm DEEP
I 0 . 7 mm DEEP
LIFT-OFF
SUBSURFACE DEFECTS
FIGURE 6.10
Eddy Current Signals With (a) Absolute and (b) Differentia1 Surface Probes
6.7 SUMMARY
Defect signal amplitude is a function of d e f e c t length, depth and closure (if a crack).
Signal phase is primarily a function of defect depth. For volumetric inspection of thin
material t h e following t e s t frequency should b e used:
f = 1.6 p / t 2 , kHz (5.7)
At this frequency there is good discrimination between defects and lift-off signals
but not between defects and ferromagnetic signals. Magnetic indications can be
distin uished from defects by retesting at reduced frequency. Defect signals rotate
'i
CCW approaching 0') whereas ferromagnetic signals r o t a t e CW (approaching 90)
relative t o lift-off signals.
There a r e few national standards governing eddy current inspections with surface
probes. For effective inspection, a calibration block should simulate t h e test piece
and contain appropriate surface and substrate d e f e c t s along with ferromagnetic
inclusions. Basic knowledge of phase lag and impedance diagrams is also required for
reliable analysis of eddy current indications.
-
CHAPTER 7 TESTING OF TUBES AND CYLINDRICAL COMPONENTS
7.1 INTRODUCTION
Tubes or rods up t o about 50 mm diameter can be inspected for defects with
encircling coils. Defect sensitivity in larger diameter components decreases because
t h e inspected volume increases while defect llvolume" remains t h e s a m e for a given
defect. For larger diameters, surface probes should b e used t o obtain higher defect
sensitivity, see Chapter 5.
The components can b e in t h e form of wire, bars or tubes and round, square,
rectangular or hexagonal in shape, as long as appropriate coil shapes a r e used.
Inspection is f a s t and efficient since a n encircling coil samples t h e complete
circumference of t h e component, allowing 100% inspection in one pass.
Defect detectability depends on disruption of eddy current flow. Therefore, t h e best
probe is t h e one which induces highest possible eddy current density in t h e region of
material t o be inspected, and perpendicular t o t h e defect.
When planning a n inspection, t h e following questions must first be answered:
- For what type of defects is t h e inspection t o b e performed?
- If cracks a r e expected, do they have directional properties?
- Does t h e material or components in close proximity have ferromagnetic
proper ties?
Once these questions have been answered one c a n decide on suitable probe design,
t e s t frequency and calibration standards. With t h e proper procedures one can
discriminate between defect signals and false indications as well a s determine depth
once a defect is located. These procedures a r e based on a knowledge of impedance
-
diagrams and phase lag.
REFERENCE C O l L
REFERENCE C O l L
FIGURE 7.1
Tube Probe Types
Coil Size
The best compromise between resolution and signal amplitude is obtained when coil
length and thickness equal defect depth. See Figure 7.2 for a labelled diagram of a
probe cross section.
As a general guideline for tube inspection, coif length and depth should approximately
equal wall thickness. However, t o improve coupling, a rectangular cross section with
thickness reduced t o one-half the length c a n b e used. For greater sensitivity t o srnall
near surface defects, coil length and thickness can both be reduced further.
Unfortunately this will result in a decrease in sensitivity t o external (far surface)
defects.
Coil spacing, in differential probes, should approximately equal defect depth o r wall
thickness for general inspections.
- I: C O I L SPACING
-CI L C O I L WIDTH
/ / / A / / / / . / / J / / / / / / / / / / /
t 1
A
C O I L THICKNESS -TX.- -
D (AVERAGE COl L DIAMETER)
TUBE-COIL
t
CLEARANCE
///y//////////////////L
I
FIGURE 7.2
Probe Coil Nomenclature
In tube testing with a n internal coil, absolute probe signals from defects and supports
a r e simple and undistorted; signals from multiple defects and defects under support
plates a r e of t e n vectorially additive.
Differential probes have two active coils usually wound in opposition (although they
could be wound in addition with similar results). When t h e two coils a r e over a flaw-
f r e e area of test sample, there is no differential signal developed between t h e coils
since they a r e both inspecting identical material. However, when first one and then
t h e other of t h e two coils passes over a flaw, a differential signal is produced. They
have t h e advantage of being insensitive t o slowly varying properties such a s gradual
dimensional variations and temperature: t h e signals from two adjacent sections of a
test article continuously cancel. Probe wobble signals a r e also reduced with this
probe type. However, there a r e disadvantages; t h e signals may b e difficult t o
interpret, even t o t h e extent of being misleading. Defect signals under support plates
can be extremely complicated. The signal from a defect is displayed twice: once as
t h e first coil approaches t h e defect and again for t h e second coil. The two signals
from a mirror image and t h e signal direction from t h e first coil must be noted. If a
flaw is longer than t h e spacing between t h e two coils only t h e leading and trailing
edges will be detected due t o signal cancellation when both coils sense t h e flaw
equally.
I
I I SUPPORT PLATE P O S I T I O N
I .
a
OIFFERENTIbL COILS ABSOLUTE COIL
L
TRACE Wl TH L0SOLUTE PROBE
OISTINCE +
TRACE l l T H O l F F E R E N T l h L
PROBE
W ~ L LLOSS
I V COMPONENT
I C I
FIGURE 7.3
Eddy Current Y-Channel Recordings from a Brass Heat Exchanger Tube
OD = 26.9 mm, t=l.lmm, fgO = 21 kHz
An even more serious situation occurs with differential probes when t h e ends of a
flaw vary gradually; t h e defect may not b e observed at all. An example of this is
shown in Figure 7.3; this brass h e a t exchanger tube suffered general corrosion as well
a s localized corrosion on either side of a support plate. The gradual upward trend of
t h e Y-DISTANCE recording in Figure 7.3(b) shows t h e pronounced grooves a t A and B
a r e superimposed on a n a r e a of general wall thinning in t h e vicinity of t h e support
plate. Note t h e response of a differential probe t o t h e s a m e defect in Figure 7.3k).
The differential probe senses t h e localized grooves but t h e Y-DISTANCE recording
shows no indication of t h e gradual wall thinning which was apparent in Figure 7.3(b).
Table 7.1 compares advantages and disadvantages of t h e two probe types.
TABLE 7.1
COMPARISON OF ABSOLUTE AND DIFFERENTIAL PROBES
ADVANTAGES: DISADVANTAGES:
ABSOLUTE PROBES
respond t o both sudden and gradual - prone t o drift from temperature
changes in properties and dimensions instability
combined signals a r e usually easy t o - more sensitive t o probe wobble than
separate (simple interpretation) a differential probe
show total length of defects
DIFFERENTIAL PROBES
not sensitive t o gradual changes in - not sensitive t o gradual changes h a y
properties or dimensions miss long gradual defects entirely)
immune to drift from temperature - will only d e t e c t ends of long d e f e c t s
changes - may yield signals difficult t o
less sensitive t o probe wobble than a n interpret
absolute probe
Directional Properties
When inspecting for defects, i t is essential t h a t flow of eddy currents b e as
perpendicular a s possible t o defects t o obtain maximum response. If eddy currents
flow parallel t o a defect there will be little distortion of t h e eddy currents and hence
little change in probe impedance.
The eddy current flow characteristics of circumferential internal or external probes
a r e listed and illustrated in Figure 7.4.
EOOV CURRENTS EOOV WRRENTS
EDOV CURRENTS FLOW IN CLOSEO rrrns - EOOV CURRENT FLOWS PARALLEL T O EOOV CURRENT FLOW OIYINISHES TO
L I M I T E O TO C O N W C T I N C M I T E R I A L C O I L WIMOINGS - NOT S E N S I T I V E ZERO AT THE C E N l R E Of A S O L I D ROO .
1 0 N R E L V C I R C U Y F E R E N T I I L CRACKS NO S E N S I T I V I T Y AT CENTRE
EOOV
.-. A
EDDY CURRENTS
CURRENTS
FIGURE 7.4
Directional Properties of Eddy Currents in Cylindrical Test Articles
where XL -
2 'IF f L
resistance in ohms.
when f is in hertz and L in henries and R is coil wire
TABLE 7.2 ENCIRCLING OR INTERNAL COIL IMPEDANCE
L = 23 L = 42 L = 59 L = 77 L = 96 34 AWG
N = 49 (0.16 mm)
R = l R = 1.5 R=2 R=2 R=3
(7. l a )
for an encircling coil,
and
f o r a bobbin type internal coil,
where -D0 is cylinder diameter
D is average coil diameter
and D~ is tube internal diameter
Fill-factor is always a quantity less than or equal t o one ( q < 1 . 0 ) For a coil
inside a tube t h e impedance change due t o decreasing is t h e s a m e as an increase in
D (with constant wall thickness). For a coil around a tube o r cylinder, decreasing 0
is t h e s a m e a s decreasing Do.
ii) Probe diameter in plate testing is replaced by tube o r cylinder diameter in ETof
cylindrical components. They have a similar e f f e c t on t h e operating point on
t h e impedance diagram.
Figure 7.5 summarizes t h e e f f e c t of test and material variables on a simple
semicircular impedance diagram. Note the similarity of changes in resistivity, test
frequency, diameter and fill-factor with t h e surface probe results of Figures 5.9 t o
5.13.
- -.-.-
FREDUENCY ( 1 ) and
NORMALIZED RESISTANCE
FIGURE 7.5
Simplified Impedance Diagram of a Long Coil Around a Nan-magnetic Thin-wall
Tube Showing Effect of Test and Material Variables
Impedance diagrams presented in t h e literature a r e often only strictly valid for long
coils (much longer than material thickness), coil lengths for inspection a r e normally
only a fraction of material diameter. Decreasing coil length has a n effect similar t o
decreasing fill-factor, i t causes t h e impedance diagram t o be smaller than expected
(but similar in shape) from coil and t e s t material geometry. Following sections will
present impedance diagrams for tubes and solid cylinders. For simplicity a fill-factor
of unity will b e used.
7.3.1 Solid Cylinders
The impedance diagram for a solid cylinder (diameter, Do ) inside a long coil is
shown in Figure 7.6. As in Figure 7.5 an increase in test frequency or diameter moves
t h e operating point (the point on t h e impedance diagram t h a t specifies the
normalized inductive reactance and resistance of t h e test coil) down t h e curve while
a n increase in resistivity moves i t up t h e curve. This diagram applies t o both wires
and round bars.
CREASING R E S I S T I V I T Y
DECREASING FILL-FACTOR
FIGURE 7.6
Impedance Diagram for a Solid Cylinder
The shape of impedance diagrams for cylinders differ markedly from a semicircle,
particularly at higher t e s t frequencies. The shape difference is due t o skin effect and
phase lag, factors which were not included in arriving at t h e semicircular shape in
Chapter 3. At high t e s t frequencies t h e curve approaches the X and Y axes at 45'.
In testing cylinders with a n encircling coil i t should be recognized t h a t sensitivity t o
defects a t t h e centre of bar or wire is zero, regardless of t e s t frequency. The reason
for this is illustrated schematically in Figure 7.7 which shows plots of eddy current
density across a cylinder. Defects have t o disrupt eddy current flow in order t o a f f e c t
probe impedance. I t is apparent from Figure 7.7 t h a t eddy current density is always
zero a t t h e centre of a cylinder resulting in no sensitivity t o defects.
LOW FREOUENCI 8 0
> 2
4
FIGURE 7.7
Schematic of Eddy Current Distribution in a Cylinder
Surrounded by an Encircling Coil
The magnetic flux density, 8,is approximately constant inside a long coil, hence
@ = BA
= (B) ( n r 2 )
where r is radial distance from centre of cylinder;
therefore,
U s2 n r p= = 2nrp
*c
u n i t length x u n i t depth
theref ore,
The impedance diagram for an extremely thin-wall tube with either an internal or
external circumferential coil is a semicircle. This shape is only obtained when wall
thickness, t, is much less than skin depth (t < < 6 ) , i.e. skin effect and phase lag a r e
negligible. This situation will rarely be encountered in practice, especially at
intermediate and high test frequencies, but t h e concept is useful since i t defines one
of t h e coil impedance limits.
With an external coil t h e other limit is defined by t h e impedance curve for a solid
cylinder (maximum possible wall thickness). The impedance diagram for any tube
tested with an external coil, hence, has t o lie between t h e two broken curves in
Figure 7.8, for example the solid line applies t o a tube with internal diameter 80% of
ENCIRCLING COIL
---
nu
u
z
u
--
,"
w
>
+
CVLINOER ( O i = 0 )
=
u
=
0 TUBE ( D , /OD = 0 8 )
-
D
.-
d
.
=
=
w
0
NORIALIZED R E S I S T Y C E
FIGURE 7.8
Impedance Diagram for a Tube with Encircling Coil Showing Effect
of Decreasing Wall Thickness
This is attributed t o phase lag across the tube wall and forms t h e basis for eddy
current signal analysis which will be treated in detail in Chapter 8.
Figure 7.8 also illustrates t h e dependence of t h e terms "thick-wall" and "thin-wall" on
t e s t frequency. Near t h e top of t h e diagram (low frequency) a tube with D l / D o ' 0 - 8
qualifies a s thin wall, there is no phase lag across t h e tube wall, t <<6. Near t h e
bottom (high frequency) t h e same tube becomes thick-wall because thickness
becomes much greater than skin depth, for eddy current purposes the tube now
appears a s a solid cylinder.
N O W 1 L I Z E P RESISTANCE
FIGURE 7.9
Impedance Diagram for a Tube With Internal Coil Showing Effect
of Decreasing Wall Thickness
any given tube will again fall between t h e dashed curves a t intermediate frequencies
and approach t h e thin-wall curve a t low frequency and t h e thick-wall curve a t high
frequency as shown for tubes with D i / D o = 0.8 and 0.9. As in t h e previous
figure, a change in wall thickness produces a coil impedance change along t h e dotted
lines tracing a spiral shaped curve. Again, this departure from a semicircle is
attributed t o phase lag across t h e tube wall.
f
g
= s.oze
2
, kHz
"rDi
f/fg - f~~tlS.07p
5 0 1 1 0 CYLINDER ( E X T E 4 w L C O I L )
f / f , = f o o l / s or p
TWIN.@ALL TUBE
( I N T E R I A L I EXTERNAL C O I L S )
' / t o = f O , ' / S o1p
0 .? 0 4 0.6
FIGURE 7.10
Impedance Diagrams f o r Tubes and Rods with Long Coils and Unity
Fill-factor Showing Variations of f/f Along Impedance Loci
g
Figure 7.10 shows impedance diagrams f o r thin-wall tubes, solid cylinders a n d thick-
wall tubes with values of f / f (from 0 t o infinity) on t h e curves. The impedance
plots a r e both different in shape and have drastically different f / f ratios. For
example, at t h e "knee" in t h e curves a thin-wall t u b e h a s f / f -1, for a cylinder
f / f g = 6 and a thick-wall t u b e has f / t g- 4
defining equations which contain 0 , , :D * and D t
.
These differences originate in t h e
.
T o find t h e operatin point
on an impedance diagram using frequency r a t i o o n e h a s t o know t h e geometry t u b e
o r cylinder). For tubes which do not satisfy t h e conditions f o r e i t h e r thin o r thick
f
wall, calculations of f I f is not possible e x c e p t near t h e t o p and bottom of
impedance diagrams where curves for intermediate wall tubes converge with t h e
thin-and thick-wall curves, respectively.
In addition t o defining operating point, frequency r a t i o c a n also b e used for
extrapolation o r scale modelling using t h e similarity condition. This condition states
if t w o objects have t h e s a m e f I f t h e n eddy c u r r e n t distribution is identical in
each. Hence if test frequency f 1 m e e t s test requirements for a r t i c l e No. 1, o n e
can calculate f for a r t i c l e No. 2 from t h e following:
For cylinders, 2 3
for thin-wall tubes,
flDiltlP2 = f ~ ~ i 2 ~ 2 P l
FIGURE 7.11
Computer Simulation of Probe Response to Various Test Parameters
7.4 CHOICE OF TEST FREQUENCY
T e s t frequency is o f t e n t h e only variable over which t h e inspector has appreciable
control. Material properties and geometry a r e normally fixed and probe choice is
o f t e n d i c t a t e d by test material geometry and probe availability. Choice of a suitable
test frequency depends on t h e t y p e of inspection. Testing for d i a m e t e r variations
normally requires maximum response t o fill-factor which occurs at high frequencies.
Testing for d e f e c t s requires penetration t o possible d e f e c t locations; s u r f a c e d e f e c t s
c a n be d e t e c t e d at higher frequencies than subsurface defects. Maximum penetration
requires a low frequency which still permits clear discrimination between signals
from harmless variations in material properties and serious defects. T h e above
f a c t o r s show choice of test frequency is usually a compromise.
Test frequency f o r Solid Cylinders
As discussed in Section 7.3.1, t h e sensitivity at t h e c e n t r e of a cylinder, with a n
encircling coil, is zero at all test frequencies. Therefore, t h e r e is no a d v a n t a g e in
using a very low test frequency t o increase penetration.
'vlaximum test sensitivity is obtained when t h e impedance diagram operating point is
near t h e knee of t h e curve. This condition occurs when f I f ' 6 At this point
balanced sensitivity to defects, resistivity and dimensions is obtained. A t this test
frequency, D ~ aI3.5. ~ Increasing t h e frequency r a t i o f I f g t o 15 o r 20
improves discrimination between surface d e f e c t s and fill-factor variations (probe
wobble), a t t h e expense of reduced sensitivity t o subsurface defects. Maximum
sensitivity t o diameter variations is obtained at higher test frequencies, f / f = 100
or more.
A frequency r a t i o lower than 6 will result in a decrease in phase l a g and t h e r e f o r e
less phase discrimination between d e f e c t s a n d fill factor. T o distinguish between
ferromagnetic variations (or inclusions) a n d defects, t h e operating point should b e on
t o p quadrant of t h e impedance diagram. A frequency r a t i o of approximately t w o
( 1f = 2) would achieve this.
7.4.2 Test Frequency f o r Tubes
When inspecting tubes for defects, t h e criterion to satisfy is (a) phase discrirninatiorl
between d e f e c t signals and o t h e r indications a n d (b) good phase separation between
internal and external d e f e c t signals. A test frequency, proven in practice on many
types and sizes of tubes, is t h e frequency f 9 0 which yields 90" phase separation
between f ill-factor variations (and internal d e f e c t signals) a n d external d e f e c t
signals. The frequency f go is empirically derived f r o m t h e ratio between thickness
a n d skin depth, slightly larger t h a n one,
and converts t o
fgo - 3p/t2 kilohertz (7 .4)
FIGURE 7.12
-
(a) Probe No. 1 Multi-pancake Coil Probe
-
(b) Probe No. 2 Zig-zag Coil Probe
To d e t e c t circumferential defects t h e coil must induce currents at a n angle t o t h e
cracks. Two possible types of probes a r e (a) surface probes and (b) zig-zag probes.
Figure 7.12 shows examples of such probes. The surface probe induces currents in a
circular pattern whereas t h e zig-zag probe induces currents t o follow t h e 30" coil
-
angle. The probes shown in Figure 7.12 a r e differential. In t h e surface probe
configuration a multi-coil array is used; t h e four surface coils in each row a r e
connected in series and t h e two rows a r e connected differentially. A single absolute
surface coil c a n also b e used, provided t h e probe maintains contact with t h e tube
surface by spring force or other means (otherwise lift-off noise would be intolerable).
See Figure 7.13 for t h e cross section of a typical spring-loaded internal probe for
tube testing.
CABLE
CONNECTOR
REFERENCE SPRING
COIL
FIGURE 7.13
Spring Loaded Internal Surface Probe for Tube Inspections
(b) 216-ZAG
COIL PROBE
+
y +
-
(c) BOBBIN
m l L ROBE +
*
Y
FIGURE 7.14
Eddy Current Scans of Circumferential Cracks in Inconel Tubing
(Signal Amplitude Normalized to a 1.6 mm Diameter
Through Hole). f = 400 kHz.
7.6 SUMMARY
Test coils induce eddy currents and also sense t h e distortion of their flow caused by
defects. Encircling or bobbin probes have test coil(s1 mounted with their axes parallel
t o t h e tube or rod axis. Since t h e coils a r e wound circumferentially the induced eddy
currents also flow circumferentially. They cannot b e used t o detect circumferential
cracks, laminar defects, nor defects in the center of a rod.
As a general guideline for t u b e inspection, probe coil length, depth, and spacing (if
differential) should approximately equal wall thickness.
An absolute bobbin probe (single test coil) should b e used f o r general in-service h e a t
exchanger inspection. However, f o r short localized defects, differential probes (two
test coils side-by-side) are normally preferred. -
Analysis of eddy c u r r e n t signals is t h e most important and unfortunately t h e m o s t
difficult task in a successful inspection. A thorough understanding of impedance
diagrams and e f f e c t of phase lag is needed t o manipulate test conditions t o minimize
undesirable test variables. T h e C h a r a c t e r i s t i c Frequency for t u b e inspection is used
to l o c a t e t h e operating point on t h e impedance diagram. I t is given by
kHz
where p is electrical resistivity and D is t u b e internal diameter (for bobbin probe)
and e x t e r n a l d i a m e t e r (far encircling probe); t is t u b e wall thickness.
SOLUTION: f D&
O - 6
flfl 5.07p
6 x 5.07 x 10
therefore f
52
= 12 kHz
7.7.2 (a)
L
PROBLEM:
D i - 1 0 . 2 m m , t = 1.1 mm
centimetres.
andp -
Calculate the t e s t frequency t o inspect Inconel 600 tubing with
98rnicrohm-
7.7.2 (c)
PROBLEM: Calculate a test frequency for t h e above tube suitable for
discriminating between ferromagnetic inclusions and defects, when
testing with an internal probe.
SOLUTION: The operating point should b e on t h e top quadrant of t h e impedance
diagram for thin-wall tubing, Figure 7.10. This point is located by
calculating t h e test frequency to make t h e ratio of Forster's
characteristic frequency equal t o or less than 0.5.
= 0.5
therefore
f (0.5) (5.07p)/Dit
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Manufacturing and in-service inspection of tubes is one of t h e most important
applications of eddy current testing. For in-service inspection of small-bore tubing in
particular, eddy current is by f a r t h e most frequently used method. Access is usually
limited t o tube ends which makes other NDT techniques difficult or impossible t o
apply.
This chapter emphasizes in-service testing of tubes using internal probes. This
approach is taken because testing of solid cylinders and tubes with external coils
(manufacturing inspection) is generally less complicated. If t h e reader understands in-
service inspection he should encounter no problem applying similar principles t o other
t e s t situations.
R = P,p/A, ohms
Introduction of a long defect, of depth h, which constricts eddy current flow over t h e
distance (in radians), increases total resistance t o
- 124-
FIGURE 8.1
Schematic Illustration of Eddy Curr a t Distribution
A r o d a Defect in a Tube
0 -
The angle between fill-factor and d e f e c t signals in Figure 8.2(b) is about 2 0 , where
x / 6. Although probably not strictly true, o n e can imagine d e f e c t signal
phase angle as t h e sum of a lag of 8 f r o m t h e coil t o t h e d e f e c t and t h e s a m e lag back
t o t h e coil.
E f f e c t of T e s t Frequency
W e can now combine Figure 8.2 results with impedance diagrams from Chapter 7 t o
illustrate t h e e f f e c t of test frequency on d e f e c t signal appearance. Figure 8.3(a)
shows part of Figure 7.9, t h e impedance diagram for a t u b e with D I/ D o = 0.8
t e s t e d with a short internal coil. T h e d o t t e d lines t r a c e t h e impedance change with
decreasing Do. An external d e f e c t (OD d e f e c t ) i n a t u b e is essentially a decrease in
D, with D held constant, t h e r e f o r e t h e d o t t e d lines t r a c e t h e change in impedance
a s a coil is scanned past a n OD defect. N o t e the similarity between t h e subsurface
defect in Figure 8.2(b) and t h e O D d e f e c t at 2 f g o in Figure 8.3(a). The display is
normally r o t a t e d counter-clockwise to m a k e a signal from fill-factor approximately
horizontal. This is achieved by rotating t h e phase control knob on t h e eddy current
instrument.
\ SUBSURFACE
DEFECT 1 1 2 1
FILL - t l C T O l . 1
FIGURE 8.2
Derivation of Eddy Current Signal Appearance f w Three Types of Defects
With this phase setting and at f gg a n OD d e f e c t shows wall loss (tY)in a tube
without a chan e in fill-factor as in Figure 8.3(b). An ID d e f e c t consists of wall loss
f
(+Y component as well as a large fill-factor (-X component) because of decreased
coil/tube coupling. The through-wall d e f e c t (hole) signal contains elements of both ID
and O D d e f e c t s and hence yields a signal which falls between t h e two. Note t h a t -
all
d e f e c t signals must fall between decreasing fill-factor and O D d e f e c t signals.
IIWMPL IZED RESI SIIINCE
FIGURE 8.3(a)
Relation Between Impedance Diagram and Defect Signal Appearance
OD DEFECT
THROUGH-WALL \
DEFECT
I D DEFECT
-Y
DECREASING F I L L FACTOR
FIGURE 8.3 (b)
Defect Signal Appearance at f gg
Figures 8.3(a) and 8.4 show what happens t o d e f e c t signals with changing test
frequency. Reduced frequency results in rotation of d e f e c t signals towards t h e fill-
f a c t o r direction. At very low frequencies (less t h a n f g o 1 4 ) signals from
d i f f e r e n t types of d e f e c t s become difficult t o distinguish due t o small phase angle
separation.
PROBE
WOBBLE
FIGURE 8.4
Appearance of Calibration Defect Signals at D i f f e r e n t Test Frequencies
Both manufacturing and in-service inspection require calibration tubes with artificial
d e f e c t s for initial instrument set-up and subsequent signal analysis and
interpretation. These tubes should be identical in material and size t o tubes t o be
tested. Minimum calibration requirements include ID, OD and through-wall d e f e c t s
(see also t h e ASTM and ASME codes c i t e d in Section 7.4.2). For in-service inspection,
expected signal sources such as baffle plates, m a g n e t i t e deposits and dents a r e useful
and o f t e n essential for reliable signal analysis. Figure 8.5 shows typical signals, at
f g 0 ,from a calibration t u b e suitable for in-service h e a t exchanger inspection. Both
absolute and differential probe signals a r e shown. T h e 90" phase separation between
ID and OD d e f e c t s also exists f o r differential probes. N o t e t h e similarity with t h e
signals derived in t h e previous section.
STEEL
SUPPORT P L A T E
, . . ...
OUTSIDE l NS l DE THROUGH MAGNETITE
GROOVE GROOVE HOLE
I I
OUTS l DE
HO!E OUTSIDE
IECREASING
F I L L FACTOR - MAGNETITE
SUPPORT
PLATE
DIFFERENTIAL
FIGURE 8.5
Eddy Current Signals from a Typical Calibration Tube.
Test Frequency fgo = 250 kHz.
7
I
I
C
Y CHANNEL
' I t
FIGURE 8.6
Appearance of Quadrature Components on a Chart
R e a d i n g for a Calibration Tube
( b ) ABSOLUTE
THROUGH
FIGURE 8.7
Eddy Current Phax AngIelDefect Depth Calibration Curve at fqo
25% OD
"'4
ECCENTRIC
CALIBRATION
DEFECTS
10% ID
ECCENTRIC
GROOVE
CORROSION
DEFECTS
P
FIGURE 8.8
E a d Corrosion in a Copper Tube
(Do= 15.9 mrn, t = 1.0 mm, f90 = 5.3 kHz)
An example of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) in Type 316 stainless steel, from a
heavy water plant heat exchanger, is shown in Figure 8.9. The crack extends nearly
half way around t h e tube. Phase angle of t h e crack signal shows i t extends through
t h e tube wall. Since t h e eddy currents flow parallel t o coil windings, circum-
ferentially, t h e large crack signal is due entirely t o t h e component of t h e crack along
t h e tube axis. The intergranular, branching nature of SCC generally permits their
detection. Since a defect must disrupt eddy current flow t o be detectable, if
circumferential cracks are suspected, fatigue cracks for example, special probes are
required, see Section 7.5 and 8.2.5.
-
3 . 2 rnm
HOLE
HOLE
5 0 0 ~
CONCEPJTQ IC
GQOOVE
C A L I B R A T ION
DEFECTS
FIGURE 8.9
Stress Corrosion Cracking in Type 316 Stainless Steel Tubing
During in-service inspection of tubes in heat exchangers, tube supports (baffle plates)
a r e frequently defect prone regions. Inspection for defects at baffles is possible
because eddy current signals a r e often vectorially additive. This permits analysis of
superimposed signals; t h e signals can be (mentally,or graphically) subtracted from the
total indication with resultant separated signals appearing similar t o calibration
defects. Vectorial addition provides t h e basis for multifrequency eddy current testing
(Section 8.4).
Figure 8.10 illustrates how signals from a steel baffle plate and an external groove
a r e added t o obtain a superimposed indication. The difference between t h e end points
of the baffle plate and baffle and groove signals equals the indication obtained from
t h e groove by itself.
I
OD GROOVE
FIGURE 8.10
Vectorial Addition of Eddy Current Signals
Figure 8.1 1(a) shows a section of stainless s t e e l t u b e removed from a power plant
w
h e a t exchanger with part of t h e carbon steel support p l a t e still in place. T h e support
shows considerable corrosion; originally t h e r e was about 0.25 mm clearance between
t h e tube and t h e hole in t h e plate. Corrosion products have completely filled t h e gap
leading t o crevice corrosion evident in Figure 8.1 1(b) which is a similar t u b e with t h e
plate removed. Calibration signals a r e presented in Figure 8. I l k ) . T h e eddy current
signal from t h e baffle plate region of Figure 8.1 l(a) is shown in Figure 8.1 l(d). This
seemingly simple signal is actually quite complex. T h e upward component is d u e t o
external pitting similar t o t h a t in Figure 8.1 1(b). T h e presence of a support plate
should result in -X, -Y signal components; in f a c t a + X deflection is observed. This is
t h e result of denting of t h e tube. Denting is circumferential constriction of tubes
d u e to compressive stresses e x e r t e d by baffle p l a t e corrosion products such as
magnetite. The presence of m a g n e t i t e c a n also contribute t o signal distortion
particularly at low test frequencies. Tube denting is of concern because, in addition
t o complicating eddy current signal analysis, i t c a n lead t o further t u b e damage such
as stress corrosion cracking o r thermal f a t i g u e because tubes a r e no longer f r e e t o
expand and c o n t r a c t during t h e r m a l cycling.
FIGURE 8.1 1
Corrosion and Denting Under a Steel Baffle Plate
Another example of defects near a carbon steel tube support is shown in Figure 8.12.
These were obtained from a brass, thermal power plant condenser tube which
suffered erosion/corrosion on either side of supports. This is t h e same tube as in
Figure 7.3. Defect signals from t h e baffle plate vicinity a r e so large t h e support
signal is obscured. The main point of this example is t h e advantage of using phase
angle, rather than amplitude, t o judge defect severity. Defect B with both
differential and absolute probes has a phase angle approaching t h a t of a through-wall
hole, i.e., i t probably extends at least 75% through t h e wall. Defect A on t h e other
hand is vertical and hence is probably no deeper than 50% even though i t exhibits
greater amplitude than B.
DEFECT
SlCNlLS
1 . 6 *n
HOLE
l a 1 C P L I U R P I I O N DFFECT SIGNPLS
FIGURE 8.12
Quadrature Eddy Current Signals from the Brass Tube in figure 7.3
To this point we have only considered ferromagnetic tube supports, carbon steel is
t h e material used in most heat exchangers. With magnetic baffle plates vectorial
addition appears t o apply for all types of defects. Unfortunately deteriorating water
quality, denting problems and longer service life requirements have made i t necessary
t o construct some heat exchangers with non-ferromagnetic support plates. Vectorial
addition of eddy current signals involving nonmagnetic supports is generally not valid.
Several factors contribute t o this situation, nonmagnetic supports yield much larger
signals than magnetic supports. The larger signal from nonmagnetic baffle plates
effectively reduces signal-to-noise making small defects more difficult t o detect.
Possibly t h e most difficult defects t o detect under non-magnetic supports are those
of t h e same width as t h e plate, e.g., fretting wear from tube vibration.
Figure 8.13(a) illustrates such a situation, a brass baffle plate with a copper-nickel
tube containig simulated 50% deep fretting wear. The same defect with a magnetic
baffle plate is shown in figure 8.13(b) for comparison.
ir MAXIMUM GAP
OD GROOVE
BAFFLE WITH
nnxrnun GAP
BRASS B A F F L E
I N CONTACT
BRASS MAGNETIC
BAFFLE BAFFLE
FIGURE 8.13
Wear Under (a) Non-Ferromagnetic and (b) Ferromagnetic Baffle Plates
Heat exchanger tubesheets a r e usually made of carbon steel, eddy current response
should therefore appear similar t o a baffle signal. In addition, a large fill-factor (tube
expansion) signal is also obtained a s a result of tubes being rolled into tubesheets.
Rolling eliminates corrosion prone crevices and also helps hold tubes in t h e tubesheet.
With carbon steel tubesheets, expansion usually yields t h e largest signal coniponent,
t h e tubesheet only contributes appreciably a t test frequencies below f g g .
Figure 8.14 shows tube configuration a t a tubesheet and typical eddy current signals.
Occasionally one may encounter a tubesheet clad with a corrosion resistant alloy such
as stainless steel or Inconel. If t h e dadding is non-magnetic t h e same complications
arise a s with non-magnetic baffle plates (Section 8.2.4). Fortunately, most tubesheets
a r e only d a d on t h e primary side (near tube ends) where service related defects
rarely occur.
- -- LXPLNSION SIGNAL
FIGURE 8.14
Schematic of Tube Geometry a t Rolled Joint in Tubesheet
and Associated Eddy Current Signals
Surface probes have several advantages over bobbin-type probes. They c a n be made
much smaller than tube diameter and hence s a m p l e a smaller volume of t u b e
periphery, this provides inherently g r e a t e r sensitivity to small defects. Spring loading
of a surface probe against t h e t u b e wall eliminates much of t h e fill-factor (lift-off)
distortion caused by t u b e expansion in tubesheets. T h e main drawback t o s u r f a c e
probe tube testing is t h a t a number of scans have t o b e made for complete
circumferential coverage. Conventional probes sample t h e e n t i r e tube in a single
scan.
TUBE SHEET
70% OD
70% OD
t ' DEFECT
DEFECT A
1 . 6 mm 1 . 6 mm
HOLE\
TUBESHEET
CONVENTIONAL
SURFACE
PROBE PROBE
FIGURE 8.15
Comparison of Eddy Current Test Results in Heat Exchanger Tubesheet
Region with Conventional and Surface Probes
(Do = 12.5 mm, t = 1.2 mm, fgo = 200 kHz)
Figure 8.15 illustrates surface probe testing at t h e tubesheet region of a power plant
s t e a m generator. I t compares signals, from what is believed t o be OD corrosion
damage at t h e end of t h e rolled joint, obtained with conventional and surface probes.
The reason for t h e characteristic A'B'C' s u r f a c e probe signal is as follows. As t h e
probe is withdrawn from t h e t u b e (direction of arrow) it encounters t h e s t a r t of t h e
expanded area. Failure of t h e probe to follow this contour exactly results in a n
increasing lift-off signal, A'R', superimposed on t h e impedance change, A'C', due t o
t h e presence of t h e tubesheet. Both d e f e c t signals were obtained f r o m t h e s a m e
tube, n o t e t h e considerable improvement in sensitivity obtained with t h e surface
probe. This t u b e was in f a c t leaking.
50% OD
ECCENTRIC
GROOVE
GAP
CALI RR4TIOIJ
-
+
50% GROOVC
BAFFLE
(MAXIMUMGAP)
FIGURE 8.16
50% GROOVE
BAFFLE
(NO GAP)
I.lmn
GROOYC GROOVE I I I
J@
1.0.
OECREASlNG F I L L FACTOR
OW
DECREASING F I L L FACTOR @
FIGURE 8.17
Coil Impedance Display at Two Test Frequencies
Ferromagnetic inclusions a r e occasionally encountered during eddy c u r r e n t testing of
non-magnetic materials. These arise f r o m chips o r filings from s t e e l tooling and
handling equipment which a r e embedded during manufacture. T h e s u r f a c e of
nominally non-magnetic stainless s t e e l s and nickel-base alloys c a n also become
magnetic as a result of cold working o r through alloy depletion from oxidation o r
corrosion.
\ FERROMAGNETIC
INCLUSION
50 kHz
INCLUSION
-
10 kHz
FIGURE 8.18
Defect and Magnetic Inclusion Signals Obtained from a New Inconel
600 Tube (Do= 13 mm, t = 1.1 mm) with an Absolute External Coil.
f go = 250 kHz
T
1 . 0 . DEFECT
l NTERNAL
MAGNET l TE
/
250 k H z
MAGNETITE '
MAGNET l TE
50 kHz
10 k H z
FIGURE 8.19
Defect and Magnetite Signals from an Inconel 600 Tube
(Do = 13 mm, t = 1.1 mm) Obtained with an Absolute
Internal Probe. fgO = 250 kHz)
DENT
+A~ MAGNET l TE
MAGNET l TE
f* = 200 kHz fj = 400 kHz
f , = s o kHz
FIGURE 8.20
Eddy Current Signals from Monel 000 Tube at Baffle Plate Location.
(f 90 = 100 kHz)
Conducting Deposits
T h e most probable conducting deposit which may b e encountered during in-service
t u b e testing is copper. Copper taken i n t o solution in o n e p a r t of a cooling circuit,
from brass tubes for example, c a n re-deposit at another location at t h e expense of a
less noble metal such as iron. An example is shown in Figure 8.21 which is a copper-
alloy t u b e from a n a i r conditioner h e a t exchanger. Copper deposits occur near tube
supports, maximum thickness was 0.05 mm. Even such a thin deposit yields a large
eddy current signal since copper is a good conductor. Figure 8.21 shows response from
both absolute and differential internal probes. T h e absolute probe gave eddy current
signals with no +Y component, clearly indicating t h e non-defect nature of t h e
anomaly.
The differential probe signal is not nearly a s d e a r and illustrates another limitation
of differential probes. Comparison of t h e deposit indication with calibration defects I
could easily lead one t o conclude t h e presence of an OD defect; particularly if t h e
eddy current results were compressed on X and Y channel recordings as is often t h e
case during in-service inspection. With a differential probe, one has t o observe defect
sense (arrows) t o distinguish between deposit signals and those from real defects.
Copper D e p o s i t s
Ill
AQSOLUTE DIFFERENTIAL
DEPOSIT SISNALS
P
FIGURE 8-21
Eddy Current Indications from Copper Deposits on a Copper Alloy Tube
(Do = 19 mm, t = 1.1 mm, fgo = 57 kHz)
Figure 8.22 shows simulated copper deposit signals at different test frequencies.
There is a noticeable change in phase angle with increasing deposit thickness as well
as test frequency. At frequencies above f there exists a possibility that deposits
could be mistaken for ID defects, even with an absolute probe. The procedure for in-
service inspection of nuclear power plant boilers specified by ASME (11)leads t o test
frequencies between f and 2 f . This appears t o b e a weakness in t h e code
which may lead t o revision if copper deposits prove m o r e common as boilers age.
Inspection of Figure 8.22 reveals t h a t clearer discrimination between copper and
d e f e c t s is achieved at f .
/ 2 r a t h e r t h a n at f g 0 Optimum test frequency for
copper c o a t e d tubes appears t o be t h e frequency which just leaves signals below t h e
horizontal fill-factor direction.
4 - 7Q% OD ECCENTRIC L R O O Y T
B - 10%ID CONCENTRIC GROOVE
C - 0.13 rnm THICK COPPER AROIJUD 'Ij9::
D - 0.05 rnrn THICK COPPER AIIOUND TlJEC
1.0
FIGURE 8.22
Eddy Current Signals Obtained with an Internal Circumferential Probe
from Simulated Copper Deposits on Tubes
Background
MAGNET1 TE 1.3 mm
15.5 mm
I
CALIBRATION TUBE
FIGURE 8.23
Internal Probe Response to Various Test Parameters.
f g o = 130kHz.
(a)
FIGURE 8.24
Eddy Current Signal at Baffle Plate Position in Tube of Figure 8.1 1
fg0 = 130 kHz.
These signals c a n then b e combined to eliminate unwanted signals and leave only t h e
d e f e c t signal. This method is only e f f e c t i v e if a d e f e c t signal differs
characteristically f r o m unwanted signals and if signals a r e vectorially additive. T h e J
FIGURE 8.25
Tube Stripping Sequence by Multif requency
As shown in Figure 8.23, the signal at each baffle plate is a composite signal
comprising a baffle plate, magnetite deposit (or baffle plate corrosion products), dent
and defect signal. Figure 8.26 illustrates elimination of baffle plate and magnetite
signals. The probe is moved back-and-forth under t h e baffle plate and t h e signal is
monitored on the storage scope in t h e chopping mode, where both frequency signals
a r e displayed simultaneously.
BPFFLE
PLPTE
BPFFlE
PLPTE
1
% RESIOUPL B l F F L E PLATE SIGNPL
FIGURE 8.26
Suppression of Baffle Plate and Magnetite Signals
FIGURE 8.27
Suppression of Dent Signal
Figure 8.27 illustrates how one c a n eliminate t h e 'denting' signal from t h e resultant
(c = f 2 -f 1) signal. This is achieved by f i r s t matching t h e phase and amplitude
of he cl and f 3 'dent' signals and then using a second mixing module ( C ) for
subtract~on.
Figure 8.28 t r a c e s t h e above sequence f o r two defective tubes, and shows t h e eddy
current signal becoming simpler t o analyze with e a c h step. On comparing d e f e c t i v e
t u b e signals with those from a calibration tube, o n e observes t h e f 2 d e f e c t signal is
distorted by t h e baffle plate, dent and/or m a g n e t i t e deposit. The C 1 signal is only
distorted from t h e dent signal, a n d C 2 is a clear signal indicating outside diameter
(OD) pits approximately 50% deep. Even a n inexperienced inspector could analyse
these results.
FIGURE 8.28
Multif requency Eddy Current Signals from Defective Tube
8.5 SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
O n e c a n find numerous r e f e r e n c e s in NDT publications dealing with eddy current
measurement of material properties, such as chemical composition, hardness,
strength, corrosion damage, d e g r e e of cold work a n d e x t e n t of both carburization and
decarburization. In f a c t , none of t h e s e properties and material conditions a r e
measured directly. Eddy c u r r e n t testing is sensitive t o material properties through
their e f f e c t of resistivity and magnetic permeability. As such, eddy currents only
provide indirect measurement of material properties and c a r e must be taken t o
ensure t h a t s o m e unforseen m a t e r i a l variation does n o t lead t o false conclusions. Two
precautions will help avoid f a l s e test results:
R = O ~ / A ohms
.
where 2 is length (cm) and A is cross-sectional a r e a ( cm2 ) Resistivity values for
various materials a r e listed in Table 9.1.
X IACS 1721
Increasing t e m p e r a t u r e normally increases resistivity (decreases conductivity) a s
shown in Figure 9.1. Over a limited t e m p e r a t u r e range t h e variation is usually linear
according t o t h e relation
P = p0(1 + aAT)
TABLE 9.1
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY OF COMMON CONDUCTORS AT 20C
Silver
Copper
Cold
Aluminum
7075-T6 (A1 Alloy)
Zinc
Magnesium
Admiralty Brass
Iron
Phosphor Bronze
Lead
70 Cu-30 Ni
Monel
Zirconium
Ti taniurn
304 SST
Zircaloy-2
Inconel 600
Hastelloy X
W aspaloy
Ti-6A 1-4V
FIGURE
- -- - 9.1
Effect of Temperture on the Resistivity of Copper, Platinum and Titanium
3L IMANGANESE
FIGURE 9.2
Effect of Alloying Elements on the Electrical Resistivity of Aluminum.
alloys is shown in Figure 9.3. T h e dependence of conductivity on composition provides
one basis for eddy current sorting of mixed alloys. Oxygen impurity in zirconium and
titanium alloys changes resistivity considerably. Figure 5.19 showed a non-uniform
oxygen distribution in a zirconium-niobium d e t e c t e d by eddy current testing.
COPPER/NICKEL ALLOYS
0 20 40 60 80 100
MASS % COPPER
100 80 60 40 20 0
MASS % NICKEL
FIGURE 9.3
Variation in Electrical Conductivity of Nickel-Copper Alloys with Composition
--
I 10 100 1000
TIME AT TEMPERATURE (h)
FIGURE 9.4
Variation of Mechanical Properties and Conductivity in 7075-T6
Aluminum Exposed at 205OC
Po - 4n x lo-' weberrlampere-metre
when B is in teslas* (T) o r weberslmetre 2 and H i s in a m p e r e l m e t r e ( ~ / m ) .
Simplification results if one uses relative permeability, which is defined as
P, = pluo (dimensionless)
Relative permeability has t h e s a m e value in all magnetic systems of units. For
magnetic materials P, can be very large, whereas for nonmagnetic material
Pr = 1.0.
FIGURE 9.6
DC Maptization Curve and Recoil Permeability for Iron
In eddy current testing, test coil inductance and depth of penetration a r e influenced
by incremental permeability not normal permeability. However, throughout this
report i t is assumed t h a t t h e e d d y current test is performed without DC bias and with
a low magnetizing f o r c e (low alternating coil current). In this case, V, = V A ,and
f o r simplification purposes , is used in t h e skin depth and inductance equations
and impedance diagrams; ur is used throughout t h e manual t o d e n o t e incremental
permeability ( uA) unless otherwise stated. In addition, all permeabilities
described h e r e a f t e r in t h e t e x t of t h e manual a r e relative permeabilities and a r e
therefore dimensionless.
When a n increasing DC magnetizing field is applied, a nonlinear E H relationship
-
results as shown in Figure 9.7. The incremental permeability continuously decreases
until saturation is achieved. A t saturation U A 1.0. T h e normal permeability,
instead, first increases t o a maximum value and then decreases gradually, see
Figure 9.7; at saturation i t can still b e very large.
FIGURE 9.7
Magnetization Curve, Incremental Permeability and Normal Permeability
f o r a 3Re60 T u b e Sample
I
I
I - - - - - - - - - - - -,,-,- - - 800-1200 ---------
_ _ _ - - -- .-400
_----=-I
---
_____-------
rust r . 2 3 ,
--'---
FIGURE 9.8
Magnetization Curves for Various M o d 400 Samples
---
--
l0OL I I I I
- A U S T E N I T I C STAINLESS STEEL -
I COLD WORK
FIGURE 9.9
Variation of Relative Permeability with Cold Reduction
for Various Austenitic Stainless Steels (2)
6 MPa NO S T R E S S
'24 MPa
AYNEALLEO 1RON
I
25 50 75 100
M A G N E T I Z I N G FORCE ( A ,m
FIGURE 9.10
Effect of Elastic Strain on the Magnetization of Iron (9)
Figure 9.10 shows changes in B-H curves for iron with internal stress. Note t h a t t h e s e
stress levels a r e purely elastic, well below t h e yield strength. The changes in B-H
(and permeability) a r e d u e t o magnetostr iction.
The above examples illustrate t h e inherent variability of B-H and hence permeability
of ferromagnetic materials. Incremental permeability a f f e c t s a n eddy current coil's
inductance as well as depth of eddy current penetration i n t o a material. T h e large
variations in permeability shown above make conventional eddy current testing for
d e f e c t s in magnetic materials very difficult if not impossible.
T h e best solution t o eddy current testing of a magnetic material for d e f e c t s is t o
bring i t t o a condition where U A = 1.0 . A few slightly magnetic materials can b e
heated above their C u r i e temperature to make t h e m nonmagnetic. Monel 400 heated
t o between 50 and 70C has been tested in this manner. Most materials have t o o
high a Curie t e m p e r a t u r e t o b e t e s t e d by this approach. The only other way to
decrease P A t o unity is by magnetic saturation. This t o p i c is t r e a t e d in a
subsequent section.
9.4 TESTING MAGNETIC MATERIALS
FIGURE 9.1 1
Simplified Impedance Diagrams for Ferromagnetic Cylinders and Plates
10 20 30 90
NORMALIZED RESISTANCE
FIGURE 9.12
Experimental Normalized Impedance Diagrams for Three Types 329
Stainless Steel Samples Tested with a Long Encircling Coil
INCREASING
FREOUENCY
I
PERMEAEILITY
INCREASING
RESISTIVITY
NORMALIZED RESISTANCE
FIGURE 9.13
Impedance Diagram for Ferromagnetic Material Showing
Effect of Material and Test Parameters
Figure 9.13 shows a n a c t u a l surface probe impedance diagram for magnetic material.
T h e shape differs appreciably from a semicircle. Most test variables have a similar
e f f e c t on t h e impedance diagram as for surface probes on nonmagnetic material
(Section 5.5). To measure magnetic permeability in t h e presence of lift-off noise,
probe diameter and test frequency should be chosen to o p e r a t e in region A.
-
SLIGHT BEND
I N TUBE
EDDY CURRENT
TEST WITHOUT
SATURATION
EDDY CURRENT
FIGURE 9.14
Eddy Current Signals from a High Magnetic Permeability Monel 400 Tube.
Test Frequency = 50 kHz
Saturation with DC magnetization is limited by coil heating. H e a t dissipation is
proportional to current squared and coil wire resistance ( P owe r = I R ) . To
increase magnetization (H is proportional t o I) pulse saturation is used. T h e saturation
current (DC) is switched on-and-off at regular intervals thereby reducing t h e heating
e f f e c t . T h e test current (AC) is superimposed on t h e saturation current and t h e eddy
current signal is sampled only at maximum saturation. O n e commercial instrument,
operating on this principle, is currently available. Testing speed is a function of pulse
r a t e , in general i t is much slower than conventional testing.
If magnetic saturation at defects is not complete, a n eddy current test becomes a
test for permeability, not eddy current testing as described in previous chapters. This
can b e understood f r o m F i g u r e 9.15 which illustrates t h e change in eddy current
signals from calibration defects in a magnetic stainless s t e e l tube as degree of
saturation is increased. T h e eddy current signals w e r e obtained with a n absolute
bobbin type probe. Since defect signal amplitude decreases as saturation is
approached, instrument gain was doubled f o r t h e 20 and 40 a m p e r e saturation results.
Magnetization was achieved with a n external, w a t e r cooled coil; 10 amperes produced
.
about 2 8 x 10 A 1m or 350 oersteds. Figure 9.15 shows o n e has t o be saturated
well past t h e knee in t h e magnetization curve (over 20 amperes) before eddy current
d e f e c t signals appear normal, like those from nonmagnetic materials.
The reason for t h e charateristic eddy current signals from partially saturated tubing
is more clearly apparent in t h e eddy current impedance display of Figure 9.16 which
includes impedance response as magnetization level increases. This figure shows, at
partial saturation (less than 10 amperes), d e f e c t signals consist nearly entirely of
increasing and decreasing permeability. The initial increasing permeability signal
component is attributed t o less saturation on either side of machined calibration
d e f e c t s while t h e decreasing permeability component is due t o m o r e intense
saturation in t h e reduced tube-wall region at defects.
Similar results a r e obtained with internal saturation using D C magnetization or
permanent magnets. A single rare-earth permanent magnet was found t o be
equivalent t o about 5 amperes of a n external magnetizing c u r r e n t for this tube size
material.
EXTERNAL MAGNETIZING COIL
THROUGU noLE
/
-A--
A
C
D
PROBE WOBBLE
0 0 GROOVE
1.0 GROOVE
---- -/-- --- cC
\AIR
I I I 1 I I I
5 10 I5 20 25 30 35 40
MAGNETIZING CURRENT ( A1
FIGURE 9.15
Eddy Current Signals from E-&ite 26-1 Tube With Increasing Saturation,
(fgo = 100 kHz at Complete Saturation)
PROBE
A - PROBE WOBBLE
B - THROUGH HOLE
C - 0. D. GROOVE
-
D I. 0. GROOVE
FIGURE 9.16
Eddy Current Signals from E-Brite 2 6 1 Tube with Increasing Saturation,
fgo = 100 kHz
An example of t h e dangers of ET ferromagnetic materials at partial saturation is
illustrated in Figure 9.17. I t shows eddy current signals from calibration d e f e c t s in a
3Re60 h e a t exchanger tube t e s t e d with a differential probe. (3Re60 requires a flux -
density of about 0.6T for complete saturation). Calibration d e f e c t s yield signals
which change in phase with increasing depth leading t o t h e conclusion one may have a
viable test technique. However, e l a s t i c deflection of t h e t u b e at a support p l a t e gives
change of permeability signals nearly identical t o serious (50% and 75%) defects. This
is due t o magnetostriction: changes in magnetic properties due t o e l a s t i c s t r e s s such
as shown in Figure 9.10.
- T
\ I I \
HOLE
\
3 R e 60
"i \
' 3 c r ss
TUBE
BAFFLE
PAFFLE PLATE
SIGNALS
ELISTIC
DEFLECTION 5 mn Y n m 3.m 2mm 0
FIGURE 9.17
Eddy Current Signals from 3Re60 Tube With Partial Saturation for Various
Levels of Elastic Stress. Test Frequency fgo = 230 kHz.
T h e problem of Figure 9.17 was overcome with a multimagnet probe similar t o t h a t
developed for Monel 400 tubing (8). This eliminated t h e false d e f e c t signals at tube
supports and made these h e a t exchangers inspectable by conventional ET techniques.
It was fortunate these particular heat exchangers had nonmagnetic, Type 304
stainless steel, support plates. This permits t u b e saturation in t h e vicinity of
supports. If t h e supports had been magnetic they would have provided a low
reluctance alternative path t o t h e saturation field leaving t h e tube only partially
saturated. Nonmagnetic support materials improve inspectability of ferromagnetic
tubes even though fretting wear may be difficult t o d e t e c t with a conventional
bobbin-type probe as discussed in Section 8.2.4.
SUMMARY
Eddy current testing can b e used t o measure electrical resistivity and magnetic
permeability. This parameter, in some cases, c a n be correlated t o a material's
chemical composition, hardness, h e a t t r e a t m e n t , etc. and therefore provide a n
indirect measurement of material properties. Material sorting by electrical
resistivity can be done with general purpose eddy current instruments o r with special
instruments with m e t e r output calibrated in % IACS. C a r e must be taken t o obtain
reliable results. Material sorting by magnetic permeability is not simple. I t requires a
sound knowledge of magnetic properties and eddy current testing. Most of t h e
commercial equipment make use of hysteresis distortion and t h e method is empirical.
I t is more reliable t o use general purpose eddy c u r r e n t equipment t o roughly measure
magnetic permeability and then c o r r e l a t e t o material property.
Testing ferromagnetic materials for surface d e f e c t s is possible but often unreliable.
If material c a n be magnetically saturated, i t appears a s non-ferromagnetic material
t o t h e eddy currents. Testing at partial saturation results in good sensitivity t o
d e f e c t s and t o ferromagnetic anomaiies but can result in f a l s e indications. I t is
possible t o magnetically s a t u r a t e s o m e ferromagnetic t u b e alloys in unsupported t u b e
sections, but nearly impossible under ferromagnetic baffle plates.
SOLUTION: %IACS = 1 7 2 1 ~
PROBLEM: Pure annealed iron under a magnetizing force, H, of 40 A/m results
in a magnetic flux density, 8,of 0.028T. Determine magnetic
permeability and relative permeability.
SOLUTION:
ll = BIH - 0 . 0 2 8 1 4 0 = 7.0 x henrylm
-
NOTE: Tesla and ampere/metre a r e t h e preferred metric units for magnetic
flux density and magnetic field strength respectively but gauss and oersted
(nonmetric units) a r e still often used. To complete problem 9.6.2 in t h e gauss,
oersted system requires t h e following calculations:
" r =
p / 11, = 557/1.0 = 557 (dimensionless)
SOLUTION: PA - - Ur Pi
- 1.0 a t saturation
p~ -
- 177 -
-
CHAPTER 10 SUPPORTING INFORMATION
NOMENCLATURE
QUALITY UNIT
SYMBOL QUANTITY NAME SYMBOL
Cross-Sectional a r e a m e t r e2 In2
Radius metre m
Length metre rn
Thickness metre rn
Width metre rn
Diameter metre
Magnetic flux density weberlmetre 2 o r tesla In
Wb/m 2, T
Capacitance farad F
T e s t frequency hertz Hz
Optimum tube testing frequency hertz Hz
Characteristics o r Limit
frequency hertz Hz
Resonant frequency hertz Hz
Magnetic field intensity ampereslmetre or A/m
(Magnetizing force) lenze
Current ampere A
2
Current density amperestmetre ~/m*
Self Inductance henry H
Number of turns (Windings) dimensionless .
Characteristic P a r a m e t e r dimensionless -
Resistance ohm s-2
Resistive load ohm n
Electric potential volt v
Depth below t h e surf ace metre m
Inductive Reactance ohm 52
Capacitive R e a c t a n c e ohm n
Impedance ohm s-2
Standard Depth of Penetration metre rn
Permeability henrytmetre Htm
Resistivity microhm-centimetre p Recm
Conductivity siemenstmetre Slm
Magnetic flux weber Wb
Fill F a c t o r dimensionless -
Phase Lag radian rad
Angular frequency radianstsecond radls
Angle between Z & R degree 0
DEFINITIONS
This section lists t h e most common terms covered in t h e manual. For each term, t h e J
Alternating current
Bridge
- SeeSection4.2.1.
- Electrical circuit incorporating four impedance arms.
Calibration standard
- A t e s t standard used t o estimate defect size and set-up instrument.
Capacitive reactance
-
-
X ,, ohms; see Section 3.2.
The opposition t o changes in alternating voltage.
Characteristic parameter
- -r2uop ,dimensionless, see Section 5.6.
- It allows t e s t coil operating point t o be specified in terms of a single quantity
rather than four independent variables.
Characteristic or limit frequency
Coupling
- The coil's magnetic field couples t o the t e s t sample.
- The change in probe impedance is directly proportional t o probe-sample
coupling.
Current
- I, amperes, s e e Section 3.3.
- Flow of electrons.
Depth of penetration (standard)
Direct current
-
-
I DC ,amperes; see Section 3.3.
A current flow t h a t is constant in amplitude and direction with time.
Discontinuity
- A defect.
Eddy currents
- see Chapter 2 and Sections 5.2.2 and 7.2.3.
- A closed loop alternating current flow induced in a conductor by a varying
magnetic field.
Eddy c v r e n t method
- An electromagnetic NDT method based on t h e process of inducing electrical
currents into a conductive material and observing t h e interaction between t h e
currents and t h e material. In F r a n c e i t is known as t h e 'Foucault currents'
method.
Edge effect
- see Section 5.8.2.
- Signal obtained when a s u r f a c e probe approaches t h e sample's edge.
End effect
- see Section 5.8.2.
- Signal obtained when a n internal o r encircling probe approaches t h e end of a
tube or rod (similar to edge effect).
Encircling probe (Coil)
- see Section 7.2.
- Also referred t o as a feed-through coil.
- A probe which completely surrounds test tnaterial; c a n be absolute or
differential.
Fill-f actor
- 0 (eta), dimensionless; see Section 7.3.
- I t is a measure of coupling between t h e coil and t e s t object.
- Fraction of t h e test coil a r e a filled by t h e test specimen.
Flaw
- Adefect.
Foucault currents method
- In France t h e Eddy Current Method is known as t h e 'Foucault currents' method.
Hysteresis
- S e e Section 9.3.1.
- Magnetizationcurve.
I ACS
- International Annealed Copper Standard, see Section 9.2.
- a % IACS - Conductivity as a percentage of t h a t of pure copper.
IACS
Inductance
- L, henries, see Section 3.2.
- R a t i o of t h e total magnetic flux-linkage in a coil t o t h e current flowing through
t h e coil.
Lift-off
- L.O., mm, s e e Sections 5.5 and 5.8.4.
- Distance between t h e coil of a s u r f a c e probe and sample.
- I t is a measure of coupling between probe and sample.
Magnetic flux
Modulation analysis
- An instrumentation method which s e p a r a t e s desirable from undesirable
frequency signals from t h e modulating envelope of t h e carrier frequency signal.
- T e s t sample must move at constant speed.
Noise
- Any undesired signal t h a t obscures t h e signal of interest.
- I t might be electrical noise or a signal from specimen dimensional or property
variations.
Null balance
- see Section 4.2.1.
Ohm's law
- Electromotive f o r c e across a circuit is equal t o t h e current flowing through t h e
circuit multiplied by t h e t o t a l impedance of t h e circuit.
Operating point
- see Sections 3.5, 5.6 and 7.3.3.
- Point on t h e impedance diagram t h a t specifies t h e normalized inductive
r e a c t a n c e and resistance of a coil.
Oscillator
- The electronic unit in an eddy current instrument t h a t generates alternating
probe excitation current.
Parameter
- A material property or instrument variable.
Performance standard
- Also referred t o a s Reference Standard.
- A t e s t standard used t o qualify and calibrate a t e s t system for a particular test.
Permeability (Magnetic)
- (mu), henrylmetre; see Sections 2.4 and 9.3. or P , dimensionless, relative
magnetic permeability.
- Ratio between flux density, B, and magnetizing force, H. Permeability
describes the intrinsic willingness of a material t o conduct magnetic flux lines.
Phase lag
- B (beta), radians or degrees; see Section 2.4.
- A lag in phase (or time) between the sinusoidal currents flowing at t h e surface
and those below t h e surface.
- s e e Section 3.3.
- A vector describing sinusoidal signals; i t has both amplitude and phase.
Primary field
- The magnetic field surrounding t h e coil due t o t h e current flowing through it.
Probe
- Eddy current transducer.
Reference coil
- Coil which enables bridge balancing in absolute probes. Its impedance is close to
t e s t coil impedance but does not couple t o test material.
Resonance
- See Sections 4.3, 5.9 and 7.2.5.
- A circuit having an inductor and capacitor connected in series or parallel.
When inductive reactance equals capacitive reactance t h e circuit is tuned or in
resonance.
Resistance
- R, ohms, see Section 3.2.
- The opposition t o t h e flow of electrical current.
- Applies to DC and AC.
Resistivity
- p ,microhm-centimetre; see Sections 2.4 and 9.2.
- Reciprocal of conductivity (p -1 )"a ) .
Saturation (Magnetic)
- A condition where incremental magnetic permeability of a ferromagnetic
material becomes 1.O.
Secondary field
- The magnetic field produced by induced eddy currents.
Signal-t~noiseratio
- Ratio between defect signal amplitude and t h a t from non-relevant indications.
Minimum acceptable ratio is 3: 1.
Skin depth
- See depth of penetration.
Skin effect
- S e e Section 2.4.
- A phenomenon where induced eddy currents a r e restricted t o t h e surface of a
test sample. Increasing test frequency reduces penetration.
Suface probe
- S e e Chapters 5 and 6.
- A probe for testing surfaces, which has a finite coverage. The coil is usually
pancake in shape.
Test coil
- Coil coupled t o test material. I t senses geometrid, electric and magnetic
changes in test material.
Voltage
- V, volts, s e e Section 3.3.
- Electric potential or driving f o r c e for current.
- Output signal from a n eddy current instrument.
Voltmeter
- The instrument used t o measure voltage.
Terminology Abbreviation
Leak testing LT
Magnetic particle testing MT
Penetrant testing PT
Radiographic testing RT
Ultrasonic testing UT
Visual testing VT
References: